Bush Crony Capitalism Reaches Its Apogee
Somehow it just seems so fitting that seven years of Bushco rule would come to this:
I guess I've long ago given up any hope that there would be some real outrage in this country about anything Bush the admin does. So what else can you do anymore but laugh?
Bush administration officials knew that a Texas oil company with close ties to President Bush was planning to sign an oil deal with the regional Kurdistan government that ran counter to American policy and undercut Iraq’s central government, a Congressional committee has concluded.Thee really is no pretense anymore about the Iraq invasion, is there? Does the Bush administration even care how this looks to the Iraqis?
The conclusions were based on e-mail messages and other documents that the committee released Wednesday.
United States policy is to warn companies that they incur risks in signing contracts until Iraq passes an oil law and to strengthen Iraq’s central government. The Kurdistan deal, by ceding responsibility for writing contracts directly to a regional government, infuriated Iraqi officials. But State Department officials did nothing to discourage the deal and in some cases appeared to welcome it, the documents show.
The company, Hunt Oil of Dallas, signed the deal with Kurdistan’s semiautonomous government last September. Its chief executive, Ray L. Hunt, a close political ally of President Bush, briefed an advisory board to Mr. Bush on his contacts with Kurdish officials before the deal was signed.
I guess I've long ago given up any hope that there would be some real outrage in this country about anything Bush the admin does. So what else can you do anymore but laugh?
posted by spooked at 8:18 AM
28 Comments:
re: Did Two Nuclear Reactors, not Nuclear Bombs, Destroy the WTC on 9/11?
i wonder; how would a nuclear reactor located beneath the tower destroy the tower in the manner evidenced on the videos?
it would have to explode would it not? that would, in a sense, make the reactor a bomb, would it not?
ok so this reactor (and the finn expert's sole underground bomb) is beneath the tower - so when it explodes would it not begin it's destruction of the tower at the bottom of the tower?
if so, then that flies in the face of what we see in the vids - that each tower totally disintegrates from top to bottom in a seemingly regulated manner, as if smaller bombs were strategically placed and strategically detonated.
if there really were a nuclear reactor beneath each tower then that hypothesis could be used by the elite PTBs to explain away the resulting china syndrome:
"oh we didn't blow up the towers on purpose, it was the nuclear reactors underneath - damn terrorists!"
h.
"I welcome feedback and genuine criticism from Tahil on this review, or of my own nuclear-911 hypotheses, and also the same from any non-intel agent."
How would you know if someone is an
"intel agent"?
said the intel agent, ha ha.
classic side-track!
Is there some particular reason why you won't give us the benefit of an answer to the question of how you would know if someone is an "intel agent"?
You act as though you have such an ability, so why would you want to keep it a secret? After all, most people, particularly those interested in conspiracies (JFK, 911 etc.) would
probably find it very helpful and useful to have the ability to know if a stranger posting on a forum is an "intel agent".
Why would you want to be so selfish? Particularly, considering all of the harm you claim to have suffered at the hands of the CIA.
Wouldn't it be more helpful and humane to let other people be able to know when the safe thing to do is step back from posting things that might cause an "intel agent" to break into their home, ransack it, and poison them with mercury?
The person who posts under the username "anonymous physicist" is, in my opinion, an IMPOSTER.
She or he claims they were poisoned by the CIA because they spoke up and said that the driver of JFK's limo is who killed JFK.
The same "a.p." has never answered questions about the alleged poisoning, indeed, even though s/he
was asked when it occurred.
"a.p." has said that a number of eyewitnesses to the JFK assassination went on record stating that they saw the driver shoot JFK.
This raises several questions which go to the issue whether or not "a.p." is an IMPOSTER.
Why have NONE of those (alleged) actual eyewitnesses been poisoned, even after 45 years?
Doesn't common sense suggest that
NOW, in light of "a.p." claims that his life has been severely handicapped as the result of being poisoned by the CIA - wouldn't common sense suggest that if they were going to do further harm to her or him, they WOULD have by now?
WE don't know who "a.p." is but you can be sure that if it were true that CIA harmed her/him, THEY certainly do know where a.p. is.
After all, s/he says that s/he has been making these charges for the past x number of years and surely,
since s/he is the only person known
to have claimed the CIA poisoned her for speaking out (remember, NOT one of the persons who made those claims publicly, using their real name have ever been harmed in any way as the result of what they said on the record) - why would an honest person STILL try to hide their identity?
Doesn't common sense tell you that
if a.p.'s claims are true, then he would WANT everyone to know who s/he is. That way, if anything else WERE to happen to a.p., the entire world would have been warned to suspect the harm came from CIA.
45 years ago, some people publicly made the charge that the limo driver killed JFK. None of those people have been harmed for saying what they believe happened.
40 years later, an anonymous poster on this blog claims that S/HE was poisoned for having made those same claims. It might be more like 45 years later since one of the many questions that a.p. has failed to answer is WHEN s/he claims CIA poisoned her.
"a.p." is not on the up and up and that raises still another question:
did a.p.'s claims cause her to become ill or does a.p. make bizarre claims as the RESULT of being ill?
5:55 above:
"How would you know if someone is an
"intel agent"?
Answer: Look in the mirror.
9:59 above:
Is there some particular reason why you won't give us the benefit of an answer to the question of how you would know if someone is an "intel agent"?
Answer: Here is one proven intel agent:
http://www.democratherald.com/content/articles/2008/06/29/news/top_story/1aaa01_dictaphone.jpg
Look familiar to you?
10:25 Early/Bill McWiliams/THE OFFICIAL INTEL REMASTERMIND:
You lying phuck. Making a mockery of all the witnesses who said the S.S. driver, Greer did it, were murdered by your boss--the Gestapo regime.
You're real (and reel) good at mocking those who were murdered and/or poisoned; but intel filth, you were tasked here to provide answers:
1. You did not answer this CRUCIAL question:
This
http://www.maryferrell.org/wiki/index.php/Essay_-_Acoustics_Overview_and_History
says that NOT YOU, but a “female technician” processed that Dictaphone recording!! So the article you cited has another lie. Please explain this, it is crucial.
2. Provide immediately your complete timeline of your actions and locations for 11/22/63, that your intel-provided newspaper article has you hearing the assassination as it happened, yet being at Parkland just a couple of minutes later and seeing the President brought in. As these were at elast 4.6 miles apart, and the limo sped up at great speed, and traffic behind was in effect blocked by all the other offical vehicles now also speeding up, how could a "civilian" have been in Dealey Plaza to hear the murder, and yet be at Parkland, miles away and see the President brought in???????????
No one else has claimed this, Except of course the Secret Service assassins themselves.
Early/Bill you are out in the cold now, you must explain else you are clearly a treasonous conspirator, and partaker of the Assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
Anonymous Physicist
Readers can draw their own conclusions about whether or not
Greer shot JFK and whether or not
"ap" was (recently) poisoned by the CIA for believing that particular claim...which was actually made by some people more than 40 years ago.
Readers may also draw their own conclusions about whether or not it makes common sense to believe that
all of the JFK assassination films were altered or faked in order to
remove images which "ap" claims would show the limo driver shooting JFK & Governor Connally during the
parade in downtown Dallas. Remember: some of the assassination films (and photos) weren't even known about until years after the assassination.
Readers may also draw their own conclusions about whether "ap" is being honest in her or his writings. I submit that there is every reason to believe "ap" is not being truthful, that s/he is not
a physicist and that readers should ponder if ap's more bizarre theories and claims are the result of having been poisoned or whether
the claims of having been poisoned are the result of an overactive imagination.
Some readers might also be interested in knowing how "ap" is able to identify who is and who is not an intelligence service agent.
In my opinion, if s/he DID have that ability, s/he would serve us all better by letting us know how to be able to do that.
I stand by my claim that "ap" is an imposter. All the evidence as well as common sense points in that direction only.
Proven intel agent:
http://www.democratherald.com/content/articles/2008/06/29/news/top_story/1aaa01_dictaphone.jpg
Furthermore, As Bill, in the article said, he abhors computers, but is somehow working with Lawrence Livermore Labs and their super computers, what possible job could Bill have except to direct the computer people in doctoring the remastering of the tape to make it come out the way Bill wants it to!
The CIA's official REMASTERMIND, Bill, is indeed directing the Remastering of the Dictaphone recording to fit what his CIA bosses want it to show. And to erase any remaining truth on it.
The Remastermind who said there was no audio of the assassination, then he reveals he is Remastering it; and won't give his timeline of the nefarious things he did in Dallas on Nov 22, 1963.
Thr Remastermind Repeatedly Regurgitates Revisionist Rantings Regardless of Reality.
A.P.
Readers can draw their own conclusions about whether or not
Greer shot JFK and whether or not
"ap" was (recently) poisoned by the CIA
absolutely.
also readers can draw their own conclusions about whether or not agent 3blahs (charlie brown's parents) is merely employing the classic technique known as side-tracking.
In 1963, J.Edgar Hoover was arguably the second most powerful man in the U.S. government.
Like any other head of a large bureaucracy, Hoover was always seeking ways to expand the scope of the FBI. One idea he had to accomplish that was to get Congress to give control over protection of the President to the FBI.
The Secret Service was quite aware of Hoover's scheme to take over at least that function.
Thus, if there had been any credible evidence that SS Agent Greer had shot JFK and Connally, the FBI would have almost certainly have prevailed in Hoover's scheme.
One more (powerful) reason why claims that Greer shot JFK are
without merit.
Most reasonable people who have become informed about the facts which refute that particular JFK
assassination myth now realize just how mistaken it is to continue to
argue to the contrary.
Why "ap" doesn't is open to speculation.
hey how about that 9/11?
OBL was a patsy; so was Oswald, but Greer wasn't. Some people have tried to make him a patsy, but he was just a limo driver.
"I welcome feedback and genuine criticism from Tahil on this review, or of my own nuclear-911 hypotheses, and also the same from any non-intel agent."
Duh-- he's saying he welcomes feedback from any non-intel agent-- and by inference he doesn't welcome feedback from an intel agent. He's not saying that he knows for sure who is an intel agent and not.
Thanks, but what's the point? That's like saying "he welcomes feedback from sincere people, but not from insincere people."
What's the purpose of saying something like that?
Probably A.P.'s point was that ONLY the intel agents here would react to this statement--at all!
Talk about proving one's point, and being obvious!
ha!
Only the REMASTERMIND would mind!
ha!
In 1963, J.Edgar Hoover was arguably the second most powerful man in the U.S. government.
Like any other head of a large bureaucracy, Hoover was always seeking ways to expand the scope of the FBI. One idea he had to accomplish that was to get Congress to give control over protection of the President to the FBI.
The Secret Service was quite aware of Hoover's scheme to take over at least that function.
Thus, if there had been any credible evidence that SS Agent Greer had shot JFK and Connally, the FBI would have almost certainly have prevailed in Hoover's scheme.
One more (powerful) reason why claims that Greer shot JFK are
without merit.
Most reasonable people who have become informed about the facts which refute that particular JFK
assassination myth now realize just how mistaken it is to continue to
argue to the contrary.
I think even "ap" now understands
that Mr. Bill "Flew the Cooper"
was totally offbase - even if
"ap" won't come out and admit it.
Furthermore, As Bill, in the article said, he abhors computers, but is somehow working with Lawrence Livermore Labs and their super computers, what possible job could Bill have except to direct the computer people in doctoring the remastering of the tape to make it come out the way Bill wants it to!
The CIA's official REMASTERMIND, Bill, is indeed directing the Remastering of the Dictaphone recording to fit what his CIA bosses want it to show. And to erase any remaining truth on it.
The Remastermind who said there was no audio of the assassination, then he reveals he is Remastering it; and won't give his timeline of the nefarious things he did in Dallas on Nov 22, 1963.
