Humint Events Online: June 2007

Saturday, June 30, 2007

Phenomenonally Low Ratings

Bush (27%) and the Iraq war (22%).

Somehow, I don't think it is all the fault of that damn liberal media.
Bookmark and Share

London Car Bomb Story Stinking Up Already

The official story has moved from the the car was driven erratically before crashing into bins, the driver fled the scene, and then the police were called, to: an ambulance crew noticed fumes in the car and alerted police.

Can't have it both ways, can we?

In any case, I suppose the authorities like the idea of "dumb" terrorists very much-- it makes them look like they are keeping the really bad guys from attacking while there is still a threat from these stupid-terrorist tricks that they can keep playing up for the fear factor.
Bookmark and Share

Mercedes Benz IED Jihad?

It's hard to figure out what is going on here, but it sounds like typical fake terror nonsense.

Why would someone waste TWO expensive Mercedes cars in such an extremely crude attack?

Today's burning car ramming incident also sounds kind of bogus, though sadly some people have been hurt.

I don't know what is going on here, though one can easily imagine deeper plots. Though, whatever is happening, it's not good.

Certainly, one obvious theme is Iraq war blowback. The suspects are likely some Pakistanis outraged by the Iraq war. There are lots of directions this could go. The most pernicious theme is that Islamists are still trying to wage war on the west. The problem is the more that one uses extreme measure to go after these people, the more incentive it gives them to keep it up-- which has been the tragic problem with the Iraq war.
Bookmark and Share

Thursday, June 28, 2007

"Thermite Jones" Versus "Mini-nuke Deagle"

Not a very enlightening discussion, it seems to me, about what really happened to the towers. It was mostly a lot of nonsense and attacks on "no-planers". Deagle did almost nothing to defend nukes, and seemed to cave in to the thermite idea very easily.
Bookmark and Share

Cyber Attack on 9/11 No-Plane Sites

Bookmark and Share

More Pyramid Fun

The exact number of stones was orginally estimated at 2,300,000 stone blocks weighing from 2-30 tons each with some weighing as much as 70 tons. Computer calculations indicate 590,712 stone blocks were used in its construction. It area covers 13.6 acres with each side greater than 5 acres in area.

There are supposedly 144,000 casing stones, all highly polished and flat to an accuracy of 1/100th of an inch, about 100 inches thick and weighing about 15 tons each with nearly perfect right angles for all six sides. Computer calculations indicated 40,745 casing stones were used averaging 40 tons each before the face angle was cut.

The average casing stone on the lowest level was 5 ft. long by 5 ft. high by 6 ft. deep and weighed 15 tons. The casing stones weighing as much as 20 tons were placed with an accuracy of 5/1000ths of an inch, and an intentional gap of about 2/100ths of an inch for mortar.

The casing stones for the Great Pyramid were cut in quarries from Tura and Masara located on the east bank of the Nile on outskirts of Cairo.

The mortar used is of an unknown origin. It has been analyzed and it's chemical composition is known but it can't be reproduced. It is stronger than the stone and still holding up today.

The mortar is quite interesting:

How did ancient people make mortar that held up so well???
Bookmark and Share

Over 2000 Years Ago, the Greeks Had a Small Working Computer

The Antikythera mechanism.

Where did this technology come from?
Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

5000 Years Old or Even Older

But could we build things like this today?

Note: the largest pyramid is composed of over 2 million limestone blocks, each weighing almost 3 tons. It's worth noting also that no one is really sure how the pyramids were built, or how long it took-- and there is even reason to doubt they were built when most people think they were built, as this rests on the word of one Greek historian who was repeating hearsay.
Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

Activism Alert!

Bookmark and Share

Excellent Analysis of TV Fakery from "Ace Baker"

Bookmark and Share


What else had the sheer power to wipe out the massively strong base of the towers besides nuclear weapons?

(click to enlarge; you can see the tiny ant-like people better)
Bookmark and Share

Monday, June 25, 2007


In a bunker beneath the East Wing of the White House, Cheney locked his eyes on CNN, chin resting on interlaced fingers. He was about to watch, in real time, as thousands were killed on Sept. 11, 2001.

Previous accounts have described Cheney's adrenaline-charged evacuation to the Presidential Emergency Operations Center that morning, a Secret Service agent on each arm. They have not detailed his reaction, 22 minutes later, when the south tower of the World Trade Center collapsed.

"There was a groan in the room that I won't forget, ever," one witness said. "It seemed like one groan from everyone" -- among them Rice; her deputy, Stephen J. Hadley; economic adviser Lawrence B. Lindsey; counselor Matalin; Cheney's chief of staff, Libby; and the vice president's wife.

Cheney made no sound. "I remember turning my head and looking at the vice president, and his expression never changed," said the witness, reading from a notebook of observations written that day. Cheney closed his eyes against the image for one long, slow blink.

Three people who were present, not all of them admirers, said they saw no sign then or later of the profound psychological transformation that has often been imputed to Cheney. What they saw, they said, was extraordinary self-containment and a rapid shift of focus to the machinery of power. While others assessed casualties and the work of "first responders," Cheney began planning for a conflict that would call upon lawyers as often as soldiers and spies.
Bookmark and Share

Evil Controllers

Increasingly I wonder if this is the only way to make sense of the Bush presidency and the last six and a half years.

The Vietnam War, as monstrously fucked up as it was, actually made some sense in the context of the Cold War.

The Iraq War really never made any sense from beginning to present in the context of "the war on terror". The only possible purpose I can make sense of this horrible mess is that the plan for Iraq was never to try to stop terrorism-- rather the plan actually was to spread terrorism and make new terrorists. It wasn't simply about money, because there are lots of ways to make money for the controllers. Even the control of Iraqi oil never made sense for what they did. But if the goal was actually to MAKE new terrorists, then the war makes some sense. Interestingly, the evil controllers did such a brilliant job that it really doesn't matter if the US stays in Iraq or leaves in the near future-- either way, the place is a perfect "al-CIA-duh" training ground.

Unlike al-CIA-duh Version 1.5 (the ones that "brought us" 9/11), I can envision that al-CIA-duh Version 2.0 (made in Iraq) is really the master entity that will carry out new horrible, unspeakable terror attacks that will eventually lead to a true global police state.

A global police state at this stage of human development makes sense as an evil master plan-- the evil controllers essentially have all the technology that they need. The global police state would be essential for the enactment of the evil controllers' final solution.

I should say that this global police state is not a foregone conclusion by any means-- it depends how much normal humans wake up and try to resist the controllers.

I do of course have some ideas about the evil controllers and their goals-- these are subjects that have been discussed here of late, particularly by "anonymous physicist".

I'm NOT saying this is the only explanation for what is happening-- but it is the explanation that fits many otherwise inexplicable facets of the grand scheme of things.
Bookmark and Share

Sunday, June 24, 2007

The "al Qaidization" of the Iraqi Insurgency

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, June 23, 2007

The Moon Is Hollow!

And has a bunch of other oddities consistent with it not being natural.

Though some of the moon data officially came from the Apollo moon landing missions, my guess is that the data was obtained by unmanned probes (the Russians did this)-- or is fraudulent (for instance magnetized rocks when there is no magnetic field on the moon).

What IS very striking is that there is all this OFFICIAL moon weirdness that people don't understand.

SO-- why the HELL haven't we sent astronauts to the moon in the past 30 years to try to answer these questions????
Bookmark and Share

The Double-Think Presidency

WASHINGTON — The White House said Friday that, like Vice President Dick Cheney's office, President Bush's office is exempt from a presidential order requiring government agencies that handle classified national security information to submit to oversight by an independent federal watchdog.

The executive order that Bush issued in March 2003 covers all government agencies that are part of the executive branch and, although it doesn't specifically say so, was not meant to apply to the vice president's office or the president's office, a White House spokesman said.
Bookmark and Share

Bad Wire-Work

Note how he falls. There is a very unnatural shift in his center of gravity.

Look at how he the astronaut jumps. Even if the spacesuits were 270 pounds, a 200 pound man plus that suit would "weigh" only about 80 pounds in 1/6th gravity. Don't you think an astronaut could have jumped higher than 18 inches if a man with muscles that could support 200 pounds all of a sudden only had 80 pounds to lift?
Bookmark and Share

Friday, June 22, 2007

The Alien Agenda

Bookmark and Share

Revised My Top Post

I just realized today that I ignored TV fakery and no planes on the top "permanent" post. I therefore have fixed this oversight. In no way was I trying previously to de-emphasize or distract from these issues. Rather, I simply wanted to present a simple proof for the fact that 9/11 was an inside job, and also highlight the issue of WTC demolition.
Bookmark and Share

In Striking Turnabout, Bush Declares His "War on Terror" as Unethical and Unneccessary

Bush, 6/20/07:

Destroying human life in the hopes of saving human life is not ethical -- and it is not the only option before us.

Though I guess he should REALLY tell it to these people and these people and the thousands of others like them.
Bookmark and Share

Thursday, June 21, 2007

Significant Amounts of WTC1 and WTC2 Debris Still Missing

Greg Jenkins: “Neither of the WTC towers fell into their own footprints.”

Me: Agreed

Greg Jenkins: “A conservative estimate of the radius of the falling debris is at least 2.5 times the radius of the tower or, equivalently, a debris field 6.25 times the footprint of the building.”

Me: Yes, except the debris was NOT SPREAD EVENLY over that 6.25x footprint. The debris pile was clearly highest in the actual footprint, and then the debris piles tapered off very substantially the farther you went from the towers.

Greg Jenkins: “Using Dr. Wood’s analysis method for the WTC tower of height 1365’, but using the WTC building 7 collapse ratio of 11.5% and considering that the debris was spread out over 6.25 times the footprint, yields an average debris height of ft 25 for one WTC tower spread out over an area 6.25 footprints.

Me: Let’s slow down here. 11.5% of 1365 feet equals 157 feet. This means if WTC1 and WTC2 had collapsed straight down and all debris went in the footprint, there would be a 157 foot high pile of debris. This is clearly what was not seen, as the central debris pile was only about 25 feet for each tower. IF there was a 25 foot high pile of debris in an area of 6.25 footprints around each tower, then this would add up to the “right” amount of debris for WTC1 and WTC2, in comparison to WTC7. But this is clearly NOT the case— NOT what was seen at Ground Zero. There were NO debris piles around the footprints of the towers that were close to 25 feet high. A more reasonable accounting of debris would say there was a central footprint of 25 feet, and the remaining 5.5 footprints worth of debris had an average height of 15 feet (a generous assumption)— this adds up to 108 feet of debris in one footprint for each tower— meaning very close to 30% of the debris of each tower is unaccounted for!

Now, Jenkins tries to account for any missing debris by saying it was in unseen collapsed basement areas---

Greg Jenkins: “Partial collapses of the sub-levels could fully account for the proclaimed ‘missing’ debris.”

Me: But this is simply not the case, because WTC1 and WTC2 and WTC7 all had similar numbers of basement levels. Thus, any WTC1, WTC2 or WTC7 debris in these sublevels cancel each other out and can be removed from our analysis. Now Jenkins would probably claim that there were additional sublevels OUTSIDE the footprints of the WTC1 and WTC2 towers in which debris disappeared. But there is almost no basis for this claim-- that significant debris disappeared outside into sublevel basements outside the towers' footprints-- and even if this were the case, this can only account for about (1/5) of the outer footprint areas of debris, as most of the "outer radii" where debris fell did not have sublevels into which debris could fall and not be observed. Moreover, any (putative) extra debris in outer sublevels is easily canceled out by the smaller debris piles to the west and north of WTC1, and west and south of WTC2— places where the debris piles were clearly lower than ten feet high.

Thus, at least, 30% of WTC1 and 30% of WTC2 debris is unaccounted for in the ground zero piles-- if you make a direct comparison with WTC7. Of course one argument is that this material was vaporized by nuclear blasts-- demolition via mini-nukes.

Jenkins also argues that the WTC1 and WTC2 debris was compacted more because the towers were bigger and the debris fell harder. While this has a ring of common sense, there is not so much evidence to support it. For instance, debris that fell outside of the tower footprints showed no significant compaction-- e.g. outer column triad structures that were stabbed into the street after falling from the towers retained their original form-- though presumably these fell from a huge height. I think that debris compaction is more dependent on how efficient the demolition was in blowing out the supporting structures in the tower than on the overall height. Since the WTC1 and WTC2 towers were clearly pulverized to an incredible extent, perhaps there WAS more compaction in WTC1 and WTC2 than WTC7 simply because the demolition was much more intense. In a sense, if WTC1 and WTC2 were actually compacted more compared to WTC7, then this is a good argument for demolition.
Bookmark and Share

WPE Watch

Bookmark and Share

Sign of the Apocalypse

Bookmark and Share

Pet Peeve: People Who Don't Button Their Button-Down Collars

And the guy is a real asshole to boot:
Bookmark and Share

Conspicuous In Its Absence

For some odd reason, Greg Jenkins leaves out nuclear energy as a source for the energy that was required to demolish the WTC1 and WTC2 towers.

I think his criticism is fair that there is an energy deficit problem for the use of DEW, but why not even MENTION nuclear energy as a possible alternative?
Bookmark and Share

Yet Another Reason Why Giuliani Is a Disgusting Man

He couldn't be bothered to work on the Iraq Study Group because he was too busy pimping his role in 9/11:

At the seminars, Rudy would take the stage to Frank Sinatra’s “New York, New York” with red, white and blue confetti swirling around his head. He would then launch into a speech using the attack and the aftermath of 9/11 to illustrate his “six principles of leadership.” For his two appearances during the Iraq Study Group meetings alone, Giuliani pulled in a combined gross fee of $200,000.
Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

WTC7 Debris and Sub-basement Levels

According to this non-conspiracy source, WTC7 had FIVE basement levels.

This makes the size of the WTC7 debris pile all the more striking in contrast to the relatively small central debris piles for WTC1 and WTC2.

What is really odd is that Greg Jenkins completely rules out any sub-basement collapse for WTC7-- presumably to explain the relatively bigger above-ground debris pile for WTC7.

Well-- the question is, if WTC7 in fact had five basement levels, why wouldn't debris have collapsed in there? But if the WTC7 debris filled five basement levels plus the large above-ground pile-- that leaves a relatively huge amount of debris for WTC7 compared to WTC1 and 2 (each of which ALSO had five basement levels).
Bookmark and Share

Load 'O Crap

My professional opinion of the Purdue simulation.

Actually, it's clearly crap, as the plane in the simulation doesn't show holes in the buildings at all similar to what was officially observed-- in particular the "tail section hole".
Bookmark and Share

Cutting Away the Mysticism

Frankly, I think it is highly refreshing to have a coherent theory on alien influence on the earth, as opposed to the obscure, mystical dense literature that has been built up around this topic.

The blog "Rigorous Intuition" is a good example. That blog routinely discusses UFOs and mystical weirdness (as well as limited hangout 9/11 conspiracy)-- but you could read that blog for years and never find any coherent explanation for what Jeff Wells is talking about.

Anonymous Physicist has done us all a favor by putting the agenda clearly on the table.
Bookmark and Share

Deep Conspiracy

Why did I get "off track" from 9/11 and start talking about things like nuking the moon and ancient alien influences?

As I explained here, I did this to get deep background into 9/11 (VERY deep background)-- in order to better understand 9/11.

Again, 9/11 doesn't stand alone-- and you will have an easier time getting at the 9/11 perps if you understand these people and what they are trying to do.

I also have to say that, at this point, there is not much point saying the same things about 9/11 over and over. Thus, for me, it makes sense to get into a new area of research.

Again, I am not going to turn this into a UFO/alien blog. But there are aspects to this subject that ARE very worth discussing.

These are the salient points:

First, I think that highly advanced life exists in the universe beyond our planet. This is essentially a mathematical certainty, given the vastness of the universe, the age of the universe versus the age of the earth.

Second, I think it is reasonable to think that advanced beings from outer space have visited the earth at some point in our history, given clues in ancient writings and given some of the ancient mysteries.

Third, I think it is reasonable to think advanced beings from outer space have visited the earth in recent times-- for many reasons to numerous to list here.

Fourth, the nuking of the ionosphere by the US, the plans to nuke the dark side of the moon, the fake moon landings, the oddities of the moon itself, and the strange project Orion video--- ALL point to seriously weird shit that CANNOT be explained by conventional explanations.

Assuming there is some truth to Anonymous Physicist's theory, isn't this information of the highest importance for people to know about?
Bookmark and Share

The UFO Disclosure Project

On May 9, 2001, Dr. Greer presided over The Disclosure Project Press Conference from the National Press Club in Washington, DC. Over 20 military, government, intelligence, and corporate witnesses presented compelling testimony regarding the existence of advanced energy and propulsion technologies sequestered in classified government black operations projects. Perhaps as many as a billion people heard of the press conference through webcast and subsequent media coverage on BBC, CNN, CNN worldwide, Voice of America, Pravda, Chinese media, and media outlets throughout Latin America. The webcast had 250,000 people waiting on line -- the largest webcast in the history of the National Press Club.

