Humint Events Online: David Ray Griffin on Unextinguishable Fires at the WTC: FAIL

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

David Ray Griffin on Unextinguishable Fires at the WTC: FAIL

The first three paragraph are good...then he FAILS:
8. Inextinguishable Fires

Besides having the power to produce the miraculous effects already reported, the World Trade Center fires were also miraculously inextinguishable. The fact that fires continued burning in the Ground Zero rubble for many months, in spite of every attempt to put them out, was widely reported. The title of a New York Times story in the middle of November, two months after the attacks, referred to the “Most Stubborn Fire.” A New Scientist article in December was entitled “Ground Zero’s Fires Still Burning.” Very hot fires continued to burn in the Ground Zero debris piles, these stories reported, even though heavy rains came down, millions of additional gallons of water were sprayed onto the piles, and a chemical suppressant was pumped into them.

According to Greg Fuchek, vice president of a company that supplied computer equipment to identify human remains at the site, the working conditions at Ground Zero remained "hellish" for six months, because the ground temperature ranged from 600 to 1,500 degrees Fahrenheit.

These inextinguishable fires were a mystery. Assuming the truth of the official account of the destruction of the World Trade Center, there would have been nothing in the debris pile other than ordinary building materials, and these can burn only in the presence of oxygen. There would have been little oxygen available in the densely packed debris piles, and wherever it was available, the fires should have been easily suppressed by the enormous amounts of water and chemical suppressants pumped into the piles. The fires’ seemingly miraculous power to keep burning could not be explained by the airplanes’ jet fuel (which some people seem to think of as having miraculous powers, even though it is essentially kerosene), because it would have all burned out, as mentioned above, within a few minutes.

A non-miraculous explanation is suggested by the discovery of a large amount of nanothermite residue in the WTC dust, which was reported in a peer-reviewed scientific journal in 2009. Being both an incendiary and a high explosive, nanothermite is one among several types of “energetic nanocomposites” – described by an article in The Environmentalist as “chemical energetic materials, which provide their own fuel and oxidant and are not deterred by water, dust or chemical suppressants.” The discovery of nanothermite residue in the dust provided, therefore, an empirical basis for a non-miraculous explanation of the long-lasting fires at Ground Zero.

According to the official account, however, the buildings were all brought down without the aid of any incendiaries or explosives. WTC 7 was said by NIST, as we saw above, to have been brought down by fire alone, and this fire, NIST added, was “an ordinary building contents fire.” As for the Twin Towers, they were brought down through the combined effects of the airplane impacts and the ensuing fires: NIST explicitly rejected “alternative hypotheses suggesting that the WTC towers were brought down by controlled demolition using explosives.”

For anyone who accepts the official account, therefore, the inextinguishable underground fires at Ground Zero provide still another demonstration of miraculous powers that must have been possessed by the World Trade Center fires.
Methinks someone really needs to turn on DRG to nukes and the China Syndrome. I'd be REALLY curious to see what he would say about that. Is DRG being duped on thermite and open to be set straight? Or is he in fact intel scum?


Anonymous Anonymous said...

DRG is not being duped. He is intel filth from the get-go. That was always obvious.

The new book,

"The Anonymous Physicist Reveals More Secrets of Man’s History, Future and Quarantine, and of the Nuclear Destruction of the World Trade Center"

has several chapters proving that the evidence-free thermite hypothesis is nothing but a scam.

"Nanothermite" is the equivalent of the perpetual motion machine and purports new laws of physics and chemistry. Only Jones' own journal and a hack journal had his (non-)research.

DRG was sent out from the beginning as a gatekeeper etc.

I do love how many times he uses the word "miraculous" for the "inextinguishable fires."

These were not standard chemical fires, but the heat given off by fissioning fragments from the nukes used to destroy the WTC.

Ask Felipe David.

Of course the long half-life of fissioning U-235 is known and part of standard nuclear physics, and not "miraculous."

The thermite scam is the equivalent of the grassy knoll. Both limited hangouts meant to hide the hideous truths of how the U.S. regime perpetrated those dastardly acts.


6:00 AM  
Blogger spooked said...

Thanks-- but still, I'd like to query DRG on thermite vs nukes. Does anyone have a contact email for DRG? I couldn't find one, an obvious one anyway.

12:27 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have not examined the debris, myself, so I will not dispute the supposed findings of thermate, thermite, in its various forms. Perhaps a good quantity of unburned thermate was found in the debris.

But I will dispute the contention that ANY chemical agent, checmical incindiary, or any chemical reaction at all for that matter can possibly account for the persistant heat and for the pools of molten metal that persisted for months after the event. That is not possible unless one can completely suspend the laws of physics.

Anyone such as Steven Jones, who knows these laws full well, and who still contends that checmical agents account for 911 is simply lying. There is no way around this. Period. Attribute what motvies you will to such lies, but lies they are.

3:06 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger