Humint Events Online: Hanging Skin and Nuclear Explosions

Sunday, July 08, 2007

Hanging Skin and Nuclear Explosions

Another remarkable finding from Anonymous Physicist-- the hanging skin of 9/11 casualty Felipe David is a striking piece of evidence indicating a nuclear blast in the basement of the WTC.

Where in the World is Felipe David-- and Did He Survive Exposure to Nuclear Radiation?

By The Anonymous Physicist


Assuming the following tale is not completely psyops, then on 9/11, Felipe David, employed by Aramark Corp., was checking or replenishing vending machines in one of the basement levels of WTC1. (Curiously Aramark Corp has Thomas Kean—Chairman of the 9/11 Commission--as one of its Board Directors since 1994.)

The following is supposedly Felipe David’s account of what happened beginning just before the first plane “hit.” "That day I was in the basement in sub-level 1 sometime after 8:30am. Everything happened so fast, everything moved so fast. The building started shaking after I heard the explosion below, dust was flying everywhere and all of a sudden it got real hot. I threw myself onto the floor, covered my face because I felt like I was burned. I sat there for a couple of seconds on the floor and felt like I was going to die, saying to myself 'God, please give me strength.'

"When I went in, I told them it was an explosion," said David, who was then helped out of the WTC by Rodriguez and eventually taken by ambulance to New York Hospital. "When people looked at me with my skin hanging, they started crying but I heard others say 'OK, good, good, you made it alive. [This ends the extract from the first URL above.]

Now I would like people to note that nowhere in the above quote, allegedly direct from Mr. David, does he mention fire. He states that he felt and heard explosion(s), and then “it got real hot.” He never says he saw any fire. This may be crucial. However when you read of his story through the words of William Rodriguez, “fire” is added into the story. "He had been standing in front of a freight elevator on sub-level 1 about 400 feet from the office when fire burst out of the elevator shaft, causing his injuries."

Reports, as we shall see, differ greatly as to how he got to the vicinity of other workers for help, including keymaster William Rodriguez, of whom we have already seen much “coincidence” and strangeness. We have the “most official” story (always the one to be most wary of for those in the know) that he staggered into Rodriguez’ office or area, and Rodriguez helped him outside, and into an ambulance. Some earlier reports even stated that Rodriguez carried Mr. David. The following site no longer works, but I copied the following from google: “Rodriguez carried Felipe David out of the building and re-entered it to rescue two men trapped on the elevator who were in danger of ... ”

But this Christian organization’s website quotes Mr David saying he ran six blocks for help! "I asked God to give me strength. And I was able to get up and run six blocks to find an exit," Mr. David says. Then we have this remarkable TV interview that morning with Kenny Johannemann. Mr. Johannemann states that he was the one who helped David, “I dragged a guy off. His skin was hanging. I helped him into an ambulance” Note that there is no mention of Rodriguez. Wise individuals have suggested that perhaps no one interviewed on TV on 9/11 was genuine. Notice how the camera angle changes and zooms in on him, just as he is asked about “terrorism.” The regime had long range plans, and a carefully crafted script. Note how Johannemann’s arms flail just like another 9/11 witness that morning who has been shown to be bogus. He, of course, could be telling the truth (and each of you will have to draw your own conclusions), but I cannot find anything on him in recent years.

So we have at least four accounts as follows:
Rodriquez helped David to an ambulance.
Rodriquez carried David to an ambulance.
Johannemann helped David to an ambulance.
David ran six blocks to an ambulance.

Of course, in the shock and excitement of such events, we know that accounts can differ, and we cannot make any definitive conclusions in this regard.

Now, let us return to Felipe David’s “hanging skin.” What caused this? It is always possible that some conventional fire or explosives caused his burns and the hanging skin on his face and arms. But we saw that David himself did not mention “fire.” So we may conclude that it wasn’t any direct fire that caused this. A conventional explosive blast could have done this. But this too may not be so likely, as such blasts may be expected to cause different types of wounds deep into the face and arms. But that is still a possibility, as is a fire that he just didn’t see.

