A Simple Awesome Proof of Video Fakery
Actually, if you look carefully, you can see the cutter charges coming out of the facade after the "plane" goes in. I never really saw this before, but it's quite obvious in the Hezarkhani shot-- the sharp, bright explosions coming out where the plane went in.
UPDATE: This fakery is very clear too--
I think I know why they did the fakery for the Detroit Public TV clip-- they actually had the WTC on the very left edge of the screen, and wanted to hide how much they were aiming the camera to the right-- away from the WTC-- so they created in footage to the left of the WTC to make their original focus less obvious.
I don't think that they did a smoke trick for the second clip-- at least it wasn't so blatant or cheaply done.
UPDATE 2: The Empire State Bldg/Detroit Public TV video with the fake smoke is of unknown origin and appears to be a hoax.
posted by spooked at 8:55 PM
11 Comments:
According to the US Geological Survey samples from lower-Manhattan, there was a nuclear fission fallout of hundreds of tons, mostly Strontium and Barium. How can this be explained by micronukes or thermonuclear mininukes?
Show us where the USGS said there was "hundreds of tons" of radioactive Strontium and Barium found.
""they actually had the WTC on the very left edge of the screen, and wanted to hide how much they were aiming the camera to the right-- away from the WTC-- so they created in footage to the left of the WTC to make their original focus less obvious.""
that makes sense and i bet you are correct.
The spectrum and percentages of cancer are massive. There are at least 4 classifications of blood-cell cancers: leukemia, lymphoma, Hodgkin's and myeloma. There are many more classifications of soft tissue cancers. There is brain cancer. There is breast cancer. For most of these there are subclassifications of many different types of specific cancer in each, so far not publicly disclosed. There are huge percentages of respiratory distress and loss of function. Multiple reports of 'irregular cycles' (miscarriages?). Most likely there will be several more types of cancer to follow. In particular, responders should be checked for thyroid cancer and function. There has been no noting of birth defects which also needs to be done. There is one thing and only one thing that can cause all these cancers and problems -- RADIATION.
http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/06/09/25/ward.htm
William Tahil has estimated the total masses of Zinc, Strontium, Barium, etc., based on USGS data, in his 178-page analysis:
http://nucleardemolition.com/GZero_Report.pdf
That's a 178 page report.
Please state the exact quote and page where he writes, "there was a nuclear fission fallout of hundreds of tons, mostly Strontium and Barium [from you above]."
Thank you.
The "smoke and mirrors" is a hoax video made by Pollen B. The actual 9/11 video does not have the cloned smoke.
12:10 PM, see, e.g., the subheading "Quantity of Fallout" on pp. 144, 145.
The "smoke and mirrors" is a hoax video made by Pollen B. The actual 9/11 video does not have the cloned smoke.
the "actual 9/11 video"?
sure thing ace.
that was a clip pulled from what was shown on detroit public TV.
do you really have the gall to suggest what is a 9/11 hoax?
how about your blog that states:
"""Dr. Wood has made known the truckloads of dirt and landfill that were brought IN to ground zero, beginning right away. Other than attempting to smother an ongoing process of molecular dissociation, no explanation has been offered for this occurrence."""
that is as big of a hoax as any.
"cold molecular dissociation"...as if!
you should just stick to writing songs.
Pteranodon:
Thanks.
Are you BTW, Tahil? I ask because your question seems to be asking: how can the nuke(s) used on 9/11 be micro-nukes instead of the massive nuclear reactor that Tahil, alone, surmises was used.
But your first statement on top is erroneous:
"According to the US Geological Survey samples from lower-Manhattan, there was a nuclear fission fallout of hundreds of tons, mostly Strontium and Barium. How can this be explained by micronukes or thermonuclear mininukes?"
That was not a finding, but a conclusion, and not from the USGS, but from Tahil. Furthermore, after reading the pages you highlighted and then the whole book (which I have always recommended for completeness), I have to say there are serious errors in Tahil's calculations, and there are several orders of magnitude less Strontium and Barium—and therefore Uranium, than Tahil surmised. Also the USGS did not differentiate differing isotopes of a given element, such as Strontium, where Tahil sometimes assumes St90 when that can’t be assumed from USGS data. St and Ba are NOT rare, as I can demonstrate, and could well have come from sources inside of the WTC buildings, or the outside. But in Tahil’s defense, his strongest point is the close correlation of St and Ba on page 26.
Anonymous Physicist
Anonymous Physicist, thanks a lot for your answer! I'm not Tahil. My first comment was erraneous. English is not my mother tongue. Not USGS finding, but Tahil's conclusion.
Post a Comment
<< Home