Black Budget Military Project Patches

Some creepy stuff here!

Bush Admin Now Says They Let 9/11 Happen?

AG Mukasey lets this one out:

Officials "shouldn't need a warrant when somebody with a phone in Iraq picks up a phone and calls somebody in the United States because that's the call that we may really want to know about. And before 9/11, that's the call that we didn't know about. We knew that there has been a call from someplace that was known to be a safe house in Afghanistan and we knew that it came to the United States. We didn't know precisely where it went." (snip)

These are multiple falsehoods here, and independently, this whole claim makes no sense. There is also a pretty startling new revelation here about the Bush administration's pre-9/11 failure that requires a good amount of attention.

Even under the "old" FISA, no warrants are required where the targeted person is outside the U.S. (Afghanistan) and calls into the U.S. Thus, if it's really true, as Mukasey now claims, that the Bush administration knew about a Terrorist in an Afghan safe house making Terrorist-planning calls into the U.S., then they could have -- and should have -- eavesdropped on that call and didn't need a warrant to do so. So why didn't they? Mukasey's new claim that FISA's warrant requirements prevented discovery of the 9/11 attacks and caused the deaths of 3,000 Americans is disgusting and reckless, because it's all based on the lie that FISA required a warrant for targeting the "Afghan safe house." It just didn't.

This apparent admission by Mukasey that they knew of "terrorists" calling the US but weren't allowed to spy on them is rather absurd in simple fact of law, as Glenn Greenwald points out above. But this apparent admission at face value also implies that the administration knew of these calls but did nothing about them. Is this administration now giving a limited hangout that they let the attacks happen?

UPDATE: Some interesting developments here from Greenwald:

The great significance of this story -- that Mukasey either completely fabricated a key 9/11 event or just revealed a heretofore unknown 9/11 bombshell -- is self-evident and made clear by these growing accounts. Having Hamilton, Kean and/or Zelikow comment on the veracity of Mukasey's claims about the 9/11 attacks -- as they ought to do -- is vital for advancing the story.

Settling South Tower Crash Physics for Once and All

There has been a huge amount of debate, in some circles at least, as to whether a mostly aluminum plane can do this to a steel and concrete building -- all without slowing:





But in one sense, the question of how much a large plane would be able to penetrate the tower is irrelevant to these two simple facts:
1) no significant part of the plane exited out the other side
2) the length of the plane was 3/4 of the width of the tower

So FINE-- perhaps under the right circumstances, a mostly aluminum plane can bust through the outer steel wall of a massive tower with the following characteristics: a) without slowing, b) without anything breaking off, c) without an explosion on the way in, d) without significant deflection backwards of debris, e) leaving a silhouette hole in the tower where it went in.

To be sure, I don't think this is the case, but for the sake of argument, I am stipulating that this could happen.

My key point here is that it is IMPOSSIBLE that this plane-- that is almost as long as the width of the tower-- completely breaks apart inside the tower and that no significant part of the plane breaks through the other side of the tower.

The argument that the plane broke completely apart RIGHT AFTER slicing cleanly through the outer wall is unprecedented, and violates physics, a priori.

And this is simply not the case judged by the lack of debris deflected backwards.

The fact that they could fake this STILL boggles my mind. But the evidence must be accepted nonetheless. And there is a lot of other evidence for fakery, of course-- stuff like this, as a small example.

Hitler Was a British Agent

(Updated and kicked to the top)

Good summary of a fascinating book here.

Official book website: http://www.hitlerwasabritishagent.com/.

This book shines a harsh light on the fact that all major wars are based on big lies. The ultimate truth is that wars are orchestrated by higher powers for the financial benefit of the elites and to satisfy their sick cravings. This book tells how Hitler was programmed by the British military Tavistock Institute during 1912-1913 to become a megalomaniacal war leader.

As wild as the thesis of the book sounds, the fact is that this revised WWII history can explain many features of WWII better than the "official story".

UPDATE: The book badly needs an editor, as it meanders and is repetitive, but nonetheless has a lot of fascinating info. It's really worth a look.

Particularly notable is the parallels with the bisexuality of key Nazis and the bisexual character of Washington politicians-- especially Republicans. Important in this vein are the suppressed clues that GWB himself is bisexual.

Regarding, GWB, it's become cliche that Bush = Hitler, however, the underlying truth is that Hitler was a bizarre personality like Bush, and most likely both are mind-control victims. Hitler apparently a Tavistock product, Bush likely a CIA product.

UPDATE 2: One reason I really like this book is that it does a great job of showing how a massive hoax could be run by conspirators behind the scenes-- e.g. there are lots of examples how the Allied and Axis war machines co-mingled-- while various key players are only partially aware of the big picture and at the same time have to present the "official story" to the public. There are obvious parallels with 9/11 and the current leaders who maintain the official "war on terror" story.

A Real Iraq War Crimes Investigation in Britain

9/11 Big Lies and Small Lies

The big lie theory is that people in general, always are more willing to accept a "big lie" from their leaders than small lies, as they cannot accept that their leaders would produce such a massive lie.

Lots and lots of little 9/11 lies have been uncovered, here and elsewhere.

But the big lies still remain-- mostly because most people cannot believe that the "powers that be" could produce such big lies.

The big lies:

--they used planes (they didn't really use planes)

-- the WTC collapsed from fire and plane damage (the WTC was really nuked)

Going East on I-70, Near Somerset, PA

There's a nice billboard for "PatriotsQuestion911.com".

9/11 In the News

Margaret Cho the latest liberal Hollyweird moonbat to question 9/11.

For some reason, Larry Silverstein finally sues the airlines for going along with the plane hoax.

UPDATE: Check out Hillary Clinton's 9/11 2nd plane fabrication!

Bombing Tribal Areas of Pakistan

Chances of killing "al qaeda" members: 1 in 1,000

Chances of killing poor, innocent muslims yet again: 1 to 1

Chances of angering poor innocent muslims and making them more hostile to the US: 100 to 1

Obviously, yet another victory in the war on terror!

Iraq Round-Up

60,000 US "Stop-Loss POWs": more evidence of a fucked up war.

Here's an ugly story about what happens when the Army is forced to recruit social misfits.

Meanwhile, Bush sees the latest surge in Iraq violence as a good thing.
(Again showing why he has the title of Worst president Ever locked up.)

And here's another great post from GG on the media's own denial on how messed up Iraq is. In some ways the media are as sick as Bush, and certainly they act as enablers for Bush's delusions.

On the IRAN front, here are two rather creepy articles.

UPDATE: Excellent summary of what is going on with the latest surge in violence, here.

For F

radiohead - street spirit (fade out)

More On the Immediate and Continous Radiation Lowering, and Shielding, Techniques Used at the WTC, after 9/11

by The Anonymous Physicist

Recall I have stated that the acts of trucking in (and out) of sand/earth, that began the very morning after 9/11, were likely done to lower the radiation levels at the WTC. I have hypothesized that Mayor Giuliani got the word from the federal perps to do this after the perps knew of the radiation/China Syndrome at “Ground Zero.” The perps knew this because they knew the types of nukes they had used, and had either agents on the ground assaying radiation levels, or had planes or satellites doing this from above. Hosing down the rubble pile with water also began as soon as they got the trucks and crews down there to this. This continued for months, as the photographic evidence clearly indicates.

Now I would like to present to you some corroboration that these two methods are used to lower radiation levels, and /or act as shielding, for people in the vicinity of nuclear radiation.

The Safety Handbook of the Alberta (Canada) Forest Products Association describes what to do in case of various emergencies. In the case of radiation exposure, it says for “Shielding: Use shielding between yourself and the source of radiation. Equipment, concrete blocks, and PILES OF DIRT OR GRAVEL often provide makeshift shielding.” http://www.albertaforestproducts.ca/document_library/PPSOHandbook2004.pdf As Judy Wood’s site indicated (for incorrect reasons, of course) http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/dirt3.html#bucketbrigade trucks began carrying sand/earth in—and out—of the WTC the next morning. Carrying away the sand/earth may have had the same purpose as selling the WTC steel to China did—to hide the radioactive evidence.

Wiki has several articles that are relevant here too. First this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_shielding“ states how paper and water can shield people from radiation: “Alpha radiation is the easiest to shield, because the very massive alpha particles can be stopped even with a leaf of paper. Beta radiation (electrons) is more difficult… shielding must be accomplished with low density materials, e.g. plastic, wood, WATER or acrylic glass.”

The importance of shielding from beta radiation emitted by fissile material is indicated in another wiki article here http://en.wikipediaorg/wiki/Nuclear_fission “Most nuclear fuels undergo spontaneous fission only very slowly, decaying mainly via an alpha/beta decay…. Fission products tend to be beta emitters…”

The following source http://moorcat.com/pragmatic_revolt/2006/04/20/nuclear-power-101/ appears to be written by someone well familiar with the ins and outs of nuclear reactors, and an almost rabid proponent of them—- which I am not. He states how well water can reduce radiation levels in a nuclear reactor: “24 inches of water reduces radiation by a factor of 10 -- therefore it is called a tenth thickness…”

The photos and text from Joel Meyerowitz’ book indicate that the water hosing down of the rubble pile was a massive, continuous effort for months. I would add that water hosing, and the subsequent steam seen emitted many times, also carried away heat as well as lowered radiation. The water’s temperature is raised, and then more energy is used up in the conversion to steam—very much like what happens in a nuclear reactor.

Now these sand/earth and water treatments were of limited use against the fissioning fragments at the bottom of the rubble pile, and in the sub-basement areas of the towers and WTC7. But here distance and inaccessibility acted as shielding for the vast majority of the responders. Only a few were allowed access to the basement areas, it is known. So it is clear that until carted away, the radioactive fission fragments at the WTC (aka the China Syndrome)--causing the great heat in the rubble pile (for threee months), and the even greater temperatures, and flowing molten metal up to six months, after 9/11, underneath the towers and WTC7--had continuous radiation-lowering, and shielding, methods applied to them.

Undoubtedly even more cancers and radiation sicknesses would have resulted among responders, and the local inhabitants, if these sand/earth, and water, measures were not undertaken. These methods lowered the radiation exposure to responders, they provided “makeshift shielding, ” and they also carried away heat. I am not stating this was done out of any concern for the responders, or New York metro area inhabitants; but rather to try to hide the nuking of the WTC, and the China Syndrome aftermath. But the evidence of all that can be found in the archived articles at wtcdemolition.blogspot.com and wtc-chinasyndromeblogspot.com.

What we should never forget, at this point, is what was learned in the long-term studies of Hiroshima and Nagasaki survivors http://www.ehponline.org/members/2006/9113/9113.html. It took decades for many survivors of those nukes to get cancer or other illnesses. The already known 400 (as of 2006) blood, lymph and thyroid cancers—all common among people exposed to radiation--among 911 responders is likely, and sadly, a drop in the bucket, compared to what may be coming. And, as far as I know, studies to see if there has been an increase of cancer, and/or other immune disorders, among the millions of New York metro inhabitants, since 9/11/01, have not been undertaken.

American Society of Civil Engineers Accused of WTC Cover-Up

In the World Trade Center case, critics contend the engineering society wrongly concluded skyscrapers cannot withstand getting hit by airplanes. In the hurricane investigation, it was accused of suggesting that the power of the storm was as big a problem as the poorly designed levees.

The group has about 140,000 members and is based in Reston, Va. It sets engineering standards and codes and publishes technical books and a glossy magazine. Members testify regularly before Congress and issue an annual report on the state of the nation's public-works projects.

The society got a $1.1 million grant from the Army Corps of Engineers to study the levee failures. Similarly, the Federal Emergency Management Agency paid the group about $257,000 to investigate the World Trade Center collapse.

(snip)

In 2002, the society's report on the World Trade Center praised the buildings for remaining standing long enough to allow tens thousands of people to flee.

But, the report said, skyscrapers are not typically designed to withstand airplane impacts. Instead of hardening buildings against such impacts, it recommended improving aviation security and fire protection.

Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl, a structural engineer and forensics expert, contends his computer simulations disprove the society's findings that skyscrapers could not be designed to withstand the impact of a jetliner.

Wha??? You mean... you mean... airplanes don't push through steel columns without slowing... then disintegrate once past them?

NYPD Beating On Tibetan Protestors in Front of the UN

This is freaking insane:

Osama bin Laden and McCain and Petraeus All Agree on Iraq

It's just SO CUTE when political and military leaders agree with our terrorist arch-enemy about the importance of Iraq!

Exposing The “Red Mercury” Nuclear Scam, & Its Possible Use In Future Bogus Wars, & Other Crucial Matters On Nuclear 911, and About Mercury

by The Anonymous Physicist

There is a great need to expose all the limited hangouts in the 911truth field, and in the general conspiracy movement. After seeing recently that a scam exists in the nuclear field, I feel compelled to expose it.

Now there is much on the net on “pure fusion” nuclear “devices.” This issue, as I have written, may be a red herring to distract from the nuclear fissioning fragments of the China Syndrome, by the release of data by the govt indicating tritium was found at the WTC. Tritium, however, can be a booster for fission reactions, and need not indicate “pure fusion.” Nonetheless, pure fusion devices have been discussed, and will be here. Now the PTB have certainly had enough decades to produce pure fusion, so I am not opposed to their existence, but it seems that the intel assets have been busy with hangouts explaining how this might be accomplished. Theoretically, pure fusion, for a large scale bomb, is a difficult thing to accomplish, because you need three things 1. Tremendous, rapid energy input — other than a fission trigger -- to overcome the forces keeping the nuclei away from each other, 2. Proper spatial configuration, 3. Proper temporal “technique.” The last two are needed so as to control the reaction to maximize a uniform and rapid method of detonation/fusion commencement. Note: Cold fusion is supposedly “pure fusion,” but appears to be unusable for bomb use. Cold fusion appears to be a slow process with insufficient yield for bomb use. But we should never forget the intel asset sent in to destroy cold fusion at its birth, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1vOeKNN2UI.

One hangout put out-- as a non-fission trigger for attaining nuclear fusion in a bomb-- is the “red mercury” scam. As usual, the intel agents accomplish several things at once with this scam. The “father” of the “red mercury” scam is none other than the “father” of the neutron bomb, Samuel Cohen, PhD. Now a neutron bomb is described variously as a fission-triggered fusion bomb: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_bomb, or alternatively as a fusion-boosted, fission bomb: http://everything2.com/title/neutron%2520bomb. As an aside, note how the wiki article states that President Kennedy— whom I called the Peacegiver-- and President Carter, halted production of the neutron bomb. I have also seen the neutron bomb described as a “pure fusion” bomb as well, by the Anonymous Finnish Military Expert.

Thus we have three very different descriptions of what a neutron bomb is!? But “red mercury” or anti-matter were described as triggers for the alleged pure fusion, in the last description; and with respect, I want to show that these are unlikely, or impossible. So it is questionable/doubtful that neutron bombs are “pure fusion” bombs though there are other methods that may be used to achieve fusion without a fission trigger— including lasers and sound wave energy. So the Powers That Be (PTB) may well have non-fission-triggered fusion bombs— but their hypothetical existence may have been used as a red herring to divert from the China Syndrome aftermath at the WTC— which arose from fissioning bomb components, as pure fusion in theory can not give rise to a China Syndrome of indefinitely heat releasing radioisotopes. And the “red mercury” scam may have been put out to set up 911 nuclear researchers/proponents.

Now the main article on the red mercury scam was written by Sam Cohen and Joe Douglass, titled, “The Nuclear Threat That Doesn't Exist - Or Does It?”

Let us now examine “red mercury,” and these two authors putting out this hangout. It was immediately clear to me that this alleged “red mercury” (if it exists at all) could not trigger fusion, for a bomb. Red mercury is allegedly a mercury antimony oxide compound that is either red, or claimed to have been made in the USSR— hence the red or Communist aspect. Red mercury is also said to be a “ballotechnic” compound with “special properties.” Now the Physics of this matter is that any chemical compound, including a “ballotechnical” one, is a million times too weak to initiate fusion reactions. One physicist already had an article demonstrating this. Red mercury is said to be enhanced only via radiation from a nuclear reactor-- thus providing an excuse to deny ownership of nuclear reactors to certain countries— and an excuse for warring with any country that has, or wants one! (Personally I wish all countries did not have nuclear reactors for environmental, and other, reasons. Creating the deadly radioactive wastes that last up to billions of years is an abomination, especially when so many other energy sources abound.) So claims of red mercury are an excuse for conflict and war. And indeed people have been arrested for falling for the scheme, and allegedly trying to buy/obtain red mercury— even though no person anywhere has ever proven either 1. it even exists and/or 2. it can be a trigger for fusion!

Let us now examine these two authors, Cohen and Douglass, and the heart of this intel op/hangout. Cohen, wiki demonstrates, has a horrific record as a cold warrior/warmonger/”red” baiter. He called for the USA to nuke Vietnam, with his beloved neutron bombs, during that war of American aggression. (The so-called Gulf Of Tonkin incident never occurred. Just as the American regime, with its perennial wars of aggression, is today perpetrating war on Iraq and Afghanistan, for bogus reasons.) Cohen, in 1979, also gets the “Peace Medal” for creating the neutron bomb, from Pope John Paul II. So we see that the so-called Prince of Peace hands out a “peace medal” to the creator of a bomb that only kills people, and does not appreciably damage property!? Another indication of how London and Rome control mankind, as I have written here numerous times. Cohen has also been ranting more recently on the alleged North Korean nuclear bomb. Note the initial reports of the alleged N. Korean nuclear detonation of 2006, were that it fizzled-- sound familiar?-- and had a very tiny yield, and/or may well not have been a nuke. See, e.g. http://www.defensetech.org/archives/002832.html. But that won’t stop Sam Cohen, or his handlers, from ranting on N. Korea’s alleged nukes. The PTB want excuses for perennial wars.

This brings us to Joseph Douglass, Jr., PhD. He has been a government “national security analyst.” I have not been able to find where Douglass worked for the govt. Sometimes this means the NSA, as officially, there is “No Such Agency.” Now the red mercury article by Douglass and Cohen was also used as an excuse for war on Iraq, claiming Saddam Hussein (a CIA asset all his adult life) had obtained/was trying to obtain red mercury and nukes, and was going to use them on America, or its allies. Much of Douglass’ career has also been as a “red baiter.” His earlier book was called “Red Cocaine.” Laughably, it purported to demonstrate that the American cocaine epidemic was a red/Commie/USSR and Red China op, when any honest researcher knows that the American regime itself brings in, and controls, the drug trade. So Douglass went from his “red” cocaine to “red” mercury. Clearly these two men are intel assets whose life-long M.O. is to blame everything that the American regime, and its masters in London and Rome, and beyond, do on reds/Commies.

“Red mercury” appears to be nothing other than a scam; and these two “authors” are scam artists, intel assets, and warmongers. These two are analogous to other intel agents who try to claim all evil, and all nefarious events, come from “Zionists.” These monsters are easy to spot, because of their “broken record” method/orders to keep putting out the very same ludicrous hangout. Again, this is much like the intel assets for the O.C.T., and “DEW” hangouts, who likely have the same intel controllers, as they continue to lie and claim that during and after WTC demolition, “there was no heat, no loud sounds, no explosions, no ground shaking,” etc. This despite my proving these to be lies, numerous times, including here with the sworn statements of the responders: http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2007/11/eyewitness-testimony-of-firefighters.html

Similarly, we are not likely to see the “red mercury” hangout disappear, as the PTB, and their intel lackeys, apparently think it is a good scheme for red baiting/warmongering/setting up “terrorists” for arrest, even though the thing they might allegedly try to obtain doesn’t even exist. A good way of throwing away the key on someone that was set-up, perhaps because he knows too much truth? The bogus red mercury scam may soon be used to set someone up from Iran, and claim that he was trying to obtain, or create, a nuclear fusion bomb for Iran. Thus providing an excuse for the American regime to start War on Iran. Indeed, the “red mercury” scam even allows the PTB to resurrect the old red/Commie scare if and when it wants to! But just as I have indicated that “Hitler was a British agent”
(see http://www.hitlerwasabritishagent.com/), the old USSR/Red Menace was itself also controlled out of London! Indeed this book, just cited, referenced Stalin being trained/tortured/controlled out of London’s Tavistock “Institute,” just a few years before Hitler was there, getting the same “treatment.” So the “red” menace, and “red” mercury will not go away, even though they are indications of far deeper matters.

Now anti-matter has also been proposed as a possible triggering source for a “pure fusion,” or fission-less, bomb. I am sure it’s only a matter of time before the PTB create a Matter/Anti-Matter bomb. This may have already occurred. This would be bad news for humanity, as this type of “device” would have approx. 1000x the energy yield of fission or fusion— it could be a country-destroying, or world-destroying weapon, and may never be announced, as its intention would be clear! (See http://anonymous-physicist.blogspot.com/2007/06/ultimate-truth.html)
Its great energy arises because 100% of the mass (via E=mc2) of the matter and anti-matter nuclei, in a reaction between them, becomes energy (presumably gamma rays). While in fission or fusion, smaller and larger nuclei are created, respectively, and only less than 1% of the mass of the starting nuclei is converted to energy. A matter/anti-matter bomb does not have the first of the three concerns listed above to make a nuclear bomb— no large repulsive force need be overcome. But instead, it is vastly more difficult to manage the other two factors— spatial and temporal techniques to shield the anti-matter from matter so as to allow a rapid, uniform reaction. Now there are two concerns regarding the possible use of anti-matter as a trigger for fusion. 1. It appears extremely difficult to create conditions meeting the two necessary criteria, and 2. If it were possible to use anti-matter as a trigger for fusion, why would you want to? Because if you could control anti-matter to this extent, you would then use it for a pure matter/anti-matter bomb, which would have approx. 1000x the yield, compared to using it to “merely” trigger fusion. So to sum up, “red mercury” as a fusion trigger is impossible, and may not even exist; and the use of anti-matter as a fusion trigger appears to be improbable or implausible.

So we have seen that red mercury is a scam put out by obvious, warmongering intel assets. And a pure matter/anti-matter bomb with its immense yield, which is neutron-free, would also not give rise to the observed China Syndrome of high heat released for months afterwards at the WTC. As I have reported, much eyewitness and material proof of neutron bombardment took place, thus it appears unlikely that a pure matter/anti-matter bomb was used, as this would not release neutrons, to my knowledge.

Finally, in addition to deciphering what the evidence indicated happened on 9/11, and its aftermath, I feel compelled to warn what the abundance of intel assets in the 911 community and the larger community will try to pull on 911 nuclear truth advocates. It is crucial to try to predict future ops against the 911 nuclear truth community. I saw recently from the website of nuclear 911 advocate Bill Deagle, M.D. that he stated the following. He had tried to get his WTC sample analyzed. His page states, “After Dr. Deagle MD’s request, Dr. Durakovic's family and Dr. Yamamoto PhD in Japan received death threats for even attempting to perform gamma spectroscopy with germanium detectors & neutron activation studies that require the presence of a neutron source from a nuclear reactor. Testing will proceed despite death threats!”

As an expert on the wider conspiracy, and one of the few who was nearly killed myself-- via mercury poisoning of my home, and thus myself-- and one of the few current conspiracy experts who isn’t himself an intel “asset”, I will give you two examples of how the PTB can interfere. First, in the late 1970’s, Marita Lorenz handed in documents to the House of Representatives Committee on Assassinations containing direct proof and evidence of CIA involvement in killing President Kennedy, including the involvement of E. Howard Hunt, Frank Sturgis and others— she had been dragged along with them unknowingly beforehand. The Committee then took a break. (Months earlier, the original Committee Chairman Henry Gonzalez-- a friend/supporter of President Kennedy-- and its first attorney, were both railroaded off the Committee, and CIA stooges had replaced them.) After the break, when Ms. Lorenz referred to the proof/evidence she had just given the Committee, she was told, “What proof, what documentation, what evidence?” It was gone. So much for a Congress, and for Justice in America.

So they could have already broken into Deagle’s place where the sample is, and replaced it. They certainly broke into my home numerous times without my knowing it, until later for my revealing that Secret Service Agent William Greer had not only killed President Kennedy, as Bill Cooper had shown, but analysis I showed-- an audio and video version of he Zapruder film-- proved Greer fired twice, first hitting Connolly as well. My murderers placed a mercury compound all over my home, that gassed and poisoned me for two years, and destroyed my health, and my life. The federal agents/perpetrators even removed a sample that had the mercury in it from my home that had undergone analysis by a state lab, and was going to be evidence. This time they brazenly removed this evidence from my home, when I said on the phone I was going to have it all investigated. So I never did. After all, who am I going to call for help, when the agencies that should be protecting us, were the ones killing me and interfering with due process. Indeed, they had removed the evidence, which they knew about from tapping my phone calls to police, to the EPA, and to other agencies that wanted to help but were called off, by the Gestapo intel agencies intercepting my calls. So this was my second example— myself. My being massively poisoned, brutally assaulted, car chased, wire-tapped, all for once publicly showing in 1992, an audio as well as video version of the Zapruder film.

So I just wish to caution the 911 nuclear truth community about this matter of getting some supposed WTC steel analyzed by some nuclear lab, as it is so easy to have a set-up. E.g., all it takes is someone at some lab to not reveal such death threats, and pretend to do a scientific analysis say on a different sample surreptitiously given to them by the regime, and report negative nuclear results. Such a bogus “analysis,” unless it were exposed— which would be difficult under the circumstances— would then appear to cause great harm to the 911 nuclear truth community. The point is the PTB will never allow release of direct proof of their nuking the WTC on 9/11, and will resort to any means to prevent such direct proof from being released to the public. And it is very easy to get set-up, in many different ways. They could have already switched the samples. Hint to Bill Deagle: Cuba might, I say might, be the only country not totally controlled by the PTB now, if you actually have a real sample at this point. To the rest of the 911 truth community, I warn you of this turning out to be a set-up against the nuclear truth of 911. This is unfortunately an easy thing to do, via complete interception of all communications by the Gestapo agencies, and the switching or alteration of any samples, possibly even before first handed in. Be wary, be wise, be well.

I'd Be More Than Happy If "The Surge" Established Some Sort of Peace in Iraq

It would mean less people dying, that we could start bringing troops home and that we could stop spending hundreds of millions of dollars a day there.

But it does seem, whether by accident or by design, that the chaos we've brought has no intention of dying out.

Important Bacteria Cultures Destroyed-- Scientists wonder why the VA killed the collection of Legionnaire’s disease samples

This is odd and disturbing.

McCain's Magical Cloak of Credibility

It seems to work well on the media, anyway.

For more honest people, not so much.

Interesting Choice for a Photo to Represent Iraq War Deaths

If There Were an Honest 9/11 Investigation, We Would Have Answers to the Following Questions (Just to Name a Few):

Where exactly in the WTC was this huge beam from, and what temperatures was it exposed to that allowed it to be bent in this perfect horseshoe shape and also resulted in the melting of the metal (aluminum?) on the surface?



Was the engine section found at Church and Murray Streets formally matched to the Boeing 767 aircraft that officially was flight 175?



Exactly how much aircraft debris was recovered from the official flight 93 crash site, was it matched to the Boeing 757 that was UA93 and where is this debris now?


Exactly how much aircraft debris was recovered from the Pentagon, was it matched to the Boeing 757 that was AA77, and where is this debris now?

(click to enlarge)

Repost: Indisputable Evidence of Molten Metal at the WTC

From here.

See also here.

Check out the molten and re-solidified metal on top of the beam.

Apart from this, imagine the physical and heat forces that would make that huge beam bend without cracking.

(Tip to Anonymous Physicist for noticing the molten pools on the beam.)

Bush Really Tried to Avoid War with Iraq

Ha ha, just kidding!

Not that the resulting mass murder is particularly funny.

Of course, the much deeper truth is that all wars are created, manufactured, by the powers that be. There is nothing surprising about what Bushco did in the run-up to the Iraq war-- it's been done many many times in history, for many other wars.

The only difference this time is that we got to see it happen in real time-- with all our glorious computer technology, we got a fucking close glimpse of what was going on, but we were still powerless to stop it.

On Radiation During the Nuking of the WTC

The “anonymous physicist” has this to say on the issue of radiation during and after the WTC nuclear demolition. We must dispense with any naiveté on this important issue. If the EPA and Whitman had found massive radiation and/or radionuclides (radioactive/decaying elements) at the WTC after 9/11, does anyone believe they would ever release this data to the people? Relatedly, it later became known that they found high levels of (asbestos, mercury and other) toxins shortly after 9/11, and yet told the world, and the responders, that “the “air was safe.” They lied, for quite some time, about what they had found in this sense. Now if the EPA tested for, and found, significant radiation, and/or radionuclides, and failed to tell the responders this; it resulted in the responders not wearing radiation-shielding, protective clothing. This would then likely lead to cancer and other illnesses. I note that there has been cancers, in 9/11 responders, and people living nearby; and asbestos is known to usually take far longer for its victims to get cancer. Could these cancers be the result of radiation? Cancer can be caused by even the very lowest levels of radiation. The father of the field of health physics, Dr. Karl Ziegler Morgan, has so stated. The EPA officials and Whitman would be liable for charges of mass murder and treason, just for this cover-up. Also if the government perpetrated 9/11 (and no one else could), would they allow another section of the government to give it all away? Do not the people know how the government lies, in perpetuity, about the Pearl Harbor set-up, the Kennedy assassination, and many more nefarious deeds it has perpetrated?

The rest is well worth reading.

Easter Thoughts???

Holy crap, indeed.

In response, this fucking rocks:

Breakthroughs Towards Attaining A Complete Understanding of the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11, and its China Syndrome Aftermath: Part II

by The Anonymous Physicist

This is part of my continuing efforts to decipher, and expose, the details of the American regime’s nuking of the WTC on 9/11/01, and the China Syndrome aftermath of high heat emitting, radioactive/fissioning fragments at, and under, the WTC. As I have detailed herein (see the archived URL’s noted at the bottom), the China Syndrome documentation includes massive evidence of high temperatures, melted boots, flowing molten metal, and much more. Inherent in this, was the perpetrators’ crucial need to keep the nuking of the WTC, and the China Syndrome aftermath, hidden from Americans (and the world.)

Now any nuke that might be significantly larger than expected, and thus might blow through a building, and be videotaped, had to be prevented, as the nuclear op would be clear to all. Now you might think that if a larger nuke than expected became visible, the regime would just say that Osama bin Laden (aka Tim Osman of the CIA) had obtained nukes after all. But they couldn’t, because they had already put out the (CGI) “plane hits”, and it is not plausible that anyone would go to all the trouble of hijacking planes, and “flying them into the towers”, if they had already planted nukes therein! The perps would lose their coveted “plausible deniability.” So it was crucial to use nukes that might be underpowered, or even fizzle (as this could be [and was] corrected later); and not to use nukes that might have a larger yield than predicted. And better to have many smaller ones— redundancy— which could be corrected as needed— as was WTC7. I have stated that the bogus “towers are leaning,” said on the air by the regime’s intel operators/”reporters” was related to the fall-back position of using larger nukes in the sub-basement of the towers— which would not be visible-- to knock the towers over, if the intricate top to bottom scenario, with many smaller nukes, fizzled completely.

In more detail, uncertainty in the lower boundary of destructive nuclear yield, was far more tolerable, than uncertainty was, in the upper boundary of yield. The former is OK, as even fizzling (insufficient yield) could be, and was, “corrected” later— a la WTC7. http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2007/09/breakthroughs-toward-attaining-complete.html

How might this relate to the fission vs. fusion issue? Perhaps either fusion bombs cannot be made with very low yield-- or perhaps more likely-- a very low yield cannot be guaranteed for fusion devices, as well as it can be for fission devices. Note the Castle Bravo H-Bomb test of March 1, 1954, where “The 15 megaton [thermonuclear] bomb delivered a force far more powerful than expected”. This leads me to the “official” tritium finding— and release-- from the USGS (aka the UCal/Berkeley/Livermore) study. See also William Tahil’s analysis of this, and his perhaps, crucial findings and analysis of levels found of Strontium, Barium, and other elements, of the fissioning of Uranium or Plutonium.

Now regarding the tritium, there are three possibilities:
1. Tritium was used as a booster in fission nukes at the WTC, and/or
2. Tritium was used in fusion nukes at the WTC, or
3. The Tritium finding is bogus, a straw man.

Now you might ask why would the federal regime release data that might indicate the use of a fusion device at the WTC? Precisely because of the existence of the China Syndrome aftermath! And stating there was tritium could be a straw man, in the sense that 911 researchers would be diverted into believing that fusion (only) devices were used— including the so-called, hypothetical “pure fusion” nukes, and therefore there could be no China Syndrome aftermath, as that requires fissioning fragments. (At the same time, of course, different intel assets would claim that the tritium finding doesn’t mean anything.) So the pure fusion debate could be a red herring. Recall earlier, I have written that whenever the federal regime releases something that seems very damaging, it will likely turn out that the truth is far worse, and is being hidden. The bottom line is that the federal regime could have easily prevented the release of the tritium finding, if it were genuine. All they had to do is to claim the usual “national security” excuse to censor anything. Recall I have asserted, and demonstrated, that the 2nd AVIRIS WTC ground temperature data is false, as well as the seismic records. Anything that indicated the China Syndrome has been particularly censored.

Anything and everything coming from the federal regime must never be taken on face value. Indeed, statistically, one would be better off assuming any statement, assertion, or data regarding any very important issue, is a lie. The regime knew from the outset that the China Syndrome had begun. This was either from knowing this as WTC destruction happened, or from its intel assets on the ground, or from satellites or planes high overhead— assaying heat or radiation spectra. The feds then informed their stooge/mayor, Giuliani, who immediately ordered the trucking in and out of sand/earth, and hosing down of the grounds, to lower the radiation levels.

I find it fascinating that one of the proponents of the nuclear WTC hypothesis repeatedly cites the tritium finding, but has never once written the words, “China Syndrome.” We must also be aware of how the regime easily keeps these words from being mentioned in the MSM, and had its assets waiting in the wings with their hangouts to hide this. I refer again to the thermite and “DEW” hangouts. The thermite physicist ludicrously claims that thermite would maintain molten metal temperatures for months. While the DEW engineer claims that each time the firemen/responders hosed down the very hot rubble pile, and steam (photographed) and hissing sounds were emitted, that instead “cold molecular dissociation clouds” appeared, or the latest “New Physics” gibberish (it will never end: the sign of an intel op)-- the “Hutchison effect.”

So in trying to obtain a complete understanding of the nuking of the WTC on 9/11, and the China Syndrome aftermath, I can state the following. There is a good probability that numerous low yield (mini- or micro-nuclear) fission bombs were used. There is the possibility that the tritium “finding”, that was released by the govt, may be a straw man to lead researchers to the red herring of “pure fusion”, and away from the evidence of the China Syndrome. In all likelihood, the regime has kept proof of radiation release at the WTC during demolition, and the later China Syndrome from public release. The ludicrous hangouts of thermite and DEW were created to hide the China Syndrome, and the nuking.

Some of the people of New York City have learned well the nature of their regime, and have bought Geiger counters (which are of limited use). The regime knows this, and is trying to ban the possession of Geiger Counters by the citizenry. So the citizens are trying to determine directly for themselves if they will be hit with any more nukings of their city. What possible reason would the regime have for denying them this right— other than the obvious, nefarious one? The current NYC stooge/mayor Bloomberg’s own Police “counter-terrorism deputy commissioner,” R.A. Falkenrath, makes it clear with his own words from the last URL. The restriction is so that “we know where these detectors are located…” Translation: They want to make sure that there will be no WORKING Geiger detectors nearby at the time the regime does its next nuking of NYC. Those of you who understand all that I have written here, will realize that “counter-terrorism experts” like former “reporter” John Miller that I exposed herein, are likely long term deep undercover intel “assets.” They are the terrorists themselves, and/or working directly for the regime’s terrorists who have done, and will do, the next nuking— or other use of a WMD against the citizenry.

But the people are obviously catching on. And I hope with my articles herein, that we can see more and more clearly exactly what they did on 9/11, and its aftermath. Please post this and my archived articles on the nuking of the WTC, and the China Syndrome aftermath at wtcdemolition.blogspot.com and wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com at all forums and blogs. And tell your friends and neighbors. The life you save may be your own. While this mass murdering, terrorist regime may desire to ban Geiger counters, and guns, the people have learned that the way to counter this is for everyone to get them now, and never give them up.

There's No Business Like Shill Business

Pentagon researcher "StevenWarran" has a run-in with our good bud "Pinch". More here.

In case there were any doubts that Pinch is a Pentagon shill, this pretty much removes them. Nice of Pinch to provide illegal pics of the Pentagon. Also nice to know he has such intimate knowledge of the area where the Pentagon was hit-- though his story seems suspect.

To Be Offended at What Jeremiah Wright Said

only shows someone to be completely ignorant of history.

Among other important points made in the essay:

(Wright) noted that we killed far more people, far more innocent civilians in Hiroshima and Nagasaki than were killed on 9/11 and "never batted an eye." That this statement is true is inarguable, at least amongst sane people. He is correct on the math, he is correct on the innocence of the dead (neither city was a military target), and he is most definitely correct on the lack of remorse or even self-doubt about the act: sixty-plus years later most Americans still believe those attacks were justified, that they were needed to end the war and "save American lives."

But not only does such a calculus suggest that American lives are inherently worth more than the lives of Japanese civilians (or, one supposes, Vietnamese, Iraqi or Afghan civilians too), but it also ignores the long-declassified documents, and President Truman's own war diaries, all of which indicate clearly that Japan had already signaled its desire to end the war, and that we knew they were going to surrender, even without the dropping of atomic weapons. The conclusion to which these truths then attest is simple, both in its basic veracity and it monstrousness: namely, that in those places we committed premeditated and deliberate mass murder, with no justification whatsoever...

On The Existence of Mini- or Micro-Nukes, Fizzled Nukes, 9/11 & The China Syndrome

by The Anonymous Physicist

This author, among a few others, has claimed that numerous mini- or micro-nukes were used to destroy the WTC. There may appear to be a conflict between the “official” listing of minimal critical masses for small nuclear fission bombs, and the claims of very small yield for such nuclear devices. Now we have sources, like this Wiki article state that about 10 kg. (kilogram) for Plutonium, and 15-50 Kg for Uranium are their minimal critical masses. I have seen other sources put 2 Kg for the minimal critical mass for Plutonium. At the same time, we have a gov’t physicist at a Congressional hearing, in 1998, who said, “These experiments involve the actual testing of extremely low yield fission devices (as low as the equivalent of several pounds of TNT) within a confined environment.” Such a very small fission yield directly implies a critical mass far below that claimed to be the minimal critical mass for any fission device; thus there appears to be a conflict. How can it be resolved?

Obviously one or the other side may be lying. The official listings and equations for finding the smallest critical mass for a given radionuclide can have been made much larger than they really are—ostensibly to deter nuclear proliferation among “newcomers.” Or the physicist testifying to Congress could have lied to scare people. Although the Congress did pass legislation barring the production of such extremely small yield nukes. Needless legislation was passed, if this were impossible; but this doesn’t prove anything, due to the nature of Congress.

Now regarding mini-nukes, as far back as the 1950’s, the USA had the Davy Crockett mini-nuke (fission). It was called a recoilless rifle with a range of 2-4 km. It’s yield was down to 10 tons of TNT. This is 0.01 Kt (kilotons), or about 1/1000 of the Hiroshima blast. Thus it can be called a mini-nuke. Note that this low yield appears to be from less than the “official” minimal critical mass claimed. One would think that with an additional 45 years before 2001, and with the advent of technological breakthroughs, such as nanotechnology--which the military would have had decades before civilian use--ultra-small nukes would be obtainable, unless truly forbidden by the Laws of Physics.

The Wiki article admits, at one point, that “critical mass depends inversely on the square of the density.” And there are greater explosives now to implode the material to a greater density, than they did in 1945. As the critical mass equation has the density inversely squared, this could provide for a great shrinkage of the minimal critical mass. There are other relevant things in the wiki article on critical mass. There is the “fudge factor, f”. And they admit that “sophisticated nuclear weapons programs can make a functional device from less material than more primitive weapons programs require.” But wiki, which has been called a CIA front, does list the minimal critical masses I cited above.

Can these opposing views be reconciled? How could a micro-nuke be made? At first thought, one might conclude that one would indeed use nanotechnology to emplace Uranium or Plutonium atoms one at a time optimally, to obtain as small, and compact, a nuke as possible— and this may be feasible. But then I realized this may be approaching the problem from the wrong direction. Instead of trying to see how that physicist at the Congressional hearing could build a fission bomb, with a yield of only a few pounds of TNT, from a very tiny amount of Uranium or Plutonium, I may have found better ways.

Now we know, e.g., that the Hiroshima bomb had 80 generations of neutron capture/emission. One neutron yielding 2-3 neutrons with each successful capture by a Uranium nucleus, and so on. 99% of the 13-15 Kt of TNT release is said to have occurred in the last 10 generations of neutron emission. That is because of the exponential build-up to the massive numbers of neutrons at the end. So instead of thinking very tiny, what is to stop the following? Start with an Hiroshima bomb, or the smaller Davy Crockett nuke. Then stop the last few generations of neutron emission/capture to have either of these bombs have a much lower yield. This can probably be attained in numerous ways. 1. A somewhat hollow core or 2. Emplacing one or more spherical shells (or whatever geometry is required) of a neutron absorbing material, at the appropriate radii, to either terminate criticality near the end (or earlier for a very small yield), or go barely critical (as opposed to the initial super-criticality), or possibly sub-critical somewhere in between to halt, or slow, the reaction. 3. Employ ACTIVE nanotech devices to halt a critical reaction, even after it has begun.

The first method is somewhat obvious, so let’s examine the second and third methods. Regarding neutron absorbing shells, we know that the properties of neutron absorbing materials are well known from the nuclear reactor industry. In fact, such a tiny nuclear bomb is almost in between a nuke and a nuclear reactor. I think this is very attainable. Now for the third method. As the time scale between each of the 80 generations of neutron capture/emission is said to be 10 nanoseconds, and nanotechnology operates at nanometer distances, it is thus possible that active, not merely passive, means could be employed to act on this related time scale. Thus it may be possible to build in active methods to curtail, or halt, a chain reaction, even after it has begun. As they have nano-engines, they could have nano-lasers that could “de-implode” the critical mass, even after it has begun! Thus no laws of physics would be violated. So it appears likely that there may be numerous ways to attain micro-nukes-- including with the earlier noted increased density—despite official claims that may be highly exaggerated, or outdated, of 2-10 kilogram masses, etc.

Indeed these methods may make it easier to produce small yield nukes out of fission only, and not have any fusion. And tiny nukes were needed, at the WTC, so as to not obviously nuke through the whole building at once, or Manhattan for that matter. So if only fission nukes could be made so small, we can see how the redundant emplacement of many of these could have given rise to the China Syndrome, beginning on 9/11. Indeed these small nukes that employ methods to “damp” them down, may be difficult to standardize. That is, a little too much damping, and it stops the chain reaction before any significant yield is attained. Thus I now have a third possible causative factor that may have led to fizzled nukes! E.g., they would have used the lowest yield nukes in the smaller buildings, and possibly many of these same devices were placed in the larger towers—or several larger ones, as I originally wrote. Again, I have asserted, all micro-nukes in WTC7 fizzled in the morning. See http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2007/09/breakthroughs-toward-attaining-complete.html

And WTC6, with it’s nearly perfect spherical hole, looks like JUST ONE mini-, or micro-nuke exploded there. If this one had fizzled, they would have had to do a WTC7 later in the day, for WTC6 also! What I am saying is that they likely tried to have several go off (redundancy), but that spherical hole indicates just one went off, and came close to being too large, if you know what I mean. Many smaller ones— to hide the nuking, was the order of the day— if possible. And these methods, to reduce the minimal critical mass, may make these micro-nukes very sensitive to fizzling. So this hypothesis of how to make a micro-nuke, may be coherent with the rest of my hypotheses, including fizzled nukes in WTC7 and the towers, and the subsequent China Syndrome of high heat generating radioactive fragments, and the three month long hot, large, rubble pile, and the six month long very high heat underneath the towers and WTC7. The latter due to insufficiency of the radiation-lowering methods of sand and water.

I might even speculate that the fizzled North Korean Nuke (of 2006) may have been given to them by none other than the American regime. And it was one of the WTC-type small nukes— with the same fizzled result! See http://www.defensetech.org/archives/002832.html This is part of the op of having a bogus enemy for a possible bogus future war.

So we may have a cohesive body of knowledge tieing together micro-nukes, fizzled nukes—among the ones that did go off--on 9/11, and the subsequent China Syndrome at New York City’s World trade Center. Unlike Hiroshima, all this arose because the American regime needed to hide the nuking of New York City from its residents! But the nuclear cat is out of the bag, and making its presence more and more known every day.

The Real Reason for the US Invasion of Grenada?

Sir Eric Gairy and his E.T. secret.

Killing "Terrorists" from a Distance

In one sense, this is a grossly immoral new trend. Though in another sense, it's just the continuation of the old immoral technique of killing people from a distance.

I guess the big difference here is that now we are doing this without even being at war with a country. We just send out killer drones that can strike out of the blue, at a peaceful and unsuspecting target.

And hardly anyone in the US even bats an eye.

Dieter Snell

Interesting article from Peter Lance on someone who looks to be a real 9/11 perp. The article also implicates Eliot Spitzer in the 9/11 cover-up.

Be warned, however, Lance ultimately is a top level limited hangout artist.

Five Years in Iraq-- the American Media Still Ignores the Massive Criminality of the Invasion

To mark the fifth anniversary of the war crime against Iraq, The New York Times "asked nine experts on military and foreign affairs to reflect on their attitudes in the spring of 2003 and to comment on the one aspect of the war that most surprised them or that they wished they had considered in the prewar debate." All nine entries are listed here.

Of course, neither the NYT nor any of the "nine experts" refer to the invasion and ongoing occupation as a war crime. Not a single one of these eminent personages acknowledges that Iraq had never attacked us, that Iraq constituted no threat to the U.S. of any consequence whatsoever, and that these facts -- which are the only facts relevant to a determination of whether the U.S. had any justification at all to launch this criminal war -- could have been known in the winter and spring of 2002-2003, and that these facts were known to many "ordinary" persons in the United States and around the world. But none of the "ordinary" persons who understood the truth were "experts." None of them belonged to the ruling class.

Therefore, there is no mention in the august pages of the august NYT of the only judgment that matters:

There is one final point to be made about all this -- and that has to do with the supreme value of a single human life. In our desensitized, dehumanized age, most people have almost no appreciation for what I'm talking about, and our political establishment and media only make this grievous failing worse. Each of us is unique; not one of us can be replaced. Each of us has a family, loved ones, friends and a life that is a web of caring, interdependence, and joy. When even one of us is killed or horribly injured for no justifiable reason, the damage affects countless people in addition to the primary victim. Sometimes, the survivors are irreparably damaged as well. Even the survivors' wounds can last a lifetime.

This is of the greatest significance. There is nothing more important or meaningful in the world. No moral principle legitimizes our invasion and occupation of Iraq, just as it will not justify an attack on Iran. Therefore, when the first person was killed in Iraq as the result of our actions, the immorality was complete. The crime had been committed, and no amends could ever suffice or would even be possible. That many additional tens or hundreds of thousands of people have subsequently been killed or injured does not add to the original immorality with regard to first principles. It increases its scope, which is an additional and terrible horror -- but the principle is not altered in the smallest degree.

So think of the five-year-old Iraqi girl who is no more, or think of any one of the countless other victims of this criminal war and occupation. Think of their families and friends. Think of the lives that have been altered forever, and of the wounds that will never heal. Think about all of that.

Contemplate the devastation and the horror. Make it real to yourself. And ask yourself if forgiveness is possible.

You can read the views of all nine "experts," and you will also find not a single mention of the genocide that the actions of the U.S. government have unleashed.

Here, Alexander Cockburn gives us his view of the fifth anniversary of the invasion.

Hating America

It's always amusing how the right-wing loves to say how liberals hate America, when the right is filled with at least as much, if not more hate, for America.

The fact is that reasonable and decent people often called liberals have every reason to hate certain bloodthirsty, venal and corrupt American institutions (e.g. the "military industrial media complex") and traditions (e.g. going to war to kill large numbers of people-- especially foreigners-- on a regular basis).

In contrast, the right tends to hate people who they view as insufficiently patriotic or people who they view as different from their perception of the mainstream. The right also tends to be motivated by religious beliefs more than the left, which shows a lack of critical thinking on the part of the right. All in all, given their more-or-less blind support for the Iraq war and for Bush, I'd say the right is pretty much fucked up in the head.

Turns Out John McCain Is a Perfect Presidential Nominee for the GOP

He's frighteningly clueless and hypocritical about almost everything.

The one important thing he's good at is pandering to the press. So he's very much in the mold of Mr. WPE.

Obama and Clinton may well be hypocritical about a good many things, but at least they fucking have a clue.

British Teachers Told to Ignore History and Promote Iraq War Propaganda

This is pretty disgusting.

Of course, when you know the truth of the nuclear demolition of the WTC, and other ultimate truths, it's hard to be truly shocked by anything the PTB do.

P.S. So much for progress in Iraq.

Krugman Asks a Key Question on the Financial System

So here’s the question we really should be asking: When the feds do bail out the financial system, what will they do to ensure that they aren’t also bailing out the people who got us into this mess?

The prognosis, of course, is quite grim:

Still, that’s not what has me worried. I’m more concerned that despite the extraordinary scale of Mr. Bernanke’s action — to my knowledge, no advanced-country’s central bank has ever exposed itself to this much market risk — the Fed still won’t manage to get a grip on the economy. You see, $400 billion sounds like a lot, but it’s still small compared with the problem.

Indeed, early returns from the credit markets have been disappointing. Indicators of financial stress like the “TED spread” (don’t ask) are a little better than they were before the Fed’s announcement — but not much, and things have by no means returned to normal.

What if this initiative fails? I’m sure that Mr. Bernanke and his colleagues are frantically considering other actions that they can take, but there’s only so much the Fed — whose resources are limited, and whose mandate doesn’t extend to rescuing the whole financial system — can do when faced with what looks increasingly like one of history’s great financial crises.

The next steps will be up to the politicians.

I used to think that the major issues facing the next president would be how to get out of Iraq and what to do about health care. At this point, however, I suspect that the biggest problem for the next administration will be figuring out which parts of the financial system to bail out, how to pay the cleanup bills and how to explain what it’s doing to an angry public.

Crane Collapse in NYC

Now this is what I call a sledgehammer-- i.e. the crane section on top of the crushed building:


Note, the sledgehammer is sitting on top, basically intact.

If this were 9/11, the sledgehammer would have ground itself into dust as it crushed the building below it, of course.

More pics here. NYTimes article here.


And I imagine that SUV got knocked over by a shockwave produced by the crash-- not by the "Hutchison effect".

Murrah Building Versus WTC6

So, Judy Wood makes a good point here about how similar looking the damage is for the bombed Murrah Building and WTC6 (that was officially smashed in by WTC1 debris):


In particular, the WTC6 damage is remarkably clean for the uneven pelting of debris it officially received. The Murrah building was done in by bombs of some sort-- likely micronukes.

It only figures that WTC6 was also the victim of micronukes.

While Wood of course thinks it was directed energy weapons ("DEW") that did this damage, there is, as yet, no evidence that any DEW could actually do this damage.

Micronukes are so far, by far, the best explanation for the WTC phenomena.

A Special Message to "Chad" and "Pinch"

Dance, monkey, dance!!!

A Rare Victory for Democracy in the US

House Democrats reject telecom amnesty and warrantless surveillance.

Some parliamentary details here.

Time for Some RAGE!!!

Various Items

--More signs of economic meltdown:

Almost everything seems to be going wrong for the American economy at once. People are buying less, but most things are costing more. Mortgage rates are rising, the dollar is falling and prices of key commodities like oil are leaping from one record high to the next.

On Thursday, the dollar plumbed new lows against the Japanese yen and several other major currencies; the price of an ounce of gold jumped above $1,000 for the first time; and lenders raised home loan rates once again. Government figures showed retail sales fell in February as consumers cut back on cars, furniture and electronics.

--More signs the military-industrial complex is freaking out of control: new jet fighter program to cost one trillion.

--A muslim friend of mine tells me that not only is Hussein a very muslim name, but Barack is as well-- Barack was the name of the horse the prophet Muhammed rode. Hussein was a key ancestor of Muhammed. Not that there is anything wrong with having a muslim name! But it is interesting that the likely Dem candidate has a totally muslim name.

--Reading hard-core right-wing blogs is very depressing. How can you possibly deal with people who (just to name a couple of things) are absolutely convinced the media has been insufficiently patriotic about the Iraq war, and people who think that Islam is an inherently evil religion?

The OK City Op

Good video:

The first minute of this look familiar at all?

Interesting, McVeigh's implausible truck bomb could be analogous to the 9/11 "planes" that struck the WTC.

UPDATE: a further analogy with 9/11 would be the use of micronukes. Would have been nice if Alex Jones mentioned the article from his own site that describes the use use of micronukes at the Murrah building.

Freak Scene

(click to enlarge)

Sublime

Beethoven's 5th (Emperor) Concerto -- Adagio 2nd movement:

The Top Six Things I Learned from Researching 9/11

6) never trust the major media, US political leaders or military leaders

5) there are far more deep ultimate truths than the fact that 9/11 was an inside job

4) "the powers that be" control the fate of humankind

3) "the powers that be" are ultimately controlled by evil extra-terrestrial beings trapped on this planet

2) mankind is deeply intertwined with the evil extra-terrestrial beings-- likely even at the genetic level

1) other extra-terrestrial beings are surveilling this planet, and preventing the escape of the evil extra-terrestrials-- these other extra-terrestrial beings account for UFOs and other related alien phenomena

The Easy Test to Tell If a Politician Is Corrupt

Will they admit 9/11 was an inside job?

If their answer is yes, they are not corrupt.

If their answer is no, they are corrupt.

Alien Face Crop Circle!

Yearghhhh!!!!!!!

Best Fake Plane Crash Since 9/11?

Check out the pilot of "Lost".

I never watched the show before, but someone I know kept telling me I should watch it... seems like a good show, as far as TV dramas go.

Spitzer

I agree with what Glenn Greenwald says.


I really can't stand people who get overly moralizing about sexual behaviour-- bugged me with Clinton, bugs me now. Breaking the law is a different matter, but I find it not the least bit shocking that Spitzer used a prostitute-- even taking into account the hypocrisy.

Massive Illegal Government Spying

How fucked up is this?

Here's the way the whole thing works, according to Gorman: into the NSA's massive database goes data collected by the Justice Department, Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of Treasury. This information includes data about email (recipient and sender address, subject, time sent), internet searches (sites visited and searches conducted), phone calls (incoming and outgoing numbers, length of call, location), financial information (wire transfers, credit-card use, information about bank accounts), and information from the DHS about airline passengers.

Then the NSA's software analyzes this data for indications of terrorist activity. When it hits upon a suspicious pattern, the NSA "feeds its findings into the effort the administration calls the Terrorist Surveillance Program and shares some of that information with other U.S. security agencies.”

Here's a more in-depth explanation:

Two former officials familiar with the data-sifting efforts said they work by starting with some sort of lead, like a phone number or Internet address. In partnership with the FBI, the systems then can track all domestic and foreign transactions of people associated with that item -- and then the people who associated with them, and so on, casting a gradually wider net. An intelligence official described more of a rapid-response effect: If a person suspected of terrorist connections is believed to be in a U.S. city -- for instance, Detroit, a community with a high concentration of Muslim Americans -- the government's spy systems may be directed to collect and analyze all electronic communications into and out of the city.

The haul can include records of phone calls, email headers and destinations, data on financial transactions and records of Internet browsing. The system also would collect information about other people, including those in the U.S., who communicated with people in Detroit.

What's amazing is how with everything else that has happened, this barely touches the outrage meter.

Sadly, I can too easily imagine the rage from wingnut bloggers towards the reporter Siobhan Gorman and The Wall Street Journal, who published the story.

Chinese Islamic Terrorists Try to Hijack a Plane?

This story seems a bit suspect.

Reuters story.

UPDATE: The whole story now sounds quite bogus:

BEIJING (AFP) - Passengers carrying suspicious liquids on board a Chinese airliner were involved in what officials have called an attempted terror attack last week, the national aviation authority said Monday.

A government official from the Muslim-dominated region of Xinjiang in China's northwest had said the flight crew had foiled Friday's alleged attempt to deliberately crash a plane flying from the region's capital of Urumqi to Beijing.

But on Monday, the General Administration of Civil Aviation said in a statement on its website that "China Southern Airlines flight CZ6901 from Urumqi to Beijing discovered some passengers were in possession of suspicious liquids.

"To safeguard passenger safety, the plane was diverted to Lanzhou's Zhongchuan Airport."

The statement said the plane later arrived safely in Beijing. No other details were given.

Shanghai's Oriental Morning Post reported that the substances in question were believed to have been flammable.

"According to sources, flammable substances were found in the toilet of the plane. At least two passengers have been detained for questioning," it said, without specifying its sources.

So someone poured some vodka into the toilet???

The Epitome of the Intel Agency Control of the “911truth” forums/blogs-- The Anatomy of the Big Lie to Hide the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11

By The Anonymous Physicist

On 2/25/2008, 911blogger ran a piece that had structural engineer, Dr. Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl citing evidence from the WTC rubble that could only honestly be interpreted as coming from the use of a nuclear weapon. http://911blogger.com/node/14062

The 911blogger piece states, “Astaneh-Asl, [who is said to have arrived at the WTC site on 9/19/01 for a two week study], said that steel flanges “"had been reduced from an inch thick to paper thin."” At a recycling center in New Jersey, he saw 10-ton steel beams from the towers that “"looked like giant sticks of twisted licorice."” He showed the San Francisco Chronicle a “"banana-shaped, rust-colored piece of steel”" that had somehow “"twisted like toffee during the terrorist attack."” He noted the way steel from the WTC had bent at several connection points that had joined the floors to the vertical columns…In an interview in 2007, Astaneh-Asl recalled, “"I saw melting of girders in [the] World Trade Center.”"He found a foot-long twisted shard of steel that was "like a piece of bread, but it was high-strength steel.”" He commented, “"I haven't seen anything like this [before]."” He came across "”severely scorched [steel] members from 40 or so floors below the points of impact [by the planes]."” The fireproofing that had been used to protect the WTC steel also showed evidence of extreme conditions. In some places it had "melted into a glassy residue." Astaneh-Asl saw a charred I-beam from WTC Building 7-- a 47-story skyscraper that collapsed late in the afternoon of 9/11, even though no plane hit it. "”The beam, so named because its cross-section looks like a capital I, had clearly endured searing temperatures. Parts of the flat top of the I, once five-eighths of an inch thick, had vaporized."”

The 911blogger piece says that Astaneh-Asl concludes that fire brought down the towers, and cleverly disagrees with that “conclusion.” I note that the piece states that Astaneh-Asl-- an Iranian engineer teaching at Berkeley-- was picked as part of a team by the American Society of Civil Engineers. This is the forever reputation-destroyed organization that printed the blatant falsifications of Seffen and Bazant, that I and Spooked have proven to be impossible and of which my dust size analysis demonstrated blatant lying about the evidence. http://www.bloglines.com/blog/spooked911/

Now 911Blogger adds this hangout to the quotes of Dr. Astaneh-Asl, “This appears to be further evidence that high-temperature explosives, such as thermate, were used to bring down the towers.” This is added despite no quote from Astaneh-Asl on thermite, and that this would be despite the fact that the vaporization of the steel, and the other evidence cited, indicate both vastly higher temperatures were present than thermite/thermate/super-duper thermate could generate, AND stating that “steel flanges had been reduced from an inch thick to paper thin" could only arise from the million degree heat and/or the neutron bombardment from nukes. Notice also how this evidence agrees with my citation from WTC engineer, Mike Pecoraro, who said he and a colleague present in the sub-basement of WTC1 on 9/11 “were astonished to see a steel and concrete fire door that weighed about 300 pounds, wrinkled up like a piece of aluminum foil" after a sub-basement explosion timed to coincide with the “plane hit” explosion above. http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2007/08/by-anonymous-physicist-sgt.html
Again only neutron bombardment and/or temperatures far beyond “thermite” could have done that, as well as completely vaporize over a thousand people, and much of the other contents of the towers.

So we see how the intel agencies have acted since the beginning. The PTB, and their intel agencies’ top dogs, knew that nuclear bombs were used to destroy the WTC on 911. False “911truth” blogs, websites, and forums would be set up to masquerade as searching for the truth, and admitting the government’s official story is wrong. These websites, would be added as needed to the already established “conspiracy” or “conspiracy debunking” websites, forums etc.-- the virtual entirety of these already present on the internet, were also controlled by the intel agencies. The number of Brits included in the old and the new Conspiracy forums/blogs is an indication of MI6 control.

Now all these blogs, forums, sites would be used to--
1. censor all evidence that nukes were used on 9/11, and that the China Syndrome resulted, and
2. Promote desperate limited hangouts instead.

A handful of intel agents would control those genuinely seeking the truth by insertion into the top of the 911truth field by the intel agencies, and by pushing the “yes, the OCT is wrong, and there was government involvement.” To help splinter, alienate etc. the 911truth community, various hangouts were created. These include the evidence-free DDT (DEW Disinfo Theory), the thermite hangout, and the perennial Jews/Zionists/Israelis hangout.

The heads of the DEW and thermite hangouts were waiting in the wings of the intel agencies, should the nuclear truth be released. When some of the Finnish military expert’s writings on the nuking of the WTC on 9/11 were translated into English and published at the Finnish website http://www.saunalahti.fi/wtc2001/military.htm in 2005, the intel agencies felt they had to spring their agents into action. The ludicrous hangouts of DEW and thermite were released to the intel agency controlled “911truth” internet community, within a year or so of the Finn’s translations being printed on the net.

For the record, Spooked has told me that when this blog posted its first article on the nuking of the WTC he found his blog had been removed from 911blogger’s list of links! This is an apparent display of intel agency control of 911blogger to promote the ludicrous hangout of thermite, and the denial of the people’s access to the nuclear truth.

My numerous articles have destroyed these hangouts. See wtcdemolition.blogpsot.com and wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com As genuine scientists and engineers could prove the case for nukes, the thermite promoter, a nuclear physicist— and nuclear physicists would ordinarily know nothing abut thermite-- was inserted to try to head and control the scientists and engineers who might be genuine. Many of these scientists and engineers could not be genuine, else they would have left after seeing all the evidence of the nuking of the WTC, and of the obvious intel agent nature of their “leader.” His earlier work for the PTB in trying to disprove the validity of a great new energy source from water is clear for all to see. See this youtube piece originally titled, “Prof. [Steven] Jones from HeavyWaterGate - The War on Cold Fusion” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1vOeKNN2UI Any engineer or scientist who allows him/herself to be led by such an obvious intel asset is him/herself suspect as being an intel asset for the thermite hangout—and, legally/criminally, an obstructor of Justice. Note, I have stated numerous times that thermite, etc. did not have the explosive power nor the temperature to have done what was done to the WTC towers, nor does thermite remain hot for months like Jones proclaims (it cools off in minutes or hours, as you can see on youtube), to hide the nuclear truth of the massive, six month long heat generation of the radioactive fragments (until removed) at the WTC--the China Syndrome.

Now-- right on cue-- two weeks after the 911blogger piece ran, Rense.com takes the 911blogger scam piece and adds the Israeli hangout to the “thermite/thermate” hangout. http://www.rense.com/general81/therm.htm Both of these hangouts pinpoint each website/blog as a total front for the MI6/Rome intel agency controllers of these sites/blogs. Rense may be the most popular conspiracy website in the world, and cleverly displays some good conspiracy material frequently. The other huge conspiracy blog (also with some good articles frequently) is that of Alex Jones, who also will never mention the China Syndrome, nor even the nuking of the WTC on 9/11. Instead he promotes the obvious intel agent, Steven Jones, and thermite. So you will never see my articles taken at these “Conspiracy” sites, as London/Rome do not want Americans and the world to see all the proof of the nuking of New York City, and the China Syndrome aftermath. Only MI6/CIA/Rome approved articles, and authors, are posted at all the websites and blogs that these agencies control-- virtually all of the “conspiracy” and “911truth” blogs/forums. Rense did take some articles on the nuking of the WTC from someone with an M.D. degree (one year taken of college Physics for pre-meds--a course I, myself, taught at one University) who slanted everything again to the ludicrous and evidence-free “Dimona nukes” hangout.

Rense’s intel cover is blown with its ludicrous and daily, massive displays of anti-Semitism, and bird flu material. From Rense, one comes away with believing that only Jews and bird flu need worry us. Bird flu, numerous experts have said, is easily defeated with the body’s own simple fever, and thus by not taking aspirin, etc. Jews: well the German Nazis got their masses to think that their only worry was the “all powerful Jew pervading their country, society and economy.” Yes. the Jews were so powerful, they couldn’t keep themselves from virtual total extermination on the European continent. Fascinating that then-- as now-- the Jew hangout, kept the German people from finding out that “Hitler was a British agent,” as this book http://www.amazon.com/Hitler-British-Agent-Greg-Hallett/dp/047311478X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/002-5807118-9820853?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1204910639&sr=1-1 proves, and that London was setting up Germany, and the rest of the world, for devastation. The Jew hangout was used so that the German people did not look to London as the real puppet-masters of the Nazi horde, and thus the real enemy of the German people.

Likewise now the same hangout is getting more and more play, as the word spreads that New York City was nuked on 9/11/01-- BY ITS OWN REGIME-- with the resultant China Syndrome of releasing cancer-causing radiation to millions of metro New York inhabitants, and 9/11 responders. So yes, the intel agency controlled internet blogs, forums, sites, must censor out all info that proves the regime’s use of nukes on 9/11, and the China Syndrome result; lest the people wake up, realize they have nothing to lose and revolt; and remove the mass murderers in their midst, and in control of their very existence. Hint: They obviously fear that it is doable!