That brings us to one possible cause of his hanging skin, that indeed he couldn’t possibly have seen! That is radiation from a mini-nuke, which may have just exploded, at that time, in one of the sub-basement levels. One is not capable of seeing the radiation (gamma rays, neutrons) emitted by a nuclear blast. One will just feel the heat, then pain and then the skin will be damaged, and may either be vaporized, charred or hanging—depending on the flux intensity (distance, wavelength/type of the radiation etc. are factors here). This eyewitness account on the survivors of the Hiroshima nuclear attack describes how common was damaged, hanging skin amongst them. (You can use your “find” function and search on “hanging.”)

I assert my following interpretation of Mr. David’s words is the most likely account of what happened to Mr. David. He hears and feels explosion(s). He doesn’t see any fire coming at him, but is surprised to feel great heat on his skin, and goes to the floor. He then is further shocked to feel and see his skin burned and hanging. All this is very much like what the burn victims of Hiroshima and Nagasaki reported.

Now radiation exposure to the skin should result in significant swelling. But we have no photos or videos of Mr. David, until this Youtube video (in Spanish) allegedly three months later, when Mr. Rodriguez visits Mr. David. David’s face does look (still?) a bit swollen, but not much. But this is allegedly three months later, without any allowed record of what his face, arms and legs looked like until that point in time. Why do we not have any photos or video of Mr David until that point in time? Could he have had massive skin swelling, beginning almost immediately after his skin was damaged by “something,” possibly radiation from a nuclear blast? Could they have only trotted Mr. David out after his swelling had come down to a “normal” level?

Finally I note that there seems to be nothing in the public record on Felipe David for the last five years or so! Even though he “too” could be regarded as a “hero.” Why do we not know where he is, and his status? Hopefully Felipe David is OK. Hopefully he did not get cancer, or other medical problems, or suffer a strange “accident.” Hopefully truly independent researchers will find him, and get his story direct from him, when he wouldn’t be surrounded by any public media, or “handlers” from the government, or any other interference. With the dearth of information forced upon us, we may ask: Where in the world is Felipe David? What has he been doing these last five years or so?

And is Felipe David the (only?) radiation survivor of a mini-nuke at the World Trade Center on 9/11? Does he share a kindred experience with those who were in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in those early days of August 1945 that marked the dawn of a new, horrible age? We must recognize that just like the World Trade Center on 9/11, Hiroshima and Nagasaki were also called…Ground Zero.

25 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

So.

We have a selective mini-nuke here that irradiates a single individual.

Out of how many that were in the basement areas of WTC?

And we'd have to not have only one, but two of these magical selective-radiation generating (or according to Spook, non-radiation generating because it was a mini-fission mini-nuke - can't you guys get together???) mini-nukes - one for each tower.

With only one guy surviving with selective-radiation burns.

This gets better and better!

C'mon, Anonymous Anal Brain! What is NEXT from your magical bag of

2:54 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

""mini-nukes - one for each tower.""

so.
probably more than 1 for each tower.
the top section of wtc2 tilted over a good 20+ degrees before it disintegrated simultaneous to the section below it.
the key word being *simultaneous.
probably the top section had its own mini nuke that went off at the same time as one in the section below it did.

one thing is for sure:
the NIST/9.11 commission's version of the wtc demise is a complete load of shit.

4:21 PM  
Blogger Spooked said...

The point is that "hanging skin" is pathomnemonic for exposure to a nuclear blast.

Like it or not.

4:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So, perhaps you are totalling basing your hypothesis on this one "hanging" piece of "evidence"?

But, how can this magical explanation describe all of the other evidence? For example, why wasn't paper burned between the WTC and each of the toasted cars? eh?

8:50 PM  
Blogger Spooked said...

The cars were toasted by nuke-derived EMPs, and EMPs do not affect paper, only materials that pass current like metal.

9:58 PM  
Blogger Spooked said...

And I am hardly basing nukes on this partcicular point, but the hanging skin is consistent with nukes, yes.

9:59 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

anonymous @ 8:50 if you have a better idea then you should bust it out.

10:10 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

EMPs from what?

1:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

EMP's from what?

you know how to read.

1:14 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Somebody around here said that nukes caused the EMPs. I know they are mistaken because there isn't a shred of evidence that any nukes were detonated.

Thats' why I asked EMPs from what. I still don't have an answer so I guess you guys don't know either.

2:56 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"" because there isn't a shred of evidence that any nukes were detonated.""

and yet you do know how to read which means that you either haven't been paying attention or you are simply lying.

http://www.wtcnuke.com/

http://www.nucleardemolition.com/index.htm"

WTC nuclear demolition 1

WTC nuclear demolition 2

google search: electromagnetic pulse at the WTC

4:07 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

go here and read previous posts.

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/

4:45 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I guess I wasn't clear. I should have said there wasn't a shred of evidence by a reputable, mainstream legitimate individual or organization that acknowledges a nuclear event occurred not once but twice in the lower Manhattan area.

There are plenty, as proven by your "links", of disreputable, fringe, illegitimate boneheads or whacko organizations that advocate nukes or space-based weapons or little green men from Mars.

You can go right ahead yelling and hollering and all about those "links", but anyone with an iota of gray matter in their brain-housing-unit know that these are the desperate screams of the mentally ill.

9:21 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

righto.
actually anyone with an iota of grey matter in their head knows that these cars weren't toasted by the force of gravity.
toasted cars!

10:05 PM  
Anonymous koala said...

Btw, the Spanish-Language youtube clip is by telemundo47, which is a New York station, and was purchased by NBC in October 2001. The voiceover actually says Rodríguez managed to get David out of the building and place him in an ambulance. But it's interesting that Rodríguez is edited out by the voiceover when he starts to tell what actually happened inside the building.

There's an article in arcticbeacon http://www.arcticbeacon.citymaker.com/articles/article/1518131/28031.htm
by Greg Szymanski which uses the phrase "escorted ... to safety". In the same article, Rodríguez is quoted complaining that NBC did a long interview with him one year after 9/11, and never broadcast it.

Oh, and the difference between carrying and escorting could be a Spanish one: Spanish texts use the word "llevó", which can mean pretty much both. I myself, a speaker of Spanish from Spain, tend to imply the carrying (in this case), but the usage in Latin America varies slightly. Could it have been some dragging-guiding-helping along? To perhaps a place where an ambulance was in sight, but David couldn't make the last few yards on his own? Again, we'd need to hear from himself.

Oh, and did you notice, David looks really awkward in the youtube clip. Like he doesn't like the entire situation, with Rodríguez and the cameras and all.

Spooked, I like your blog. Sometimes you are really naïve, but you aren't afraid of asking even the absurdest questions. And from time to time, you dig up real gems. Problems I'd never thought of, facts I'd never heard of. Your technique of approaching problems does bear fruit. Keep up the good work, and don't feel disheartened by some of the more impolite comments!

9:49 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Koala:

Thanks for your input about my article, especially in regards to the Spanish.

RE Rodriguez, it is pretty clear from his entire (known) background as found, even on wiki, and his (post 911) world-wide lecturing, and meeting H. Clinton and Bush, etc. that 1. he has done quite well for himself and 2. his media "suffering" fits a classical limited hangout.

Felipe David, who some earlier reports named as Felipe Duran, is the one who suffered in the "heat" of the moment, and has since been silenced, in one way or another. But I did cite the one quote, where he himself said he ran "six blocks." This might jive more with "skin hanging" burn survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, who--though in shock--were able to wander around at length, if there were no deeper systemic injuries. But I appreciate the carried/ecorted translation you provided.

I am glad you noted how awkward David looks, as I did. Perhaps Rodriguez is his (forced) handler--or should I say was.

