Dedicated to fighting authoritarianism, bigotry, greed, corruption, climate change denial, white supremacy, racism, stupidity and general evil, as well as the exploration of interesting ideas and conspiracy theories including 9/11, UFOs, ET's, the paranormal and the general unknown.
Pittsburgh police on Thursday used an audio cannon manufactured by American Technology Corporation (ATCO), a San Diego-based company, to disperse protesters outside the G-20 Summit -- the first time its LRAD series device has been used on civilians in the U.S.
An ATC sales representative confirms to DailyFinance that Pittsburgh police used ATC's Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD). "Yes, we sold one LRAD unit to a government agency -- I don't know which one -- which was used in Pittsburgh," the representative said. American Technology Corp.'s stock was trading up over 15 percent in heavy activity late Friday.
ATC calls itself "a leading innovator of commercial, government, and military directed acoustics product offers" that offers "sound solutions for the commercial, government, and military markets."
Pittsburgh officials said yesterday they believe this to be the first use of a LRAD "sonic cannon" against civilians in U.S. history.
In the chapati flour and peroxide bomber case, the prosecution took pains to convince that the bombs, which fizzled, were deadly. In this, a variety of experts were trotted out to make statements to point in this general direction. They were never particularly convincing, except as arguments from authority, asserting that cobbled-together soggy things consisting of flour and an indeterminate concentration of store bought hydrogen peroxide would be dangerous without explaining how or why.Indeed, it is a bit hard to see how diluted impure components are going to give an effective bomb. And as to Zazi's mental capacity, a relative quoted in this article said he was simply dumb.
The more accurate picture was that the bomb-makers were yet another dismal collection of stupid al Qaeda men, in contravention of the usual received wisdom in the media that jihadists are Islamo-MacGyvers, always well-trained, efficient, smart and capable of whipping up a batch of death from anything.
Sotomayor superficially appears to be a rather sympathetic figure from an earthy background. Such people, however, do not always remain loyal to their roots when ushered through the Ivy Leagues and the halls of judicial power. When Sonia Sotomayor had the chance to "speak truth to power"—indeed, when she herself was the power—when she had the chance to expose the denial of a litigant's due process right to be heard, Sotomayor did not merely remain silent; she protected her judicial colleagues and directly participated in sinking injustice into an embarrassed silence. At a crucial moment in the history of the controversy over President John F. Kennedy's assassination, she helped to denigrate a true patriot in American history and destroy his life; helped to destroy his attorney's career and his life; and failed to meet the test of honesty, independence, and integrity. As accomplished a legal technocrat as she may be, the spirit of the law and justice does not reside in this woman, Sonia Sotomayor, and it is doubtful she may be trusted to perform the role of a principled legal decision-maker in the nation's court of last resort. Public confidence in that Court's role and function in government requires that the Senate refuse to give this nomination its consent.
The last time we left Afghanistan, and we abandoned Pakistan," she said, "that territory became the very territory on which Al Qaeda trained and attacked us on September 11th. So our national security interests are very much tied up in not letting Afghanistan fail again and become a safe haven for terrorists.This doesn't even pass the laugh test. When was the US in Afghanistan before 9/11? When did we "abandon" Pakistan? What an idiot shill. (But don't tell Fortune magazine-- "Condi: The should-be face of the GOP. She's smart. She's experienced. She's worldly." Though I guess "smart" is relative since we're talking the GOP.)
"It's that simple," she declared, "if you want another terrorist attack in the U.S., abandon Afghanistan."
WASHINGTON—An international panel of leading anthropologists, cultural critics, biologists, and social theorists announced this week that Western civilization will reach its lowest conceivable point at 3:32 p.m. Friday.
"From the prehistoric Lascaux cave paintings to the stirring symphonies of Mozart to today's hot-dog eating competitions and action films with comical gerbils, culture has descended into a festering pool of mass ignorance," said Yale sociologist Paul Riordan, who has spent his career analyzing western civilization's fall into the depths of depravity. "If our calculations are correct, this complete erosion of all that is enlightened and unique will reach absolute rock bottom on the afternoon of Sept. 25, 2009."
Added Riordan, "It is scientifically impossible for civilization to sink any lower than it will this Friday."
...back in November 2001... the Washington Post reported that Bush had signed an executive order giving himself the power to order the killing of anyone he arbitrarily designated a terrorist. Year after year, I wrote of how this murderous edict was put into practice around the world, and of its virulently corrosive effects on American society. Now Barack Obama is availing himself of these same powers. There is not one crumb, one atom, one photon of difference between Obama and Bush on this issue. They both believe that the president of the United States can have people killed outside of any semblance of a judicial process: murdered, in cold blood, in sneak attacks, with any "collateral damage" regarded as an acceptable by-product – just like the terrorists they claim to be fighting with these methods.What can we do but howl in outrage in cyberspace, at this evil monstrosity that has grown and grown since 9/11?
Nor does this doctrine of presidential murder make any distinction between American citizens and foreigner.
