The Last, Great American TV Fakery Before 9/11/01— The Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
by The Anonymous Physicist
"The Anonymous Physicist” summarizes what was perhaps the largest psyop/TV fakery of all time— not counting wars— the Apollo Moon Landing Hoax. In pondering the vastness of the 9/11 fakery and the collusion between the government and the media, people need to keep in mind the many precedents of similar fakery and collusion. We had the relatively simple fakery regarding the Kennedy Assassination already demonstrated here; and the far more extensive (TV and other) fakery of the alleged Apollo Moon landings— to be expounded upon now. What constitutes fakery? Certainly one criterion is if the “evidence” to be examined violates the laws of physics— which are inviolable. Another is when the perps are captured doing the fakery. Due to space constraints, I will mostly just list some of the many anomalies, impossibilities, and caught-in-the-act episodes of the Apollo Hoax— like this one— fake video of the “first Lunar Step for Man.”
Just as with 9/11, and e.g. the Popular Mechanics ludicrous attempt/hit piece to debunk the 9/11 truth movement, there are indeed desperate Apollo Hoax debunking websites. It is easy for an honest physicist to debunk these debunkers/shills. Indeed, not wanting to believe that Apollo was a total hoax, I went, years ago, to the debunking sites. I quickly understood that they were themselves pure bunk/lies. This compelled me to investigate Apollo myself, and to read books and articles and purchase many videos— some of which are now available free, and listed herein. See them quick (or get the originals) as things seem to be removed when I send them to this site.
Perhaps my favorite (and sufficient) proof of the Apollo Hoax is the alleged lift-off of the Lunar Module (LM) from NASA’s own videos. We see not a single molecule of rocket exhaust coming out of the top half of the LM. We can see evidence of real explosive bolts separating the two halves. But no rocket exhaust whatsoever is seen against the black sky of the atmosphere-less Moon. The explosive bolts only had the energy of a pound or two of TNT, while the engine had 3500 pounds of thrust. Bogus debunkers’ websites claimed that the invisibility of the rocket exhaust is OK, as the “fuel was hypergolic.” But a hypergolic fuel just means it is so explosive it ignites on contact with the oxidizer, and needs no kind of ignition device. Indeed the same exact fuel and oxidizer has been photographed numerous times, in space (the Shuttle), and on the Earth. They do indeed produce a very visible plume. Chemical rockets don’t move without combusted exhaust rapidly moving in the opposite direction. It’s the Law of Conservation of Linear Momentum— it doesn’t get broken. This is also the same basic Law of Physics the regime “flouted” in its patsy Oswald from behind, fatal JFK— from the front— head shot.
Then we have the fake TV broadcasts of Apollo 11 showing that they cropped the Earth during the broadcast and were in low Earth orbit— snagged! (This is 32 minutes into this video.) And at 42 minutes in, Armstrong gives it all away at the White House “25th Anniversary.” We had the Apollo 11 press conference after “returning from the Moon”, where Collins answers a reporter’s question about not seeing stars from the lunar surface. Only problem: Collins was not on the surface-- see Armstrong cringe.
Now for the probable murders of Astronauts Grissom, White and Chaffee on the dry run of Apollo 1 in 1967. Why lock the hatch in a pure oxygen environment, if you knew Fire Safety 101? Grissom’s son continues to assert that his father and the two others were murdered— in part because Grissom wouldn’t have stood for the fakery. Thomas Baron, a safety inspector for NASA, was killed along with his family just a week after delivering highly critical testimony to Congress regarding Apollo. Along with his testimony, Baron submitted a 1,500 page report to the congressional committee. Following his death, the report went missing and has never been seen again. [Congress tends to lose important documents, for those who think we have a democracy.] All astronauts cooperated with the fake Moon landings after these events.