Excerpts from this conference can be seen on YouTube.

According to a reader, this conference was actually shown on C-SPAN-- only a few days before 9/11.

So.. right before 9/11, we had the government practically admitting the existence of UFOs/aliens, we had Rumsfeld admitting trillions were missing from the Pentagon budget, and we had had worldwide anti-globalization protests.

Then the system was rebooted by 9/11.
Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, June 19, 2007

The Official Flight 77 Story

Still a load of bunkum:

These guys did an extremely thorough job of investigation, and it points out the effectiveness of bypassing the media and the politicians, and simply obtaining evidence from agencies, such as from the FBI and the NTSB, using the freedom of information tool that we are still able to use in this country.

If one is interesting in 9/11 activism, I think it is highly worthwhile submitting FOIAs to the FBI to obtain key evidence and information-- and then reporting your results on the internet.
Bookmark and Share

The Terror War, Phase II-- Small Nukes

They want you to be afraid, very very afraid:
Small Nukes Bring Big Threat. FBI Director Tells CBS News: Small Devices Sought By Terrorists Could Unleash Destruction Worse Than 9/11. Jun 13, 2007.
"Terrorists — al Qaeda, bin Laden — have sought nuclear materials for a number of years now," FBI Director Robert Mueller told CBS News correspondent Bob Orr in an exclusive interview.

Mueller says terrorists would like nothing better than to hit the U.S. with a nuclear weapon.

"When we saw 9/11, everyone I think pretty much looking at those pictures thought this is about as bad as it could get," Mueller said. "Its not as bad as it could get. A nuclear device — if a nuclear device went off, you're talking about devastation that is far, far beyond what we saw on September 11th."

These people have in fact, have been talking about this for a while, so it's not clear what is behind this latest round-- unless they are trying to connect this idea with the news that al-CIA-duh is sending newly-trained suicide bombers over here to kill us.

Even though that last story seems ludicrous-- the headline is the important thing: "Exclusive: Suicide Bomb Teams Sent to U.S., Europe"
Bookmark and Share

"Iraq has overtaken Afghanistan as an ideal training ground for Jihadists"

Mission accomplished:
The new generation of Islamist militants in Iraq are more battle-hardened than their veteran anti-Soviet counterparts from Afghanistan, and the export of their Muslim "holy war" to calmer Arab countries has become a phenomenon.

The presence of Saudi, Jordanian and Yemeni volunteers in the besieged Palestinian refugee camp of Nahr al-Bared in north Lebanon, as well as arrests in Jordan and Saudi Arabia of Jihadists coming from Iraq illustrate this.

"The Iraqi resistance doesn't need people inside, they have more than they need, freeing up foreign fighters to fight elsewhere," said Marwan Shehadeh, an expert in radical movements with the Vision Research Institute in Amman.

And supposedly these zealots are coming over here to bomb us.

What an unbelievable, horrible, self-fulfilling prophecy of world-wide terror this administration has created.
Bookmark and Share

Bullshitter or Whistleblower?

Here is a NASA worker describing "bases" or strange structures on the dark side of the Moon.

Personally, I find his story convincing.

This testimony was from the UFO Disclosure Project, which took place in May 2001.
Bookmark and Share

Real Moons with Real Craters

Phoebe and Phobos.
Bookmark and Share

Monday, June 18, 2007

A New View of the History of the World

I present this essay in the spirit of open-mindedness and in the spirit of sharing new ideas. In my view, there is a striking coherence to the story presented here, even if the overall scenario appears absolutely incredible and hard to accept. I think this is the most amazing explanation for world history I've ever heard. Judge it for yourself.

(note, a black text on white background version of this piece can be seen here.)

On the Nuking of: the van Allen Belts, the Dark Side of the Moon, the WTC; & Who are The Real Powers That Be © June 16, 2007 by the Anonymous Physicist. Permission granted for all to re-transmit, post, etc as long as “© Anonymous Physicist” remains on it.

The Anonymous Physicist comments first on the nuking of the van Allen Belts, and the planned nuking of the dark side of the Moon. He then uses those ideas, and others to try to get at who is really in charge of Mankind. This may be crucial information of the highest order. Research it and judge for yourself. He recommends both a healthy skepticism, and an open mind.

First off, Wiki announces at the top of this article that “This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.” Since Wiki doesn’t have the highest veracity standards, this should generate great caution as to this article’s veracity. Then, for those of us who know “ultimate truths,” the end of the article is, in my opinion, the most revealing: “The summer of 1962 was problematic for nuclear weapons aboard Thor rockets. The Bluegill nuclear test on June 4, 1962, was aborted 10 minutes after launch when the missile tracking system failed prior to nuclear detonation; the nuclear device was lost and the Thor destroyed. The original Starfish test on June 20, 1962, failed one minute after launch, again losing the nuclear device and destroying the Thor; radioactive metal and debris rained over Johnston Island. The summer concluded with extensive plutonium contamination of Johnston Island and following the failed Bluegill Prime nuclear test on July 26, 1962, which was aborted on the launch pad after the Thor engine malfunctioned on ignition.”

Before going on, I hope people realize, despite the public proclamation, that NASA is a thoroughly, military agency. But by 1962, the U.S. Air Force and NASA (if they were really different) had pretty good track records in launch success. I have little doubt that all these “failures” were not accidents. They were deliberately blown up, by OTHERS who knew what they were about to be launched for! Before I explain in detail, let us examine the two programs that both the U.S. and the USSR regimes partook in, in the late 1950’s and 1960’s. I have already informed you that the “Cold War” was bogus, as is the “War on Terr-ism” now. (Although the shorter version of that is all too real—“War on Terre.”) So the same “others” down here and in control of both the US and USSR regimes ran these two extraordinary and secret programs. (The nuking plans for the dark side of the Moon were only declassified in the last 7 years or so.) 1. The nuking of Near Earth outer space. (Or the Van Allen radiation belts), 2. The attempted nuking of the dark/back/hidden side of the Moon. I assert that the first program endangered the existence of Mankind and all life on this planet! Interfering with Earth’s magnetic field is capable of the most dire of consequences as the magnetic field protects Earth from all sorts of energetic particles from the Sun and from more distant sources which sometimes emit massive fluxes of high-energy particles. Perhaps also even the disappearing ozone layer was affected too. Of course, others have found that even the rocket exhausts have caused significant damage to the protective ozone layer around the Earth. I assert that there was no scientific basis for exploding fission then fusion bombs in outer space, near the Earth. The Wiki article’s (probably written by a govt shill)desperate attempt to find a scientific benefit is a joke. A radioactive Cadmium tracer was “included” in the Starfish Prime H-bomb and supposedly led to tracking air masses, and it states that EMP was studied. Now a tracer could have been sent into space without exploding H-bombs into Earth’s protective field! And EMPs can be(and are) studied without nuking the Earth’s magnetic field. Again from Wiki itself: “Thermonuclear weapons are also less efficient at producing EMP because the first stage can pre-ionise the air, which becomes conductive and hence rapidly shorts out the electron Compton currents generated by the final, larger yield thermonuclear stage. Hence, small pure fission weapons with thin cases are far more efficient at causing EMP than most megaton bombs.” And they had earlier exploded fission bombs into the van Allen Belts. So this is a lie, if they purport that this H-Bomb nuking was about studying EMP! So there was no valid reason to proceed to nuking the Belt, or near-Earth Space, and I assert no scientific reason for exploding fission bombs there either, especially since it risked endangering humankind and all life here.

When this is coupled with the planned nuking of the dark side of the Moon by, once again, the hidden allies-- the US and the USSR, the reasoning becomes clear. But let us first examine the planned nuking of the Moon. Both sides began planning this in the 1950’s, which, of course, is the very earliest they could have tried to do it. Again letting us know what both the ICBMs and all the nukes really are about, in my opinion! The rational from both sides of the bogus “Cold War” was, per usual, the same. “We wanted to show the other side, our great power.” As if exploding 50 megaton H-bombs and testing ICBMs all over the Earth didn’t already make the point! And I assert again that “showing” something when you are going to do it at the hidden side of the Moon is obviously a lie! (I have seen desperate statements where they claimed it would have been visible “at the limb” of the Moon.) Why not do it at the front side of the Moon if you wanted to impress? I assert that the purported “environmental” reason both sides called this off is laughably bogus. If they didn’t/don’t care about all the atmospheric nuclear tests, all the D.U. (Depleted uranium) released etc. right here on Earth, does anyone buy this rationale for not proceding with their plans? In my opinion, they didn’t end up nuking the dark side of the Moon because they tried and were stopped by OTHERS. Just as several of the Thor rockets were stopped before or after lift-off in the near Earth nuking events. This too is probably why those stopped—they were halted by OTHERS. And the creation of bigger, closer radiation belts I assert was not a natural consequence! Physicists would have been able to predict this, and wouldn’t have launched the nukes— it was not a “natural process” that created the newer, bigger belts, in my opinion! It was a deliberate act by OTHERS saying: “You want to destroy this Grid/Quarantine, OK now it is bigger and more impenetrable than before.” Indeed this article unlike the Wiki article, states that the new belts created after the nuking will last for “hundreds of years,” not the “five years” that the Wiki authors claim. I would wager the new stronger, larger belts are permanent, myself.

