Humint Events Online: August 2007

Friday, August 31, 2007

Iraq Police Force Needs to Be Scrapped and Remade

Surprise! The regime found another reason to stay longer in Iraq!

And here's another reason they came up with-- if we leave, it means $9/gal gas!

Though one cannot have true Iraq propaganda without mentioning al-CIA-duh. All hail General Petraeus! "We say we have achieved progress, and we are obviously going to do everything we can to build on that progress and we believe al Qaeda is off balance at the very least."

These guys are awesome.
Bookmark and Share
0 comments

Pentagon Video Fakery



No wonder they took so long to release this video.

I have long thought that this blurry object was roughly consistent with an AA 757. But since a 757 cannot have produced the damage seen at the Pentagon, this object is likely fakery of some sort. One tip off to something funny here is that that huge puff of smoke under the object-- it simply is not consistent with a jet going over 500 mph trailing some smoke from just hitting a lamppole. The smoke should be trailed behind out much more.

Meanwhile this video from the same "debunker" analyzing the DoubleTree Hotel security camera video is fragrantly dishonest in claiming a flying object goes across the space only once in eight minutes-- supposedly the plane right before the hit. But if you look at the extended video here, something goes fast across this same space several times before the hit. Either this blurry object seen before the explosion is not a plane-- or several things flew into the Pentagon before it exploded.

And while we're on the Pentagon, this is worth a re-watch:
Bookmark and Share
2 comments

Torture Is a Warcrime

Bookmark and Share
1 comments

Wednesday, August 29, 2007

AP Rewrites Katrina History

Hurricane Katrina made landfall south of New Orleans at 6:10 a.m. Aug. 29, 2005, as a strong Category 3 hurricane that flooded 80 percent of the city and killed more than 1,600 people in Louisiana and Mississippi. It was the worst natural disaster in the history of the United States.


The fucking hurricane did NOT flood New Orleans, it was the fucking levees that broke (or were blown) that flooded the city after the storm passed!!! The hurricane itself barely damaged the city.

NEW ORLEANS - On the second anniversary of Hurricane Katrina, anger over the stalled rebuilding was palpable Wednesday throughout the city where the mourning for the dead and feeling of loss doesn't seem to subside.


People SHOULD still be angry over this.

Goddammit.
Bookmark and Share
3 comments

The Sad Story of Dr. Anna Pou

Bookmark and Share
0 comments

Bush Threatens Nuclear Holocaust in the Middle East Over Iran' Efforts to Get Nuclear Technology

Doesn't say who might deliver the holocaust.

While I have tended to doubt that the US would attack Iran, at least in the near future, I'm not so sure Bush isn't crazy and/or sick enough to actually do it-- thus completing the middle east country invasion trifecta before his presidency is over.

I have little doubt Bush is itching to attack Iran, the main question is whether the "powers that be" will allow it.
Bookmark and Share
0 comments

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Headline: "Astonishing tower collapse screams "No New Nukes!!""

Unfortunately, it is not exactly the story I expected.

Though still an important story...

Pics here.
Bookmark and Share
0 comments

Did We Win the Iraq War?

If not, it looks like we're in trouble:
Simon Tisdall
Wednesday February 28, 2007
Guardian Unlimited

An elite team of officers advising US commander General David Petraeus in Baghdad has concluded the US has six months to win the war in Iraq - or face a Vietnam-style collapse in political and public support that could force the military into a hasty retreat.

(via Eschaton)

Though as anyone knows who follows this, various pundits and politicians have been giving a six-month deadline for winning the war since the first summer of the war.

Reminds me of the old carrot and stick trick...
Bookmark and Share
0 comments

Gives New Meaning to "Craig's List"

Though at least now we know the signals guys use when cruising for anonymous sex in men's bathrooms:
“At 1216 hours, Craig tapped his right foot. I recognized this as a signal used by persons wishing to engage in lewd conduct. Craig tapped his toes several times and moves his foot closer to my foot. I moved my foot up and down slowly. While this was occurring, the male in the stall to my right was still present. I could hear several unknown persons in the restroom that appeared to use the restroom for its intended use. The presence of others did not seem to deter Craig as he moved his right foot so that it touched the side of my left foot which was within my stall area,” the report states.

Craig then proceeded to swipe his hand under the stall divider several times, and Karsnia noted in his report that “I could ... see Craig had a gold ring on his ring finger as his hand was on my side of the stall divider.”


Update-- he may not think he's gay, but that doesn't mean he doesn't get a kick out of trolling for anonymous male sex.
Bookmark and Share
0 comments

Monday, August 27, 2007

Stupid Terrorist Tricks

Osama bin Laden's grand plan for 9/11 was to lure us into invading a middle-eastern country.

Riiight.

Apart from the fact that it is damn suspicious that bin Laden's goals were the same as the neocons-- to invade Iraq-- there is another fact that completely shoots down the idea that bin Laden really wanted the US to invade a middle-eastern country: Afghanistan.

We invaded Afghanistan after 9/11, and bin Laden was completely unprepared for that war-- it was a rout. And bin Laden failed at mounting any sort of massive jihad in Afghanistan even though that was the obvious place the US would strike following 9/11.

So the whole notion that bin Laden's grand plan for 9/11 was to lure us into invading a middle-eastern country is clearly propaganda. It is most likely propaganda written by the CIA to explain why al-CIA-duh hasn't mounted another 9/11-type attack in the US, as well as to justify the planned Iraq quagmire.

Apparently most people don't even mind the cognitive dissonance and double-think this propaganda generates!
Bookmark and Share
3 comments

Simple Domestic Example of a False Flag Attack

A big brother is mad at his little brother for some relatively petty reason and wants to get him in trouble. The older brother finds a valuable toy that he no longer wants. The younger brother has a history of breaking toys. The older brother wrecks the toy and leaves it in a place where the breakage will be blamed on his little brother. The parents find the wrecked toy and immediately blame the little brother-- he gets in trouble despite his pleas of innocence-- and the older brother gets some special treatment from the parents.

However, the giveaway for the truth, if the parents had chosen to investigate, is that the toy was destroyed in a much more violent manner than the little brother could have accomplished. Further, the older brother's alibi is not reliable and his story not consistent.
Bookmark and Share
3 comments

Permanent War and Financial Scams

Bookmark and Share
1 comments

Worst Attorney General Ever

Bookmark and Share
1 comments

Sunday, August 26, 2007

Liberals Made the US Lose in Vietnam and Have Caused Most of Our Problems in Foreign Affairs Ever Since

Or something like that.

While much of this whole trope is merely political theater-- Bill Kristol is surely too smart to be so simple-minded about Vietnam-- it still stunning to see the sheer level of historical revisionism about Vietnam and it is amazing how much bitterness conservatives seem to still have about Vietnam.

And whether deeply felt or merely an act, Bush plays up to this whole mindset.

But ultimately what makes these people truly sick is how casually they dismiss the horrendous pain inflicted on vast numbers of people by wars such as Vietnam and Iraq.
Bookmark and Share
1 comments

Bush and the Katrina Disaster: Proof of "LIHOP"

Given a 9/11 MIHOP mindset, I have long thought that the Katrina disaster of the flooding of New Orleans was also MIHOP. Of course that view was ridiculed by some who visited this site.

Nonetheless, the evidence that the Bush administration-- at minimum-- let New Orleans flood on purpose has always been good-- and a sadly under-noticed Bush administration crime.

Now, we have actual proof that the Bush administration let New Orleans flood on purpose:
"By midnight on Monday, the White House knew. Monday night I was at the state Emergency Operations Center and nobody was aware that the levees had breeched. Nobody."

The charge is devastating: That, on August 29, 2005, the White House withheld from the state police the information that New Orleans was about to flood. From almost any other source, I would not have believed it. But this was not just any source. The whistleblower is Dr. Ivor van Heerden, deputy director of the Louisiana State University Hurricane Center, the chief technician advising the state on saving lives during Katrina.

I'd come to van Heerden about another matter, but in our talks, it was clear he had something he wanted to say, and it was a big one. He charged that the White House, FEMA, and the Army Corps hid, for critical hours, their discovery that the levees surrounding New Orleans were cracking, about to burst and drown the city.

Understand that Katrina never hit New Orleans. The hurricane swung east of the city, so the state evacuation directors assumed New Orleans was now safe -- and evacuation could slow while emergency efforts moved east with the storm.

But unknown to the state, in those crucial hours on Monday, the federal government's helicopters had filmed the cracks that would become walls of death by Tuesday.

Van Heerden revealed: "FEMA knew at 11 o'clock on Monday that the levees had breeched. At 2 p.m., they flew over the 17th Street Canal and took video of the breech."

Question: "So the White House wouldn't tell you the levees had breeched?"

Dr. Van Heerden: "They didn't tell anybody."

Question: "And you're at the Emergency Center.'

Dr. Van Heerden: "I mean nobody knew. The Corps of Engineers knew. FEMA knew. None of us knew."


SHOCKING, ISN'T IT???

But not really-- not in the context of 9/11, not in the context of the Iraq debacle.

Just another impeachable crime, should anyone care about justice.
Bookmark and Share
2 comments

Saturday, August 25, 2007

More Evidence & Testimony Indicating Nuclear Blasts, Nuclear Radiation, & China Syndrome at the WTC

By The Anonymous Physicist

Sgt. Matthew Tartaglia, a WTC responder, rescue worker, counselor, and FEMA consultant has made many remarkable statements related to the nuking of the WTC, and its China Syndrome aftermath.

Tartaglia, said he believes “tactical nukes” took down the towers, and was responsible for the high temperatures weeks and months later (but does not know of the existence of the China Syndrome.) His statements include these: “…There were only certain parts of the site that you could not legally leave without going through decontamination.…They would tackle you and take your camera away. I watched people be tackled.” Most responders couldn’t go “down in the garages…The rescue people – when our clothes got so contaminated, we were told not to bring our clothes off that site. Don’t wear anything on the site you’re not prepared to leave there because it’s contaminated.” Note that “discarding clothing”, and “going through decontamination” are standard nuclear industry methods of dealing with radiation-exposed individuals. I do not know if other industries necessitate the use of these methods as well.

In 2005, Sgt. Tartaglia said, “My teeth are falling out.” Like hanging skin resulting from a nuclear bomb, teeth falling out is a common symptom, months or years later, from nuclear radiation exposure. (Other factors can also possibly cause this, but are less likely.) Read about this Army veteran sent to Hiroshima, just days after it was nuked, to bulldoze roads. This was apparently much too soon to send Americans in to Hiroshima, but the PTB apparently cared as much about Americans, as they did about the Japanese women and children who were nuked. I note that after the July 16, 1945 Trinity “A-Bomb” test, Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer and General Leslie Groves did not return to Ground Zero until five weeks later on Sept 11, 1945. Yes, there is 9/11 again. So man did not walk again on the first alleged Ground Zero which resulted from the “Manhattan Project” until 9/11/45. Also read here about 3 veterans of atomic bomb tests in Nevada in the 1950’s who had their teeth fall out within a few years of their radiation exposure. [To quickly find the 3 veterans cited, search on “teeth.”] That article also indicates that the gov’t lied to them as to the amount of radiation they had received. It is excerpted from the book, “They Never Knew: The Victims of Atomic Testing”, [not read here] by Glenn Alan Cheney. See also “The Plutonium Files” by Welsome, and the two books on the “Making of the A-Bomb”, and the H-Bomb, “Dark Sun”, both by Rhodes--all three read here.

But please read this (portions of the book, "They Never Knew") in its entirety. It includes the following remarkable quote that may be very relevant to 9/11 research. A whistleblower came forward decades later about the actual radiation exposure Army personnel were subjected to. “In 1982, a former Army medic, Van R. Brandon, admitted that he had been ordered to keep two sets of books. "One set was to show that no one received an exposure above the approved dosimeter reading," he said. "The other set of books was to show what the actual reading was. That set of books was brought in a locked briefcase attached to [an officer]'s wrist by a set of handcuffs every morning." Army personnel were denied medical benefits and disability because the regime publicly used the “cooked” book. Do you think this same govt has gotten more or less evil, corrupt, and duplicitous, in the ensuing decades-- and in a matter that relates to possibly irradiating tens of thousands of WTC workers, responders, and near-by residents???

The statements made by Mike Pecoraro, a WTC1 stationary engineer, and 9/11 survivor, are also remarkable. Pecoraro first knew something was wrong after observing flickering lights (EMP?), and then he ascended to the sub-basement C level, from below. He says, "There was nothing there but rubble, we're talking about a 50 ton hydraulic press gone!" Pecoraro and a co-worker “made their way to the parking garage, but found that it, too, was gone”… As they ascended to the B Level, one floor above, they “were astonished to see a steel and concrete fire door that weighed about 300 pounds, wrinkled up like a piece of aluminum foil" and lying on the floor. Now I assert that this too is a likely sign that a nuclear bomb went off. Perhaps only the multi-million degree temperature at the hypocenter, or neutron bombardment, is capable of doing that to that heavy steel door. The article continues: “"They got us again,"” Mike told his co-worker, referring to the terrorist attack at the center in 1993. Having been through that bombing, Mike recalled seeing similar things happen to the building's structure.” This last statement from Pecoraro, I assert may be corroboration of nuclear engineer/geologist Phil Schneider’s statement that his inspection of the 1993 WTC explosion damage revealed to him that it was a nuclear blast, that may have gone awry, that is, was insufficient. (See my previous articles at wtcdemolition.blogspot.com.) Pecoraro states that as WTC2 “collapsed,” “there was a wind that came through the revolving doors that blew me [in the WTC1 lobby area] 100 feet to the far wall” Was this a nuclear pressure blast? You’ve probably seen the videos of A-bomb test sites, and resultant winds blowing down model houses, and heat causing fires. Like this and this.

More evidence of the likely nuking of the WTC, and China Syndrome aftermath, comes from no less than CNN’s Larry King Show. This show aired on 10/6/01, and was taped at the WTC, and a nearby burn unit, in the days prior to the air-date. The transcript is here.

Regarding the likely China Syndrome of high heat three weeks later, Thomas Von Essen, NYC Fire Commissioner, says, at the WTC, “…it's so hot, it's a really hot fire. The steel has been hot for three weeks now. Tremendous heat below, you know. It's -- the fire is not out down below.” From my earlier articles, you know that this went on for at least six months after 9/11.

At the Weill Burn Center at the Cornell Medical Hospital, Larry King interviews two women who received burns—without any fire--while trying to flee WTC1.

King: “So, did you know you were on fire, in a sense?”

Yang: “No, I wasn't on fire, I think it was from the heat.“

Mary Jo: “That's what we were told, it was the heat.”

So like Felipe David, like the Hiroshima survivors, these two women have no clue as to why their skin was burned. And who told them “it was from the heat”? And if it was the doctors, who told them to say this to the patients? Note that King says “…fire in a sense.” I assert that that sense is not fire per se, but bombardment by radiation (thermal rays, gamma rays, neutrons) that can cause heat at the skin, and damage the skin--if the flux is large enough (relevant parameters include distance, shielding, intensity and type of radiation).

King also interviews burn victim Brian Reeves, a security guard starting his rounds in the lobby of one of the towers. Reeves says: “I don't know when I got burned, but I just know when it knocked me over, there was -- there was something, the windows blew out. And when the windows blew out, I was on the ground, and like I said, there was a gust of wind. And when I opened my eyes, I seen a bright orange light.” Reeves, feeling heat on his back, takes his jacket off and falls on the ground while fleeing. There is the issue of whether his jacket is on fire or not. [Months later, the media would morph the “bright orange light” into “fireball.”] We must ask, did Reeves see the flash of, and receive the radiation, and air pressure blast from, a mini-nuke? Like the Hiroshima victims, he knows there had to be “something” but he/they didn’t see what burned him/them. In this video, months after 9/11, Reeves then says “the fire was this close to my face” (and holds his hand near his face). He did not say any such thing 2-3 weeks after 9/11, when interviewed by King.

Getting back to the King show, Dr. Roger Yurt of the Weill Burn Center says, “[Reeve’s] worst burns were on his back, some burns up on his head. Burns on your arms also.” My possible interpretation is the following. Likely his jacket was not on fire (note the burns on his head), and the jacket likely shielded him from receiving even more radiation! The source of which was apparently behind him, as his burns were mostly on his back, but also on his head. But if the flux of radiation is high enough, a person and/or their clothes will catch fire from the radiation. Many Hiroshima victims were immediately killed and left in a charred state. The “bright orange flash” he “saw” may well have been a flux of radiation onto his retina. This kind of thing is again known from Army veterans of the nuclear blasts in Nevada in the 1950’s. In the worst cases, numerous Army personnel were forced to be, in ditches, only a football field away from an atomic bomb going off!

But when Brian tells his story months later, the reporter adds “fireball” several times in her telling the story. Even the direction of the alleged fireball is cleverly, and falsely, inserted: “… a fireball that roared down the elevator shaft.” In actuality, from numerous lobby, and sub-basement witnesses, a non-fireball, a likely nuclear detonation, occurred below the lobby, and its effects traveled UP a few floors—and not down some 80-90 floors from the likely conventional explosion above. In any case, Reeves did not observe what may, or may not, have been traversing the elevator shaft. It appears that in the telling of the 9/11 survivors’ accounts, the MSM, and the 911 pseudo-truth media, are doing everything they can to add “fire” and “fireball” to the later retelling of numerous survivors’ tales. And these survivors, who did not report “fire” initially, and not knowing about such things as radiation-induced burns—without any fire—may later start including this in their own accounts, after doctors, or reporters, or hidden (or not so hidden) handlers either keep repeating the “fire” and “fireball” memes to them; or perhaps in some cases threatening/rewarding the survivors to start telling it the way their handlers demand. Never forget how FBI, or secret service agents, both on the scene in Dallas and later during depositions, threatened eyewitnesses to President Kennedy’s assassination, if they either said they clearly saw the Secret Service driver do it, or that there also were shots from the grassy knoll. Experts in eyewitness testimony tell us that the most accurate account is the closest in time to the event.