In order to pass the citizenship test, an applicant must answer six of the 10 questions correctly. As you can see in Table 2, only 2.8 percent of Oklahoma high-school students attending public schools answered six or more questions correctly, and thus pass the citizenship test. Out of the sample of 1,000 students, only six students got seven questions correct, and none answered eight or more questions correctly.Note, only 61% of OK high school students could identify the Atlantic ocean as the large body of water to the east of the US. In any case, I guess this explains Oklahoma's representation in Congress, such as the complete troglodyte, James Inhofe.
Notice that the number of students answering either zero or one item correctly (204 students) is more than seven times larger than the number answering six or more items correctly (28 students). In short, Oklahoma's public high-school students have displayed a profound level of ignorance regarding American history, government, and geography.
Overly-broad language used by lawmakers intending to pull government funding for community organizing group ACORN may have the unintended effect of forcing the government to also pull funds from much of the military-industrial complex, a Tuesday report revealed.
Public-health officials are breathing a small sigh of relief that the H1N1 swine flu virus hasn’t mutated to become more deadly since emerging last spring. But what are the chances it will?
To find out, scientists at the CDC recently launched experiments in the agency’s labs in which they infected ferrets with both the new H1N1 virus and the highly lethal H5N1 avian flu virus to see if they might “reassort” to create a new hybrid.
In this year’s survey, 63 percent of respondents said news articles were often inaccurate and only 29 percent said the media generally “get the facts straight” — the worst marks Pew has recorded — compared with 53 percent and 39 percent in 2007.In general I would say this is good news, but probably a lot of this skepticism is from angry, racist, confused and/or idiotic wingnuts freaking out over a black dude being president.
Seventy-four percent said news organizations favored one side or another in reporting on political and social issues, and the same percentage said the media were often influenced by powerful interests. Those, too, are the worst marks recorded in Pew surveys.
Negative opinions grew since 2007 among both major parties, but significantly more so among Democrats. The percentage of Democrats calling the media inaccurate rose to 59, from 43; the percentage who said the media took sides rose to 67, from 54.
JOHN FARMER, senior counsel to the 9/11 Commission, author of The Ground Truth: The Untold Story of America Under Attack on 9/11.... HOUR 1: John Farmer on how what the 9/11 Commission, public and media was told by military and government officials, 'was almost entirely, and inexplicably, untrue.'So I listened for a bit to this show, lured in by the tease of official lies. So I listen for about 30 minutes, and it is the usual official story of the planes, nothing really surprising. THEN Farmer claims how despite the fact that they were misled by govt officials, THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT IS COMPLETELY TRUE.
"I took some flesh home and called it my son."There is more, if you can stomach it.
The NATO airstrike that killed more than 70 civilians near Kunduz earlier this month was a deadly confluence of two primary elements that characterize the living hell of Afghanistan: relentless violence and crushing poverty.
The villagers were slaughtered while trying to siphon gasoline from two fuel tankers that the Taliban had hijacked from the occupation forces. The trucks were stranded in the ford of a shallow river. Unable to get the trucks out, the insurgents invited local villagers to come gather the fuel for themselves. The prospect of salvaging a can or two of free fuel to help them get through the coming winter drove many of the villagers out into the dead of night. At about 1 a.m, an airstrike ordered by a German commander struck the fuel tankers and the surrounding area.
The result was a firestorm that ripped the villagers to pieces and roasted their bodies beyond all recognition. But that was not the end of it, nor, perhaps, the worst of it. For then the survivors of the slain had to come to the smoking field and try to find their loved ones amidst the gruesome, ungodly residue.
A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginning of history has been about 200 years. During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence:I'd say we are somewhere between "complacency to apathy" and "apathy to dependence"-- though more pessimistically one could make a case for "dependence back into bondage".
* From bondage to spiritual faith;
* From spiritual faith to great courage;
* From courage to liberty;
* From liberty to abundance;
* From abundance to complacency;
* From complacency to apathy;
* From apathy to dependence;
* From dependence back into bondage.
The Nat Geo Channel recently aired a 2- hour special on 9/11 Truthers’ objections to the OCT (Official Conspiracy Theory) put out by the U.S. Gov’t, on the WTC destruction. It was clearly a “hit piece” on numerous levels. The show was comprised of a back and forth on the WTC destruction aspects. The “truthers,” and the supporters of the OCT--the 9/11 Commission Report--mostly politely stated their opposing views. However, the only “truthers” shown were all thermite supporters: Architect Richard Gage, young Dylan Avery of the Loose Change film “fame,” the 9/11 thermite hypothesizer himself, Steven Jones, PhD, and the theologian, David Ray Griffin. No mention of what really destroyed the WTC--micro-nukes--nor of the China Syndrome Aftermath was allowed.
