Heavy Spraying of Water
Keep in mind, when you think about the incredible heat that remained at Ground Zero for months, that this heat remained after incredible amounts of water were sprayed on the pile (for instance 3 million gallons between 9/11/01 and 9/21/01, plus an additional 1 million gallons of rainwater).
Need I point out that a low-level nuclear chain reaction would not be extinguished by water, while normal fires would?
Need I point out that a low-level nuclear chain reaction would not be extinguished by water, while normal fires would?
posted by spooked at 11:27 AM
7 Comments:
a low-level nuclear chain reaction would not be extinguished by water, (for instance 3 million gallons between 9/11/01 and 9/21/01, plus an additional 1 million gallons of rainwater), while normal fires would.
a good point and thank you for making it.
4 million gallons of water won't put out a low-level nuclear reaction.
And that low level nuclear reaction does not emit any radiation.
Ya. right.
Pray tell, Spooky, what are the characteristics of a fission-based low level nuclear reaction based on "micro-nukes"?
Since you seem to know so much about this as-yet no-yet invented technology (or not-yet public, but the same thing) please tell us how THAT would react to 4 million gallons of water.
fingers drumming on the table.....
drum
drum
drum
Well??? How would 4 million gallons of water affect a low-level micro-nuke no-radiation-producing magical pile of fission material?
7:59am--Glad you're so interested in this question, but I'm afraid your question isn't very clear.
4 million gallons wouldn't be concentrated on one device, and I don't know how the device was constructed either. I am only seeking explanations here, and I don't pretend to know what exactly happened.
The low-level nuclear chain reaction IS however, a good explanation for the extreme lingering heat at Ground Zero, for the molten metal, and for the persistance of the heat despite extensive spraying of water.
Does this help? If not, what exactly did you want to know?
Also, we've gone over the radiation issue here before. As well as the idea that the devices could have been fusin. In either case, it is possible to make nuclear devices that emit little radiation.
Finally, there is nothing magical about a nuclear weapon-- it is one of the more well-developed advanced weapons systems we have, and there is no question that the technology has advanced considerably in the past 60 years. There is EVERY reason to think micro-nukes exist, probably even nano-nukes.
3:13, water was used to COVER-UP the use of nukes...it's used for nuclear/radioactive decontamination...and it was caught on VIDEO!! there's MANY videos and photos of the WTC Cleanup, they're spraying water like crazy, and not just on the WTC debris/rubble...on the RECOVERY WORKERS...!!
8:14 Great post.
Could you please post any URL that has the perps spraying water on the recovery workers.
Thanks.
Anonymous Physicist
Post a Comment
<< Home