Remember how sub-basement, 9/11 burn victim Felipe David’s own accounting never mentions “fire” or “fireball,” but his alleged rescuer, William Rodriquez added fire or fireball to his accounting of David’s experiences. You will have to be the judge after reading survivors’ accounts shortly after the event, and then months later after media/(govt?) interviews. This is a crucial point in the likely tampering of witnesses to a heinous crime. It is particularly odious as this may be ongoing from deep-cover intel assets in the major, AND internet “truth”, media. But if the government/media had nothing to fear, or cover-up, why do they have to change so many burn victims’ testimonies? Likewise they are frequently inserting “plane hits” into statements, when the witness couldn’t possibly have seen that, even if the plane hits were real, instead of CGI.

I believe we are only scratching the surface regarding evidence of the use of mini-nukes on 9/11. Many fire and police witnesses fear losing their jobs, or their pensions. Beginning a month after 9/11, NYC Fire Commissioner von Essen’s office took depositions of 503 fire personnel, port authority police and EMT first responders. The report is 12,000 pages long and rarely read [and not read here]. It was deliberately excluded from the 911 Commission, and NIST, reports (scroll down at link). Could they be hiding evidence, not of the widely known explosions/controlled demolition, but specifically of the nuking of the towers and 3000 people? After von Essen’s 503 witness interviews, former CIA director Robert Woolsey, was inserted into this in 2002, as the NYC Fire Department's “Anti-terrorism Consultant.” (It’s interesting that Wikipedia omits this job in his bio.) He issued a gag order, under threat of job loss and worse, down the ranks, under the guise of “anti-terrorism.” This report is the one that includes EMT, Patricia Ondrovic’ [See my articles on her here] heavily redacted, but remarkable interview. Recall my analysis demonstrated she witnessed Electromagnetic Pulse from a nuclear bomb causing flickering lights and making cars catch fire, for no apparent reason (“toasted cars”), right near her, and also jets shooting down other jets in the sky over the Hudson. Was Woolsey in charge of the redacting, of her, and other, testimony? I make the assertion that the very purpose of interviewing these 503 9/11 witnesses and responders was to find out who had witnessed evidence of the nuking of the WTC, and to then threaten, and silence them! Perhaps too many to kill, so first try to silence them! Here are the full 503 interviews. It would be good if some real 911 researcher could read them all or search for when portions are redacted. Note my scanning them indicates that numerous witnesses report “explosions;” this was not reason enough for redaction!

There is other eyewitness (or should I say skinwitness) evidence, I believe of the heat, and radiation, wave which emanates outwards from a nuclear blast from numerous people who happened to be in the vicinity of the towers. This article states that “John Axisa, who was getting off a commuter train to the World Trade Center, …[after the alleged first plane hit]… Then there was a second explosion, and he felt heat on the back of [his] neck.” Note the timing of the “second” explosion he heard--nothing from which was seen exiting the building--and yet he felt the heat at that exact time! This again could only be from a nuke, I assert. (The DEW hangout theorists always say their alleged DEW is cold.) Also at a 911 forum, a forum administrator named Quest noted that, “I have an acquaintance who was a NYC cop on 9/11 when the second tower came down. He was 3 blocks away and told me there was "incredible heat" during the "collapse".” Heat indeed is the thing that would be felt furthest out from a nuclear blast. Read this account of physicist, Dr. Phillip Morrison 10 miles from the Trinity nuclear test site. He said, "Suddenly, not only was there a bright light, but where we were, 10 miles away, there was the heat of the sun on our faces.” [This was before the Sun came up.] So we see the similarity of statements, regarding heat during a nuclear blast, made by the Trinity witness, John Axisa, Quest’s policeman, Felipe David, and the three burn victims interviewed by Larry King. I have written that the nukes used on 9/11 were 1/100th to 1/1000th (each) of the intensity of the Trinity blast (with several per tower used, and only one per smaller WTC buildings) and we also have some shielding by the building. So the distance that radiation would be able to propagate would be vastly less than the 10 miles felt by Dr. Morrison (noted above), where the test was in the open air. Those in the towers, and nearby, would indeed be bombarded by the (unseen) radiation from a mini-nuke. Given these ideas from this physicist, who has taught physics at several universities, can Quest please further interview his cop friend, and get back to us here at comments, or via email to Spooked?

There has been at least one study published of WTC responders’ medical problems treated on scene, from 9/14/01 to 11/20/1, at the WTC. This was published in May-June, 2005, of “Prehospital and Disaster Medicine,” and was authored by: K.R. Peritt, W.L. Boal, and “The Helix Group, Inc.” This third “author” listed is a media corporation. (I did not know that corporations, per se, could now be authors?) This study related to a 10 week period whereby a Federal govt agency, the “United States Public Health Service (USPHS), deployed Disaster Medical Assistance Teams (DMATs) and the Commissioned Corps to provide on-site, primary medical care to anyone who presented.” The authors conclusion admits, the “USPHS visits probably were skewed to milder complaints when compared to analyses of employer medical department reports or hospital cases…” This appears to mean that the more serious cases went straight to the hospital. There were 9,349 on-site patient visits, which included some surrounding residents. There were 30 cases of nausea and vomiting. Let us look at skin conditions reported. There were 253 1st or 2nd degree burns, of which 107 (42%) were said to be related to equipment use. There is no word on what caused the other 58% of these burns. In addition, there are 132 cases of “other” skin problems reported. There is not a single case of third degree burns (the most serious), and no comment on this lack! Were there people with more serious burns that went straight to the hospital, and thus are not counted? There are some curious statistics: “Other injury or illness: 696 cases,” and “Not classifiable as an injury or illness: 920 cases.” That’s quite a lot of cases that are either “other” or “not classifiable,” about 17%. Why such a high percentage? They’re not “psychological” because they reported 78 cases of this. Is any medical condition being covered up? Did they test for radiation which is not mentioned? And what caused the 146 cases of burns that were not due to equipment handling? And how many people had third degree burns among the responders? Or is this classified information, related to what really was happening at the WTC, even after its demolition? This study is very troubling, and looks very “doctored.”

In conclusion now, this article, and my previous articles archived at wtcdemolition.blogspot.com and wtc-ChinaSyndrome.blogspot.com indicate the following. The proven existence of mini-nukes and micro-nukes , the massive outward explosions seen, the vaporization of a steel press, the wrinkling into “foil” of a steel door, spherical blast wave destruction, the “nuclear meteorite,[parts of 4 storeys fused together at extreme temp.,]” the feeling of heat without fire of numerous witnesses, the burned or hanging skin--without fire, the responders’ teeth later falling out, the vaporized building contents, the 1157 vaporized people, the massive evidence of the China Syndrome of resultant nuclear reacting fragments causing the very high heat and molten steel witnessed by many at least six months after 9/11, and photographed, the clothing discarding, and decontamination procedures, my detailed explanation of Ondrovic’ account of Electromagnetic Pulse and resultant car fire, and the door exploding into her as WTC 5, 6, were being exploded from within, near her, the micro- or nano-fine particle size, and much more, all indicate the federal regime set off numerous mini-nuclear bombs in the WTC on 9/11. The witnesses that my articles have cited, included numerous WTC workers, numerous firefighters, EMT worker, responders, stationary engineer, fire engineering professor, top British and American Structural Engineers who have been shown “secret” photos denied to the rest of us, NYC Commissioner, NYC Fire Commissioner, policeman, and others. Many (or the vast majority of the 503 who were found) other on-scene witnesses have—for the moment—likely been silenced, as detailed herein—which is witness tampering, and worse. Scientific data have also been cited, including —AVIRIS, LIDAR, seismic readings before “collapse”, Tritium finding (UCAL/Berkeley, and subsequent Tahil study), and the now exploding number of “rare” cancers among responders, including thyroid, leukemia, and lymph cancer—all common among radiation victims. Other data, I have asserted has been altered, or is totally hidden--second long-delayed AVIRIS data set, and the lack of any further AVIRIS released.

I assert and accuse— J’Accuse”—that the preponderance of this evidence demonstrates that the federal government of the United States of America did explode nuclear bombs inside most of the WTC buildings on 9/11/01. Furthermore, there was a resultant China Syndrome (through mechanisms detailed here by me previously) of nuclear reacting fragments releasing ionizing radiation, and high heat, for at least six months after 9/11, causing molten steel, and radiation exposure to thousands of responders and NYC residents. This was an act of treason, conspiracy, mass murder, genocide, and a ruse for waging war on innocent peoples around the world—crimes against humanity, and a ruse for blatantly eradicating American citizens freedoms and rights. The 9/11 WTC nuclear holocaust was not likely even the first time the American regime did this to its own citizens! Too few people know of this research into the American government’s probable nuking of American sailors in 1944.