Do you know accents? The lutheran.org site I cited (the 6 block run) said that Felipe was from Honduras. I would ask you if his accent fits that, but are you not saying that David never speaks in the Telemundo/youtube clip? If the clip allows him to speak, what does he say?

If he doesn't speak, its all the more strange as the story is supposed to be about him. (But really is again playing up Rodriguez.)

If anyone heard the original airing of this (non-)interview?, please let us know. It might be more revealing than the youtube put up.

Of course, the real thing that might be extremely revealing would be to see any pictures/video of David (or hear from honest eyewitnesses), from the moment of his injuries, until it was OK to trot him out to be seen with Rodriguez.

Anonymous Physicist

12:59 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I must articulate my appreciation as well as my alarm at this web page.

Bringing to light so many of the discrepancies and outright bald-faced lies of the situation is so very important.

But try as I might I have not found any discussion about the true aspect and reasons behind what happened on Sept 11, and that is the disappearance of over 4000 toilets that had been in the WTC complex.

The aforementioned 4,000 is a conservative estimate - it could be as much as 10,000.

The fact that nobody - NOBODY - has broached this question is proof positive that there is a severe cover-up taking place.

Raise your voices and I will be posting/commenting on this much more in the future here.

Anonymous Plumber

1:03 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey Anonymous Plumber, I'm glad you finally got out of jail for doing Nixon's dirty tricks!

Your toilet bowl analogy is very fitting for someone who has s*it for brains.

11:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

anon@2:56 said: "there isn't a shred of evidence that any nukes were detonated."
really?
www.wtcnuke.com
www.nucleardemolition.com
http://www.saunalahti.fi/wtc2001/evidence.htm

how about the elevated levels of barium, strontium, and tritium in the WTC area after S-11? why do you think the media perps and spooks almost immediately designated the area "Ground Zero"? Because it WAS a Ground Zero, for multiple nuclear explosions...the Psy-Op has many holes, we need to explore them and ultimately expose them...

7:55 AM  
Anonymous Sword_of_Truth said...

anon@2:56 said: "there isn't a shred of evidence that any nukes were detonated."
really?
www.wtcnuke.com
www.nucleardemolition.com
http://www.saunalahti.fi/wtc2001/evidence.htm


None of the above websites contain any evidence of nuclear detontations at the World Trade Center on September 11th 2001.

The comment you are responding to still stands.

6:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

the anonymous physicist has presented the evidence for nuclear demolition of wtc on several occasions now.
go ahead and refute it. if you can.

the NIST/911 commission reports contain no evidence that the wtc were destroyed in the manner that was officially claimed.
go ahead and make a case for that. if you can.

it is all being sworded out in the wash.

9:35 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

One doesn't have to refute nor CAN one refute that which doesn't exist.

There *is* no evidence of nuclear detonations at the WTC site. It is that simple. There is no radioactivity. There is no visual damage that a nuclear detonation took place. There is no video damage that a nuclear detonation took place. There is no evidence *in any way, shape or form* that a nuclear event took place. Saying it did, it doesn't matter how often, Goebbels, won't make it so. Having some 14 year old moron on his parent's computer using a name that will obviously sway those who are a bit daft among us won't make it so, either.

5:45 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

saying that there is no evidence does not erase the fact that AP has repeatedly and concisely pointed out the evidence.

denial is not just a river in egypt, swort.

10:39 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Needless to say, "pointing out evidence" (Anonymous Pissant) to someone who is about as sharp as a cue ball (You) isn't much of an accomplishment.

Stuff like critical thinking skills, analytical approaches to questions, scientific methods, etc are lost on this crew of half-baked asshats.

Again, there is a 14 year old pimply little geek who gets wood anytime one of these moronic semi-sycophants swoons over his incredible analysis!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Pardon me while I fart.

1:59 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

""critical thinking skills, analytical approaches to questions, scientific methods,""

how ironic that you mention these while simultaneously avoiding them!

4:16 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger