Seven "Solved"!!!
The final mystery of 9/11 will soon be solved, according to US experts investigating the collapse of the third tower at the World Trade Center.
The FINAL mystery? Puh-leeze.
SOLVED? Somehow I think their definition of solved is different than mine.
This part is funny:
With no steel from Tower 7 to study, investigators have instead made four extremely complex computer models worked out to the finest detail.
No steel? No problem!!! They can use their highly rigged computer models to explain everything!
Because they sure don't want to be forced to explain "steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated in extraordinarily high temperatures".
So, definitely, it was a good thing that "all of the thousands of tonnes of steel from the skyscraper were taken away to be melted down."
Because, if there's no evidence, then clearly there's no crime!!!
posted by spooked at 9:44 AM
5 Comments:
investigators have instead made four extremely complex computer models worked out to the finest detail.
ha ha just like the purdue simulation of the ghostplane effect.
NIST has its own REMASTERMIND, RECREATING NON-REALITY.
They have traitors like this perp,
http://www.democratherald.com/content/articles/2008/06/29/news/top_story/1aaa01_dictaphone.jpg
involved with Destroying/REMASTERING the JFK audio tape.
We can see how the intel agency criminals work. Destroy the physical evidence, then get the perps who did that to REMASTER, non-physical reality into stupid videos and audio impossibilities.
Right now the perp/traitor Bill McWilliams is telling Lawrence Livermore Labs just where to audio-wise emplace a shooter or two, and then destroy the original dictaphone recording--if he hasn't done that already, or back in 1963, if he really interacted with the recording then, which may not be the case. As everything he ever said, or is said about him, is a proven lie.
Anonymous Physicist
In all of your many posts, you have yet to prove your claims about Greer.
In fact, the ONLY argument you've ever made is based on two things:
1. Witness claims - and most of them
were vague and many, if not most of them are even less deserving of consideration because the very same people also made statements indicating that the shots originated from the Grassy Knoll. Furthermore, there are more than 50
UNambiguous witness claims that the fatal shot to JFK came from the GKnoll.
2. Zapruder film - yet neither the Z film nor the other films taken in Dealey Plaza show Greer doing anything other than turning around to see what, if anything had happened to the passengers in the limo. Most importantly, NONE of the films show Greer holding ANYTHING in his hand, much less a pistol.
That is the extent of your argument. You have failed to address any of the long list of reasons why it is impossible that Greer could have shot anyone.
When presented with questions and reasons, you have tried to divert attention away from the topic. Why? Obviously, because you can't
refute the arguments which prove the implausibility, indeed the impossibility, that Greer killed JFK.
What you apparently don't realize is how much damage you have done to your credibility on other issues on which you post comments.
Why should anyone give any credence to what you have to say about 9/11 or bases on the moon or that Spooked is a CIA agent. Spooked was asked about this and he stated
flatly that it isn't true, yet you
have not even had the common decency to acknowledge of apologizing for what you said.
Maybe it can all be attributed to your claim of having been poisoned by the CIA, but I don't see any reason why anyone should believe that story either.
45 phucking years you have had Early/Bill to provide your timeline of where you were throughout Nov. 22, 1963, and what you were doing. 45 years to get your story together. And when we asked you here for these details, after YOU posted that link to that article about you, you have not answered.
You, liar, said there was no audio of the assassination/Zapruder film. Then you gave a link saying YOU are the NSA/CIA's offical REMASTERMIND--of the audio of the assassination.
Then you said everything in that newspaper story was false. Interesting because either you directly, or your boss, the intel agency you have always worked for, Mr. "33 years at Dictaphone", provided this info.
We will wait till Hell freezes over, perp.
Provide your timeline of everything you did on Nov. 22, 1963, and where you were, and where exactly was Dictaphone HQ.
Don't show your lying face here again until you do, perp.
We got one of them now!
A.P.
You can try and divert attention away from the subject but that won't change the fact that your claims about the JFK assassination are nothing more than another one of your infamous baloney sandwiches.
I stand by my claim that your knowledge of the assassinations of major U.S. political figures in the 1960's is paper-thin and that by pretending to know things you don't, you have damaged your credibility here.
Does mercury poison ordinarily affect the brain and personality of the victim? You make a good case that it does.
Post a Comment
<< Home