Humint Events Online: "9/11 FAQ"

Friday, January 25, 2008

"9/11 FAQ"

15 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://youtube.com/watch?v=XaBEKczqgC4

We're right!
YEAH!
We're free!
YEAH!
We'll fight!
YEAH!
You'll see!

5:46 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"The objective physical universe is a mental construct of limited usefulness. Reality itself has the structure of a dream -- and the Dreamer has depths that we cannot imagine. "You" and "I" are like two fingertips that don't know there's a body -- and that "body" is probably the fingertip of an even larger body, and so on..."

Yeah, that sounds like a Troofer. You really pick 'em, Spooky!

9:47 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Whatever sword of "truth"!
The official fairytale is exposed:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljegR44iRWY

12:30 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Right, because tens of thousands of eyewitnesses can't possibly beat a grainy postage stamp sized youtube video made by someone with no training or experience in image analysis.

Dream on, islamo-fascist shill.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=XaBEKczqgC4

We're right!
YEAH!
We're free!
YEAH!
We'll fight!
YEAH!
You'll see!

4:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"tens of thousands of eyewitnesses?"

Yeah right!
Hey, produce even one!

9:07 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Weee! Hey the official fairytale is exposed.
The planes were faked!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljegR44iRWY

11:06 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey wait a minute....I cannot dispute this refutation of the official govt/media 9/11 fairytale....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljegR44iRWY

What am I supposed to do now?

1:12 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah right!
Hey, produce even one!


Stanley Praimnath.

2:29 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Stanley Prainmath is supposed to be a legitimate eyewitness of the alleged UA175?
Ha ha! His office desk is supposedly more robust than a real aluminum 767 (with a plastic nosecone)?...as if!
Sword of "truth" you are truly grasping at straws at this point.
Idiot!

2:52 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Argument from incredulity.

That you refuse to believe it is not evidence in any way shape or form. But it does tell me how you will treat any other eyewitness reports of the 1st or 2nd impacts. And what a waste of time it will be to tell you about them.

The attacks of September 11th 2001 were the most witnessed and documented events in human history. All these people who saw what they saw and recorded thier observations have given rise to an account of the events that is unassailable and unquestioned by all but a very tiny handful of people who are variably mentally ill or just plain evil.

Deal with it, you jihadist shill.

4:48 AM  
Blogger spooked said...

No one here is a jihadist shill, you twit.

Argument from incredulity doesn't begin to explain away the impossibility of Prainmath's account.

As far as the other "witnesses", assuming you're just deluded and not a shill, the witnesses do not give a monolithic account and do not even consistently support the official story.

9:11 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

it does tell me how you will treat any other eyewitness reports of the 1st or 2nd impacts. And what a waste of time it will be to tell you about them.

Whatever you say sword of *truth*!
As Spooked has just said, the witnesses do not even consistently support the official story.

tens of thousands of eyewitnesses and all you can come up with is Stanley Prainmath?
Sure thing sword of *truth*!

Deal with it, you moronic shill.

9:56 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

No one here is a jihadist shill, you twit.

You, AP and your entire single digit fan club are all just shills for Osama.

Argument from incredulity doesn't begin to explain away the impossibility of Prainmath's account.

This is, ironically, another argument from incredulity.

As far as the other "witnesses", assuming you're just deluded and not a shill, the witnesses do not give a monolithic account and do not even consistently support the official story.

No one has questioned this account except for the mentally ill or immoral.

The rock solidness of the EBV (Evidence Based Version) over the AQP (Al-Queada Propaganda) is self-evident.

6:59 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

rock solidness of the EBV (Evidence Based Version)

Meaning the official fairytale version?
Evidence would have been nice.

Too funny, sword of comedy!

8:14 PM  
Blogger spooked said...

The only one's who are being propagandists for Osama and jihadist are in fact supporters of the official story!

How do people like us-- who say that al Qaeda is bogus and had little if anything to do with 9/11and that US elites carried off 9/11--help the al Qaeda cause?

Does al Qaeda-- to the extent that they even exist-- REALLY want people to think that they had nothing to do with 9/11?

YOU, Sword of Comedy, are the one giving al Qaeda and jihadists and Osama all the validation and making them so powerful.

10:32 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger