Cutting Through Some of the Crap in the "War on Terror"?

I think Barack Obama's general views on 9/11 and terror are as flawed as any major politician out there, however, it is interesting to see how Obama has struck some sort of nerve with the Democrats by actually daring to propose that the US attack terrorists in Pakistan-- if Pakistan won't take them out. And this is precisely the thing that Bush HASN'T done, despite all his official toughness on terrorism.

Now I suppose the mainstream fear is that since Pakistan has nuclear weapons, we don't dare to violate their national sovereignty-- even to go after "bad guys". On the other hand, officially, if Pakistan won't go after these "bad guys", doesn't this create a huge safe haven for our (official) enemies?

There's something really obscene about the whole comfy deal the US has with Pakistan-- especially considering the close link between the Pakistani secret service (ISI) and al-CIA-duh (Al Qaeda) that has existed for many years, and is a key aspect of the official 9/11 story being wrong. We give Pakistan lots of money and arms-- and they pretend to hunt al-CIA-duh for us. Meanwhile, al-CIA-duh is allowed to proliferate nearly unchecked-- probably preparing for the next false-flag psy-op.

This seems to be the system that both political parties are supporting, and the system that Obama apparently doesn't realize.