Humint Events Online: A Few New Dots

Monday, March 20, 2006

A Few New Dots

for my "connecting the dots" piece:

BY ITSELF, the fact that videos of the second hit have different timings for when the plane goes in and the fireball comes out doesn't mean that no plane was used on 9/11. But if there was a real plane going into the building, why would the timing differ for different shots?

BY ITSELF, that the explosions that occur in the south tower right after the plane enter don't always line up the same as where the plane went in doesn't mean that no plane was used on 9/11. But, as above, if there was a real plane going into the building, why would this alignment differ for different videos?

BY ITSELF, the fact that the south tower fireball came out all on one side of the building, even though the plane hit straight on and just slightly off-center, does not conclusively tell us that no plane was used. But it sure is strange, particularly in comparison to the North tower hit, where explosions came out all sides of the building. Moreover, the port wing of the second plane should clearly have broken open on the core columns and sprayed fuel all out the center/west side of the tower, in an analogous fashion to what the starboard wing apparently did (giving rise to the huge famous fireball to the east)-- yet the port wing simply in the building disappeared without any analogous explosion. What happened to it?

Where are the raging fires on the middle and west side of the tower that should have occurred from the exploded port wing?

1 Comments:

Anonymous janedoe said...

Here's a fun cartoon about connecting the dots.

http://www.ny911truth.org/images/just-connected-dots.jpg

2:06 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger