A More In-Depth Plane Path Analysis
Apropos of this post, I performed a more careful analysis of the plane paths for video 1 and video 2-- calculating angles carefully using the towers as a guide. The beauty of this sort of analysis is the towers serve as perfect guide markers, with their square shapes and defined alignment.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c7a3/5c7a300ed0d40ab5423d92a1e1cac37928261f36" alt=""
(double click to enlarge image)
The bottom line for me, is that when the camera angles are precisely positioned, the plane paths are still different-- both in terms of overall descent and in terms of angle of approach. The angle of approach difference is not huge, about 10-15 degrees, but if you have a model of a Boeing 767 and look at it head-on, a 10 degree angle difference makes a huge change in the appearance of the profile.
So I am still convinced. Unfortunately though, I doubt I will be able to convince someone who believes in the official plane fairy tale.
Importantly though, I think science is on the side of there being no plane.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c7a3/5c7a300ed0d40ab5423d92a1e1cac37928261f36" alt=""
(double click to enlarge image)
The bottom line for me, is that when the camera angles are precisely positioned, the plane paths are still different-- both in terms of overall descent and in terms of angle of approach. The angle of approach difference is not huge, about 10-15 degrees, but if you have a model of a Boeing 767 and look at it head-on, a 10 degree angle difference makes a huge change in the appearance of the profile.
So I am still convinced. Unfortunately though, I doubt I will be able to convince someone who believes in the official plane fairy tale.
Importantly though, I think science is on the side of there being no plane.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home