The 9/11 perpetrators have used, and are using, limited hangouts and psyops to keep the people from knowing this. These hangouts, ultimately from the U.S. regime’s “intelligence” agencies, include the bogus “theories” of the official planes/fuel/gravity/pancaking nonsense, and also thermite, DEW, and Depleted Uranium [D.U.] (any uranium used on 9/11 at the WTC, and the China Syndrome aftermath, would have been highly enriched, not depleted). The observed American military helicopters and planes directing the initial explosions, and the final nuclear destruction prove that this was not done by Arabs, Muslims, Iranians, Israelis, Russians, or Chinese. As with the Kennedy Assassination, this massive set of actions, and massive cover-up, could only have been perpetrated by the so-called government of the United States, and not by any small “rogue elements” therein. Complicit in the original act, and/or its cover-up, are all the branches of the federal government, its military, and intelligence agencies, and the Main Stream Media, and even much of the so-called alternative or internet media which is also laden with intel agents posing as “truthers,” while pushing the hangouts listed above. The people of the world must get together, in what may be their final hour, and act literally to save themselves from extermination, from the handful of monsters that control humanity. Nature has demonstrated that individuals trained to be fearful can all come together, and overcome this fear, and act and defeat the small number who had previously seemed to be so invincible and bloodthirsty. We are indeed likewise in the jaws of these monsters, and have been for a long time; but likewise again, it is still possible to break free, and be free. We must try. Like this last video, there are so many more of us, than of them.
Bookmark and Share
17 comments

Thursday, August 23, 2007

At Least 50-60 CIA Officers Were In On the 9/11 Plot

Bookmark and Share
2 comments

CIA Pre-9/11 "Fuck-Ups" and "The War on Terror"

The simple fact is, if officially, 9/11 could have been easily stopped if the CIA had more diligent-- the war on terror is obviously completely bogus and there is no significant Islamic terror threat.


Which is why the Bush administration, Republicans and the media do not want to talk about this report.

The Democrats are another story.
Bookmark and Share
1 comments

More Weirdness with the Deutsche Bank Building Fire Story

First, there was no water supply to fight the fire, and the building was being stripped of fireproofing-- and still the building didn't collapse after at least seven hours of burning. Perhaps it burned longer-- it's hard to get this info from news reports.

Now, it turns out the contractor in charge of the Deutsche Bank building "demolition" had Mafia ties. The contracting company also had a funny name: the John Galt Corporation. You can read a bit about John Galt here. Suffice it to say, John Galt is a very evocative and symbolic name that should generate suspicion.

Also, it looks like I am not the only to wonder if this fire was done on purpose to help prove the idea that damage and fires were not enough to bring down the WTC towers 9/11 -- in some sort of bizarre reverse psy-op. Of course the "powers that be" have always tried to support the "opposition" in some way, to keep various conflicts going, to have polarities from which to derive a synthesis. The "powers that be" use every means out there to their advantage.
Bookmark and Share
2 comments

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

Proof FOX News Is Evil



Evil defined here as a war-mongering propaganda machine.
Bookmark and Share
0 comments

Congress Less Popular Than Bush

Though historically Congress gets much lower ratings than the president, it's quite sad to see a newly-in-charge Democratic Congress getting worse approval than the worse president ever(TM). However, it's not hard to imagine why Congress is faring so poorly (even by the standards of conventional politics).
Bookmark and Share
0 comments

Real Or Hoax?

Real or hoax?

Hard to tell isn't it?

Real or hoax?

Hard to tell isn't it?

Morgan Reynolds is so convinced the latter is a hoax, he's taking it to court!

Good luck, Morgan!!!!!!!
Bookmark and Share
6 comments

Bush: Harvard-Educated Student of History

Bookmark and Share
0 comments

CIA 9/11 "Error" Report

Bookmark and Share
3 comments

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

Hundreds of Billions Thrown at a Fucked-Up War, But We Can't Make Sure Kids Have Health Insurance?

The Bush administration-- continuing their Herculean efforts to become cartoon caricatures of evil:
The Bush administration, continuing its fight to stop states from expanding the popular Children’s Health Insurance Program, has adopted new standards that would make it much more difficult for New York, California and others to extend coverage to children in middle-income families.
(snip)

After learning of the new policy, some state officials said yesterday that it could cripple their efforts to cover more children and would impose standards that could not be met.

“We are horrified at the new federal policy,” said Ann Clemency Kohler, deputy commissioner of human services in New Jersey. “It will cause havoc with our program and could jeopardize coverage for thousands of children.”

Stan Rosenstein, the Medicaid director in California, said the new policy was “highly restrictive, much more restrictive than what we want to do.”
Bookmark and Share
32 comments

The Science of Cognition and Illusion

Bookmark and Share
2 comments

Deutsche Bank Building Failed to Collapse Despite Severe Fire and Stripped-Off Fireproofing from Steel Beams

I'm just saying:
Workers told officials they had been stripping asbestos from beams, and the fire spread quickly through gaps and holes in the structure.

The blaze spread through spots on 10 different floors through those pockets and voids. It went as high as the 26th story, which is now the top floor of the building.


Loos of fire-proofing was of course part of the official blame for the WTC "collapses".

Also worth noting that the Deutsche tower had a large gash its side, apparently made by WTC debris, which was very similar to the gash in WTC7.

Also interesting in the same piece:
Demolition of the building, which once stood at 41 stories, had been delayed for years because of environmental concerns, labor and contract disputes, and to accommodate the search for human remains from the terrorist attacks. The chief medical examiner’s office said in February that 766 body parts had been found in the building. Most were fragments less than four inches long.


All these body fragments in a building across the street from the WTC is another indication of demolition.
Bookmark and Share
8 comments

Monday, August 20, 2007

Proof of the Existence of Mini-Nukes and Micro-Nukes

From the Anonymous Physicist

More and more people are realizing that other theories proposed could not have destroyed the WTC, and are limited hangouts. As more people realize that the WTC was likely demolished via small nuclear bombs (likely with subsidiary conventional explosives), some are now claiming that milli-nukes (mini-nukes), or micro-nukes don’t even exist. Spooked and I have addressed this issue before. Here first is proof of the “Nuclear rifle” from the 1950’s, no less.

The .01 kiloton (kt) TNT equivalent is about 1/1000th of the Hiroshima (20KT) blast. And here is a govt scientist, Peter Leitner, PhD, speaking to a Congressional Committee, in 1998. This is proof of nuclear bombs down into the range of “several pounds of TNT.” He stated, “These experiments involve the ACTUAL TESTING of extremely low-yield fission devices (as low as the equivalent of several pounds of TNT) within a confined environment.” Several pounds of TNT is equivalent to about 1/10,000,000th (one ten millionth) of the Hiroshima blast. Thus the U.S. Govt admitted having micro-nukes, and beyond in 1998. Note that this public admission stated that the testing was done “in a controlled environment.”

Clearly, the gov't has had milli-nukes and micro-nukes for some time.
Bookmark and Share
2 comments

Sunday, August 19, 2007

China Syndrome at the WTC

New site, with the collected pieces of Anonymous Physicist regarding molten steel and nuclear heat at ground zero.


Note, this is not the complete collection of articles from Anonymous Physicist. His other pieces can be found on this site or at http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/.
Bookmark and Share
3 comments

Saturday, August 18, 2007

Damaged Skyscraper Near Ground Zero Suffers Major Fire, Doesn't Collapse

A seven-alarm fire ripped through an abandoned skyscraper next to ground zero in Lower Manhattan Saturday, killing two firefighters who were responding to the blaze.

Officers at the scene were preventing nearby residents from returning to their homes, telling them that authorities were concerned the former Deutsche Bank office building, vacant since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks turned it into a toxic nightmare, could fall. Mayor Michael Bloomberg said that fear turned out to be unfounded.

The plume of gray smoke that trailed above the site of the World Trade Center raised concerns that toxic substances in the building could be spreading.

Bloomberg sought to reassure residents that the chemicals in the building likely did not present a significant health risk, saying air-quality tests so far showed no danger.
(snip)
Construction crews had already dismantled 14 of the building's 40 stories — reaching the 26th floor on Tuesday. Some firefighters used stairs to reach the burning upper floors of the building, just steps from where 343 firefighters lost their lives on Sept. 11, 2001.

The cause of the fire was not immediately known. Smoke pouring from the burning building was visible from midtown Manhattan and the New Jersey side of the Hudson River.

The acrid smell of smoke, which hung over the neighborhood for days after Sept. 11, returned to lower Manhattan along with the wail of emergency vehicles. More than three dozen fire vehicles, with more than 160 firefighters, responded to the blaze as pieces of burning debris fell from the building to the streets.

(snip)

"We heard this crashing," said Elizabeth Hughes, who saw the fire start from her rooftop deck across from the tower. "And then a huge fire that went up three floors fast. It was massive.
(snip)

The 1.4-million square foot office tower was contaminated with toxic dust and debris after the World Trade Center's south tower collapsed into it. Bloomberg said the chemicals in the building did not present a significant health risk.
(snip)


Of course I have to wonder if at this point, part of the "toxic" "contamination" is radioactive debris.

Amateur videos of the fire:



More here (NYTimes):

The building had stood as a ghost since parts of the south tower of the World Trade Center came crashing into it nearly six years ago, leaving it severely damaged and filled with toxic debris, including asbestos, dioxin, lead and chromium.