Despite vastly improved science, technology, and computerization, NASA— nearly 40 years later— can’t do what they claimed to have done 40 years earlier with primitive technology and computerization. Regarding the Lunar Module (LM): To this day, NASA still can’t get Vertical Landing (from orbit via retro-fire) to work, due to the great instability of vertical landing rockets. People on board moving, touching dials, coughing etc. would throw it out of stability. See Neil Armstrong crash— a mere few seconds into testing the similar Lunar Landing Research Vehicle (LLRV). This was just a few months before piloting the similar LM on the vastly longer and more difficult “landing” on the Moon. There is little or no sound of the 10,000 lb. thrust rocket landing (3500 lb thrust on lunar lift-off) heard on their transmissions. The film, camera, spacesuit wouldn’t work at the temperature extremes on the Moon. The very manufacturers of the film and camera have made these comments. Astronauts couldn’t fit out of the hatch with their spacesuits on—based on the dimensions involved. Laughably, bogus lunar photos show multiple angled shadows— not all parallel as would be with only one light source at effective infinity— the Sun. Hills and bumps do NOT alter shadow angles. We had the instantaneous audio communication from the Earth to the Apollo spacecraft; and not the approx. 3 second delay due to the speed of light (both ways) limitation. We had the blue light filling the window in TV transmissions (indicating they were in low Earth orbit). This includes moments before the fake Apollo 13 [“Houston we have a] problem”/bogus explosion, when they claimed to be 180,000 miles out, but were in low Earth orbit. We have the impenetrability of the Van Allen Radiation Belts, so humans could not have survived without massive shielding. We had the same exact mountainous “background” seen on several lunar landings a thousand miles, or so, apart! NASA has begun to paint these backgrounds differently in new photos! You might call this bad, studio, special effects to paraphrase Evan Fairbanks. The fact that the “Lunar Astronauts” walking steps and jumps are not six times higher— or any higher— than an Earth jump or walk, rather just slower. Just speed up the “Moon Walking” to about double speed, and you get Earth walking or jogging or jumping! See the astronauts being picked up by wires, which can be seen at times. This includes being picked up after falling before the “astronaut” himself even pushes off the ground!
There were no craters beneath the LMs after landing, no dust on the LM’s legs, even though the Astronauts said dust was kicked up, and we “see” this in the “videos” as it lands. See the color photos left on a LM landing leg. The flag waving in the “wind” on the atmosphere-less Moon.
The recent, convenient “loss” of NASA‘s original Apollo 11 tapes— only the alleged most profound achievement of mankind— like a country losing its Constitution— sadly that turns out to be too much of an analogy. NASA itself was going to produce an anniversary/debunking movie— but then chickened out. They gave the task to a well-known disinfo Space Race/Cold War “expert”. He later chickened out too. The infamous Apollo 11 coke bottle rolling across the “lunar surface” seen in Australia (re-broadcast and whistle-blown down there) during Apollo 11. The lettering [“C”] still seen on some “lunar” props er …“rocks.” The contact between Nixon and Stanley Kubrick to make fake video footage, Kubrick’s doing it, and the mysterious death of Kubrick. Others who knew of the fakery have been killed. There is so much more “bad, special effects.” Get the videos and see for yourself. The fakery is often so bad, you’ll be both amused and amazed. From the above, we saw that no one wants to make the definitive Apollo Hoax debunking movie. Why? The fakery was much more primitive then; they don’t stand a chance against the truth!
So from the Kennedy assassination, to the Apollo Hoax, to 9/11, this regime has shown that it spends a great deal of time and money on video, and other, fakery to create false history, and false evidence. Thus, astronauts have walked on the Moon, as much as President Kennedy was killed from a shot from behind him, or as much as planes/fuel/gravity caused the WTC towers to “collapse.” All these lies are easily proven as such in each case, upon examination of the alleged films, and other evidence. The only difference now is that computer graphics, and other advancements, make it easier for them to fake things. And the fact that the people have let them get away with past fakeries has emboldened them to bigger and more insidious fakeries. Thus we have the 9/11 fakery, and subsequent bogus wars and ruses to remove American freedoms and rights, while perpetrating perennial war on the human race.
References include the following:
Book: "Dark Moon: Apollo and the Whistle-Blowers" by Bennett and Percy; and the DVD by the same people: "What Happened on the Moon." And the DVD: "A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon" by Sibrel.
Ignore any govt agent's negative "reviews" at Amazon or elsewhere. The above were read or seen by me; and contain eye-opening proof, and are mostly excellent. Some places also sell the Fox-TV video that was aired (once) on the Apollo Hoax-- yes that network actually aired proof of the Apollo Hoax before 9/11/01-- but never after wards despite the many requests for a re-run of the truth.
"The Anonymous Physicist” summarizes what was perhaps the largest psyop/TV fakery of all time— not counting wars— the Apollo Moon Landing Hoax. In pondering the vastness of the 9/11 fakery and the collusion between the government and the media, people need to keep in mind the many precedents of similar fakery and collusion. We had the relatively simple fakery regarding the Kennedy Assassination already demonstrated here; and the far more extensive (TV and other) fakery of the alleged Apollo Moon landings— to be expounded upon now. What constitutes fakery? Certainly one criterion is if the “evidence” to be examined violates the laws of physics— which are inviolable. Another is when the perps are captured doing the fakery. Due to space constraints, I will mostly just list some of the many anomalies, impossibilities, and caught-in-the-act episodes of the Apollo Hoax— like this one— fake video of the “first Lunar Step for Man.”
Just as with 9/11, and e.g. the Popular Mechanics ludicrous attempt/hit piece to debunk the 9/11 truth movement, there are indeed desperate Apollo Hoax debunking websites. It is easy for an honest physicist to debunk these debunkers/shills. Indeed, not wanting to believe that Apollo was a total hoax, I went, years ago, to the debunking sites. I quickly understood that they were themselves pure bunk/lies. This compelled me to investigate Apollo myself, and to read books and articles and purchase many videos— some of which are now available free, and listed herein. See them quick (or get the originals) as things seem to be removed when I send them to this site.
Perhaps my favorite (and sufficient) proof of the Apollo Hoax is the alleged lift-off of the Lunar Module (LM) from NASA’s own videos. We see not a single molecule of rocket exhaust coming out of the top half of the LM. We can see evidence of real explosive bolts separating the two halves. But no rocket exhaust whatsoever is seen against the black sky of the atmosphere-less Moon. The explosive bolts only had the energy of a pound or two of TNT, while the engine had 3500 pounds of thrust. Bogus debunkers’ websites claimed that the invisibility of the rocket exhaust is OK, as the “fuel was hypergolic.” But a hypergolic fuel just means it is so explosive it ignites on contact with the oxidizer, and needs no kind of ignition device. Indeed the same exact fuel and oxidizer has been photographed numerous times, in space (the Shuttle), and on the Earth. They do indeed produce a very visible plume. Chemical rockets don’t move without combusted exhaust rapidly moving in the opposite direction. It’s the Law of Conservation of Linear Momentum— it doesn’t get broken. This is also the same basic Law of Physics the regime “flouted” in its patsy Oswald from behind, fatal JFK— from the front— head shot.
Then we have the fake TV broadcasts of Apollo 11 showing that they cropped the Earth during the broadcast and were in low Earth orbit— snagged! (This is 32 minutes into this video.) And at 42 minutes in, Armstrong gives it all away at the White House “25th Anniversary.” We had the Apollo 11 press conference after “returning from the Moon”, where Collins answers a reporter’s question about not seeing stars from the lunar surface. Only problem: Collins was not on the surface-- see Armstrong cringe.
Now for the probable murders of Astronauts Grissom, White and Chaffee on the dry run of Apollo 1 in 1967. Why lock the hatch in a pure oxygen environment, if you knew Fire Safety 101? Grissom’s son continues to assert that his father and the two others were murdered— in part because Grissom wouldn’t have stood for the fakery. Thomas Baron, a safety inspector for NASA, was killed along with his family just a week after delivering highly critical testimony to Congress regarding Apollo. Along with his testimony, Baron submitted a 1,500 page report to the congressional committee. Following his death, the report went missing and has never been seen again. [Congress tends to lose important documents, for those who think we have a democracy.] All astronauts cooperated with the fake Moon landings after these events.