My readers know well that I have no doubt that the thermite “hypothesis” is nothing but an Intel agency created limited hangout, to desperately try to hide what really destroyed the WTC. I have written three lengthy articles archived here http://bogus911science.wordpress.com/, proving the thorough falsity of the arguments in papers by Jones et al, promoting thermite, or “super nano-composite thermite”, as being the agent for WTC destruction. In fact, there was one very strange “thermite moment” in this show. Now when one of these NGC experiments showed that thermite failed to explode, Steven Jones remarked that nano-thermite has more explosive properties than regular thermite; and he actually said “nano-thermite such as made by Lawrence Livermore Labs--which implicates them [smiling sheepishly]…” So Jones and this show actually leave us with the implication that a U.S. Laboratory was involved in making the alleged WTC destruction agent! Except, of course, “nano-thermite” was not. But what has LL Labs’ primary task been, since the 1940’s? Yes, design of NUCLEAR weapons. Was this another hint by Jones, and the NGC controllers, that LL Labs’ designed NUCLEAR weapons destroyed the WTC?
So what else was aired during this NGC/Regime hit piece? Within minutes, Dylan Avery says that the No Planes Theory is ludicrous. This despite the blatantly, obvious proof that all videos are purely nothing but CGI, and that they all contain exhibited behavior of both the South Tower, and the alleged plane, showing Zero Interaction Physics. Then also within minutes, the show flashes two “33’s” one from a poll of New Yorkers, and the other on a flatbed containing WTC evidence--the coveted double 33--often used to denote something nuclear, as I have revealed.
Also near the beginning, Griffin calls the towers’ destructions, “implosions.” This despite his “colleagues” calling them “explosions.” Is this a slip-up? And if not, at what level is Griffin’s disinformation? It may be at a superficial level, as all these hidden intel assets really are put in place to destroy their own hangout, and support the OCT. And the regime’s number one stooge for tower “collapse” mechanism “explanation, Z.P. Bazant’s papers claim that 80% of the tower ends up in its footprint--thus perhaps it can be called an “implosion” if that is true. Of course, the vast majority of the towers went variously up in smoke (vaporized), or was flung beyond its footprint. My analysis of Bazant’s work, and calling for his arrest for outright fraud for lying about the crucial smallest dust particle size found by scientists is also here: http://bogus911science.wordpress.com/
But is there a deeper reason for Griffin contradicting himself, and his colleagues, with the “implosion” statement at the beginning? It is possible that the regime’s stooges are ordered to leave little hints all about--like the double 33, already noted. Indeed while the towers are exploding outward and upward (vaporized contents rising), what initiated the destruction and caused the vaporization--and dust particle sizes much smaller than the regime’s stooge alleges--could only have been small nuclear bombs. And these fission bombs are initiated by the IMPLOSION of sub-critical, fissioning components into a super-critical mass. So it is possible Griffin, and the NG Channel, were ordered to include this implosion statement, as an “homage” to what really took out the WTC!
Then the several “experiments” depicted, and the “expert” opinions of several pro-OCT people, are hardly even worth noting. The experiments were thoroughly irrelevant to the WTC event! They included shooting a projectile at a set of thin, supposedly concrete slabs (not thick steel as was the outer structure of the towers), and some conventional building demolition. There was also a steel beam softening experiment. Fire in open air was claimed to have reached a temperature of over 2000 degrees F., and led to the beam buckling. Of course, this is irrelevant for many reasons. The open air was not what was happening regarding the towers, where any alleged jet fuel was 1.expended in the outside explosions, and whose smoke color--black--denoted a low temperature fire inside the oxygen deprived area. The claim that the shock of impact took off all asbestos coating on the beams, is also ludicrous; and obviously both necessary for the regime’s position, and an outright lie. Yes, all these “experiments” and the comments made by the OCT supporting stooges were ludicrous and irrelevant to the WTC set of events!
As already noted, there appears to have been much included here at a deep level for those who have studied my works as here: http://anonymousphysicist.com At one point, a night-time flyover the new WTC area shows the three largest buildings remaining in a row. They all have pyramids on their tops. And they are aligned similarly to both the Giza pyramids, and what those are modeled after-- the Orion belt stars.
Numerous other Intel stooges are paraded out as “journalists or “historians.” These assets claim basically that there has never been a conspiracy, beyond what the Regime states happened. The Pearl Harbor set-up, the Kennedy Assassination, and 9/11 are all stated to only have occurred exactly in the impossible manners that the regime has declared for each one. Of course, one glaring omission by these stooges, in claiming that “Oswald alone did it”--in violation of the inviolable Law of Conservation of Momentum, as Kennedy is slammed backward against the momentum of the claimed incoming bullet from behind him--is the fact that the Regime itself said there was at least another shooter when the House Assassinations Committee, in the late 1970’s, released its report.
So basically the Regime jumped on this chance to not only try to shoot down “9/11 Truth,” but also the truth of the Pearl Harbor set-up, and the Kennedy Assassination. Indeed I have noted here before, that even the Pearl Harbor set-up was acknowledged by no less than President Richard Nixon, that President Roosevelt knew ahead of time, and set it up to happen. This was included in a book by Daniel Ellsberg, “Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers.” So these regime “journalists” and “historians,” as well as the “experts” and their “experiments,” did not recite a single word of truth during this 2-hour “special.” Neither alas did the bogus “truthers”: Gage, Jones, Avery, and Griffin. This is standard for the somewhat clever way the Intel agencies work, in putting out several bogus hangouts to appear to be the only possibilities for some dastardly deed perpetrated by the Regime. Then they get them to “war” with each other publicly. But probably they later go out celebrating together at Langley or London.
But my “favorite” stooge, who just recited one stupid, ignorant lie after another about 9/11, the JFK Assassination, Pearl Harbor, etc. was David Aaronovitch, who closed the show for NGC. His bio includes the fact that he was awarded the “George Orwell Prize for his political writing in 2001.” Yes Big Brother is proud of this Intel asset for his “journalism.”
But despite all these lies, the people are more and more realizing that the World Trade Center could only have been destroyed by micro-nukes http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/and the China Syndrome http://wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com/ resulted. And this realization, and the Regime’s fear, are the reasons the Regime put out this ludicrous hit piece on 9/11. And the need for the ludicrous denial of ALL conspiracies, and especially the global conspiracy against Mankind, also indicate that more people are finding out that the Ultimate Conspiracy leads to a set of knowledge http://74.220.219.64/~myhealu9/AP/quarantine.htm that they fear would enrage Mankind so much that an uprising would attempt to eradicate those in control of Mankind, and their agents/lackeys--some dozen or so of which (on “both” sides) were depicted in this risible TV show, posing as “journalism.”
Leon Heyward emerged from the subway just as the second plane struck, piercing the south tower. As others fled, he helped evacuate disabled employees from 42 Broadway, where he worked for the city’s Department of Consumer Affairs, and when the first tower fell, he was caught in the churning plume of contaminated dust and smoke.
Within months he started to feel sick. A father of two who prided himself on being fit, Mr. Heyward found himself overcome with fatigue. He had seizures; his memory slipped. Once, while working undercover as an inspector, he forgot where he was. (snip)
Last October, after developing lymphoma, Mr. Heyward died at age 45 in the Bronx, where he was born and had formed one of the earliest rap groups.
“He told me Whitney Houston was the most beautiful woman he’d seen,” she writes in “Diary of a Lost Girl,” excerpted in next month’s Harpers’ Bazaar. Boof adds that he constantly spoke of “how beautiful she was, what a nice smile she has, and how truly Islamic she is but is just brainwashed by American culture and by her husband.”
Allegedly, Bin Laden sought to have Houston’s ex-husband Bobby Brown killed.
And although the totalitarian government of Afghanistan considers listening to music sinful, she writes Bin Laden “spoke of someday spending vast amounts of money to go to America and try to arrange a meeting with the superstar.”
If that’s not bizarre enough, other American pop culture she cites as him enjoying were watching episodes of “The Wonder Years,” “Miami Vice” and “MacGyver” and reading Star Magazine and Playboy.
Afghans loyal to President Hamid Karzai set up hundreds of fictitious polling sites where no one voted but where hundreds of thousands of ballots were still recorded toward the president’s re-election, according to senior Western and Afghan officials here.But we're fighting for democracy there! For a democracy just like our wonderful democracy here, where of course, vote fraud never happens!
The Taliban will attack an Afghan village set up in the heart of Washington courtesy of the Canadian Forces, who will send in a medic in a dramatic effort to save a civilian crippled by the explosion.
At least four times over two days this month, simulated IED blasts will bring the Afghan war – and Canada's combat role in Kandahar – home to Americans if an elaborate scheme based on modern training realism attracts widespread attention, as is hoped.
“If this works the way I want it to, more Americans will know what Canada is doing in Afghanistan,” said Lieutenant-Colonel Douglas Martin, a military attaché at the Canadian embassy.
KABUL, Afghanistan — A NATO airstrike before dawn on Friday killed 80 people or more, at least some of them civilians, in a once-calm region of northern Afghanistan that has recently slipped under control of insurgents, Afghan officials said.WTF do they mean by "at least some of them civilians"? That maybe ALL of them could be civilians???
At least 40 of the dead were civilians, said officials. Many more people are injured, and the local hospital in Kunduz province is overflowing with burn victims, reports the BBC.
Private security guards at the U.S. Embassy in Kabul were pressured to participate in naked pool parties and perform sex acts to gain promotions or assignment to preferable shifts, according to one of 12 guards who have gone public with their complaints.and
One email from a current guard describes scenes in which guards and supervisors are "peeing on people, eating potato chips out of [buttock] cracks, vodka shots out of [buttock] cracks (there is video of that one), broken doors after drnken [sic] brawls, threats and intimidation from those leaders participating in this activity...." Photograph after photograph shows guards--including supervisors--at parties in various stages of nudity, sometimes fondling each other. These parties take place just a few yards from the housing of other supervisors.This deviancy is straight out of some of the most sickening chapters in history. Really, like WTF? Is there any more evidence of fucked up these times are? And we're doing this in a Muslim country, where we are supposed to be setting a good example?
Ultimately, do we want to see Cheney, who backed these actions and still does, standing in the dock?The answer is yes, you fucking douchebag.