The ongoing demolition and abatement of those substances created difficulties for firefighters trying to reach and extinguish the fire, which started on the 17th floor, allowing the blaze to mushroom out of control, fire officials said. The building did not have a working standpipe, which run through high rise buildings to provide a source of water for firefighters.

"This was a truly difficult fire,
" Fire Commissioner Nicholas Scopetta said. "We had to lift lines from the street, with ropes in order to get it up to the 17th floor."

Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg said the building, which was still in flames late into the evening, was structurally sound and not in danger of collapsing. He also said preliminary air-quality tests showed a rise in particulate matter but no hazardous contaminants, though he cautioned that results of more complete tests would not be available until Sunday morning.




This slideshow of the dismantling process is interesting too.
Bookmark and Share
0 comments

Surprise!!! More Spying Powers Than Originally Thought!

WASHINGTON, Aug. 18 — Broad new surveillance powers approved by Congress this month could allow the Bush administration to conduct spy operations that go well beyond wiretapping to include — without court approval — certain types of physical searches on American soil and the collection of Americans’ business records, Democratic Congressional officials and other experts said.
(snip)
“This may give the administration even more authority than people thought,” said David Kris, a former senior Justice Department lawyer in the Bush and Clinton administrations and a co-author of “National Security Investigation and Prosecutions,” a new book on surveillance law.

Several legal experts said that by redefining the meaning of “electronic surveillance,” the new law narrows the types of communications covered in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, known as FISA, by indirectly giving the government the power to use intelligence collection methods far beyond wiretapping that previously required court approval if conducted inside the United States.


Oh... baby! More spying! Yes! Feels so good... don't stop!
Bookmark and Share
0 comments

Giuliani Has Ties to Raytheon

And MORE domestic spying to boot!!!
Giuliani’s security division is a part owner of a company that is developing such technology with the defense contractor Raytheon. The innovation is a sensor-based platform that can be launched aloft and will “see” a twenty-kilometre area, in a three-hundred-and-sixty-degree panorama. “It will be able to conduct a surveillance, actually,” a person familiar with the project told me. “It can follow an individual, or follow a car, at very far distances.”


Yes!! Yes!!! Yes!!!!

Oh yeah, there was of course, a very strange coincidence with Raytheon and 9/11.
Bookmark and Share
1 comments

An Orgasm of Domestic Spying

Bookmark and Share
0 comments

Friday, August 17, 2007

David Shayler and "Discrediting 9/11 Truth"

If indeed the strange saga of former MI5 agent David Shayler was about "discrediting 9/11 truth" (if that term even has any meaning anymore), then it seems to me that Shayler was specifically about discrediting WTC demolition and "no planes". To me, this implies that there IS some merit to these ideas (WTC demolition and "no planes"), if there was a plot to discredit it.

I don't understand why this isn't clear to Jeff Wells. Worse, Wells tries to make the Shayler story as vague as possible. What DOES Wells think Shayler was all about? It's hard to tell. Wells appears to argue that Shayler was initially simply trying to discredit 9/11 "truth" by spouting whacked ideas such as WTC demolition and "no planes", but then actually went around the bend and went crazy with his messiah revelation.

Actually, there are three basic ways to read the Shayler story--

1) he was an honest MI5 agent, then saw something funny regarding the handling of terrorism, left as a whistleblower, then became progressively crazier as he delved into 9/11 "truth" and the bizarre sides of 9/11, finally emerging as a self-described messiah.

2) he was an honest MI5 agent, then saw something funny regarding the handling of terrorism, left as a whistleblower, then became progressively more of a whistleblower as he delved into 9/11 "truth" and the bizarre 9/11 operation, to the extent that he became a nuisance, where upon he was treated in some way by MI5 to start discrediting himself with his last nonsense.

3) he was always an MI5 (or other) agent, and his whole saga was a scam, meant to discredit 9/11 truth from the beginning.

Wells apparently believes #1.

I say, never trust anyone from an intelligence agency, and the answer is more likely #3.
Bookmark and Share
0 comments

In 2000, Giuliani Had Radiation Therapy for Prostrate Cancer

Bookmark and Share
0 comments

Ah, So Giuliani Wasn't Exposed to So Much Ground Zero Radiation After All

Bookmark and Share
0 comments

Evidence of Vaporized WTC Victims

(This was originally posted July 17)

I just finished reading Robert Shaler's book "Who They Were", on the identification of 9/11 victims at Ground Zero. Shaler was the director of the forensic biology department for the New York City Chief Medical Examiner, and oversaw the enormously complex identification process for 9/11 vicitims at Ground Zero. Much of the ID'ing was done by DNA typing, as the very few intact bodies were found, and much of the human remains were small pieces.

Only 293 intact bodies were recovered from Ground Zero, out of at least 2749 victims.

Even more striking is the fact that only 1592 victims could be ID'ed-- meaning for at least 1157 victims, nothing was found (or if remains were found, intact DNA was not recovered). DNA is quite stable, as shown by recent reports of scientists obtaining DNA from thousands of years old specimens, such as men and mammoths.

Again, this is strong confirmation for extremely high energy devices, as might be obtained from nuclear blasts, being used to destroy the twin towers-- and at the same time vaporizing many of the poor souls left inside the buildings.

Keep in mind that officially, for the flight 77 and flight 93 crashes, all people were identified by remains found at the crash site-- same for the AA587 crash on November 12, 2001. These were officially extremely violent events, like the WTC demolitions.

But only about 58% of Ground Zero victims were recovered in any significant form.

On a related note, people might want to look at this article again, and others posted here relating to nukes at the WTC.
Bookmark and Share
1 comments

Thursday, August 16, 2007

National Security Insanity

You have to read this to believe it.

Example:
"Judge Hawkins wonders if the document is really that secret?

"Every ampersand, every comma is Top Secret?," Hawkins asks.

"This document is totally non-redactable and non-segregable and cannot even be meaningfully described," Bondy answers.
Bookmark and Share
22 comments

Who Edits Wikipedia and Why?

Bookmark and Share
1 comments

The Financial House of Cards Was Built on Risky Mortgages

Sadly, it looks like some of the doom-and-gloom forecasters regarding the lending crisis and its general effect on the economy may be proven right.
Bookmark and Share
1 comments

Rove: Bullshitter Supreme

Bookmark and Share
0 comments

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Simple Ghostplane Angle Proof of Fakery?

At least to me, this analysis, and the analyses within, are confusing as hell.

How about a simple page with the Ghstplane view screenshot, versus real-life view photos trying to match the view?

Something real simple, that you could present to someone in one minute as proof.

It would be rather useful.

Something along the lines of my proof that the official flight 93 story is a lie.
Bookmark and Share
8 comments

An Analogy for the People Waking Up to 9/11 Being an Inside Job?

Bookmark and Share
0 comments

Authorizing the Use of Force Against Iran

Bookmark and Share
1 comments

Tuesday, August 14, 2007

What Was Rove Really All About?

Hubris? Short-sighted selfishness? Naked, spiteful partisanship? Incompetency? Secretly undermining Republicans? Schizophrenia? Something else?

The man's legacy is a conservative movement largely discredited and disunited, a president with lower consistent approval ratings than any in modern history, a generational shift to the Democrats, a resurgent al Qaeda, an endless catastrophe in Iraq, a long hard struggle in Afghanistan, a fiscal legacy that means bankrupting America within a decade, and the poisoning of American religion with politics and vice-versa. For this, he got two terms of power - which the GOP used mainly to enrich themselves, their clients and to expand government's reach and and drain on the productive sector. In the re-election, the president with a relatively strong economy, and a war in progress, managed to eke out 51 percent. Why? Because Rove preferred to divide the country and get his 51 percent, than unite it and get America's 60. In a time of grave danger and war, Rove picked party over country. Such a choice was and remains despicable.

Rove is one of the worst political strategists in recent times. He took a chance to realign the country and to unite it in a war - and threw it away in a binge of hate-filled niche campaigning, polarization and short-term expediency. His divisive politics and elevation of corrupt mediocrities to every branch of government has turned an entire generation off the conservative label.
Bookmark and Share
0 comments

Monday, August 13, 2007

The Grand Conservative Delusion

How else to describe the idea that Islamists are going to take over America and impose Sharia law?

Now, the fear that some type of terrorists (Islamic or otherwise) are going to get their hands on a nuke and kill a hugely horrible number of Americans is a not an unreasonable fear. And of course, all diligence must be used to prevent such a catastrophe-- including the idea that such an act could be synthetic terrorism.

But the notion that Islamists are going to take over the US, in any sort of foreseeable time-frame?

It's simply laughable.

Yet conservative bloggers who push this stuff get lots of mainstream attention-- while people who have proven beyond any reasonable doubt that 9/11 was an inside job are relegated to obscurity.
Bookmark and Share
4 comments

A Humble Request for Fred/BSRegistration



Would it be possible to clip some still frames from this video and post them on a web-page for easier side-by-side comparison?

I have a real problem doing careful comparisons of views with video shots, where the video keeps moving around and where the key shots are not next to each other.

Don't get me wrong, I think the basic finding shown in the video is sound. But I think it might help detractors to have the key still shots put together on one webpage for easier comparison.

Please???
Bookmark and Share
4 comments

Why Rudy Giuliani Will Be the Next President

His sex scandals are just too delicious!
Rudy Giuliani has lately been getting some long-overdue criticism for his missteps both before and after 9/11. For example, The Village Voice reports that he insisted that the city’s emergency command center — which included a personal suite with its own elevator that he visited “often, even on weekends, bringing his girlfriend Judi Nathan there long before the relationship surfaced” — be within walking distance of City Hall. This led to the disastrous decision to locate the center in the World Trade Center, an obvious potential terrorist target.
Rudy wanted the emergency command center close to City Hall so he could DO IT WITH HIS MISTRESS.
Bookmark and Share
2 comments

Buh Bye to "Bush's Brain"

Bookmark and Share
1 comments

Sunday, August 12, 2007

Further Thoughts on the Nuking of the WTC, and Future Psyops

By The Anonymous Physicist

It behooves me to report that some claim that it doesn’t matter if the WTC, and its 3,000 human occupants were destroyed via thermite, or “DEW,” or nuclear bombs. Of course, if mini-nukes were exploded, and the subsequent China Syndrome occurred, it does matter in numerous ways.

The truth matters, in and of itself—and inherently includes an infinitude of reasons, known and unknown at any given time.

1) It matters in the legal sense, as this is also a legal matter of mass murder and high treason, and war-making crimes against humanity. And actual criminal details are part of catching and trying the perps—even if the trials are in other countries, and/or carried out by “plain” citizens for the time being.

2) It matters to the WTC responders (and their families) who are dying of rare cancers, as are many people living in NYC who are now getting “rare” cancers. If my theories are correct, they may be dying from cancers caused by exposure to nuclear radiation--in particular, in part, from the UNSHIELDED, six months long release of the China Syndrome of radioactive fragments, at the WTC. It matters in the medical treatment and prevention of disease.

3) It matters because nuclear bombs being used on innocent American citizens will outrage Americans more than anything else. Much more than learning about putting CGI on TV. Is not the most important goal in this to cause the people to wake up and act, before it is too late? Nuclear annihilation and radiation are perhaps the most odious things conceivable. This is precisely why the regime put out so many disinfo agents and “theories”! The pancakes, thermite, and DEW were all put out to keep the people from finding out that the WTC, and its thousands of human inhabitants were nuked—vaporized, irradiated—like they were less than nothing. The PTB fear the masses finding this out and realizing they have nothing to lose with such a regime in power. Every 911 truther is only helping the regime, the mass murderers, by denying the nuking of the WTC on 911, and accepting disproven, or impossible theories, or saying let’s not dwell on this.


In regards to #3 above, and in my making preliminary extrapolations from the Chernobyl China Syndrome event, I have to report that the nearly 3,000 people who died on 9/11 may--in years, or decades--be significantly surpassed by the number who will have died from cancer, or other disease, much of which may have been caused by radiation exposure! It is also a medical matter in trying to save these people. The responders and their physicians need to know the mechanism/cause of their cancers. So it is very wrong that some say the mechanism of WTC destruction either doesn’t matter, or it’s not important--compared to the TV fakery issue. It is just the opposite. All they ever put on TV, is fakery, like the Apollo Hoax. Demonstrating TV fakery is important. But how they killed thousands, and what is causing many other people to suffer and die, is a [or the] most important issue.


Now, it is important to predict, and prevent, what the regime, and its many disinfo agents, may soon try to promulgate regarding the WTC/911 nuclear destruction scenario. More and more people are realizing that planes/fuel/gravity/pancaking, or thermite, and/or DEW, could not possibly have caused the WTC explosions, and the China Syndrome of high heat and molten steel months later. More and more people are realizing that only nuclear demolition can account for all this, as well as the Electromagnetic Pulses which caused toasted cars, and not people and paper. So predicatably, I have already seen the limited hangouts arising. “Well yes it was nukes that did it, but they were foreign nukes.” Either the “Russkie” card, or the “Zionist/Israeli” card will be played as limited hangouts—or for that matter the “Al-Quaeda [Al-CIA-Duh] Card” or the “Iranian” card, or a “China card” may be played. Whoever they might want to start a bogus war with, at the time. The “Russkie card” has been planted a few decades ago, as the “Soviet suitcase nukes” claim. The Zionist card—well that’s a perennial, or should I say bi-millenial scapegoat ruse; and a hint at whether an author or website, etc. is a shill. Any honest research will inform you that MI5/6 control the CIA, the KGB/FSB, and the Mossad, and not the laughable vice versa.


Should the PTB, say, decide to nuke Chicago, they would likely simultaneously do the following scenario: Get some Arab (looking) dupes [Al-CIA-Duh] to be the first pawns. But they will also plant some dancing Israelis (or a single prominent one), in Chicago, and make sure to videotape them (for possible later use); or say that they were the old Soviet suitcase nukes, and try to whip up another “Cold War”. Or more likely they will plant numerous false flag/limited hangouts (as above), to confuse and confound— what I now call “Babelizing” the matter. So as the WTC mini-nukes mechanism of WTC destruction becomes more popular, EXPECT that it may be co-opted as “Russkie nukes” or “Israeli nukes.” Don’t fall for it. Look to Washington, D.C., and their taskmasters in London. But do expect to see this. BTW, the old “Soviet suitcase nukes” claim really means, IMO, that the PTB thought about doing a NUCLEAR 9/11 WTC type event (or even the exact same event) decades ago! But probably they didn’t then have total support from the military, media etc. And one President and his brother, and others, had to die first. And if you truly understand the whole conspiracy field, it would be clear that if the old Soviet Union really did place any suitcase nukes in the USA, it was done at the REQUEST of Washington and London. Likewise, in the present time, if there are any Mossad, or Chinese, (or other foreign) agents here (and likely there are); they would only be here at the request of Washington and London.


Finally, I call upon the survivors of 9/11 who are stricken with those radiation-induced cancers to reach out to your fellow survivors, or their families, in none other than Hiroshima and Nagasaki. For it is the same monstrous regime that has nuked you all, and would like to nuke the rest of us, if not stopped. It was not only the China Syndrome that was brought to New York City on 9/11. With the peeling away of all the WTC destruction pysops layers, we can finally see that what was brought to New York City on 9/11 was a physically somewhat less intense, but morally just as heinous version of … HIROSHIMA.
Bookmark and Share
2 comments

The Mainstream "Limited Hangout" for Al-CIA-duh

The idea that the Bush administration is merely hyping the terrorism threat-- rather than terrorism being an almost purely synthetic construct.
Bookmark and Share
1 comments

Questioning the Whole Terrorism Construct

Given the vast sums of capital and human lives tied up with supposedly fighting terrorism in this country (and out of this country), is there a good reason why more poeple don't question the basic premise of an army of Islamic terrorists out to get us?

This is a bit seperate from what happened on 9/11. It's clear by what has transpired in the past 6 years that 9/11 was a freak attack, and that there is a paucity of nasty terrorists doing things in this country.

I can understand what motivates the politicians to not question the whole terrorism construct.

But what about the people?

What percentage of Americans questions the basis for the "war on terror"?
Bookmark and Share
0 comments

The Bush Administration: Giving Sweet Succor to Brutal Dictators Around the World

Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe on Friday signed into law the controversial Interception of Communications Bill, which gives his government the authority to eavesdrop on phone and Internet communications and read physical mail.


The legislation has drawn outspoken opposition from the political opposition and civil society organizations as trampling on the civil rights of Zimbabweans. Spokesman Nelson Chamisa of the opposition Movement for Democratic Change faction of Morgan Tsvangirai called it an addition to "the dictator's tool kit."
(snip)

Secretary General Welshman Ncube of the MDC faction led by Arthur Mutambara called it a "final straw to the curtailment to the liberties of Zimbabweans." Human rights lawyer Otto Saki told VOA that the law interferes and undermines the enjoyment of rights enshrined in the constitution and is a sign Mr. Mugabe wants to consolidate his power by "any means necessary or unnecessary."

But Communications Minister Christopher Mushowe said Zimbabwe is not unique in the world in passing such legislation, citing electronic eavesdropping programs in the United States, the United Kingdom and South Africa, among other countries.

Bookmark and Share
0 comments

Saturday, August 11, 2007

Fooled Again

WASHINGTON, Aug. 10 — At a closed-door briefing in mid-July, senior intelligence officials startled lawmakers with some troubling news. American eavesdroppers were collecting just 25 percent of the foreign-based communications they had been receiving a few months earlier.

Congress needed to act quickly, intelligence officials said, to repair a dangerous situation. Some lawmakers were alarmed. Others, jaded by past intelligence warnings, were skeptical.

The report helped set off a furious legislative rush last week that, improbably, broadened the administration’s authority to wiretap terrorism suspects without court oversight.

It was a surprising victory for the politically weakened White House on an issue that had plodded along in Congress for months without a clear sign of urgency or resolution. A flurry of talk in the last three weeks on intelligence gaps, heightened concern over terrorist attacks, burdensome court rulings and Congress’s recess helped turn the debate from a slow boil to a fever pitch.

(snip)

“There was an intentional manipulation of the facts to get this legislation through,” said Senator Russ Feingold of Wisconsin, a Democrat on the Intelligence Committee who voted against the plan. The White House, Mr. Feingold said Friday in an interview, “has identified the one major remaining weakness in the Democratic Party, and that’s its unwillingness to stand up to the administration when it’s making a power grab regarding terrorism and national security.”

“They have figured out that all they have to do is start talking about an imminent terrorist threat, back it up against a Congressional recess, and they know the Democrats will cave,” he added.

Bookmark and Share
2 comments

Friday, August 10, 2007

Giuliani Claims He Was Exposed to as Much Radiation as Everyday Ground Zero Workers

In effect.

UPDATE: Now says he misspoke.

This is interesting: "There were people there less than me, people on my staff, who already have had serious health consequences, and they weren't there as often as I was," Giuliani said.
Bookmark and Share
1 comments

The Ultimate Truth of the Kennedy Assassination

By The Anonymous Physicist


President Kennedy fought to rein in the warmongers, the covertoperators, the elite enslavers and so much more. He had taken steps to smash the Federal Reserve Bank, and created “U.S. Notes.” He had refused to go to war in Laos, and Vietnam (See “JFK and Vietnam” by John Newman or see the “Stars and Stripes” Newspaper for October, 1963 on bringing all the “advisors” home beginning in late 1963.) He had refused to invade Cuba during the Missile Crisis or to start the Big One. He refused to allow the Pentagon to do their Project Northwoods. He promised “Peace not just in our time, but for all time.” Listen to this. He promised Senator Mansfield that “after I am re-elected I will smash the CIA into a thousand pieces, and scatter them to the wind.” Noel Twyman’s book, “Bloody Treason”, even describes how— far beyond Northwood, and not reported— the Joint Chiefs pressured him to launch a “pre-emptive, full nuclear strike against the Soviet Union and China.” Because “with approaching nuclear parity we won’t be able to get away with it soon.” He even wanted to release information on who might be here and in charge of everything. The regime’s disinfo agents continue to lie with ubiquity about all these things. The dead man, and his brother Robert, can’t defend themselves. The so-called Warren Commission (WC) was composed primarily of his murderers or those beholden to them. The fatal “head shot from behind” has already been detailed here as both physically impossible, and contraindicated by all the treating physicians and the asst press secretary. Likewise the “magic bullet” theory from WC attorney and now-Senator, Arlen Spector, hitting five bones in two people and hanging out in midair for a second and a half and making turns without forces acting on it, and of course not being deformed, is laughably, physically impossible. This is equivalent to 911 with the 911 OC’s theory of gravity, in this instance “magically” exploding outward as well as downward, at that time.

On the internet’s many alleged truth sites, one can see some proclaim that “Kennedy’s assassination has nothing to do with today’s world” or that they flat out don’t care, or they believe the Warren Commission (while trying to proclaim that they don’t believe the 911 Commission). Of course, the simple truth is he was killed precisely so we would end up with this country in its present state of blatent fascism, world domination, world mass-murder, and perennial war. Some of the disinfo agents in the 911 field are the same disinfo people from the JFK ass’n field. From the very moment of the assassaination to the present time, a whole industry of bogus investigations, books, authors, articles, museums, conferences, websites, etc, was created. The analogies with 911 are clear. Regarding Kennedy, for people that could see and think and rejected the impossible Oswald patsy story— Oswald himself being a CIA/ONI agent framed/murdered by his govt— there would be the unfolding Babel that it was done by the Mafia, Cuba/Castro, Johnson, Grassy Knoll, Israelis, etc. [Just as 911 has the official planes/fuel/pancaking theory, followed by disinfo theories of thermite and DEW—to hide the ultimate truth of nukes]. Jackie and everyone there saw and/or heard who fired the head shot, as this article and never-published book demonstrate. Even SS (Secret Service) agent Clint Hill, one of only a few SS agents not in on the plot, said to the WC that the fatal head shot did not come from a rifle. He said it was: “like the sound of shooting a revolver into something hard.

In the Parkland Hospital O.R., only Agent Hill had his own revolver out and cocked the whole time! He knew Kennedy’s murderers were right there. See the books by Dr. Charles Crenshaw. There are some eye-openers therein. It has come out, elsewhere, that initially the FBI interrogated SS agents William Greer (driver) and Roy Kellerman (passenger side) for Kennedy’s murder. Perhaps the FBI attempted an arrest then (before Hoover called them off), because Crenshaw’s books detail how a SS agent knocked out an FBI agent with the butt of his machine gun— not used, of course, during the assassination.

Now I have seen over 20 different versions of the Zapruder film. I have already detailed how initially the regime forbade release of it, and printed reversed frames in Life Magazine; and likewise got cub reporter Dan Rather to proclaim Kennedy went forward in the limo from the fatal head shot. While the Zapruder film is heavily (and primitively) doctored, when released, it clearly shows Kennedy being slammed back in the limo, and then limply bouncing off the back seat and over to the left—after the slam backwards. If Kennedy had been hit from the left, he would have slammed into Jackie whose head was just to the left of his head. Also numerous witnesses detailed how Greer brought the limo to a complete halt, despite the film showing a steady speed of 10 mph or so. The film was duped onto the moving background of a version of itself. (No CGI then.) Twyman’s book (and many others) detail how there are numerous missing frames which accounts for his proof that Greer turns back to the front 2-3X faster than any other human could. Z frames printed in the “Globe” showed smoke/exhaust from Greer’s gun.

But let us see what the Zapruder film shows and implies. After the first shot that hits Kennedy, he turns to Jackie for help and his arms reflexively start to come up towards his throat that now has been penetrated. He never moves after this. He also apparently tried to cough up the throat bullet as shown here.

It is clear he was paralyzed for the last 4-6 seconds of his life, but would have been conscious and knew what was happening to him. In all likelihood, a rifle with a special bullet (ice bullet containing shellfish poison was used by the CIA for these purposes) was fired from the Grassy Knoll (or elsewhere) at that time. Jackie first looked to Gov. Connally for help. Then she did as instructed by the S.S. in such an eventuality; she tried to force his elbows and him down, but he was rigid. Gov Connally had turned around to stare at who he knew was the sole target. He was known as LBJ (Little Boy Johnson, as he was Johnson’s puppet. Johnson threw a fit at JFK the night before to try to change the “seating” arrangements.) Connally is hit and yells out “My God they’re trying to kill us all.” [And not just Kennedy, as he had been promised.] After the fatal head shot, both Connallys can be briefly seen looking to the driver as they duck down to give him room. They had not ducked down earlier. On arrival at Parkland, the SS agents help Connally out, but leave Kennedy in the limo. The limo is soon washed down by the S.S. It is eventually destroyed. This too has numerous variations. One article had the air force admit it was later dropped from a C5A, from high altitude into the ocean. Elsewhere it is described as destroyed in more mundane fashion. (I guess they couldn’t ship it to China in those days.)

Who fired the fatal head shot? With a magnifying glass you can see a piece of the gun for yourself. No this will not come out and hit you on the head with clarity. The regime is not that stupid. Some whistleblower may have paid with his/her life for leaving this in; or the PTB often seem to want the intelligentsia to know who did it. Remember this is (primitively) doctored. Frame 313 is known to be the fatal head shot frame by all, and you can see this for yourself. If anyone says a different frame is the fatal head shot frame, you know what that means.

You can actually see that Greer's gun (lower left corner of frame--usually cropped out of most versions of the film for obvious reasons) was not completely erased. Use a magnifying lens; much better still, get a printed version such as is in Twyman’s (or other) book—it is clearer than on a monitor. Do this if you really care about truth and justice. The top piece of the gun (i.e., the Sun’s reflection off of it) is visible over the head of Kellerman, and slightly also to the left of his head. See the curvature of Kellerman's black-haired head. Then see that the bright object above it, and a little piece of it to the left of said curvature--when there shouldn't be anything there. This is the left most part of the gun. They tried to make it look as if Kellerman’s black hair turns white on top, but the white piece to the left of the curvature is the giveaway. Indeed you can also see Greer's hunched up left shoulder and forearm leading up to the gun (in his left hand). Again they tried to make Greer’s upper arm and forearm blend in with background objects (gutter and limo edge), so (when viewing frame 313) block all this out with your hand to the left of Greer and Kellerman while viewing with a magnifying glass, and you should realize that you are seeing Greer’s upper arm and forearm leading up to the gun by his right ear. You can even see the motion of the gun coming up, here.


As with 9/11, only a small number of people came out with the ultimate truth, while the bogus industry of fake JFK “research” came into being and remains big. (Heavily funded still by you know who.) But former Navy officer, William (Bill) Cooper and his book, “Behold a Pale Horse” were the mainstays of revealing this ultimate truth. Cooper spoke around the country for 15 years or so, and on shortwave radio, before being assassinated just two months after 9/11, by “local” police in an obvious entrapment masterminded by the feds. In the late 70’s, the House Committee on Assassinations first had its Chairman and Chief Counsel forced off the Committee. The controlled replacements did their best to hide the truth. But they got hold of the tape of a Dallas motorcade cop’s microphone, which was on the whole time during the assassination. The House Committee got audio scientists to add this audio to the Zapruder film. They then were forced to admit there was more than one shooter, but blamed “the Mafia.” And let it end at that. However the people who were in charge that day, still are. E.g., see GHW Bush at the book Depository, and his role in the affair here.