Now I assert there was something on the dark side of the Moon that the monsters in charge down here wanted to destroy. Just as there is something the monsters in charge down here wanted to destroy in the Space nearer to the Earth. The coupling of these two sets of nukings helps give the aim away. The dark side of the Moon is linked to the Grid around the Earth. There is likely a base there at the Moon, possibly a control center of the Grid/Quarantine. Indeed I have already released herein, at the comments section, what some ancient civilizations’ writings have left us, that the Moon was created/brought over some tens of thousands of years ago, and is an artificial body as numerous Soviet astronomers have stated. The uniform depth of craters regardless of their width is a clear impossibility! The very wide craters seen should have left very deep craters as the meteors hitting at those sites were vastly more massive—unless the Moon is an artifact. Speaking of Moon artifacts, this recent photo of Saturn’s moon, Iapetus, shows the equatorial ridge around that body and two hemisphers that don’t quite fit! Someone was in a hurry and did a bad job in creating that moon! Or were they letting us know, when we would be able to see it well enough, that OTHERS are around and in charge? (But don’t read much at that site—it claims that the laughably bogus Apollo program was real.) Most “authors/experts” deliberately and cleverly mix truth and lies. I post at this site because I could see that its owner is interested only in the truth.

Back to our Moon, the improbable solar eclipse and dark side always to the Earth (both of these having strategic value to the quarantiners), and the orbital fluctuations of lunar orbiting craft—said by some scientists, to be from a hollow Moon, are further indications of the artificial creation/bringing of the Moon. Some alternative historians claim that ancient writings depict both Moon-less skies and a tide-less Earth. But I agree with Spooked, there is also much misinfo/disinfo, and one should indeed view everything with scepticism, but should be open to new ideas if validated.

All the above points to a conclusion that those in charge of the US’and the USSR’s nuclear weapons, and missiles, wanted to destroy something on the dark side of the Moon, and in the space surrounding the Earth. This, of course, implies this nefarious force is in charge of Mankind (and his nukes and missiles, intelligence agencies, etc.) and perhaps always has been. There is massive evidence of the latter, including the 6,000 year old Sumerian “bible” (the source for the later Hebrew and then Christian bibles), and countless other ancient texts which have been, in modern times, derided as “myth. But now are seen, as people in their own time writing down events and history as they happened—and there was far more truth then than now! And thus the myth may be that those writings were myth. The Sumerian bible, and other ancient writings indicate that aliens were “cast down” here and created man “in their image” and to be their slaves. The latter condition continuing to this day—just ask someone who was in WTC 1 or 2 on 9/11, (if they could talk today.) The Sumerian bible depicts the double helix (double spiral snake) when it says “the gods created the Adam—the first man”. The Sumerians knew of DNA 6,000 years ago (because the “gods”/aliens told them of it.) The double snake became the symbol of medicine even now, 6,000 years later! It is called the Cauduceus. But the point is that these aliens who apparently created us and have been in charge ever since—hence all the wars, chaos and evil displayed—have been quarantined here, and have tried unsuccessfully to escape their quarantine for tens of thousands of years. I have made my own breakthroughs in understanding this and report now, for the first time, that what some have already described as evidence of ancient nuclear wars “among humans” was more likely the result of the quarantined ones (our evil creators) trying to break through the Grid, and failing, and the “Grid” then unleashing hell, with dire consequences for humanity, while the ones trying to break through (“God”) scurried back to their deep underground bases, while possibly suffering some losses—hopefully anyway. Such events include Sodom and Gomorrah’s destruction, and the “Deluge.” I know physicists who have found the fused sand at the Sodom and Gomorah location indicative of a nuclear blast. And then there is the Mahabharata. This is an ancient Indian “bible” depicting events that differing experts say occurred from 8,000 to 24,000 years ago. Read the “sacred text” for yourself; does it not fit a nuclear war? What else fits a “flying craft unleashing a projectile with all the power of the Universe” and leaving charred human remains? Most alternative historians say it does, and say it is about ancient opposing human cities or countries nuking themselves. I release to the world now, what I think is a more likely hypothesis. The quarantined ones, our evil creators, tried to break through the Grid at various times, and the Grid unleashes hell each time. Indeed I teach people to see how the same scenarios are repeated over and over again. (Like the current Russian/American problem of the U.S. putting in missiles in Europe, just as the Americans put in Jupiter nuclear missiles in Turkey in the late 50’s to ostensibly lead to the Cuban Missile Crisis.) The Mahabharata supposedly says that one area wiped out is where Kashmir is today—where another nuclear war may break out! If a scenario worked before, they use it again, throughout history. Compare the Reichstag fire and 9/11 as excuses for the destruction of a Constitution and a Democracy, and each country sinking into a torturing, mass murdering monster. Compare the ancient Roman “Hail Caesar” salute and the “Heil [Hail] Hitler” salute. Indeed the PTB make a mass murdering regime out of the most powerful nation at all times in history: Rome, Vatican, England, Germany, the USA, China to follow. Behind the scenes each regime helping to create the next mass-murdering regime of another country, despite their being “enemies.” BTW, to see that ancient civilizations had much technology (despite what they teach at Universities), search for the “Baghdad battery.”

Now the Western “bible” says that one of “God’s commandments” was not to make any image of him. Why? In those days the “gods” walked among men, when they weren’t underground. And they knew they were being scanned from above, and did not want to be blasted for the cosmic criminals they are! Thus the need for this “commandment.” For the more advanced ones (the OTHERS in capitals as I have used them) in trying to kill our evil creators had aleady destroyed their hangout at the planet (Tiamat) which was between Mars and Jupiter—where the Asteroid Belt now is. Ancient civilizations’ writings claimed that Tiamat was very bright in the sky. The more advanced ones, not wishing to completely destroy the sentient beings they observed on Earth (that’s us, sometimes), set up a Quarantine/Grid that so many ancient civilzations refer to, e.g. the Chinese with their drawings of dragons surrounding the Earth. And yes even today, with e.g. the Firefox logo of an animal surrounding the Earth with one area left open. Now if Firefox wanted to encompass everybody (and what international business doesn’t), why leave out one area of the earth? Because those in charge are telling those who know, that they are looking for that one spot to break through the Grid and leave! And the Grid, or bio-net, scans for the DNA of anyone going through the atmosphere approaching space. Anyone with the DNA of the cosmic criminals (our “God”) is stopped, and blasted if it looks like they could completely escape. This includes humans as noted above. When John Glenn went a bit frantic about all the bodies at his craft, in 1962, he was speaking of the devices that were scanning him. They didn’t kill him because they ascertained his craft was not capable of leaving low Earth orbit. But NASA quickly brought him down with a bogus claim of a malfunctioing re-entry unit. (If that were true, he would have fried.) Every honest astronaut has reported being surrounded by such “UFOs”. There is much of this on the web. Look for the tether incident with one of the shuttle missions and you will know!

Finally we recently have the rebuilding of weapons such as missiles, nukes, lasers, the NSA—trying to “crack the code” of the quarantine—so as to send a signal/virus such as was done in the movie, “Independence Day” , to facilitate the cosmic criminals leaving and going back to ORION, by all the indications, their origin. I have indicated that the NASA “return to the Moon” logo for its “Project Orion” has the three Orion belt stars-–as did the Apollo program logo!--but no Moon now—their supposed destination! And the video of Project Orion shows a blast after already leaving Earth orbit—depicting blasting through the Grid, IMO. Yes, for those who have knowledge of “ultimate truths,” the PTB do not hide their goals and methods! And NASA’s original Latin motto translated is “Through hardship, to the stars.” It’s all about the “gods” in charge here breaking through the Grid, and returning to Orion. NASA is not about Man. As I wrote, once you have this knoweldge, you can understand everything that has happened, is happening, and may be about to happen. Everything important that happens down here is about our evil creators trying to break out. Another reason why you will see “news” about the U.S. regime weaponizing space “against terrorists.” But really about you know what now. But the OTHERS won’t allow it, unless they are defeated, then we may be in big trouble. Because they (our “gods”) may wish to eliminate all of us—leave no witnesses—as with the nuking of 9/11/01.

The events at the WTC on 9/11/01, which I have called a nuclear holocaust, were nothing less than the final stages of the destruction of the American “democracy” so as to facilitate what is coming. Something like a global nuclear event to try to overload the Grid/Quarantine so the cosmic criminals can leave. Indeed I assert this was the reason for the tens of thousands of nukes and ICBMs the U.S. and the USSR had/have, in the first place. There was never a need to nuke someone ten times over! Even more ridiculous when you learn, behind the scenes, the two countries were always “together.” But all wars have been bogus; all have been for the end you now know. There must always be some bogus excuse to start a global nuclear war—currently Iran. In my original thinking now, Hiroshima and Nagasaki were nothing less than events to show the quarantiners that the quarantined were willing and able (once again) to nuke the whole human race unless they were allowed to leave—and this IMO, was the reason for WWII itself! The cosmic criminals, as I call these self-proclaimed “gods,” or in fact their leader, wanting to be called “God”, once again, after losing some technology, or Man’s apparent holding of some technology (but perhaps not really), have regained the technology to try to break through the Grid again. It appears imminent alas. In my opinion, the quarantiners will never let them back out into the galaxy for the evil that they have likely done on many planets to many sentient beings they may have either created or interfered with and destroyed whether they created them or not. There may have been a galactic war. We may be the kidnapped hostages in this galactic war. And never forget the human filth in charge of mankind—the Presidents, the “Kings” are said to be of the “bloodline.” The bloodline goes all the way back to what the “bible” described as the “cast down” ones “coming into” [rape] the human women they had created, and giving rise to whatever names they are called—Nephilim, giants [imagine what must have happened to the poor human women], etc. But this is the origin of the “bloodline” which continues to the present day kings and presidents—having some DNA from the original “gods” that created Mankind. It is not a surprise that Bush, Clinton, Dole, Kerry are all related— and all related to that evil English King Longshanks who had William Wallace of Scotland “drawn and quartered.” Look up the last term if you don’t know what it means. The descendants of Longshanks are no less evil, and
supposedly are in charge of Mankind, but, of course, taking orders from you know who now! The decendants of Longshanks will happily have us all “drawn and quartered”, or more easily nuked en masse, if we don’t wake up, and fight back, as the ones who created the quarantine/grid wish to see, and have aided us probably many times such as in disengaging nukes. Listen starting at 4:34 of this remarkable video of a govt scientist detail a UFO destroying a nuclear missile. Ignore the shill before him, who tries to put the wrong spin on all this. The NSA has also been temporarily disengaged by OTHERS (at least for a few days— imagine they couldn’t get themselves “plugged back in”). There has likely been much other intervention that we do not know about, and may be why we are still here.

Even the famous Roswell incident is tied in with this. Now the U.S. Army Air Force (USAAF, 1947) at first freely admitted this was an alien craft that came down. See the newspaper headline, it came from the Air Force until they then got their orders for 60 years of lies and cover-up. Most do not know, (and all conspiracy fields are headed by installed popular govt shills who hide the ultimate truths) that Roswell was the USAAF base for the world’s only atomic bomber group! And “OTHERS” (and I don’t mean the “Russkies”) apparently had found this out, and were perhaps going there to terminate these nukes so our cosmic criminals could not continue to nuke mankind! However, just as the OTHERS have control of space around the Earth, our cosmic criminals down here control much on the Earth and the atmosphere (most of the time), and were able to knock down this craft. Now that was a Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) far beyond what is acknowledged even today! The fate of the downed OTHERS— if any survived (and numerous eyewitnesses have said they did),--you can imagine, in light of the recent public admission to fondness for torture and murder by the American regime and who controls them.

So while OTHERS may be trying to disengage nukes, they have not been completely successful. The proof may be in 9/11 itself and the apparent nuclear “incidents” of the OKC bombing, and the Baghdad airport in 2003, and maybe others that people mistakenly think were conventional bombs. So humans cannot, and should not, count on the helpful intrevention of OTHERS whose main concern is likely for themselves in not allowing our cosmic criminals back into the Galaxy. We each need to examine if these things I explain are true, and then to inform everyone. Perhaps things are very much like some TV shows alas. If you recall “the Invaders” or the miniseries “V”? Each of us needs to enlighten and warn those we know as the first step. I have taken the time to enlighten you with this, without remuneration at this point, and indeed I have suffered a terrible, terrible price for such things already. But living in fear, living in a lie is not living. Overcome the fear. Lyndon Johnson’s term for the American people was “pissants” because, in part, they did nothing when their beloved President, John Fitzgerald Kennedy, was murdered by the government—and those who control it, for trying to prevent the things we have now! And yes, you can even look up, that he had wanted to warn the people about aliens and actually said, "I’d like to tell the public about the alien situation, but my hands are tied."

He was a man so far ahead, in so many ways, and the last President, and the last President to have cared about the American people, and the people of the world. He was therefore so dangerous to our monstrous controllers. Please listen (again) to his remarkable “Peace Speech.” You will know why they killed him. He was what the human race could be, if it were free of the monsters that control us. That most Americans do not know or care about getting justice for him, speaks volumes about much of the human race, and the success of the monsters in control of mankind. For he knew well, what was likely to be done to him, yet he persisted in trying to control these evil forces, and to stop wars. If only each of us had his guts and his wisdom, we might likely succeed against the bare handful of monsters and their human lackeys--the modern day Gestapo--in control. They shoot a good President, and poison other citizens who told the world that his government driver killed him, because they know they could lose, if the people ever woke up.

When learning of these startling, new ideas for the first time, the enlightened person should research them for him/herself.

It is hoped that you will see both the unstoppable logic of these ideas, and all the evidence of thousands of years, and the monstrosities of todays’ world where it’s actually easy to prove that it’s not about money or oil—it’s far worse than all that. If you think they need to do a 9/11, or perennial war, for “money”, just recall the Bush family stealing billions during the Savings and Loan scandals of the 1980's (and getting away with it); or the $2.3 trillion Rumsfeld announced, on 9/10/01 was “missing” (and spent on “something”) from the Pentagon budget (and they got away with that). And then research (as I have) how there is 1. vastly more oil than admitted (but, of course, it’s finite), 2. much evidence that oil is abiotic, and that “peak oil” is a scam for perennial war, and 3. they could easily use alternatives now, if they wanted, including solar, wind, geothermal, tidal, other, and the “cold fusion” a corrupt physicist helped shoot down. No, the open-minded person can prove that 9/11 and the perennial wars have never been about money or oil. It’s far worse, and now you know what it has always been about. Now you will be able to understand things. The author has taken the time to write this for you, in the hopes that you will think and act, and tell everyone about all this now, just as the first step. Be well.

The Anonymous Physicist

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, June 16, 2007

Deeper Truths

I think by now, the following should be evident to anyone who has been paying attention:

-- 9/11 was a horrible and huge hoax intended to fool the American people into supporting many things that they would not otherwise support

-- the horrible mess that is Iraq was not due to incompetence but rather the result of deliberate mismanagement

-- the media does not serve the people but rather is a tool of powerful interests-- "the powers that be"

-- 9/11 and Iraq did not occur in isolation, but was the culmination of many hoaxes and horrible acts inflicted upon humanity by "the powers that be"

-- there are deeper level truths that can explain this evil

I think a key question is who are "the powers that be" and what is their goal?

Obviously this is a huge and complex question, one that will undoubtedly lead to lots of misinformation.

There are of course many secret societies that still exist (Council on Foreign Relations, the Vatican) and those that have come and gone over the years (Masons, Illuminati, Knights Templar, Rosicrucians, etc) that have powerfully influenced history. Most of these secret societies have a benevolent front to lure people in or for PR purposes, and the idea is that the vast majority of acolytes to these groups have no idea what the organizations are truly about-- and that there is a hierarchy wherein more "truths" are revealed as one progresses up the ladder. Of course, the majority of members never make it to the top and are more or less clueless-- but are still controlled by those at the top. Jim Marrs' "Rule by Secrecy" does an admirable job of covering this vast and complex territory-- and gives many interesting insights into world history. What is fascinating is that Marrs' eventually distills all the secret society history and influence to their deep knowledge of ultimate truths about the origin of man and religion. Marrs draws from many others in postulating a deep outer space alien influence on mankind.