Despite vastly improved science, technology, and computerization, NASA— nearly 40 years later— can’t do what they claimed to have done 40 years earlier with primitive technology and computerization. Regarding the Lunar Module (LM): To this day, NASA still can’t get Vertical Landing (from orbit via retro-fire) to work, due to the great instability of vertical landing rockets. People on board moving, touching dials, coughing etc. would throw it out of stability. See Neil Armstrong crash— a mere few seconds into testing the similar Lunar Landing Research Vehicle (LLRV). This was just a few months before piloting the similar LM on the vastly longer and more difficult “landing” on the Moon. There is little or no sound of the 10,000 lb. thrust rocket landing (3500 lb thrust on lunar lift-off) heard on their transmissions. The film, camera, spacesuit wouldn’t work at the temperature extremes on the Moon. The very manufacturers of the film and camera have made these comments. Astronauts couldn’t fit out of the hatch with their spacesuits on—based on the dimensions involved. Laughably, bogus lunar photos show multiple angled shadows— not all parallel as would be with only one light source at effective infinity— the Sun. Hills and bumps do NOT alter shadow angles. We had the instantaneous audio communication from the Earth to the Apollo spacecraft; and not the approx. 3 second delay due to the speed of light (both ways) limitation. We had the blue light filling the window in TV transmissions (indicating they were in low Earth orbit). This includes moments before the fake Apollo 13 [“Houston we have a] problem”/bogus explosion, when they claimed to be 180,000 miles out, but were in low Earth orbit. We have the impenetrability of the Van Allen Radiation Belts, so humans could not have survived without massive shielding. We had the same exact mountainous “background” seen on several lunar landings a thousand miles, or so, apart! NASA has begun to paint these backgrounds differently in new photos! You might call this bad, studio, special effects to paraphrase Evan Fairbanks. The fact that the “Lunar Astronauts” walking steps and jumps are not six times higher— or any higher— than an Earth jump or walk, rather just slower. Just speed up the “Moon Walking” to about double speed, and you get Earth walking or jogging or jumping! See the astronauts being picked up by wires, which can be seen at times. This includes being picked up after falling before the “astronaut” himself even pushes off the ground!
There were no craters beneath the LMs after landing, no dust on the LM’s legs, even though the Astronauts said dust was kicked up, and we “see” this in the “videos” as it lands. See the color photos left on a LM landing leg. The flag waving in the “wind” on the atmosphere-less Moon.
The recent, convenient “loss” of NASA‘s original Apollo 11 tapes— only the alleged most profound achievement of mankind— like a country losing its Constitution— sadly that turns out to be too much of an analogy. NASA itself was going to produce an anniversary/debunking movie— but then chickened out. They gave the task to a well-known disinfo Space Race/Cold War “expert”. He later chickened out too. The infamous Apollo 11 coke bottle rolling across the “lunar surface” seen in Australia (re-broadcast and whistle-blown down there) during Apollo 11. The lettering [“C”] still seen on some “lunar” props er …“rocks.” The contact between Nixon and Stanley Kubrick to make fake video footage, Kubrick’s doing it, and the mysterious death of Kubrick. Others who knew of the fakery have been killed. There is so much more “bad, special effects.” Get the videos and see for yourself. The fakery is often so bad, you’ll be both amused and amazed. From the above, we saw that no one wants to make the definitive Apollo Hoax debunking movie. Why? The fakery was much more primitive then; they don’t stand a chance against the truth!
So from the Kennedy assassination, to the Apollo Hoax, to 9/11, this regime has shown that it spends a great deal of time and money on video, and other, fakery to create false history, and false evidence. Thus, astronauts have walked on the Moon, as much as President Kennedy was killed from a shot from behind him, or as much as planes/fuel/gravity caused the WTC towers to “collapse.” All these lies are easily proven as such in each case, upon examination of the alleged films, and other evidence. The only difference now is that computer graphics, and other advancements, make it easier for them to fake things. And the fact that the people have let them get away with past fakeries has emboldened them to bigger and more insidious fakeries. Thus we have the 9/11 fakery, and subsequent bogus wars and ruses to remove American freedoms and rights, while perpetrating perennial war on the human race.
References include the following:
Book: "Dark Moon: Apollo and the Whistle-Blowers" by Bennett and Percy; and the DVD by the same people: "What Happened on the Moon." And the DVD: "A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon" by Sibrel.
