Fun "on the Moon"

As people who've read this blog for a while know, I support the idea that the Apollo moon landings were faked, for a variety of reasons I went over many years ago. If someone is interested in what's been posted here on the moon (or anything in general), they can search the site using the tool on the lower right side. Generally, I really liked the late Dave McGowan's writing on the moon hoax. His original website is gone, but the pieces are archived various places. I have saved the files myself on my computer. If anyone wants them, you can email me.

I really haven't spent too much time thinking on the moon landings in recent years, but with all the conspiracy stuff popping up in the election season, and the media constantly mocking conspiracy theorists as moon hoax believers, I was getting periodic reminders of my thinking on this issue. Then looking up something recently on youtube, I stumbled on this video from 2012 where this sgcollins guy claims that the astronaut footage from the moon could not have been faked by slow motion:


Sgcollins' argument seems fair enough, and he seems to be a reasonable guy. Jarrah White did debate a bit with him back and forth on this, but let's just say ultimately that the footage wasn't faked to slow motion speed using any sort of normal video technology available then.

But I have been thinking about this a bit more, and the whole slow motion fakery argument is just dumb. Because in 1/6th gravity, men walking on the moon wouldn't be walking slowly (even with a heavy bulky suit on), they would be zipping around fast because they have so much strength. This oddly is NOT what the footage of astronauts on the moon shows! Sometimes they kind of run and skip, but a lot of the time they do seem to be walking kind of slowly. But really, the only time slow motion would be useful is when someone or something is falling. Interestingly, there's no footage where they ever jump really high on the moon, as would be natural to try. At the same time, another oddity of the moon footage is we rarely if ever see anything falling on the moon WAY slower than it should. Slow motion could be used effectively for these short parts where they want to show something falling slowly. But overall, saying they faked moon gravity using slow motion is just dumb.

I realized (or remembered) that the easiest way to fake the low gravity of the moon would not be slow motion video, but to have the astronauts (they are on a movie set anyway) hung by suspension wires with some play or give to them, so that much of the astronaut's weight is eased but they still contact the ground. I know I've seen this proposed elsewhere and some examples of it in footage. For instance this:

Note, I don't agree with everything in the video, but the basic point is there.

Wires are certainly the obvious solution to faking low gravity, rather than slow motion video.


So look at this example of an Apollo 16 astronaut falling on the moon:


Would this guy really fall like that and have such trouble getting up in 1/6th gravity? The backpack is not that much weight relatively, to throw his balance off, and even if the whole suit is 200 pounds, he's still 1/3 lighter than on earth if we assume he's about 200 pounds. So, he should still be 3 times stronger than on earth, and be able to jump up very easily.

There are many odd issues with this clip, for instance after his first leaning fall, and he tries to get up, then he falls again-- more quickly than expected. Also when he falls, he's sort of suspended above the ground (which fits the suspension wire footage). There's also some dirt that gets kicked up that falls down veryy quickly-- like earth gravity speed. So it's just weird footage. I think the key oddity is the way his whole center of gravity seems off-- which doesn't really make sense for being in 1/3th gravity and wearing a backpack. His center of gravity COULD be thrown off by suspension wires though, if they are positioned away from his natural center of gravity, such as on his backpack.

The same sort of problems are seen in two different scenes of falling Apollo 17 astronauts here at 10 minutes and 15 minutes in:


A really convincing example of unnatural weight shifting at 2:30 in this video:


Also see here:

There are a bunch of related videos from this last one, showing all manner of obvious fakery.

Trump Is Running the Biggest Con Job Possible

Trump is DEEP in debt with Russia and he owes them.

So they help him get elected so he will do their bidding, and now he's pulling everyone along on an incredibly treasonous gamble to do Putin's bidding in order to cover his debts.

The GOP has fallen behind this guy, all because he easily manipulated their base (they've been programmed to believe his crap after years of rightwing radio and FoxNews BS) and he's gotten elected POTUS with the help of Russian aid.

It's freaking insanity, it's the plot of thriller movie. But it seems to be real life.

However-- it is also a house of cards that could come crashing down rather easily if the right threads are pulled. Trump would be revealed as a massive traitor, and the GOP would be absolutely ruined as a party, after they backed his election.

Americans NEED TO SEE TRUMP'S TAXES. That is the thread we need to pull.

How incredibly wrong is it, that we haven't seen his taxes yet, despite his weird ties to Russia and Putin love???

Trump's income taxes HAVE to be shown. The people must DEMAND it.

Fuck 2016 and Trump

For many reasons, fuck 2016, but especially fuck you 2016 for Donald Trump.

That great "fuck you Trump" piece encapsulates much of why Trump makes me sick, and millions others are also sickened by him.

That piece doesn't even get to Trump being a pro-Putin suck-up.

Great move on delay (by V. Putin) - I always knew he was very smart!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 30, 2016

These are a few of the horrors we are dealing with for Trump:

George W. Bush's Ethics Lawyer: Trump Will Be in Violation of Constitution on Day One

Trump advisor: The wealthy can’t be corrupt because they’re wealthy

An interesting article on how Trump's racism is being whitewashed and his win will end up being a "lost cause" like the confederacy.

Obama Urged to Take U.S. Nukes Off High Alert Before Trump Takes Office

Scientists Scramble to Protect Decades of Climate Research Before Trump Takes Office 

Trump will push for highly nasty space weapons, which has deep conspiracy implications.

There Is Some Very Deep Creepy Shit Going on with Trump and Nukes

An important piece from Sarah Kendzior--

On Dec. 22, president-elect Donald Trump and Russian president Vladimir Putin both announced that they intend to increase their respective countries’ nuclear arsenals. Their use of language eerily paralleled each other. “The United States must greatly strengthen and expand its nuclear capability until such time as the world comes to its senses regarding nukes,” Trump tweeted. “Russia should fortify its military nuclear potential and develop missiles that can penetrate any missile-defense system,” Putin said at a defense ministry meeting. 

The joint statements set off speculation that the United States and Russia are planning an increase in nuclear capacity that is in stark contrast to standard anti-proliferation policy. This is an erroneous interpretation. Trump and Putin aren’t heading to war with each other—they’re heading to war together. 

Trump is a vociferous defender and admirer of Putin and is suspected by multiple intelligence experts of being assisted and even co-opted by the Kremlin. Russian interference in the US election has been affirmed by multiple US intelligence agencies and has led to calls for a congressional investigation. Rather than engaging in an arms race against each other, Trump and Putin are possibly teaming up as nuclear partners against shared targets. 

Sound fantastical? It’s not: Trump has been obsessed with nuclear weapons for several decades, and has expressed his desire to coordinate with Russia on nuclear policy since the 1980s. In 1984 Trump, backed by Roy Cohn, the political operative who advised Joe McCarthy and Richard Nixon, proclaimed his goal of negotiating nuclear deals with the Soviets: “It would take an hour-and-a-half to learn everything there is to learn about missiles,” Trump said. “I think I know most of it anyway. You’re talking about just getting updated on a situation… You know who really wants me to do this? Roy… I’d do it in a second.” 

This rhetoric mirrors Trump’s current rejection of expert advice and conviction that his instinct is enough to guide policy. (“I’m speaking with myself, number one, because I have a very good brain and I’ve said a lot of things,” he said in March 2016 when asked whom he consults on foreign affairs.) During the 2016 US presidential campaign, Trump refused to look at intelligence briefings or collaborate with anyone outside his inner circle. This advisory team is comprised of corporate raiders, warmongers, and white supremacists, some of whom—like his nominee for secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, or national security advisor, Michael Flynn—are personally tied to Putin as well. 

In 1987, Trump made his goal of Russian collaboration on nuclear power explicit: The Soviet Union and the US should partner to form a nuclear superpower with the intention of intimidating other countries into dropping their own nuclear plans. “Most of those [pre-nuclear] countries are in one form or another dominated by the US and the Soviet Union,” Trump told journalist Roy Rosenbaum. “Between those two nations you have the power to dominate any of those countries. So we should use our power of economic retaliation and they use their powers of retaliation, and between the two of us we will prevent the problem from happening. It would have been better having done something five years ago. But I believe even a country such as Pakistan would have to do something now. Five years from now they’ll laugh.” 

When Rosenbaum suggested Pakistan would not respond favorably to this policy, Trump laughed: “Maybe we should offer them something. I’m saying you start off as nicely as possible. You apply as much pressure as necessary until you achieve the goal. You start off telling them, ‘Let’s get rid of it.’ If that doesn’t work you then start cutting off aid. And more aid and then more. You do whatever is necessary so these people will have riots in the street, so they can’t get water. So they can’t get Band-Aids, so they can’t get food. Because that’s the only thing that’s going to do it—the people, the riots.” 

Trump then suggested that the US and Russia jointly apply the same policy of brutal sanctions on US allies like France. 

1987 was also the first year Trump visited Russia, which was then part of the Soviet Union. In 1988, he attempted to meet with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev, reportedly to sell him on his nuclear plan. This meeting never happened. At this time, Trump also began proclaiming his presidential ambitions and taking out newspaper advertisements harshly criticizing US foreign policy. 

While Trump’s obsession with nuclear weapons, calls for riots, rejection of expert advice, and deference to Russian leaders has remained consistent since the 1980s, his position on the use of nuclear weapons has changed. Originally, Trump proposed his nuclear partnership with Russia as an unusual form of deterrence. 

In 2016, however, he repeatedly stated his goal to use nuclear weapons on other countries. In an interview with Chris Matthews in April, Trump said the use of nuclear weapons may be necessary under certain circumstances. When pressed to elaborate by a startled Matthews, Trump continued: “Then why are we making them? Why do we make them?” 

He went on to say he would consider using nuclear weapons on Europe and the Middle East. 

On Aug. 3, after a week marked by a series of scandals including Trump asking Russia to hack Hillary Clinton’s emails during what would be his final press conference, MSNBC host Joe Scarborough expressed his own belief that that Trump was obsessed with using nuclear weapons in an exchange with Mike Barnacle: 

Scarborough: I’ll be careful here. Several months ago, a foreign policy expert on the international level went to advise Donald Trump, and three times he asked about the use of nuclear weapons. Three times he asked, at one point, “If we have them, why can’t we use them?” 

Barnicle: Wow. 

Scarborough: That’s one of the reasons why he has—he just doesn’t have foreign policy experts around him. 

Barnicle: Trump? Trump asked three times whether we can use nuclear weapons? Scarborough: Three times in an hour briefing, “Why can’t we use nuclear weapons?” 

At the time, Scarborough seemed deeply alarmed by Trump’s plans. On Aug 22, Trump threatened to reveal secret information about Scarborough and his co-host Mika Brzezinski. A few weeks later, the hosts met with Trump and have since providing flattering coverage of the president-elect. 

Scarborough appears to be the sole media figure Trump informed on his new nuclear policy, which Scarborough paraphrased on Dec. 23 as “Let it be an arms race because we will outmatch them at every pass and outlast them all.”It is unclear who “them” is in this situation—and the phrasing is likely very alarming for countries around the world. 

But given Trump’s affection for and connection to the Kremlin—one the Kremlin itself has confirmed—and the fact that the US and Russia have now promoted nearly identical foreign policies (and also appear to be pursuing a series of financial arrangements in the gas and oil industry that benefit billionaires of both states), it is unlikely that the US is preparing to engage in a nuclear arms race against Russia. 

Trump may have found the nuclear partner in Putin he has been seeking for decades. In Trump, Putin may have found a willing accomplice who will back Russian imperialistic ambitions and drop sanctions, among other benefits. 

This is the new mutually assured destruction: the two states with the most nuclear weapons in the world, both backed by authoritarian leaders, may be partnering against as-yet unknown shared enemies. 

Their rhetoric alone is dangerous, and an actual increase in nuclear arsenals more so. In a worst case scenario, the end target of Trump and Putin’s destructive ambitions could ultimately be the entire world.

Trump is almost certainly a Russian agent of some sort.

This whole creepy-ass shit enhances the idea that Russia helped ensure Trump election.

It doesn't help that Trump has a very weak character, and has some very bizarre and obsessive personality traits.

He's also a eugenecist, and has ties to white supremacists.

He also fits the "dark triad" personality trait, which is a sign of severe psychopathy.

And he apparently has a willingness to use nukes. It really couldn't be more disturbing.

To put it quite simply, he's a fucking sociopathic madman.

So-- to what end is all of this madness?

I talked about it here-- how having joint control of world-wide nukes is a fucking horrifying world-ending event:

Remember the deep ultimate conspiracy postulated here by Anonymous Physicist -- that there are evil aliens controlling us, and they are quarantined here on planet earth by other aliens.  The evil aliens really want to  break out of quarantine and get off earth, and to do this, they need nuclear weapons. 

While this probably sounds sort of crazy, it is still a fascinating idea that can explain a number of other conspiracy issues such as Apollo moon landing fakery, UFO's, and why things are so fucked up here on earth.

I'm not saying the evil alien-quarantine theory is an absolute fact, but it's a useful model to work with.

But I have some additional ideas on this model.

The evil PTB would need most of the nukes on earth for their purpose of breaking out of quarantine. But the problem is, right now, most of the nukes are controlled by two countries: US and Russia. The nukes are pointed to earth, but really what is need is to point the nukes at the atmosphere of the planet, to the outer edge where the quarantine ships are, to disable them. That would mean total control of all the US-Russian nukes, and to be able to re-direct them.

With different governments in opposition to each other this would be impossible.

But if US and Russia became friendly, and allied militarily, their nukes could be tied to one controller.

Who favors closer relations with Russia and the US? Trump and Putin, of course.

Who would block such a union? Hillary, of course.

So Hillary could be saving us from the ultimate horror scenario of the atmosphere getting nuked, essentially destroying life on the planet.

Keep in mind that Hillary wanted UFO disclosure as president, which had some real possibility of uncovering the ultimate evil PTB. That didn't happen, and now we have a president-elect, who has ties with and is making nice with Russia.

Conspiracy types typically portray Hillary as the one hell-bent on starting a nuclear war with Russia, but to me, that isn't plausible. I don't buy that she is that evil, in willing to kill almost everyone on the planet.

You know who seems like a true psychopath to me?

Donald J. Trump

Trumpists Silent As Trump Fills Administration with "Globalists"

Not shocking...

Gingrich Says Trump's No Longer Interested In 'Drain The Swamp'

Wow, it's almost like his whole campaign was a lie! Go figure!

Meanwhile, the kleptocracy will proceed apace:

Gingrich Suggests Trump Simply Pardon Family That Breaks Anti-Nepotism Law

 

Trump Gives Conspiracy Theories a Bad Name

He's such a freaking liar and conman, his conspiracy theories and those of his supporters are demented bullshit.

And it gives a bad name to real conspiracy theories, and to people who try to do serious conspiracy research.

The US Constitution Failed Us

What kind of nation allows the loser of a national election to become president — and then does it again 16 years later? 

What kind of nation retains an electoral process that was originally designed to inflate the influence of slaveholders? 

What kind of nation permits its Congress to write a time bomb into law that periodically forces rival factions into a game of chicken that could wreck the world economy? 

What kind of nation fights a civil war over the question of whether people of African descent are people or property, and then looks the other way when the loser ignores the resolution of that war? 

What kind of nation waits until 1965 to guarantee black people’s right to vote? 

Americans speak of our Constitution as if it were a religious text. 

To label a law “unconstitutional” is not simply to say that it violates some procedural rule or legal technicality, it is to label it fundamentally unAmerican. To do so is to question the values of any lawmaker despicable enough to support such a law, and to suggest that those values are at odds with who we are as a nation. 

But our Constitution has not served us nearly as well as we would have been served by other systems adopted by our peer nations. Nor has it lived up to the expectations of its drafters. 

Now, our country is facing a man of superlative ignorance. A racist. An admitted sexual assaulter of women. A man poised to violate the Constitution the very instant he takes the oath of office. A man who openly encouraged Russia’s efforts to usher him into the White House. A man who owes his election to the underhanded efforts of deep state actors within our nation’s internal police agency. A man who lost the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes. And the Constitution has placed this man in the White House. 

The Constitution gave Donald Trump command of the world’s most powerful military and an nuclear arsenal that can eradicate all life on Earth. It let him name a racist as our nation’s top enforcer of its laws. It let him use his office to sell hotel rooms to foreign diplomats. 

The Electoral College has voted. Trump will be our next president. This is what the Constitution hath wrought. 

It did this because our Constitution remains the product of a compromise with moral monsters who believed that human beings could be owned as property. 

It did this because our Constitution offers no guarantee, or even much in the way of likelihood, that the men and women elected to lead the country will share the preferences of the nation as a whole. 

It did this because our Constitution fosters voter ignorance. It did this because our Constitution can be gamed — and was gamed quite successfully by the Republican Party.

Also there's no doubt Trump is a psychopath of the highest order.

So, in closing, fuck the GOP and the monster they gleefully elected to the most powerful office in the land.

RIP United States of America, 1776-2016

Electoral college confirms Trump's election.

Donald Trump Featured on Russian Nesting Doll in Red Square:

Trump and some of the media, uber creepy:

The Trump Follies, part 333

Trump, Putin, and ExxonMobil team up to destroy the planet

The aligning interests between Russian President Vladimir Putin, Russia’s choice for U.S. president (Donald Trump), and Big Oil represents the gravest threat to humanity (and democracy) since the rise of the Axis powers in the 1930s. That’s because while Trump may not be able to destroy global climate action and the landmark 2105 Paris climate deal all by himself — as he pledged to do during the campaign — he probably could do that with help from Russia and the trillion-dollar oil industry. 

So much is explained by Trump’s Secretary of State choice. Media reports now say it will be Rex Tillerson, CEO of oil giant ExxonMobil, which had made a $500 billion oil deal with Putin that got blocked by sanctions. Stalling the biggest oil deal ever did not just “put Exxon at risk,” as the Wall Street Journal reported in 2014. MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow explained last week this deal was so big it was “expected to change the historical trajectory of Russia.”

GEE, I CAN'T UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE KEEP SAYING RUSSIA WANTED TO HELP TRUMP GET ELECTED.

IT'S JUST SO HARD TO FIGURE THAT ONE OUT.

THE CIA MUST BE LYING ABOUT RUSSIAN HACKING!


But the fact is, the hacking of documents in this election was MASSIVE and several independent groups concluded that Russia was behind much of the hacking.  

Democrats were the main targets of the hacking, obviously helping Trump. Oh yeah, I'm not even sure I noted this here before, but on election day, Democratic Underground was HACKED, AND SHUT DOWN FOR OVER A WEEK. This was a site where Dem activists discussed the election and could note unusual goings on. what a coincidence this site went down on such an important day.

But as usual, by aligning themselves with a foreign power to sway the election, the Republicans committed TREASON to get themselves into power.


Putting the hacking and TREASON aside, overall, Trump's cabinet appointments are an insult to humanity-- a bunch of crackpots, rabid generals, plutocrats and Goldman Sachs bankers.

Some good clips here on the insanity of it all, although it really only scratches the surface:


This is a pretty awesome article:

Donald Trump Is Gaslighting America

The CIA officially determined that Russia intervened in our election, and President-elect Donald Trump dismissed the story as if it were a piece of fake news. "These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction," his transition team wrote in a statement. "The election ended a long time ago in one of the biggest Electoral College victories in history. It’s now time to move on and ‘Make America Great Again'."   

It wasn't one of the biggest Electoral College victories in history, so presumably that's another red-herring lie to distract from Trump treating the Central Intelligence Agency of the United States like it is some rogue blogger to be cast to the trolls. A foreign government's interference in our election is a threat to our freedom, and the President-elect's attempt to undermine the American people's access to that information undermines the very foundation upon which this country was built. It's also nothing new. 

Trump won the Presidency by gas light. His rise to power has awakened a force of bigotry by condoning and encouraging hatred, but also by normalizing deception. Civil rights are now on trial, though before we can fight to reassert the march toward equality, we must regain control of the truth. If that seems melodramatic, I would encourage you to dump a bucket of ice over your head while listening to “Duel of the Fates." 

Donald Trump is our President now; it’s time to wake up. "Gas lighting" is a buzzy name for a terrifying strategy currently being used to weaken and blind the American electorate. We are collectively being treated like Bella Manningham in the 1938 Victorian thriller from which the term "gas light" takes its name. In the play, Jack terrorizes his wife Bella into questioning her reality by blaming her for mischievously misplacing household items which he systematically hides. Doubting whether her perspective can be trusted, Bella clings to a single shred of evidence: the dimming of the gas lights that accompanies the late night execution of Jack’s trickery. The wavering flame is the one thing that holds her conviction in place as she wriggles free of her captor’s control. 

To gas light is to psychologically manipulate a person to the point where they question their own sanity, and that’s precisely what Trump is doing to this country. 

He gained traction in the election by swearing off the lies of politicians, while constantly contradicting himself, often without bothering to conceal the conflicts within his own sound bites. He lied to us over and over again, then took all accusations of his falsehoods and spun them into evidence of bias. At the hands of Trump, facts have become interchangeable with opinions, blinding us into arguing amongst ourselves, as our very reality is called into question. 

There is a long list of receipts when it comes to Trump's lies. With the help of PolitiFact, clear-cut examples of deception include Trump saying that he watched thousands of people cheering on 9/11 in Jersey City (police say there's no evidence of this), that the Mexican government forces immigrants into the U.S. (no evidence), that there are "30 or 34 million" immigrants in this country (there are 10 or 11 million), that he never supported the Iraq War (he told Howard Stern he did), that the unemployment rate is as high as "42 percent" (the highest reported rate is 16.4 percent), that the U.S. is the highest taxed country in the world (not true based on any metric of consideration), that crime is on the rise (it's falling, and has been for decades), and too many other things to list here because the whole tactic is to clog the drain with an indecipherable mass of toxic waste. The gas lighting part comes in when the fictions are disputed by the media, and Trump doubles down on his lies, before painting himself as a victim of unfair coverage, sometimes even threatening to revoke access.

-------------

More PizzaGate, Because People Are Stupid

The bizarre "Pizzagate" online hoax theory that Hillary Clinton operates a satanic pedophilia ring out of Comet pizza in Washington, D.C., has now expanded to encompass pizzerias in at least three other cities, local outlets report: 

In Austin, Texas, according to the Austin American-Statesman, the East Side Pies mini-chain has been the subject of online and phone harassment (and one incident of IRL vandalism) by individuals who have "interpreted the restaurant’s logo as a symbol of the 'illuminati,' questioned the meaning of photos of pizza-eating children on East Side Pies’ Facebook account, inferred that a picture of staffers with former Austin Mayor Lee Leffingwell was proof of nefarious political ties and claimed co-owner Michael Freid, an alumnus of the Culinary Institute of America, had 'connections to the CIA.' " 

DNAInfo writes that an employee of the Brooklyn pizza restaurant Roberta's received a telephoned death threat after it was identified as a hub of satanic activity in a YouTube video posted by an individual who made similar claims about a restaurant in Amherst, New York, which is near Buffalo. 

As Slate's Christina Cauterucci and Jonathan Fischer wrote Tuesday, part of what seems to have made Comet pizza a target of the far-right white nationalist crowd is that it has long been a welcoming environment for "eccentrics, queers, outsiders, and their art," hosting punk shows and art installations. East Side Pies and Roberta's are both also located in predominately liberal areas with thriving music and arts scenes. 

Here's a strange fact from the Washington Post's comprehensive and disturbing report about the Comet pizza affair, which culminated on Sunday when a man from North Carolina entered the restaurant and fired at least one shot from a rifle: An oddly disproportionate share of the tweets about Pizzagate appear to have come from, of all places, the Czech Republic, Cyprus and Vietnam, said Jonathan Albright, an assistant professor of media analytics at Elon University in North Carolina. 

In some cases, the most avid retweeters appeared to be bots, programs designed to amplify certain news and information. 

Michael G. Flynn, the son of Donald Trump's soon-to-be national security adviser, was reportedly removed from Trump's transition team Tuesday for having circulated Pizzagate tweets. But Flynn's father—Michael T. Flynn—has also promoted fake Hillary Clinton sex-abuse stories...

Freaking INSANITY...

seriously this is beyond funny and weird, and is becoming frightening.

At least some people are having fun with it...

PizzaGate In the News ... Because People Are Dumb

I've avoided posting anything on pizzagate for a while, but now it's too big.

I looked into it a bit a while back and what really turned me off on it was the naked and over-the-top partisan tone of the coverage, acting as if Hillary is really some massive pervert Satanic worshipper but Trump isn't a huge pervert and a major narcissist and a delusional liar and a fraud and a money worshipper. The thing I find funny is the right invents these huge conspiracies about how bad Hillary is, based on no evidence, whereas you don't need to invent any conspiracy to see how terrible Trump is.

Anyway, the story of a pedophile ring being run out of a pizza shop in DC seemed a little weird to me, and while I can't swear that it's bogus, the fact that it's being peddled by the Alex Jones crowd and far right wingers really casts doubt on it for me. I can't take those people seriously; they are liars, bad conspiracy theorists, clearly controlled sellouts and have gotten worse since they started promoting Trump. Jones himself has truly gone off the deep end in a frightening way, ranting about stupid crazy shit like pickle cans and about Hillary being Satan and Obama smelling like sulfur.

But you probably heard the poor sucker who took the #pizzagate thing seriously and went there with his guns to check it out, thankfully didn't shoot anyone and apparently gave up when he couldn't find any underground passages or kids being held captive.

In general the guy sounded like a slacker.

Of course, the #pizzagate people think it's a falseflag because the guy had some acting credit on IMDB, meaning he was a crisis actor.

The big question is why would the government run an op like this? It doesn't make a lot of sense to give more exposure to the idea of a secret pedophilia ring or child sex slave ring.

I suppose they could say that "oh, this guy is trying to make it sound like there's nothing there" and keep the truth hidden.

But whatever... I'm sure President Trump will finally crack it wide open, right???

New Hypothesis: The Apollo Moon Missions Were About Discrediting and Distracting from UFOs

I was listening to an interview with an older UFO researcher, and he was talking about how in the 1950s and 1960s, UFO stories were very popular in the media. There were a large number of legitimate sightings and they were openly discussed in the news.  Then in the late 60's, UFOs were treated differently by the media, and it became a kooky subject, where if anyone talked about UFOs, there was something wrong with them.  Part of this was the CIA of course, who definitely were in charge of covering up UFO truth. But there were so many big articles about UFOs in the media in recent years, that it was hard to completely discredit all of them

Of course JFK has first proposed the moon missions, and it's quite possible he did this in order to get at the ultimate truth of the aliens based on the moon, who were involved in controlling matters on earth, matters such as the planetary quarantine.

But of course JFK was killed by a conspiracy, and it may well have been done to keep him quiet about UFO's and aliens, since shortly before his death he had mentioned disclosure.

I propose the Apollo moon missions were repurposed, to actually cover up the truth of the moon and aliens and the evil powers that be (PTB).

The idea is that by sending a scientifically-based spaceship to the moon as part of a massive engineering enterprise, and "finding nothing there" regarding aliens (because the moon landings were all fake), provided a massive and effective distraction away from all those "silly, "wacky" UFOs stories that the government had long been denying had any substance. The government had been desperately trying to coverup UFOs for years, and UFOs were the biggest national security secret to them. So effectively, the fake Apollo moon missions were basically a massive cover-up for UFO's.

A related concept is that the secret government has gone to extreme lengths to close down any official disclosure of UFOs. As I mentioned above, JFK was killed in part because he was going to disclose UFOs. There's some evidence that Nixon actually was going to disclose UFOs (and he of course was forced out of office by Watergate). Most recently, Hillary Clinton was openly discussing UFO disclosure if she was elected. She was ahead in all the polls, and was projected to win by everybody, against a very bizarre extremist candidate, but she lost in a close upset. Was this done by the PTB to maintain the UFO cover-up?

The President Trump Show: Half Horror, Half Comedy

Remember when Trump said a cabal of international (mostly Jewish) bankers was destroying American workers? Here's his new list of advisers:

I guess as long as it's HIS cabal, it's cool.

-------

Here's an interesting piece saying how Trump is an emotional weakling, who is very susceptible to manipulation.

-------

Trump called the Philippines maniac president Rodrigo Duterte and said Duterte was doing a great job and invited him to the White House. Duterte is running serious death squads to kill drug dealers and users.

----

On the lighter side, here's a hilarious piece, albeit with some serious implications:

Half Windsor, all fiasco: Trump’s necktie-gate may undermine his statesmanlike gravitas