Just when you thought things couldn’t get any weirder from the PTB, and their Intel agency stooges, we have this tale. In 2002, several, young, NASA interns allegedly stole a top security safe from under NASA’s noses, eyes, and ears. The 600 pound stolen safe contained--here it comes--an alleged treasure trove of “Apollo Moon rocks” and Mars meteorites (presumably from Antarctica.) http://gizmodo.com/5242736/how-an-intern-stole-nasas-moon-rocks Later, it was claimed that the 600-pound safe only contained 10 ounces of this material. This remarkable tale of four workers defeating NASA’s latest security measures, and then two having sex “on the Apollo Moon rocks” is not for the weak-hearted. Intelligent folks will laugh themselves to death with this Op.
The young “genius” ringleader posted the proposed sale of his Moon rocks on the internet, which resulted in a Belgian rockhound cooperating with the FBI. They arranged a meeting and sale, for a cool $2 million. Instead he met with what turned out to be an undercover FBI agent. When, you ask, did this hopeful sale and actual sting take place? Why naturally on July 20, 2002. Exactly 33 years, to the day that Apollo 11 AstroNOTs first did not walk on the Moon.
More info and a timeline on the heist, and especially the aftermath is here. http://www.collectspace.com/news/news-072202a.html#021205 Search for this article: “Loss of NASA work surfaces at trial,” and you will find the coveted second 33 for this tale. Allegedly, missing was “33 years of NASA research from Johnson Space Center…[in] clothbound journals, the work of NASA Senior Scientist Everett K. Gibson Jr. on the origins of the universe [no less].” Searching on Dr. Gibson reveals he is an “expert” on the possibility of life on Mars. He is not only one of the ones who claimed that some Antarctic rocks are from Mars, but that they also show signs of “relic” microbial life.
Two males and two females were arrested in the NASA theft. The four culprits were mostly interns/students. Included were Thad Roberts (ringleader), Gordon McWhorter (the only non-intern and the only one to go to trial as he pled innocent), Tiffany Fowler, and Shae Saur. The two women who pled guilty had hoped to be either astronauts or astroNOTs. Now they can be neither! The women got probation, while the men got somewhat lengthy jail terms. Roberts’ was later reduced. The trial included placing a monetary value on these “Moon rocks.” $50,800 per gram in 1973 dollars was agreed upon, at trial, with a total value of some $7 million for “now worthless” rocks and lost notes. Note several important matters in my estimation. It allows for NASA to claim that they lost the chain of custody “from the moment the samples were taken from the Moon by the AstroNOTS.” So if someone proves the “Moon rocks” are bogus--why it’s Thad’s fault. And they threw in the alleged Mars Meteorites as well. So if someone proves these came from a more terrestrial site, why “it’s Thad’s fault again.” Why that Thad practically destroyed the whole Universe in losing or altering Everett Gibson’s 33-year quest for the Holy Grail of life “somewhere else.”
IMO, this Op shows that perhaps there’s no legend greater when trying to fake that something is real, than to have dupes going to great lengths to steal it; and then getting a FEDERAL court, and a FEDERAL judge, and a FEDERAL prosecutor to decide some great value for these alleged Moon rocks.
Let’s look more closely at ringleader Thad. He had his own page at the NASA JSC [Johnson Space center] Cooperative Education Program website. http://www.collectspace.com/news/news-072202b.html Shades of Lee Harvey, the Utah-born undergrad student was studying Russian. He was getting prepared for “receiving Martian rock samples.” He had all kinds of fun interning at NASA’s JSC. He was “able to break real Apollo moon rocks and catalog them.” Note the inclusion of the word “real.” He’s a pilot and a scuba diver, with a beautiful wife--but that wasn’t whom he later had sex with “on the rocks.” Curiously this amateur astronomer wrote of the astronomical entities he favored and viewed. Somehow he couldn’t correctly write the Dumbell Nebula, and his page calls it the Dunbell Nebula. Was this just a typo, or something deeper?
What you ask is Thad up to these days, now that he got out of jail last year? His page says it is being redirected to www.einsteinsintuition.com. Clicking on that yields this http://moebiusgroupe.com/qst/index.html. Why Thad is now a grad student at the U of Utah, and (naturally) he has come up with his own Holy Grail or theory of the Universe. It’s his 11-Dimensional Quantum Space Theory [QST]. His QST explains and predicts… well, everything (naturally.) It is a version or rip-off of Superstring Theory. One wonders with all the highfalutin Physics, Astronomy and some Math, if Thad ever figured out, or was told, that the “Apollo Moon rocks” were not? But his new QST site claims that NASA itself had labeled the samples he stole as “trash” because they were “contaminated” by scientific testing. His grandiose page, “Who is Thad Roberts anyway?” leads to links for two lists: “things done” and “things to do.” His “things done” list reveals the answer to my question above. He states that he has “touched the moon and made love on the Moon.” So he believes, or is still pretending to believe, that he actually had real Moon rocks in his possession. And his to-do list indicates he thinks he, or Man, can go to the Moon.