Ignore any govt agent's negative "reviews" at Amazon or elsewhere. The above were read or seen by me; and contain eye-opening proof, and are mostly excellent. Some places also sell the Fox-TV video that was aired (once) on the Apollo Hoax-- yes that network actually aired proof of the Apollo Hoax before 9/11/01-- but never after wards despite the many requests for a re-run of the truth.
posted by spooked at 7:32 AM
37 Comments:
CNN should be put on the job and man would be walking on the moon *again* in no time.
imagine a CNN ghostshuttle noseout on the other side of the moon!
Excellent, vitally important analysis and summary, Spooked.
Soviet leaders surely were told by their own space program leaders that the U.S. moon landing was a hoax, and that may well explain why the Russians didn't try to accomplish an actual manned flight to the moon (and landing, then returning safely to Earth). They knew it was an impossibility (at that time), but they also knew that
THEY couldn't say so publicly, because the mighty U.S. propaganda machine would have made them look like ridiculous, hopelessly jealous and insecure losers who would never be able to measure up to, much less surpass, the "can do, ANYTHING is possible in the capitalist, so-called free enterprise system here in the United Snakes".
i wonder what the next great hoax will be? "aliens attack! be afraid!"
or will the PTB simply do away with all pretense and blatantly seize whatever they want to seize...
Ironic that the DOD's own invention; the internet, is probably now the greatest thorn in their side!
How unsurprising that Spooky - the man who built a WTC model out of chicken wire - ALSO believes in that old conspiracy chestnut, the "fake moon landing". Elvis is still alive dude...
i never realized just how phony the moon landing was until now, but really, even the wizard of oz flying monkeys were more realistic!
and in fact Elvis is still alive!
They have removed the first video from my article. This is the "first step" in a studio.
Here is another URL of that.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=mouUUWpEec0
Anonymous Physicist.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=mouUUWpEec0
ha ha!
un-fucking-real.
So wait... let me get this straight...
You claim that the US government has the technology to put into orbit a directed energy weapons system capable of vaporizing more than 100,000 tons of steel through 100 miles of atmosphere without needing a power supply the size of Rhode Island, while at the same time claiming that the US government does not have the technology to put 3 men and a video camera on the moon?
I think it's time you went back to torching rabbit cages and playing with toy wooden airplanes, Spooky.
Read it to see if there was anything new....nope, same old same old that has been debunked before. A suggestion; get thee to www.clavius.org and after reading the site go to their Apollo Hoax messageboard and show all those engineers and rocket scientists how totally wrong they are. I double-dog dare ya!
Can we please focus on the 9/11 TV Fakery?
Can we please focus on the 9/11 TV Fakery?
Hey...its YOUR Spooky who put this up!
Which means it YOUR Spooky who put this web site even FARTHER into the abso-fucking-lutely moonbat laft with this.
Enjoy your toe sucking!
Look, I don't think we are going to get much further with 9/11 at this point without a deeper understanding of what "the powers that be" have done over the years.
Sorry if I am "hurting the movement".
You claim that the US government has the technology to put into orbit a directed energy weapons system capable of vaporizing more than 100,000 tons of steel through 100 miles of atmosphere without needing a power supply the size of Rhode Island, while at the same time claiming that the US government does not have the technology to put 3 men and a video camera on the moon?
I DON'T claim that DEW could destroy the WTC in the manner that was seen. That is why I said it was mini-nukes. Please try to keep up with the program here.
You also might note that I didn't write the Apollo moon fakery piece, anonymous physicist did. I am not going to defend everything in the piece because I don't know the subject that well. But I think he makes great points that deserve an audience.
Spook911,
You need to go mainstream with this.
Throw all anonymity away, if you really believe this.
If you stay hidden behind this blog, if you stay anonymous, then you are nothing more than a collaborator to the vast dark powers that control us!
You need to stake everything you have - reputation, family, job, life - on exposing this.
If you don't, you are part of the problem.
Attention All SHILLS:
If the U.S. had possessed the technology to put a man on the moon (and return him safely to Earth) in 1969, there wouldn't have been any reason to fake the Apollo mission.
If even one of the SHILLS here could refute the article Spooked posted, they would have done THAT, rather than attack the messenger(s)...with 1969-vintage juvenile rantings.
spooked, you don't need to justify or even explain your motives in posting this moon hoax post.
the stupid moon landing videos and photographs speak for themselves.
the radiation belt around the earth and the amount of shielding that it would actually take for a human to survive such also speaks for itself.
i think that anonymous @2:02 put it best:
"even the wizard of oz flying monkeys were more realistic!"
i agree that 9/11 research has probably reached an impasse - absent some real whistle blower stepping forward it is pretty much either restating the obvious or speculation at this point.
i say right on for this moon hoax post and right on for any other posts!
^h.
I thank all those who posted appreciation of my Apollo Hoax article. I hope shills get ignored by Spooked and everyone else, as many commenters on most blogs apparently are shills who crawl out of the darkness when crucial truths are revealed. It does not "hurt the movement" to have articles that lead the way to who the perps really are. Indeed, I might paraphrase Santayanna: Those who believe they will ever understand the events at the WTC on 9/11/01 by only looking at the WTC events of 9/11 are doomed to never understand it at all. And if people stop censoring themselves with what has been implanted there by the PTB, and free themselves up completely, and start exploring the larger and older picture, they will not only come to understand the who and what and why of 9/11 but will understand much that has happened before and what is about to happen now. They may then be able to stop it. This is the reason I have taken the time to begin to reveal deeper truths to the owner of this blog and to you. I realize that sadly many cannot let go of their programming and that when the truth reveals itself to be worse or more profound than they might have imagined are desperate not to know, in the end. But again, if even one person here is ready for deeper truths...well that is why I have written the Apollo Hoax article and my other articles.
When people wake the hell up, and see that it's not "rogue elements" in the govt, it's not the moron/drug addict/alcoholic who is obviously not the "President". It goes far beyond "money" or "oil" or "terrorism" or any bogus "ism." The Democrats and Republicans are controlled by the same monsters. The truth is so far beyond this level...
Well I was going to go into some ultimate truths, but I should be certain there is at least one person... Since I am not certain at this time, I have erased the rest of this message for now. People may reach out in some way.... But this indeed may not be a venue where anyone wants to go wherever reality leads? All of us have our limitations. We are only human (hopefully).
I do not write now of the possibility that no one here may be ready, in any judgmental way. But it may be a fact that I must recognize unless people prove to me otherwise.
For me though, only when I went far, far beyond the Kennedy assassination was I able to truly comprehend that, and 9/11, and all the lies that are put out daily and where it is going, if people don't stop censoring themselves and decide to find out what it is all about before it is too late.
In case it wasn't clear, the last comment was from the "anonymous physicist."
Anonymous Physicist your work here is much appreciated. Please continue to enlighten us you're brilliant and I enjoy reading your articles. Thanks.
Anonymous: Please stop lying, claiming that you are a physicist.
Spooked: Please stop lying, claiming that you never said it was space based energy weapons that destroyed the WTC.
sword_of_truth you are simply unbelievable!
i am still awaiting the long overdue now lesson in physics from you but you never quite get around to putting your money where your foot in your mouth is!
anonymous physicist, if you have something else to say then you should just say it.
this is unacceptable:
"""But this indeed may not be a venue where anyone wants to go wherever reality leads?"""
if you know something and either have proof or can convincingly convince others then you have an obligation, do you not?
h.
"Jump the shark": A metaphor that is used to denote the tipping point at which a blog is deemed by a reader to have passed its peak, or has introduced twists that are logically inconsistent in terms of everything that has preceded them.
Spook has officially jumped the shark with this.
By hitching his wagon to this lunatic anonymous "physicist" (who quite obviously isn't anything of the sort), Spook has taken his beloved "Troofer" campaign and four-square moved into the Freak Show section of the traveling Weirdo Carnival.
Not that he wasn't there before, but I suppose now he wants to be the Ultimate Freak in a world of Uber Freaks.
I said earlier - if you really believe this, if this is what you honestly believe, you need to go 100% mainstream with it.
