“Hand Waving” the Physics of 9/11
This is EXCELLENT.
This part is very important:
This part is very important:
However, Dr. Garcia grossly overrates Occam’s Razor in the matter of what experience actually shows. In my 40 years of doing experimental physics I found that the phenomena I studied in the greatest depth usually turned out to be vastly more complex than my initial hypotheses anticipated. Indeed, the one time I can remember actually using Occam’s Razor to justify a hypothesis in a published paper, I lived to see it disproved 19 years later by a research group in Palermo, Italy.
Score: Physics 1, William of Occam 0.
What I love about doing physics of the material world is that the correct explanation of each and every physical phenomenon eventually emerges, even if it takes many years. Physicists worldwide read each other’s work, gather more and more evidence, and commonly falsify one another’s earlier hypotheses in the process of getting to the core truth.
But leaving behind the physical world for the world human conniving, all bets are off.
Human conspirators may well choose to deliberately violate Occam’s Razor simply to throw off forensic investigators sophisticated enough to be aware of the concept.
2 Comments:
chuckboldwyn Says:
Chuck Boldwyn, Retired Physics & Chemistry Instructor has very extensively researched the Twin Tower Collapses and discovered:
The following is the Equation that proves that the 911 Twin Towers could not possibly have collapsed due to exploding plane crashes and extremely widespread and intense fires.
CL(95) = 20*LL(95)
= 20*[5*DL(95)]
= 100*DL(95)
= 100*(95/15)DL(15)
=100*6.33*DL(15)
=633*DL(15)
= 633 Force Units of upward support
where,
CL = Collapse Load for 100% & Total Collapse
LL = Live Load = Occupied & Furnished Weight
DL = Dead Load = Unoccupied, Unfurnished
110 = 110 Floor Steel WTC
95 = 95 Floor Steel Block (Lower Block)
15 = 15 Floor Steel Block (Top Block)
20 = Collapse Load Factor of John Skilling
5 = Live Load Factor of Ronald Hamburger
of NIST
Therefore, it required the Force of Weight of 633 15-Floor-Blocks pressing down on one 95-Floor-Steel-Block before the possibility of total collapse could possibly occur.
I am using the NIST and Mass Medias own published and or announced at 911 tour presentations data to make this scientific proof that one 15-Floor-Block could not, even in one’s wildest dreams totally collapse the 95-Floor-Steel-Block below.
The same application of this data will show that the other Twin Tower could not possibly collapse.
I have prepared a MS Word document with photos, data tables, graphs and other evidence aplenty to conclusively prove my assertions. If you are interested in receiving it for your own evaluation and can help me distribute it to the world, please email me at
cboldwyn@bellsouth.net
and I will send you a copy at your email address.
I am also building a scale model of the WTC Twin Tower, using Ramagon connector beams and connector balls (26 holes.
The 95-Floor model has a Core with trussed outer walls and trussed floors connected. The model weighs only 3 pounds.
I am predicting it will Collapse-Load to failure between 200 and 1000 times its own weight of force. I will top load it
using 25 to 50 pound barbell plated to total failure. I will take photos and video of this project and publish it on youtube,
eventually and have a lot more to say about the impossibility of total collapse from a mere 15 floor block.
I am in possession of the most critical information that all of the 911 researchers have been longing and praying for some
Physicist to uncover. The wait for conclusive proof is over. Just request my paper to sent to you via your email address….
Chuck Boldwyn
cboldwyn@bellsouth.net
Retired Physics & Chemistry Instructor
Make sure that the top falls 10-12 feet before hitting the bottom in that model.
Post a Comment
<< Home