Note to Thad from this Anonymous Physicist. Wake up and welcome to the Quarantine! http://74.220.219.64/~myhealu9/AP/quarantine.htm Forgive me, for it’s been “more than 33 years” of thinking and researching, but I think that is the beginning of real knowledge about the Earth and Mankind. That and this research http://74.220.219.64/~myhealu9/AP/911.htm may only get you mercury poisoning and other monstrosities, but I’d rather go to my grave this way, then be an Intel stooge. Or does anyone believe this lunacy about stealing “Lunar rocks” from under NASA’s high tech security, and 33 years of “lost” research, and trying to sell the rocks on the 33rd anniversary of not landing on the Moon?
Poor Thad. Forget the 11 (Dimensions), and just learn to look out for the 33’s! I’ll help you out. Drop your list of “important things to do.” They are mostly meaningless. Instead study the peace-giver. http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2007/11/john-fitzgerald-kennedy-last-true.html This man had wealth, power, fame, women--the things you aspire to. Yet he chose to give it all up to fight the Powers That Be on Mankind’s behalf. Study also what was done to me, 40 years later, merely for revealing the Ultimate Truth of how his own fake protector killed him.
Instead of being a dupe for future Ops, (though it’s hard to top stealing fake Moon rocks), fight them from the inside, if that’s where you are. Use your energies to expose them, hell destroy them if you can. Nothing greater could you do with your life, than fight the good fight against Man’s evil enslavers. Then you will know why the Apollo Program was a Hoax, and a Quarantine was necessary to eternally entrap these evil beings who are in charge of NASA, and most other things here. But President Kennedy came close to smashing them. Use your intellect, that you seem so proud of, to figure out how to defeat them. Then you will have lived the best life possible, and you can smile before you die, as your to-do list proclaims.
by The Anonymous Physicist
The recent news story on how the U.S. regime gave a fake (Apollo 11) lunar rock to the Dutch Gov’t is part of a larger tale of NASA fakery. Of course, I have previously detailed that the entire Apollo program was laughably bogus. http://anonymous-physicist.blogspot.com/2009/01/last-great-american-tv-fakery-before.html
I have also detailed that NASA itself is a thoroughly military enterprise devoted to one main goal-- given away by its initial logo, “through hardship, to the stars.” Its goal has always been to try to find a way through the Quarantine, allowing our Cosmic Criminal Creators to escape Earth, and return to their origin of the Orion region.
But let me now offer a more complete understanding of the specific issue of fake Moon rocks. While the Dutch “Moon rock” story noted that “The museum had vetted the moon rock with a phone call to NASA” http://news.aol.com/article/moon-rock-in-dutch-museum-is-just/642402, the photo of the alleged Moon rock clearly shows what it is-- petrified wood. This is such a bad fake -- unlike most other fake Apollo “moon rocks” that this is another likely example of MITOP (Made It Transparent On Purpose). So likely this one was meant to eventually be exposed for what it is.
Now what about the rest of the fake “Apollo Moon rocks”? I have addressed this issue several times in the past, and I will also have info I did not discuss previously. I have cited that one of the possible “interfacers” with those in charge of mankind, was a physicist who was Carl Sagan’s boss during the U.S. military’s plan to nuke the far side of the Moon in the 1950’s. This was Dr. Leonard Reiffel. http://anonymous-physicist.blogspot.com/2008/11/ultimate-truths-part-xiv-which-if-any.html But I detailed how he was also in charge of so much other “Science” in the USA. This included many “Lunar” matters. Supposedly including “laser reflectors” that the Apollo AstroNOTs “left” on the lunar surface, and the matter of the “Apollo Moon rocks.” I have detailed that one way to create rocks that are different from anything on earth is to use bombardment with sub-atomic particles (neutrons and others) that would cause atoms to transmute to either other elements, or other isotopes of the original element. This has been possible since the 1940’s with cyclotrons or particle accelerators.
But there is another intricate method that may be involved. It may contain many levels of fakery or limited hangout. This is that since the 1980’s, NASA and supposedly independent scientists have claimed that Antarctica contains many rocks that are meteorites whose origin is the Moon, and even Mars. Wikipedia notes that, “It is now accepted by the scientific community that rocks have been ejected from both the Martian and lunar surface during impact events, and that some of these have landed on the Earth in the form of Martian and lunar meteorites.” Here’s where the fun and intertwined limited hangouts get going. The Antarctic meteorites were “proven to be of lunar origin” when they were compared to “Apollo Lunar Rocks.” But what if the inverse is true? Even the Wiki piece notes that there was a strange trip to Antarctica in 1967, by Wernher von Braun and other NASA scientists and personnel. The reasons given for von Braun’s going are obviously specious. He was a rocket scientist, not a geologist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_conspiracy_theories#Moon_rocks
As an aside, there was also the strange Antarctic expedition of Admiral Byrd in 1946-7, called Operation High Jump. The U.S. Navy sent some 4700 servicemen, 13 ships and numerous aircraft. Claimed explanations of this expedition include finding high-level Nazi war criminals (all the way up to Adolf) to recovering UFO saucer craft. http://www.reference.com/browse/Operation+High+Jump Perhaps this article now suggests another possible reason for the trip. It’s never too early to recover rocks that can be claimed to be from the Moon.
