The Official Flight 93 Crash Story Violates Laws of Momentum
Government photo of the crater looking west along the length of the "wing" gashes. Note the unburnt grass on the right (on the northwards side of the crater).
Another view from a similar angle as in the photo above but further out near the tips of the "wing" gashes. Note the unburnt grass out here.
This aerial photo shows the "tail" scar on the left (northwards) side of the crater:
Diagram of the official crash scene (the top of the diagram is northwards) froma similar view as in the top photo:
Everyone should be able to agree about what I presented above. It is just a description of the crash scene using official photos as evidence.
Now keep in mind, NO LARGE PLANE DEBRIS was found on the ground around the Flight 93 crash site. By large, I mean no intact engines, tail sections, wing sections, no landing gear struts, no intact seats, no pieces of fuselage larger than a few feet across (and only two of these). None of the large debris seen in almost every other plane crash since 9/11.
OFFICIALLY, most of the plane went into the ground in the crater. The black boxes were supposedly found 15 or more feet below ground, along with most of the fuselage. Many people bought this story because there was no significant plane debris outside of the crater.
Again, this is the official story.
Now.. .we've never seen photos of the excavated crater showing the buried fuselage. The FBI says 95% of the plane was recovered, but we've never seen pictures of this recovered debris.
We've seen 3 pictures of "large" debris, two chunks of fuselage maybe 4 x 4 feet each, and a hunk of engine about 2 x 3 feet supposedly thrust into the ground by the crash. Two of these pieces of debris have signs of being planted, as I have noted before.
Nonetheless, let's try to understand what happened with this crash.
UA93 officially impacted the ground flying inverted at a 40 degree nose-down angle.
If the plane crashes into the ground such that it explodes and burrows into the ground, there should be a significant deflection of debris BACKWARDS (as well as other directions). Remember the video of the F4 crashing into the concrete wall. Much of the plane debris was deflected backwards. But for the flight 93 crash site, the grass wasn't even BURNT on the edge of the north side of the crater!
On the other hand, if the plane crashes and at the same time bounces off the ground, then debris would be flung mainly forward. But then there should be much more big debris.
An analogy here might be useful. Imagine a hose shooting a high-pressure stream of water on a hard flat surface, at a 40 degree angle. You can see the water primarily splashes forward. This is analogous to the plane crashing and the debris bouncing off the ground and spraying forward.
Now, imagine a hose shooting a high-pressure stream of water at a 40 degree angle into a shallow 40 degree divet in the ground, angled the same direction as the water. Now you should see that a lot of water is going to spray (deflect) backwards, back towards the hose. This is analogous to the plane crashing and burrowing into the ground and spraying debris backwards.
Physics, simple physics, says the official flight 93 crash story is just WRONG.
Something can't BOUNCE and BURROW at the same time.