The NIST Simulation of a 767 Disintegrating
How many things can we find wrong with these sequences?
(click to enlarge)
It's not unlike NIST is depicting the South tower as a giant cheese grater, and the plane as a large piece of cheese. But why is the cheese slicing through the grater at the same time?
I like the way they have the plane going all the way in at the same time the debris field has not even gone the length of the plane. This suggests there was very rapid deceleration of the debris/shredded cheese once it went in the building. Odd how the part of the plane outside the building never showed any deceleration-- in the videos, anyway.
Also odd-- how much destruction there was in the first 100 feet inside the building, but how little debris deflected back out the entrance hole. All we see is gray powder and then a fireball coming out the entry hole.
Gray powder?
(click to enlarge)
It's not unlike NIST is depicting the South tower as a giant cheese grater, and the plane as a large piece of cheese. But why is the cheese slicing through the grater at the same time?
I like the way they have the plane going all the way in at the same time the debris field has not even gone the length of the plane. This suggests there was very rapid deceleration of the debris/shredded cheese once it went in the building. Odd how the part of the plane outside the building never showed any deceleration-- in the videos, anyway.
Also odd-- how much destruction there was in the first 100 feet inside the building, but how little debris deflected back out the entrance hole. All we see is gray powder and then a fireball coming out the entry hole.
Gray powder?
posted by spooked at 4:34 PM
22 Comments:
excellent post!
official nist diagram 7-33b & 7-34b show the front half of a 767 already inside the wtc AS IF BY MAGIC!
since it is OFFICIALLY depicted as having defeated the wtc, IN WHAT MANNER did it do so?
did it:
A) cut thru like a blade?
B) bludgeon thru like hammer?
in reality the entire front aluminum fuselage (with a lightweight smooth rounded plastic nosecone of a REAL 767 would squash up against the massive steel/concrete wtc like the flying beercan that it really is.
official nist diagram 7-33c & 7-34c look like some kind of a rorschach test:
"what do you see?"
"duh, you're a fucktard."
Scientists and engineers (the people you refuse to talk to) at Perdue University ran their own simulation independently of NIST and confirmed their findings.
http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/2006/060911.Sozen.WTC.html
Do you guys every wonder why it id that no scientists will agree with you?
hmmm. it would seem that your swort_of_scientists have neglected to explain exactly in what manner the smooth rounded lightweight hollow plastic nosecone of the equally lightweight aluminum fuselage of a REAL 767 could penetrate the massive steel box columns and steel reinforced concrete horizontal floors of a wtc...
i don't really care if they agree with me or not. i want them to explain. why do they not?
because they cannot.
They don't have to.
It's up to you to explain why the nosecone shouldn't have penetrated the WTC.
BTW, are you the same anonymous who refuses to prove his claims about the burned cars at the WTC every time I ask for proof?
i've explained many times why the nosecone of a real 767 could not defeat a wtc - because it is lightweight hollow and plastic.
you say that it can? then you need to explain in what manner that it can.
prove the claims about the burnt cars all around the wtc?
their very existence is proof.
how many times must a link to photos of them be posted before you acknowledge their existence?
No, actually, you've explained jack shit.
We live in a world where tornados drive wooden tree branches through steel tire rims, but you think than an airplane made of metal and flying at 500 miles an hour can't penetrate an office tower.
All you've proven is that you know NOTHING about physics.
As for the cars, you need to prove that they were too far from the WTC to be affected by flying, burning debris. And then you need to prove that there are no other explanations for the burning of said cars but your space jews flying captured saucers from area 51.
The fact is, 9-11 would have been a golden opportunity for nutjob pyromaniacs in NYC, with every cop and firefighter in the city swarming around the WTC, a psycho firebug could have run around lighting all kinds of fires without fear of getting caught.
While you're desperately clutching at straws, here's a series of films of non-nuclear explosions:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcmmLvAYqkI
You idiots who think that nukes destroyed the WTC are the dumbest futhermuckers on the planet.
9/11 was not a tornado.
the front of a real 767 is an aluminum tube with a plastic nose and a wtc is not simply an office tower.
gravity did not burn those cars nor did a pretend airplane destroy a wtc.
no one who reads this blog has yet believed that you have any idea what you are talking about except me who realizes that you actually do and are simply playing a game.
just beat it swort_of _moron.
Tornadoes have windspeeds of 110 to almost 300 miles per hour. The hijacked airplanes on 9-11 had speeds at impact of almost FIVE HUNDRED miles per hour.
THOUSANDS of eyewitnesses saw the airplanes, you syphilitic whore.
The US can produce micronukes.
SOT probably hasn't even bother to read the evidence for why the WTC destruction involved nuclear energy.
"bothered" to read, that is.
Not that shills can be convinced of anything, anyway.
The explosion video was cool, though I don't think it really helps the official story.
Spook, you fat bloated idiot.
The article you linked to says that they are building these micro-nukes inside computer simulations.
You couldn't be more @#$%ing retarded if you tried.
just shut up sword you moron.
Who are you to call me a moron?
You are so dumb, that if some loser who sits on his fat ass all day playing video games and reading nazi websites told you that what tens of thousands of people saw with thier own eyes isn't real because it doesn't look like his video game screenshots, you'd believe him.
You are just that mind-numbingly stupid.
The Reno Sword Bukkake Pincher shill posse is at it again. They're horribly outnumbered and increasingly irrelevant. It's amusing to watch them pissing into the wind.
Just think, in six months they'll be lucky to get let out into the yard and have jobs in the prison laundry.
Treason is not easily forgotten, and all the IP addresses are logged.
Better get a foreign passport, because you're not going to be travelling on a US Passport anytime soon.
The article you linked to says that they are building these micro-nukes inside computer simulations.
Not so. The scientist said they made actual micro-nukes and tested what happened with super-computers.
The fact is, the US was making "millinukes" in the 60s. It is absurd to think we haven't made them even smaller since then.
By the way, if they were only doing computer simulations of nukes, it makes little sense for them to do it on a micro scale if such bombs didn't really exist.
Sword, Pinch, ScrewLooseChange, Conspiracy Smasher HAVE to work for the same people...dang varmints!
www.nucleardemolition.com
www.falseflagnews.com
www.team8plus.org
www.newamericancentury.org/
faster. funnier.
Please, Spooky.
More. I want more.
Crazier. Wackier. I want to read that Condi is Chimpy's alien love child.
That isn't beyond your web page.
is it?
condi is chimpy's alien love child!
"""THOUSANDS of eyewitnesses saw the airplanes, you syphilitic whore."""
ya? produce one.
""wooden branches thru steel tire rims""
as if!
bird vs. plane!
plane vs. bird!
""As for the cars, you need to prove that they were too far from the WTC to be affected by flying, burning debris.""
what flying burning debris?
we are way past this you swort_of_moron!
and if you think that you know something about physics then you are welcome to actually say something about physics...
Wow, there is a great deal of effective material above!
Post a Comment
<< Home