Let’s return to the notorious von Braun. He was a Nazi, and worked closely with the Gestapo in the use of slave labor in producing the V-2 for the German Nazis. (A brief, bogus Gestapo arrest may be an early part of his legend.) Most of the human beings/slaves who worked at Peenemünde were starved and worked to death, and often tortured. Von Braun was really a war criminal, and of particular notice to me is his bogus “death bed confession” to a strange character. Von Braun’s last statement--according to Carol Rosin--was that the whole alien matter is bogus. All that this shows is just how important it is to the PTB to lie about this most important of issues: that all of Mankind must learn about. Carol Rosin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carol_Rosin claims the ultimate thing von Braun “warned” about is “what he called aliens, extraterrestrials. That would be the final scare. And over and over and over during the four years that I knew him and was giving speeches for him, he would bring up that last card. And remember Carol, the last card is the alien card. We are going to have to build space-based weapons against aliens and all of it is a lie." http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=8175
It seems clear that the cancer-ridden, invalided von Braun was controlled in his last days by Rosin.
Rosin’s Wiki piece includes “She is a former spokesperson for Wernher von Braun and has consulted to a number of companies, organizations, government departments and the intelligence community.” (I have detailed what it means when someone like “Disclosure Project” and Project Orion, head Stephen Greer, M.D., states that he “lectured to the CIA director.”) Rosin co-founded the “Institute for Cooperation in Space” [ICIS], along with none other than leading “Exo-politician”, Alfred Webre. I have detailed that the purpose of the Exo-politics field is to claim 1. that aliens or UFOs are real, but are only “out there”, and not down here in control of Mankind for eons, and 2. That they are likely good--leave ‘em alone, cooperate with ‘em. All to hide the truth of the Quarantine and related matters. Here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqJEvqrxNYM Webre states that he supports the “DEW hypothesis” for WTC destruction on 9/11, and that Dr. Judy Wood “proved” that DEW did it. All the while, of course, all Judy Wood did was show photos, provide baby talk, and use all the evidence that the WTC was nuked and that the China Syndrome resulted, and claim if for the ludicrous, evidence-free DEW hypothesis. Webre went on to claim that ultimate responsibility for 9/11 went to Zionists--the usual scapegoats for what is devised out of Langley, London, Rome and beyond.
Rosin’s and Webre’s ICIS Board includes Lunar AstroNOT, Edgar Mitchell. When leading Apollo Hoax researcher/demonstrator, Bart Sibrel confronted Mitchell about the Apollo fakery, he was booted out. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTUaZl6Nyho
Mitchell’s son can be overheard asking the father, “Want to call the CIA and have him waxed?” As Sibrel sped off after also being threatened with being shot, by one of the Michells, no reply is heard. So much for the allegedly sweet, New Age, “Noetics-ologist”, astroNOT, and ICIS Board member, Edgar Mitchell.
It seems that one of von Braun’s professors was more honest (at least) about the alien matter, than was von Braun. Hermann Oberth, along with Goddard and Tsiolkovsky, was one of the pioneers of rocketry. (Curiously, Oberth also worked as consultant in making one of the first films of future space travel under Fritz Lang. The inverse countdown depicted in the 1929 German film, “Frau Im Mond [Woman In the Moon] continues to this day.) In 1954, he said, “It is my thesis that flying saucers are real and that they are space ships from another solar system. I think that they possibly are manned by intelligent observers who are members of a race that may have been investigating our earth for centuries..." http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Hermann_Oberth
So anyone associated with von Braun and/or his “death bed confessor” is not to be trusted. And von Braun’s 1967 trip to Antarctica was some form of hangout, as was Byrd’s 1946 Operation High Jump. And the Antarctic “lunar meteorites,” and the “Apollo Lunar Rocks” can be seen as being used either way--one “vouching” for the other, depending on which legend they wish to use. Now it is improbable, that rocks getting blasted off the Moon would overcome lunar gravity, and then “find their way” to the Earth, and then survive atmospheric burn up. But it is not impossible. But the way Antarctica is being used, seemingly exclusively for this, also gives pause.
Then there is the Mars issue. If the bogus Apollo Lunar Rocks are vetting the “Antarctic Lunar Rocks”, what is being used to vet the “Antarctic Mars Rocks”? That is, since we don’t claim to have any rocks taken from the surface of Mars, how can they be sure, or even claim, they have “Antarctic Mars Rocks”?
I should note that due to the much greater distance, it is even more improbable that Mars rocks (compared to the alleged Antarctic Moon rocks) would find their way to the Earth, and then survive the heat of entry. But it is not totally impossible. Perhaps I see the real reason for the Antarctic aspect. Due to its remoteness, and near-“Quarantine” for most of Antarctica, only the larger nations--and really their Gov’ts-- have access to the interior of Antarctica! This makes it easy to fake something, as only Gov’t-approved scientists are “finding” these claimed Mars rocks, and Moon rocks. So it is really an easy task, if so desired, for the same (Intel) people to have control of alleged “Apollo Moon rocks,” and “Antarctic Moon rocks,” and “Antarctic Mars rocks.” It’s also easy to plant them, or use them, wherever and however they chose. And all these rocks could be made/processed in a nuclear physics lab, as noted above.