In 1992, this now audio/video version of the Zapruder film was shown by the lying counsel for that Committee, on a national television magazine show. I taped this and analyzed it, and it clearly showed (audio and video) that not only did Greer kill Kennedy, but he had turned first and accidentally shot Connally. You can hear, as well as see, that at the apex of his two turns, first Connally, then Kennedy is shot. After his first erroneous hit, Greer brought the limo to a standstill, as he obviously found his aim was not too good, while moving. This was not planned, but the last minute substitute, agent Clint Hill, disobeyed the order to remain in the follow-up car, and was running up to try to save Kennedy, and Kellerman can be seen talking to Greer, likely giving him the order to kill Kennedy.

When I presented this audio/video Z film publicly but once, I paid for it with the loss of my health and nearly my life. Among the many horrors I have suffered was that they broke into my home and placed a mercury compound all over my house. I was poisoned via inhalation of a mercury compound for nearly two years. Only with the greatest of luck did I find this out before dying. So I know all too well how easy it is for them to kill any of us individually, and get away with it. While an individual can only lose, and lose everything, it is clear how they fear the masses rising up against them. This is why they did what they did. This is why people must not know that the govt’s own driver killed President Kennedy. This is why the people must not know that 3000 people were nuked by their own regime on 9/11; and the people must not know that thousands of responders may get cancer from the nuclear radiation (China Syndrome) they were exposed to in the aftermath of 9/11. The regime fears that the people will awaken and realize that they are all going to be the victims of these monsters, as was President Kennedy, and the thousands of WTC workers, and the millions around the world, and myself.

For my part, I gave out many copies of this audio/video Zapruder film, in case… But I accept, and expect, my fate, but I have obtained my freedom, in part, by releasing herein the ultimate truths of the WTC mass murder, the Kennedy assassination, and the who and why of it all. Each of you should realize that the reason they did what they did to JFK, to me, and to all the others, is because they know they will lose if the people find out these things and act. They rightly fear the people realizing that they have nothing to lose, and everything to gain. If we all accepted the New Hampshire state motto, Live Free or Die, we would all likely Live Free. Then this world would be the kind of place that the best and the brightest of us, like John Fitzgerald Kennedy, the last President of the United States, had to knowingly die striving to create.
Bookmark and Share
28 comments

Nagasaki Anniversary

The Japanese city of Nagasaki is marking the 62nd anniversary of the world's second atomic bomb attack with calls for the elimination of nuclear weapons worldwide.

At a somber ceremony Thursday, thousands of people, including Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, observed a moment of silence at 11:02 AM (0202 GMT) to mark the moment when a U.S. B-29 bomber dropped an atomic bomb on the city in 1945. More than 70,000 people were killed.

Speaking at the ceremony, Mayor Tomihisa Taue said the use of nuclear weapons can never be permitted or considered acceptable, for any reason.

Bookmark and Share
0 comments

Simply Beautiful, However It Is Done


From here.
Bookmark and Share
1 comments

Thursday, August 09, 2007

Domestic Spying

Bookmark and Share
0 comments

Cutting Through Some of the Crap in the "War on Terror"?

I think Barack Obama's general views on 9/11 and terror are as flawed as any major politician out there, however, it is interesting to see how Obama has struck some sort of nerve with the Democrats by actually daring to propose that the US attack terrorists in Pakistan-- if Pakistan won't take them out. And this is precisely the thing that Bush HASN'T done, despite all his official toughness on terrorism.

Now I suppose the mainstream fear is that since Pakistan has nuclear weapons, we don't dare to violate their national sovereignty-- even to go after "bad guys". On the other hand, officially, if Pakistan won't go after these "bad guys", doesn't this create a huge safe haven for our (official) enemies?

There's something really obscene about the whole comfy deal the US has with Pakistan-- especially considering the close link between the Pakistani secret service (ISI) and al-CIA-duh (Al Qaeda) that has existed for many years, and is a key aspect of the official 9/11 story being wrong. We give Pakistan lots of money and arms-- and they pretend to hunt al-CIA-duh for us. Meanwhile, al-CIA-duh is allowed to proliferate nearly unchecked-- probably preparing for the next false-flag psy-op.

This seems to be the system that both political parties are supporting, and the system that Obama apparently doesn't realize.
Bookmark and Share
0 comments

DEW Expert Doug Beason

from Judy Wood's site:
DR. J. DOUGLAS BEASON, Col. (USAF, ret.), a key architect and leading expert of directed-energy research for the past twenty-six years, holds a Ph.D. in laser-technology physics. He has served at the White House, working for the President's Science Advisor in both the Clinton and Bush administrations. Today he is on the Board of Directors of the Directed Energy Professional Society, and at Los Alamos National Laboratory he is Director of Threat Reduction. Dr. Beason is the author of twelve books, including some popular fiction techno-thrillers, and over one hundred scholarly papers and other works. He is a Fellow of the prestigious American Physical Society.


He is indeed Director of Threat Reduction at Los Alamos.

"Threat reduction" sounds a bit like "counter-intelligence" to me.

This guy sounds like a DEW-version of Steven Jones to me.

Why should we trust anything about what he says about DEW and their possible use at the WTC?
Bookmark and Share
6 comments

A Good Example of Why People Hate Lawyers

The attorney for the retired general who was censured by the Army for his role in the announcement of the death of Corporal Pat Tillman challenged the idea that his client had 'evaded' a subpoena from Congress to testify at a hearing last week.

Lieutenant General Philip Kensinger's attorney went as far as accusing Rep. Henry Waxman, Chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of telling a 'blatant lie.'

"I am saying that is a blatant lie," Charles Gittins, the Virginia-based attorney for the retired Kensinger told RAW STORY in an e-mail.

(snip)

"General Kensinger refused to appear here today," the California Democrat said in his opening remarks. "His attorney informed the Committee that General Kensinger would not testify voluntarily and, if issued a subpoena, would seek to evade service."


Kensinger's attorney contested the summary of events offered by Rep. Waxman. "I told the committee lawyers that my client declined to testify and would attend his meeting, as scheduled," Gittins added. "I told them I would not advise the Committee of his whereabouts and expected that without that information he would be difficult to locate. But my client did not evade and I never told anyone that he would evade service. I observed that it was unlikely that they would find him, which was true, since the meeting was not in his home."

Kind of speaks for itself.
Bookmark and Share
0 comments

Cover Story for I35W Bridge Emerges

Gusset plates, says NTSB.

Sounds bogus to me, sounds bogus to Minnesota authorities:
In Minneapolis, state transportation department officials seemed surprised by the sudden focus on the bridge’s gusset plates, which are the steel connectors used to hold together the girders on the truss of a bridge. On this bridge, completed in 1967, there would have been hundreds of them, officials here said.

Gary Peterson, the state’s assistant bridge engineer, said he knew of no questions that had ever been raised about the gusset plates, no unique qualities to distinguish them from those on other bridges, no inkling of any problem during decades of inspections of the bridge.

“I don’t know what this could be,” Mr. Peterson said. “I’m frankly surprised at this point. I can’t even begin to speculate.”

Bookmark and Share
2 comments

Tuesday, August 07, 2007

Ghostplane Videographer Michael Hezarkhani Found!

However, for some reason, CNN won't let him say ANYTHING about the video.

Errr... let's put it this way: WHO DOESN'T THINK THIS GUY'S STORY STINKS?

After all, there is no doubt that the video has been heavily manipulated, if it isn't an outright forgery.
Bookmark and Share
4 comments

WTC Nuclear Aftermath

Sure looks like it:
Bookmark and Share
2 comments

"Fascinating"

The Structural Engineer journal:
Dr Eaton said: ‘We were given a fascinating insight into what had been happening at the site. Our hosts, under the firm’s principal engineer George Tamaro (F), had been constantly involved at Ground Zero for several months. They had been called in as foundation engineers within a week of 11 September, and had spent several months examining the stability of the debris and the diaphragm wall all around the site, commonly known as the “bathtub” They had been key individuals in advising on the excavation of the site, with a great deal of care being needed before debris could be removed in order to maintain the stability of the original slurry walls.

‘They showed us many fascinating slides’ he continued, ‘ranging from molten metal which was still red hot weeks after the event, to 4-inch thick steel plates sheared and bent in the disaster’.


It's hard to know how to respond to this. Clearly, Eaton is telling us of an extreme anomaly, that blows away the official 9/11 story, and for that we can be grateful he is giving us this evidence. Perhaps, this is all he thought he could get away with saying, without getting into "trouble".

On the other hand, what an asshole. Yes, isn't it FASCINATING to see this evidence that certainly points to a deep dark crime of the highest order-- so why the fuck won't you say anything else about it???
Bookmark and Share
6 comments

Powered by Blogger