Like I have indicated here before, I am not religious-- I do not believe in supernatural (magical) explanations for events. But there are in fact a lot of strange things that have happened and things that exist that are not easily explainable. At one time, I wrote on this site that I would not discuss UFOs and other "weird" stuff that distracted from 9/11. I guess I changed my mind. But this all fits into the evolution of my thinking over the past three years. Of course I have no intention of turning this into a UFO blog, and overall, I think most of the UFO/alien field is bogus and/or disinfo (much like any other conspiracy field-- a great deal of misinfo/disinfo is put out to hide the truth). Nonetheless, I do suspect there are ultimate truths that relate to alien influence on humans on this earth. This is what I was getting at when I asked a few days back-- who is in control and what is their goal?

Now the GOOD thing about investigating 9/11 is that we have some fairly concrete evidence to analyze. But I think the major analysis is now done. We know that 9/11 was an inside job, a massive psy-ops run by covert military groups along with the media. As I have said, the plane crashes were faked, the plane videos were faked and the towers were blown up with high tech weaponry including nukes. But what are the odds we are going to get complete justice for 9/11? I think for all intents and purposes as of now, the 9/11 perps got away with it. The majority of people just don't want to go that far, mentally they cannot handle it, and I think history shows that uncovering a major conspiracy like this is darn near impossible, even when there is large support from the people. There may be another investigation into 9/11 in the future-- I think over time more and more people will realize 9/11 was a lie and press for justice. But at the same time, I think it is important to look for the deeper truths as to what is going on with 9/11 and all the sick wars and threats for more wars.
Bookmark and Share

Friday, June 15, 2007

Starfish Prime

Strange and obscure history:
Starfish Prime was a high-altitude nuclear test conducted by the United States of America on July 9, 1962, a joint effort of the Defense Atomic Support Agency (DASA) and the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). Launched via a Thor rocket and carrying a W49 thermonuclear warhead (manufactured by Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory) and a Mk. 4 reentry vehicle, the explosion took place 400 kilometers (250 miles) above Johnston Island in the Pacific Ocean. It was part of Operation Dominic. With the test taking place in such a high altitude, it was one of the five tests conducted by the USA in outer space as defined by the FAI. It produced a yield of 1.4 megatons of TNT.

As for Starfish Prime, because there is almost no air at an altitude of 400 kilometers, no fireball formation occurred, although manifold other notable effects did occur. About 1500 kilometers (930 statute miles) away in Hawaii, the electromagnetic pulse (EMP) created by the explosion was felt as three hundred street lights failed, television sets and radios malfunctioned, burglar alarms went off and power lines fused. On Kauai, EMP shut down telephone calls to the other islands by burning out the equipment used in a microwave link.
While some of the energetic beta particles followed the earth's magnetic field and illuminated the sky, other high-energy electrons became trapped in man-made radiation belts around the earth. There was much uncertainty and debate about the composition, magnitude and potential adverse effects from this trapped radiation after the detonation. The weaponeers became quite worried when three satellites in low earth orbit were disabled. These man-made radiation belts eventually crippled one-third of all satellites in low orbit. Seven satellites were destroyed as radiation knocked out their solar arrays or electronics, including the first commercial communication satellite ever, Telstar.
Bookmark and Share

Apollo Moon Hoax, Part 3

It's easy for shills to make fun of the general idea that the moon landings were faked.

It's harder for shills to make fun of specific evidence-- especially smoking gun evidence.

How did this vehicle get here without making tracks either to the front or the back?

(click to enlarge)
I love the footprint right where the front tire should have left a track.


AS15-88-11901 (OF300) ( 176k or 928k )

167:49:38 Rightward of 11900. Dave took this photo as part of a pan at the VIP site. It shows the Rover at it's final parking place. At the back, we can see the rake, but neither of the tongs. Keith Wilson notes that this frame shows a red bible that Dave has just placed against the handcontroller. See the detail produced by Kipp Teague; see, also,the discussion following 167:49:38.

The red bible is just the icing on the cake.

(Thanks to Rob for the tip)
Bookmark and Share

Thursday, June 14, 2007

The Media Are Terrorists

Bookmark and Share

More Fun with Human DNA

Bookmark and Share

More Fun with 9/11 TV Fakery

This one has some really new, cool stuff:
Bookmark and Share

Yet Another Bush Disaster

His recent Europe trip.
High officials of European governments describe U.S. influence as squandered and swiftly eroding (one minister went down a list of Bush administration officials, rating them according to their stupidity), the country's moral authority nil. Lethal power vacuums are emerging from Lebanon to Pakistan, and Europeans are incapable on their own of quelling the fires that burn far closer to them than to the United States through their growing Muslim populations and proximity to the Middle East. They have no illusions that they will be treated seriously as real allies or that there will be a sudden about-face by the Bush administration. Their faint hope -- and it is only a hope -- is that they have already seen the worst and that it is not yet to come. Even worse than Bush, from their perspective, would be another Republican president who continued Bush policies and also appointed neoconservatives. That would toll, if not the end of days, then the decline and fall of the Western alliance except in name only, and an even more rapid acceleration of chaos in the world order.

Bush's procession through Europe was a pageant of contempt, disdain, delusion, provocation and vanity masquerading as a welcome respite from his troubles at home.
Bookmark and Share

Apollo Moon Hoax, Part 2

You've heard from "Anonymous Physicist", now let me list a few reasons I have doubts about the moon landing:

1) like faking the plane footage on 9/11 rather than flying real planes into the towers, faking the moon landing footage was operationally much safer than really landing men on the moon

2) footage of the Apollo 11 returning astronauts shows them to be in a strange daze, not at all happy, not at all as if they had accomplished the greatest feat of mankind

3) Stanley Kubrick was involved with NASA and apparently rigged up a studio with an artificial moon surface

4) it is hard to believe the technology existed in 1969 to land a man on the moon, but with all the advances in technology in the past 30 years, we have not gone back-- nor are there even any imminent plans to go back

5) it is hard to believe the lunar module story-- the maneuvering required to land, take off and dock was incredibly difficult and error prone, but officially they did it many times

6) there are various anomalies in the video footage-- some of which may be explainable, some of which I think are highly indicative of fraud

7) The movement of the "astronauts on the moon" in video clips REALLY does NOT look like they are in 1/6th earth gravity-- it looks like they are just moving in slow motion

8) The recent loss of the Apollo 11 video tapes by NASA is incredibly suspicious. As "anonymous physicist" put it-- this is analogous to a country losing its constitution!

9) Bill Clinton, in his autobiography, cryptically referred to an old man he knew in Arkansas, who believed the moon landings were fake, then went on to praise the wisdom of common folk. I believe this was as close to admitting the landings were fake as Clinton could get.

I did not see the Fox moon hoax show "anonymous physicist" refers to, nor have I seen any other movie on this topic except one weird British movie about Stanley Kubrick and NASA, which had some incredibly bizarre interviews with Donald Rumsfeld and Kissinger (I think)about their participation in some sort of fakery. The whole interview set-up was done to give complete "plausible deniability", yet it made no sense for these people to be doing the interviews other than that they were tacitly whistle-blowing. I need to find the link and will post it when I can find it. But the idea is that Kubrick needed a special lens for his movie "Barry Lyndon", and NASA had this high-tech lens, and Kubrick made a special deal with NASA to get the lens-- presumably he made the original moon landing footage. This was supposedly done as a back-up in case anything went wrong, but the idea is that NASA went ahead and used the fake footage.
Bookmark and Share

Weird Office Collapse

The top floor of the building, in which Ms Blears has offices on two floors, collapsed on Tuesday.

Six volunteers for her deputy leadership bid were in the building at the time, but none were hurt.

It is not yet known what caused the building to collapse but it is thought it was being renovated.

Emergency services were called to the building, in Dean Farrar Street near New Scotland Yard, Westminster, at 1600 BST.

The whole top floor of the building had been blown away and eyewitnesses say they heard an explosion.

WHAT???? No progressive top-down collapse??????

Note, the upper 25% of the building came down, which is proportionally similar to what happened to the WTC (greater proportionally than WTC1 and more proportionally than WTC2).
Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Thin Aluminum Can't Cut Through Thick Steel

Bookmark and Share

The Last, Great American TV Fakery Before 9/11/01— The Apollo Moon Landing Hoax

by The Anonymous Physicist

"The Anonymous Physicist” summarizes what was perhaps the largest psyop/TV fakery of all time— not counting wars— the Apollo Moon Landing Hoax. In pondering the vastness of the 9/11 fakery and the collusion between the government and the media, people need to keep in mind the many precedents of similar fakery and collusion. We had the relatively simple fakery regarding the Kennedy Assassination already demonstrated here; and the far more extensive (TV and other) fakery of the alleged Apollo Moon landings— to be expounded upon now. What constitutes fakery? Certainly one criterion is if the “evidence” to be examined violates the laws of physics— which are inviolable. Another is when the perps are captured doing the fakery. Due to space constraints, I will mostly just list some of the many anomalies, impossibilities, and caught-in-the-act episodes of the Apollo Hoax— like this one— fake video of the “first Lunar Step for Man.”