Or, here is my prediction: the “Antarctic Mars Rocks” will end up being used to vouch for the return of “NASA’s Mars Rocks” from some bogus, future mission to Mars by Earth AstroNOTs. And vice versa, as needed. Yes, the Laws of Physics, logic and temporal sequencing can be ignored in the brainwashing of Mankind by the PTB, our quarantined CCCs. http://74.220.219.64/~myhealu9/AP/quarantine.htm
But I must ask, if individuals go off to jail http://www.space.com/news/moonrock_guilt_001102.html for claiming to have (and sell) “Apollo Lunar Rocks”, shouldn’t American Gov’t officials also be thrown in jail for the same scam? Should not the Dutch Gov’t charge the American Gov’t officials with this racket? Should all the “scientists” claiming to do research on “Apollo Lunar Rocks” be charged with fraud, and even a RICO crime, as they are part of a large criminal enterprise? Maybe then, the larger conspiracy would more easily be realized by the masses, if these bogus scientists admitted their fraud. I should note what transpired when perhaps the first well-known, Apollo Hoax Exposer, Bill Kaysing, sent a private investigator, Paul Jacobs, to “ask the head of the U.S Dept. of Geology in Washington about the 'moon rocks'. He asked: Did you examine the Moon rocks; did they really come from the Moon? The geologist simply laughed and insinuated that people high in the US government knew all about the cover-up.”http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2008/06/masonic-moon-landing-hoax.html Paul Jacobs and his wife died from cancer within 90 days of that meeting--the Jack Ruby treatment. Also the Richard Feynman treatment, after he exposed the truth of the Challenger disaster. Who knows how many others got this treatment, or worse? Word gets around. Like the Apollo AstroNOTs themselves getting the message of the Apollo One fire, whereby NASA burned the three astronauts alive, so that the others would go along with the coming hoax.
Now rocks, per se, can’t talk. But if there were any fearless, genuine scientists exposing the fake Apollo Lunar rocks via physical analysis, it would not be hard to succeed in a genuine court of law. The above indicates that the U.S. regime would not allow such a proof to be seen by Mankind. Bill Kaysing tried. In 1997, he sued Lunar AstroNOT, James Lovell (“Houston, We Have A Problem”) for libel, in a Santa Cruz, California County Court; after Lovell publicly called Kaysing “wacky.” The Judge, Samuel Stevens, granted Lovell’s attorney, John Paul Hardy, a motion for summary judgment in 1999. Kaysing had acted as his own attorney. So an American jury never got the case, as they did in the matters of the Assassination of President Kennedy (E. Howard Hunt appeals trial) and the Rev. Martin Luther King civil trial. In both those cases, an American jury ruled that the U.S “Government” and/or its thug agents were guilty. I am convinced that an American jury--upon seeing and learning of all the evidence--would convict the U.S. Regime of fraud, and worse, for the Apollo hoax.
Will the Dutch Gov’t sue the U.S. regime; will anyone try to sue NASA for the Apollo Hoax? Or for far more insidious crimes that NASA commits? The Apollo Hoax case is totally winnable with the testimony of any honest physicist! The alleged Apollo Hoax debunking websites from the bad astronomy astronomer, Hoagland, Clavius etc. are all easily themselves debunked point by point, by any honest physicist. Some lies are blatantly obvious, others are tedious and more clever. I did this for myself, but do not have the time or health to write this up completely. It also reaches the point--if readers do not reciprocate when asked--that I will leave this to some other honest physicist. But is there any one with the guts to delineate the debunking of all the bogus debunking “points?” Some of the books and videos on the Apollo Hoax do quote legitimate scientists, but would they go to court? Is there an attorney out there with the guts to take on the federal regime for this one matter? Will all the “Apollo Moon rocks” crumble under the light of day? Will any geologist who “worked on” these rocks, leave the truth of the “Apollo Moon rocks” at least in his/her will, or such? Would any media publish such an “epiphany”?
Now my favorite “debunking point” (after the hypergolic fuel excuse for not having any rocket exhaust as the LM “lifts off”) is from the Clavius site as I recall. It claimed that the Lunar (Non-)Rover left no tire tracks (in either direction) in one or more photos http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-88-11901HR.jpg because the astroNOTs picked IT up and carried IT (instead of vice versa), when it came upon a rock in the road!
Or was it a petrified forest, a piece of which would later be presented to the Dutch Gov’t?
I blog about politics, interesting ideas and conspiracy theories. Many or most of the official stories for key events are lies. For instance, the 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes appear to be clever hoaxes. The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2. It seems that 9/11 was an evil hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. However, 9/11 was only part of the fraud and evil committed by the evil powers that be (PTB).