Thr Remastermind Repeatedly Regurgitates Revisionist Rantings Regardless of Reality.
A.P.
That is extremely insightful, but what does it have to do with the fact that you obviously don't know Jack Shift about the JFK assassination?
Or the MLK and RFK assassinations, for that matter.
Stick with the Mercury flights of fancy, but for heaven's sake, stop embarrassing yourself with this nonsense that Greer shot JFK &
Connally - and don't try to doctor
any more videos to make it look like Greer did anything other than turn around to see what was going on in the rear of the limo.
45 phucking years you have had Early/Bill to provide your timeline of where you were throughout Nov. 22, 1963, and what you were doing, at the different sites in Dallas. 45 years to get your story together. And when we asked you here for these details, after YOU posted that link to that article about you, you have not answered.
You, liar, said there was no audio of the assassination/Zapruder film. Then you gave a link saying YOU are the NSA/CIA's offical REMASTERMIND--of the audio of the assassination--along with the mass murderers at Lawrence Livermore Labs.
Then you said everything in that newspaper story was false. Interesting because either you directly, or your boss, the intel agency you have always worked for, Mr. "33 years at Dictaphone", provided this info.
We will wait till Hell freezes over, perp.
Provide your timeline of everything you did on Nov. 22, 1963, and where you were, and where exactly was Dictaphone HQ.
Don't show your lying face here again until you do, perp.
We got one of them now!
A.P.
ANOTHER baloney sandwich from the world's only fake physicist turned baloney sandwich maker.
Prove that you are a physicist and that the CIA poisoned you or admit that you're an imposter.
45 phucking years you have had Early/Bill to provide your timeline of where you were throughout Nov. 22, 1963, and what you were doing, at the different sites in Dallas. 45 years to get your story together. And when we asked you here for these details, after YOU posted that link to that article about you, you have not answered.
You, liar, said there was no audio of the assassination/Zapruder film. Then you gave a link saying YOU are the NSA/CIA's offical REMASTERMIND--of the audio of the assassination--along with the mass murderers at Lawrence Livermore Labs.
Then you said everything in that newspaper story was false. Interesting because either you directly, or your boss, the intel agency you have always worked for, Mr. "33 years at Dictaphone", provided this info.
We will wait till Hell freezes over, perp.
Provide your timeline of everything you did on Nov. 22, 1963, and where you were, and where exactly was Dictaphone HQ.
Don't show your lying face here again until you do, perp.
We got one of them now!
A.P.
Baloney sandwiches. That's all you've got.
Mercury poisoning must be a terrible thing. I'm assuming that you haven't always been the way you are now.
Nothing seems to make you any better,
but don't give up. And no, your personal insults aimed at those who've asked you questions doesn't bother me. I realize you have a medical condition that apparently has affected your otherwise sweet personality.
P.S. Whatever credibility you may have once had is now in tatters, but it's never too late to change.
Remember what Jesus said to the thief on the cross?
45 phucking years you have had Early/Bill to provide your timeline of where you were throughout Nov. 22, 1963, and what you were doing, at the different sites in Dallas. 45 years to get your story together. And when we asked you here for these details, after YOU posted that link to that article about you, you have not answered.
You, liar, said there was no audio of the assassination/Zapruder film. Then you gave a link saying YOU are the NSA/CIA's offical REMASTERMIND--of the audio of the assassination--along with the mass murderers at Lawrence Livermore Labs.
Then you said everything in that newspaper story was false. Interesting because either you directly, or your boss, the intel agency you have always worked for, Mr. "33 years at Dictaphone", provided this info.
We will wait till Hell freezes over, perp.
Provide your timeline of everything you did on Nov. 22, 1963, and where you were, and where exactly was Dictaphone HQ.
Don't show your lying face here again until you do, perp.
We got one of them now!
A.P.
You're nothing but an
anonymouse poster on the Net, pretending to be something that you
aren't and denying what you actually are: a baloney sandwich maker.
Either prove that you're a real
physicist or get the H*** out of here.
Post a Comment
<< Home