Just as with 9/11, and e.g. the Popular Mechanics ludicrous attempt/hit piece to debunk the 9/11 truth movement, there are indeed desperate Apollo Hoax debunking websites. It is easy for an honest physicist to debunk these debunkers/shills. Indeed, not wanting to believe that Apollo was a total hoax, I went, years ago, to the debunking sites. I quickly understood that they were themselves pure bunk/lies. This compelled me to investigate Apollo myself, and to read books and articles and purchase many videos— some of which are now available free, and listed herein. See them quick (or get the originals) as things seem to be removed when I send them to this site.

Perhaps my favorite (and sufficient) proof of the Apollo Hoax is the alleged lift-off of the Lunar Module (LM) from NASA’s own videos. We see not a single molecule of rocket exhaust coming out of the top half of the LM. We can see evidence of real explosive bolts separating the two halves. But no rocket exhaust whatsoever is seen against the black sky of the atmosphere-less Moon. The explosive bolts only had the energy of a pound or two of TNT, while the engine had 3500 pounds of thrust. Bogus debunkers’ websites claimed that the invisibility of the rocket exhaust is OK, as the “fuel was hypergolic.” But a hypergolic fuel just means it is so explosive it ignites on contact with the oxidizer, and needs no kind of ignition device. Indeed the same exact fuel and oxidizer has been photographed numerous times, in space (the Shuttle), and on the Earth. They do indeed produce a very visible plume. Chemical rockets don’t move without combusted exhaust rapidly moving in the opposite direction. It’s the Law of Conservation of Linear Momentum— it doesn’t get broken. This is also the same basic Law of Physics the regime “flouted” in its patsy Oswald from behind, fatal JFK— from the front— head shot.

Then we have the fake TV broadcasts of Apollo 11 showing that they cropped the Earth during the broadcast and were in low Earth orbit— snagged! (This is 32 minutes into this video.) And at 42 minutes in, Armstrong gives it all away at the White House “25th Anniversary.” We had the Apollo 11 press conference after “returning from the Moon”, where Collins answers a reporter’s question about not seeing stars from the lunar surface. Only problem: Collins was not on the surface-- see Armstrong cringe.

Now for the probable murders of Astronauts Grissom, White and Chaffee on the dry run of Apollo 1 in 1967. Why lock the hatch in a pure oxygen environment, if you knew Fire Safety 101? Grissom’s son continues to assert that his father and the two others were murdered— in part because Grissom wouldn’t have stood for the fakery. Thomas Baron, a safety inspector for NASA, was killed along with his family just a week after delivering highly critical testimony to Congress regarding Apollo. Along with his testimony, Baron submitted a 1,500 page report to the congressional committee. Following his death, the report went missing and has never been seen again. [Congress tends to lose important documents, for those who think we have a democracy.] All astronauts cooperated with the fake Moon landings after these events.

Despite vastly improved science, technology, and computerization, NASA— nearly 40 years later— can’t do what they claimed to have done 40 years earlier with primitive technology and computerization. Regarding the Lunar Module (LM): To this day, NASA still can’t get Vertical Landing (from orbit via retro-fire) to work, due to the great instability of vertical landing rockets. People on board moving, touching dials, coughing etc. would throw it out of stability. See Neil Armstrong crash— a mere few seconds into testing the similar Lunar Landing Research Vehicle (LLRV). This was just a few months before piloting the similar LM on the vastly longer and more difficult “landing” on the Moon. There is little or no sound of the 10,000 lb. thrust rocket landing (3500 lb thrust on lunar lift-off) heard on their transmissions. The film, camera, spacesuit wouldn’t work at the temperature extremes on the Moon. The very manufacturers of the film and camera have made these comments. Astronauts couldn’t fit out of the hatch with their spacesuits on—based on the dimensions involved. Laughably, bogus lunar photos show multiple angled shadows— not all parallel as would be with only one light source at effective infinity— the Sun. Hills and bumps do NOT alter shadow angles. We had the instantaneous audio communication from the Earth to the Apollo spacecraft; and not the approx. 3 second delay due to the speed of light (both ways) limitation. We had the blue light filling the window in TV transmissions (indicating they were in low Earth orbit). This includes moments before the fake Apollo 13 [“Houston we have a] problem”/bogus explosion, when they claimed to be 180,000 miles out, but were in low Earth orbit. We have the impenetrability of the Van Allen Radiation Belts, so humans could not have survived without massive shielding. We had the same exact mountainous “background” seen on several lunar landings a thousand miles, or so, apart! NASA has begun to paint these backgrounds differently in new photos! You might call this bad, studio, special effects to paraphrase Evan Fairbanks. The fact that the “Lunar Astronauts” walking steps and jumps are not six times higher— or any higher— than an Earth jump or walk, rather just slower. Just speed up the “Moon Walking” to about double speed, and you get Earth walking or jogging or jumping! See the astronauts being picked up by wires, which can be seen at times. This includes being picked up after falling before the “astronaut” himself even pushes off the ground!

There were no craters beneath the LMs after landing, no dust on the LM’s legs, even though the Astronauts said dust was kicked up, and we “see” this in the “videos” as it lands. See the color photos left on a LM landing leg. The flag waving in the “wind” on the atmosphere-less Moon.

The recent, convenient “loss” of NASA‘s original Apollo 11 tapes— only the alleged most profound achievement of mankind— like a country losing its Constitution— sadly that turns out to be too much of an analogy.
NASA itself was going to produce an anniversary/debunking movie— but then chickened out. They gave the task to a well-known disinfo Space Race/Cold War “expert”. He later chickened out too. The infamous Apollo 11 coke bottle rolling across the “lunar surface” seen in Australia (re-broadcast and whistle-blown down there) during Apollo 11. The lettering [“C”] still seen on some “lunar” props er …“rocks.” The contact between Nixon and Stanley Kubrick to make fake video footage, Kubrick’s doing it, and the mysterious death of Kubrick. Others who knew of the fakery have been killed. There is so much more “bad, special effects.” Get the videos and see for yourself. The fakery is often so bad, you’ll be both amused and amazed. From the above, we saw that no one wants to make the definitive Apollo Hoax debunking movie. Why? The fakery was much more primitive then; they don’t stand a chance against the truth!

So from the Kennedy assassination, to the Apollo Hoax, to 9/11, this regime has shown that it spends a great deal of time and money on video, and other, fakery to create false history, and false evidence. Thus, astronauts have walked on the Moon, as much as President Kennedy was killed from a shot from behind him, or as much as planes/fuel/gravity caused the WTC towers to “collapse.” All these lies are easily proven as such in each case, upon examination of the alleged films, and other evidence. The only difference now is that computer graphics, and other advancements, make it easier for them to fake things. And the fact that the people have let them get away with past fakeries has emboldened them to bigger and more insidious fakeries. Thus we have the 9/11 fakery, and subsequent bogus wars and ruses to remove American freedoms and rights, while perpetrating perennial war on the human race.

References include the following:
Book: "Dark Moon: Apollo and the Whistle-Blowers" by Bennett and Percy; and the DVD by the same people: "What Happened on the Moon." And the DVD: "A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon" by Sibrel.

Ignore any govt agent's negative "reviews" at Amazon or elsewhere. The above were read or seen by me; and contain eye-opening proof, and are mostly excellent. Some places also sell the Fox-TV video that was aired (once) on the Apollo Hoax-- yes that network actually aired proof of the Apollo Hoax before 9/11/01-- but never after wards despite the many requests for a re-run of the truth.
Bookmark and Share

Cui Bono?

BAGHDAD (AP) -- Suspected al-Qaida insurgents on Wednesday destroyed the two minarets of the Askariya Shiite shrine in Samarra, authorities reported, in a repeat of a 2006 bombing that shattered its famous Golden Dome and unleashed a wave of retaliatory sectarian violence that still bloodies Iraq.
Police said the attack at about 9 a.m. involved explosives and brought down the two minarets, which had flanked the dome's ruins. No casualties were reported.

The attack immediately stirred fears of a new explosion of Sunni-Shiite bloodshed.
Bookmark and Share

Media Scripting of the 9/11 Psy-Op

Check out the American flag behind Charles Gibson and Diane Sawyer as they report the first hit (0:58 seconds in).

I really really really doubt that was the normal backdrop for the show.
Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Who Is Really In Control and What Is Their Goal?

I welcome everyone to leave their ideas here in comments.