You aren't, and neither is anyone else - the Anonymous Idiot, Early Baby, James ^Moron, nor anyone else.
Which means a) you don't obviously believe it and you are just headlining this for blog number or b) you are a coward and lack any shred of intestinal character to bring this to light.
Either way, none of you are worth a crap.
again, photos speak for themselves, whether of phony airplanes or phony moon landings.
why don't you @6:28 explain how the shadows of objects allegedly on the moon can be cast in different directions in the same photo?
"If even one of the SHILLS here could refute the article Spooked posted"
Good gravy friend, the moon hoax has been debunked as many times as the rest of the bigfoot/alienanalprobes/lizard people/9/11 conspiracy's
Only a drooling psychopath believes in these things...
You know, it all depends on what the meaning of "debunked" is. If by "debunked", you mean officials have given some explanations that are good enough to satisfy people who want to believe the comforts of the official story, then yeah, ALL the conspiracies have been completely "debunked". But really, one cannot "debunk" the nasty truth.
"But really, one cannot "debunk" the nasty truth.
You're correct there friend. The truth of it is this; you and your handful of fellow kooks who believe every wacky conspiracy really ARE mentally ill. But as long as you're not influencing any children - who cares?
You are entitled to believe whatever it is you believe (regardless of how stupid it appears to rational people) because you live in a free country.
Holograms, beams from space, JFK, moon landings, bigfoot, illuminatti, masons, NWO, Area 51/UFOs, Pearl harbor, extradimensional beings or dead elvis stories - believe what you want. Just don't expect the world not to laugh our asses off at your stupidity...
""as long as you're not influencing any children - who cares?""
obviously you care or you wouldn't be wasting your time here evading all the real issues of fakery while lamely attacking and questioning our collective sanity.
"our collective sanity"
Who gives a crap about the sanity of three or four people?
The proof is in the sloppily faked NASA "Moon" photos themselves:
http://www.aulis.com/skeleton.html
Every single "anomaly" described here has been debunked and disproven 100 times by the international scientific community. For anyone questioning the validity of Apollo, visit www.clavius.org or go to YouTube and search for "Lunar Legacy".
Unlike hoax advocates with a DVD or book to sell, these two sources exist only for the purpose of disseminating truth. Not for making a profit off of gullible rubes and laypersons lacking the technical knowledge necessary to see the hoax claims for the scams they are.
My goodness! How did I live 35 years without realising that I've been lied too all this time. What else is fake out there. My car? My house? The moon itself? I'll never sleep again because my bed is probably fake too. The fake giverments have gotten away with fooling fake people with their fakery for too long. I need a fake beer to calm my fake nerves.
*yawn*. Tool.
is it possible the fake moon landings were filmed in Western Australia? wasn't the US military allies with Australia in the 60's?
western australia has a LOT of open space, more than enough to film a HOAX like the moon-walks and landings...
The stupidity in this article is astouding. Repeated blatherings of the same claims that have long been fully explained does not make you a proponent of the truth, it makes you a moron.
http://www.clavius.org
http://www.bautforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=19 (Conspiracy Theories section of the Bad Astronomy/Universe Today board)
Proof this article is idiotic? The first "proof" offered that the Moon landings were faked is the "moontruth" video. That was a viral marketing campaign by an internet ad agency, not secret NASA film. If you fall for that crap, no wonder you fall for the rest of the tripe dragged out.
"Anonymous physicist" knows very little about physics and is astoundingly wrong. He says "Hills and bumps do NOT alter shadow angles." I challenge you to look at photos of daylight terrain. They do.
Why is it a telling sign that the astronauts never jump or perform extraordinary feats of strength on the Moon, but then also telling when they do perform extraordinary feats, such as the astronaut pushing himself upright from the ground after falling over?
Stop listening to the hysteria mongers and think for yourself.
Oh, that last shill/retard--swart?
When the Astro-not who fell, can clearly be seen being pulled up before he tries to push off the ground. And the cable has been exposed as well. This is a matter of timing, lying idiot, not strength.
Those "forums" continue to get more and more people to see the Apollo scam.
Post a Comment
<< Home