Apollo Moon Hoax, Part 2

You've heard from "Anonymous Physicist", now let me list a few reasons I have doubts about the moon landing:

1) like faking the plane footage on 9/11 rather than flying real planes into the towers, faking the moon landing footage was operationally much safer than really landing men on the moon

2) footage of the Apollo 11 returning astronauts shows them to be in a strange daze, not at all happy, not at all as if they had accomplished the greatest feat of mankind

3) Stanley Kubrick was involved with NASA and apparently rigged up a studio with an artificial moon surface

4) it is hard to believe the technology existed in 1969 to land a man on the moon, but with all the advances in technology in the past 30 years, we have not gone back-- nor are there even any imminent plans to go back

5) it is hard to believe the lunar module story-- the maneuvering required to land, take off and dock was incredibly difficult and error prone, but officially they did it many times

6) there are various anomalies in the video footage-- some of which may be explainable, some of which I think are highly indicative of fraud

7) The movement of the "astronauts on the moon" in video clips REALLY does NOT look like they are in 1/6th earth gravity-- it looks like they are just moving in slow motion

8) The recent loss of the Apollo 11 video tapes by NASA is incredibly suspicious. As "anonymous physicist" put it-- this is analogous to a country losing its constitution!

9) Bill Clinton, in his autobiography, cryptically referred to an old man he knew in Arkansas, who believed the moon landings were fake, then went on to praise the wisdom of common folk. I believe this was as close to admitting the landings were fake as Clinton could get.

I did not see the Fox moon hoax show "anonymous physicist" refers to, nor have I seen any other movie on this topic except one weird British movie about Stanley Kubrick and NASA, which had some incredibly bizarre interviews with Donald Rumsfeld and Kissinger (I think)about their participation in some sort of fakery. The whole interview set-up was done to give complete "plausible deniability", yet it made no sense for these people to be doing the interviews other than that they were tacitly whistle-blowing. I need to find the link and will post it when I can find it. But the idea is that Kubrick needed a special lens for his movie "Barry Lyndon", and NASA had this high-tech lens, and Kubrick made a special deal with NASA to get the lens-- presumably he made the original moon landing footage. This was supposedly done as a back-up in case anything went wrong, but the idea is that NASA went ahead and used the fake footage.