I guess I should note that I strongly prefer non-mystical, non-supernatural, non-religious explanations.
Bookmark and Share

Nuclear Blackmail -- or Worse?

The reason Russia doesn't want even a few missile interceptors on its doorstep (Poland, Czechloslovakia) is because the US has never ruled out a nuclear first strike.

While a few US missile interceptors pose no threat should Russia decide to nuke us first, these interceptors pose a threat to Russia should the US launch a first strike.

This is because a US first strike would have a main goal of taking out much of Russia's nuclear arsenal. The anti-ballistic missiles (ABMs) could then mop up what few missiles Russia might have left to shoot at the US.

That is the Russian worry anyway.

So Bush putting ABMs in Poland is a very aggressive move. He's either trying to start a new nuclear arms race, destabilize things enough to start a nuclear war, or at minimum blackmail Russia into going along with whatever evil Washington has planned.

I wonder if it has anything to do with Iran?

Either the Bush administration really REALLY wants to attack Iran-- or they are trying to distract us from something other nasty thing they are up to.

I still tend to think they are not THAT crazy to start a war with Iran-- so the question is: what are they distracting us from?
Bookmark and Share

The "Gay Bomb"

This certainly gives new meaning to the phrase "make love not war"...

Berkeley watchdog organization that tracks military spending said it uncovered a strange U.S. military proposal to create a hormone bomb that could purportedly turn enemy soldiers into homosexuals and make them more interested in sex than fighting.

Pentagon officials on Friday confirmed to CBS 5 that military leaders had considered, and then subsquently rejected, building the so-called "Gay Bomb."
Bookmark and Share


I've been reading this book by Robert Shea and Robert Anton Wilson recently. I bought the book YEARS ago but never got around to reading it.

It's actually quite an interesting book-- basically it's a schizophrenic encyclopedia of conspiracy and deep politics. The story is basically silly, but overlaid on it is some really excellent discussion of the illuminati and various deep political conspiracies.

You can read some of the interesting background on the book here.
Bookmark and Share

Sunday, June 10, 2007

Camerawork Clues

Using a Sony Handycam, I tried taking some zoom-in shots of low-flying planes the other night.

A couple of observations:

1) if you have the camera zoomed OUT, it is difficult to see and thus find the plane in the viewfinder

2) if you have the camera zoomed IN, , it is difficult to simply find the plane in the viewfinder because you are focused in on one particular area

3) when you are zoomed IN and tracking the plane, it is VERY hard to keep the camera steady-- there is a lot of shaking that is amplified by the zoom factor

My strong sense from this small test is that ALL of the putative "amateur" 2nd hit shots seen here are not amateur at ALL, but very clever fakes done by professional videographers or an even more computerized advanced video technology.
Bookmark and Share

September Clues Part 2-- Comments and Critiques

This Video.

1) the initial plane path discrepency looks fairly convincing-- I have used that first clip in the past to show a conflict with another video

2) the plane color argument DOESN'T hold water for two reasons-- a) officially the plane was flying in the shadow of the WTC smoke trail, which is why it could be dark and not shiny, b) objects reflect light differently from different angles, so saying wings are dark from one angle and light from another doesn't mean much

3) the analysis of the home video is good, suggesting crude editing removing the plane

4) I'm not sure the "pixel bleed" phenomenon at 2:45 remaining isn't some compression artifact from low-resolution digitized videos, so this bit isn't convincing for me

5) the sound analysis is interesting though not necessarily convincing

6) the very last segment showing the helicopter coming by the south tower in one video and not the network "live" video is very oimportant-- and this is something I have been meaning to analyze. Several second hit videos show this helicopter but others DON'T. Apart from the obvious answer of video fakery, WHY has the helicopter been cut out of many videos?

TO SUMMARIZE: This part 2 "September Clues" video, along with part 1, has very key convincing evidence of video fakery. But part 2 has a few segments that are not accurate or convincing-- unlike part 1, which was almost flawless.
Bookmark and Share

Saturday, June 09, 2007

More TV Fakery "September Clues"

Apart from Part 1, that I already linked to, these are all well worth watching-- lots of good catches:

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4
Bookmark and Share

Putin Has a Sensible Idea

Bookmark and Share

OTHER Bush Administration Spying Programs?

Bookmark and Share

Friday, June 08, 2007

The WTC Temperature Problem

According to NIST, they found no evidence that any WTC steel was heated above 600 C and in fact little steel was heated above 250 C.

This would seemingly rule out nuclear bombs as the cause of the WTC "collapses", wouldn't it? It would also tend to rule out ANY explosives.

The problem, is that this "finding" that no steel was heated above 600 C, also rules out any fire-induced collapse mechanism.

Thus, either NIST is flat out lying about the temperatures of the steel-- or they were EXTREMELY selective about what steel they tested.

Hmmm-- I wonder if they tested THIS piece of steel for heat exposure:

6" thick WTC I -Beam Bent like a Horseshoe

Further evidence of tremendous heat can be seen in this 8 ton 6" thick I beam that is bent like a horseshoe without warping, kinking or splitting. Again, there is no way for thermate to create this horseshoe, unless it is "miraculous" thermate. Clearly, this is residual steel that has been exposed to massive and intense heat that is entirely consistent with a Thermodynamics,Nuclear Fusion, Electromagnetic Radiation, Kinetic Energy and virtually nothing else can produce this single effect, let alone this and ALL the other irregularities.

UPDATE: The other issue related to this is the apparent molten steel found at Ground Zero, upon which it is very difficult to get solid evidence for apart from a few eye-witnesses that have been interviewed. Thus, there are no reliable pictures of this molten steel-- meaning, either the story is apocryphal or it has been covered up. I would think however, that true evidence of molten steel would be one of the things the government REALLY would not want showing up, and thus these pictures and videos would almost certainly be censored.

That extreme hot spots remained at Ground Zero for a few weeks seems likely -- and this tends to support demolition and go against NIST.
Bookmark and Share

Pretty Well Sums Up Why Giuliani Is a Sickening Man

Bookmark and Share

Following Up on the "Fox News = Al Qaeda" Post

(This post.)

It turns out-- Usama bin Laden works at FOX News headquarters!

We live in one CRAZY world.
Bookmark and Share

Thursday, June 07, 2007

A Possible Directed Energy Weapon Technology?

MIT researchers said Thursday they will soon be able to charge a computer or cell-phone battery from across a room, perhaps making the annoyance of wires or dead batteries a thing of the past.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology scientists and their wireless energy transfer technology may soon eliminate wires that tether our machines to wall sockets, or may keep batteries topped up and ready to go. (snip)

The technology is almost at the point where it could be used for a practical application," he added.

The technology is simple and based on resonance, which causes an object to vibrate when energy of a certain frequency is applied to it, Soljacic explained.

Two resonant objects on the same resonance frequency can exchange energy efficiently, while interacting weakly with objects that are not on the same wavelength.

Keep in mind that typically, military technology is several years ahead of civilian technology.

Conceivably, a target could be induced to resonate by one type of energy pulse, then given a jolt of high energy from a resonance gun using this resonance transfer mechanism.
Bookmark and Share

TV Fakery Proved


Granted, I covered ALL of these issues on this blog over a year ago, in some cases raising these points for the first time anywhere-- but this video is just perfect.

UPDATE: I watched all four of the videos in the series. I thought the ones analyzing WTC footage were very good, but the bits on the Pentagon and Shanksville didn't have much impact.
Bookmark and Share

Ménage à Creep

Bookmark and Share

Flight 93 Memorial Spat

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, June 06, 2007

Fox News = Terrorists?

I guess that would explain a lot about 9/11 video footage!

And he had some choice words for Democratic candidates who have decided not to debate on Fox.

“The candidates that can’t face Fox, can’t face Al Qaeda,”
said Mr. Ailes. “And that’s what’s coming.”

That was followed by applause from the crowd which featured several News Corp. executives and journalists from Murdoch-owned papers—Richard Johnson, the Post’s Page Six editor, for one.
Bookmark and Share

Big Trouble Brewing

Bookmark and Share

Is Even the NY Times Hinting at Fake Terrorism in Today's Op-Ed?

Bookmark and Share

New Piece on the Issue of Radiation and the Nuclear Demolition of the WTC

Please see this article.
Bookmark and Share

Nukes Took Out the Spire by Disintegrating the Base Core Columns

The "spire"-- a tall remnant of the inner core section, falls straight down. Think how freaking strong the base columns of the core were. Think of the power that must have been needed to take out this base and cause the "spire" to sink straight down.

This is what it looked like at the end:

(click to enlarge)
Bookmark and Share

Powered by Blogger