Humint Events Online: Updated 9/11 Odds

Saturday, July 07, 2007

Updated 9/11 Odds

9/11 ODDS

Very little in this world is certain, and therefore it is difficult to be absolutely certain of many aspects of 9/11. Moreover, my ideas for what happened on 9/11 have evolved, as I take in new evidence and new ideas and analyze new evidence.

The following are how I rate various aspects of 9/11, in betting terms (and yes, I would bet real money on these if it were possible):

1) Some officials in the US government had specific foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks: 1,000 to 1

2) Some officials in the US government aided the hijackers at various points before 9/11: 1,000 to 1

3) Some officials in the US government had a direct hand in carrying out the attacks: 1,000 to 1

4) Flight 77 did not crash into the Pentagon: 1,000 to 1

5) No conventional plane hit the Pentagon: 100 to 1

6) Pre-planted explosives including nuclear weaponry caused the total collapses of the WTC twin towers: 1,000 to 1

7) WTC7 was brought down by controlled demolition of some form: 1,000 to 1

8) no plane crashed at all in Shanksville and the crash site was a complete hoax: 100 to 1

9) UA93 did not crash in Shanksville: 1,000 to 1

10) flight 11 did not hit WTC1: 500 to 1

11) flight 175 did not hit WTC2: 1,000 to 1

12) at least some videos and photos of the second hit were faked: 10,000 to 1

13) Bush had some specific foreknowledge about what was going to happen on 9/11: 10 to 1

14) The air defense (NORAD) response to the hijackings was distracted and/or disabled by wargames being run on 9/11: 50:50 (lack of real hijacked planes may have been more of a factor)

15) The direct 9/11 attacks did not involve any conventional planes: 100 to 1 (planes were probably used indirectly)

16) The 9/11 attacks did not involve any planes at all and were a hoax facilitated by pre-planted explosives, planted plane parts and video fakery: 100 to 1

17) There is a cover-up/disinfo campaign about 9/11 being maintained by the government: 1,000 to 1

18) There is a cover-up about 9/11 being maintained at high levels by the media: 1,000 to 1

My previous odds as of October 2006, can be seen here.

Interestingly, I have clearly firmed up on many of these key points in the last 8 months-- going from 100 to 1 to 1,000 to 1 in many places.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

NORAD is "civil" air defense?

Boy, are you a dumb shit.

What else is bull shit in that posting?

3:07 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

4 planes not intercepted in 1,5 hours?

5:37 PM  
Blogger Spooked said...

NORAD is "civil" air defense

Yes, I made a mistake there. I will fix that. I know those are different, that was an oversight.

5:49 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

you have the odds numbers mixed up...what you're trying to say is:
1 to 1,000
1 to 100

see what i mean? otherwise you're giving the PERPS better odds...the FAVORITE goes on the left, UNDERDOG on the right...

8:10 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger