More Fake 9/11 Imagery?
The flight 93 mushroom cloud.
Possibilities:
1) it is a real photo, but of something else, such as perhaps a missile that took out one engine of the plane (or more of the plane that we've never seen)
2) it is a photoshop job meant to inspire conspiracy theories
3) it is a photoshop job done to profit off the tragedy
4) it is a photoshop job meant to reflect what Val McClatchey saw but missed originally with her camera
#1 and #3 are obviously the most benign from the POV of Val McClatchey-- but these also point to a deep problem with the official flight 93 story.
Possibilities:
1) it is a real photo, but of something else, such as perhaps a missile that took out one engine of the plane (or more of the plane that we've never seen)
2) it is a photoshop job meant to inspire conspiracy theories
3) it is a photoshop job done to profit off the tragedy
4) it is a photoshop job meant to reflect what Val McClatchey saw but missed originally with her camera
#1 and #3 are obviously the most benign from the POV of Val McClatchey-- but these also point to a deep problem with the official flight 93 story.
posted by spooked at 7:38 AM
3 Comments:
: )
Killtown's article says, "Remember that Val supposedly took this shot just seconds after the crash and the plume in her photo is seen going straight up in the air, apparently NOT affected by any wind."
I would say the plume in her photo is seen going straight up OR STRAIGHT DOWN.
Downwardly-forming smoke is a documented S11 phenomenon: it appears in the Naudet 1st Hit video.
I mean the tall skinny stalk of the stalked tan-gray mushroom cloud that comes out the north (impact) side of Tower 1. That stalk forms downwardly (and cyclonically, rotatingly) out of the initial 1st Hit cloud mass. The initial 1st Hit cloud mass then becomes the mushroom cap.
The stalk apparently formed all the way down to the ground, and the whole tall-skinny-mushroom arrangement apparently kept a very coherent shape for at least several blocks of drifting away:
http://thewebfairy.com/911/bombs/0507.jpg
A fairly well known (among S11 researchers) screenshot from the Naudet 1st Hit impact vid, was captioned incorrectly by Webfairy to say the stalk rose from ground level between the towers:
http://thewebfairy.com/911/bombs/perfidity.firsthit.jpeg
Webfairy herself now agrees with me that the stalk formed downwardly, not upwardly. It is clear when you slow down the video enough. It's not obvious at first because the camera was zooming in and out and the downwardness of the stalk formation is mostly cut off at the bottom of the screen. But enough of the downward-forming action is present to be quite clear when you slow it down enough.
Also the 1st Hit stalked tan-gray mushroom cloud had a yellow top at first (discovered by Webfairy) -- and, a black-orange fireball (discovered by me) came out the SOUTH side of Tower 1, just visible in the skinny space BETWEEN the Towers.
http://thewebfairy.com/911/halloween/halloween.htm
The 2nd Hit impact side also exhibited a tan-gray mushroom cloud with a downward-forming stalk.
http://www.photos-september11.co.uk/optimized%20pics/photo4.jpg
BOTH WTC Hits show a tan-gray mushroom cloud with a downwardly-forming stalk out the impact side AND a black-orange fireball out the opposite side.
Ray Ubinger
So, like hey man, if the oicture is a fake than was there a plane or wasn;t there a plane. If the picture is not a fake, was there a plane or not?
Like even if the picture is a fake, does it mean anything besides the picture is a fake?
I mean I'm just asking questions.
Post a Comment
<< Home