Unfortunately, This Thermite Crap Isn't Going Away
Impressive work here, even if it is misleading at best and disinfo at worst. It's a pretty slick presentation but one problem is that first that he says thermite was used because it doesn't make a loud explosion when it goes off, then he later shows how it can make a loud explosion.
Of course, most of the evidence he uses as support for thermite-- iron microspheres, molten steel, bright flashes during the destruction (a good eyewitness clip here for that evidence I hadn't seen before) and clearly defined explosions also support nukes.
And of course the highly sophisticated readers of this blog know that thermite can't account for the incredible pulverization/vaporization of the tower contents, as well as account for the incredible heat generation at ground zero for months after the towers went down. Nukes and the China Syndrome do.
21 Comments:
Hey it's cold here now.
Where can I get some of them there "inextingushable fires"?
And if those are unavailable, I will settle for some molecular dissociating clouds for my living room.
But the China Syndrome?
Occurred at Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Chernobyl and the World Trade Center. Don't want that in my home.
Poor Karen Silkwood!
Now here again is a page on witnessing temperatures at or greater than 1500 degrees, six months after 9/11.
http://gcn.com/articles/2002/09/09/handheld-app-eased-recovery-tasks.aspx
And we "know" that "supernano-composite thermite" can produce heat for six months, give or take six months.
Ludicrous thermite scam totally disproven in my books and articles--its proponents' claims are nothing less than a violation of the laws of chemistry sand physics.
Indeed the last great thermite article in a pay to publish journal had to be snuck in when its editor was away. He said it was so bogus, he wouldn't have allowed it in.
Anonymous Physicist
This comment has been removed by the author.
Save your time people. Don't waste it listening to that crap.
And skip the disinfo, Pter, all this has been exposed here at great length.
The bullshit Op-Plan of Deagle and Ward and who they are trying to pin this on has been exposed here. As well now on who is still trying to push this crap!
That Tritium is made by ternary fission (not 4th generation whatever) has also been exposed. here. And I love how Deagle claims he knows who has micro-nukes. Did his intel controller--excuse me I mean "buddies that protect me against the govt" tell him that? Or just to say that.
Been stated here that Anonymous Physicist sent his 9/11 nuke book to Deagle who refused to even reply, let alone have him on as a a guest.
What Deagle and Ward--2 M.D.s NOT physicists (despite delusions)--have been up to has been well exposed here. And you know it. Deagle was exposed here as promoting the "red mercury" scam (at his site) as being capable of causing nukes to go off. When High School physics knowledge shows that it is 6 orders of magnitude too feeble to do that. So these m.d.s don't know physics.
Now with this youtube you have shown me that this creature, Deagle is using the term "Anonymous Physicist" to divert away from what A.P. has proven here. Just as he first said he interviewed A.P., when all he interviewed was Spooked.
Next, Pter, please check first. I have been to the Finnish military expert's website many times. I never saw anything that said that the Finn claimed that "the Port authority and Silverstein ...actually commissioned" the Finn to destroy WTC with "thermate, RDX and nuclear devices".
This appears to be made up totally by Deagle.
Unless this was just added, if so, copy it and post it here. If not, stop spreading here Deagle's and Ward's obvious lies and diversions and limited hangouts.
I doubt that Deagle has his "my own Anonymous Physicist." Just another lie to divert from everything done here Re nukes/CSA and 9/11.
Update:
I went to the Finnish site:
http://www.saunalahti.fi/wtc2001/military.htm
I searched each file there for Port Authority and Silverstein. Something YOU should have done Pter, before spreading apparent disinfo.
I found no mention or P.A. or Silverstein or that the Finn was commissioned by them to destroy and or nuke the WTC.
If you have this, pleast post, or else stop spreading intel agencies' assets' lies.
Thanks, I posted that only to know your view.
Of course I knew that it is disinfo.
It sure doesn't look that way. You did not ask, you cited it as if it were true!
Here's your post:
Dr. Deagle said here at 7:24 that a Finnish munitions expert was commisioned by Silverstein and Port Authority to do the WTC demolition:
Dr Deagle Show 062209 - THE TRITIUM CONSPIRACY 4 of 4
You make honest people waste their time with claptrap.
If you were honest, and knew this was false, you would have STATED THAT.
Your cover is blown.
Check how I asked in "Elevator Motor-- Indication of EMP?" comments.
If you have something to cite from elsewhere, post the url. As I recall that was another BS post. You seem to be burying yourself deeper and deeper.
You are really pissing me off.
Actually posting total disinformation, and when called out on it, have the pseudo-clever Op of saying "I was only kidding."
F.O.
I'm sorry that I did not state that it was clearly BS. I have not followed this site for a long time so I didn't know that you have already exposed Deagle and Ward here. I only knew what you wrote about Deagle in your new book that I bought.
In "Elevator Motor" comments I wrote:
You mean Dr. Deagle knuckled under? I don't understand why he claimed that the Finnish military expert was contracted to do the demolition of the towers.
This comment I formulated better than the unfortunate new one.
url please
Elevator Motor-- Indication of EMP?
And were you the one who sent that to Spooked? As I wrote, I see no clear evidence that that motor got EMPed.
so again...
Not me.
Furthermore your comment
"You mean Dr. Deagle knuckled under? I don't understand why he claimed that the Finnish military expert was contracted to do the demolition of the towers."
appears to have just been added now. And is not even relevant to the EMP motor BS article! You just posted that at the wrong article! There is no mention of Deagle knuckling under at the EMP article. Are you trying to cover your tracks and burying yourself far deeper.
I think you are really out now.
Why not just come clean?
Glad it wasn't you, hope Spooked confirms.
Still no reason to post about Deagle there, and it looks like it was just posted, at the wrong article, so epic fail here.
I posted it 2 or 3 days ago. You wrote in the first comment to the EMP article about someone who knuckled under the thermite guy and commented your comment by asking about Deagle's absurd claim, partly also because I'm interested in all things Finnish:)
OK. Thank you. My bad in a sense. I see that there now, though I did not mention Deagle by name. That's what I just looked for. But someone who has followed my writings would know who I was referring to.
I guess you must be Finnish? Nice people.
But I still cannot fathom about posting outright lies from Deagle without stating that they are such.
Can people not see the outrageous Op from Deagle now?
To claim that the Finnish military expert stated that he was "commissioned by the Port Authority and Larry Silverstein...to use thermite, RDX and nuclear devices" to destroy the WTC.
When the Finn never said that! Notice also how it supports thermite, the Jew thing, and all the usual hangouts. (Not that Silverstein isn't filth, but intel filth.)
And it proves Deagle is a disinforamtionalist, again showing how nearly everyone in the conspiracy field are assets or nutters, as I stated from the outset. And his claiming to have his own "my Anonymous Physicist" is telling of intel agency Op-Plans.
So in that sense I thank you for posting that detritus from Deagle so that we are all now aware of it.
That was good of you, just need to take a bare second or two to say it is BS if that is what you know to be the case. Else, if I didn't write this, it gets promulgated as the truth.
Thanks AP. This was a valuable lesson to me how to post. I regret and apologize my omission. Good thing that Deagle is once again exposed by your answer.
Post a Comment
<< Home