UA versus AA
Yet another 9/11 curiosity is how flights 11 and 77, both American Airlines flights, were not listed in the BTS database following 9/11, whereas flight 175 and 93, both United Airlines flights, were listed.
There has been a lot of speculation about what this means, with Gerard Holmgren and others saying that flight 11 and flight 77 didn't exist. I tend to think that these were real flights that loaded passengers, but that the flights never took off. The planes probably taxied to some remote part of the airport, the passengers loaded onto another plane or vehicle, and then were taken away and killed. The reason the flights didn't show up in the BTS database is because they never took off.
A related point is that for the three flights that officially hit targets: 11, 175 and 77, there was a LOT of initial confusion over what flight was what and what flight hit where. But for flight 93, which was also hijacked and "lost", there was NEVER any doubt about where it was and what it was doing (officially). The oddest aspect of this was that flight 175 wasn't officially recognized as being lost until 12 noon on 9/11-- three hours AFTER it supposedly hit the WTC. How could UNITED be so confused over where their own plane went and what plane was missing? Most likely flight 175 took off with its passengers, and then was diverted somehow to a place were it landed in secret and the passengers also takne away for disposal. A similar thing most likely happened to flight 93.
In any case, the four official plane crashes on 9/11 most likely were either total fakes (flights 77 and 93), or involved other aircraft than the official story (flights 11 and 175). Here, it is one of each for both airlines.
Flight 11, of course, is the twin flight, and I think it likely that one or both of the flight 11's that took off actually played the role of pretending to be hijacked.
Another possibility is that the four flights were part of a terror drill or part of the live-fly-hijacking drill that was being run on 9/11. As I have discussed before, this makes some sense for flight 93, for a number of reasons.
There has been a lot of speculation about what this means, with Gerard Holmgren and others saying that flight 11 and flight 77 didn't exist. I tend to think that these were real flights that loaded passengers, but that the flights never took off. The planes probably taxied to some remote part of the airport, the passengers loaded onto another plane or vehicle, and then were taken away and killed. The reason the flights didn't show up in the BTS database is because they never took off.
A related point is that for the three flights that officially hit targets: 11, 175 and 77, there was a LOT of initial confusion over what flight was what and what flight hit where. But for flight 93, which was also hijacked and "lost", there was NEVER any doubt about where it was and what it was doing (officially). The oddest aspect of this was that flight 175 wasn't officially recognized as being lost until 12 noon on 9/11-- three hours AFTER it supposedly hit the WTC. How could UNITED be so confused over where their own plane went and what plane was missing? Most likely flight 175 took off with its passengers, and then was diverted somehow to a place were it landed in secret and the passengers also takne away for disposal. A similar thing most likely happened to flight 93.
In any case, the four official plane crashes on 9/11 most likely were either total fakes (flights 77 and 93), or involved other aircraft than the official story (flights 11 and 175). Here, it is one of each for both airlines.
Flight 11, of course, is the twin flight, and I think it likely that one or both of the flight 11's that took off actually played the role of pretending to be hijacked.
Another possibility is that the four flights were part of a terror drill or part of the live-fly-hijacking drill that was being run on 9/11. As I have discussed before, this makes some sense for flight 93, for a number of reasons.
posted by spooked at 10:00 PM
3 Comments:
I've been involved with anticapitalism, antiwar, and the civil rights, since probably before you were born. I don't buy your theory.
I think rulers simply on their interests, not needing such a complex conspiracy.
If 9/11 was to instill a spirit of militarism, numbers show failure.
Regards.
Thought I'd mention something from my video tape from 9/11.
About 3 hours after the attack the BBC finally get an official statement from UNITED AIRLINES & AMERICAN AIRLINES, it's a kind of declaration of what planes they had lost. Anyway, their original statements said FLIGHT 77 hit the WTC and that FLIGHT 175 was STILL MISSING !!! - this is a good few hours after 'planes' hit the WTC.
Those companies would have known immediately what was missing IMO so why give out a false statement.
Renegade Eye-- I think you haven't studied 9/11 enough nor the nature of synthetic terrorism. You may not buy it, but that doesn't mean you know all the facts.
Ally-- thanks for that info. I can only figure that they were making it up as they went along, they weren't sure what to say about the flight.
Post a Comment
<< Home