I Am Still Having Problems with the Pentagon Hit

The non-contentious part of the Pentagon hit is where the plane hit. The "plane" went out of its way to impact a recently reinforced and relatively unpopulated part of the Pentagon-- this strongly suggests some government control of where the plane hit.

The contentious part of the Pentagon hit is WHAT exactly hit the Pentagon.

My thought very simply is this:

either a plane hit the reinforced wall and then partially blew up upon impact, or,
something else hit the wall, such as a smaller plane or a missile.

The reason for thinking this is the penetration hole only corresponds to the dimensions of a fuselage of a Boeing jet. From tests that have been done, when a plane crashes into a hardened wall, it basically disintegrates, without affecting the wall very much. With the Pentagon hit, we are supposed to believe that the wings and tail of a Boeing 757 simply folded up alongside the fuselage and the plane penetrated the Pentagon that way. I find this VERY hard to believe. What is much more likely is that the wings of a Boeing 757 would explode upon impacting the hardened wall, since the wings contain the engines and are filled with fuel. And if the wings exploded, they would explode OUTSIDE the wall-- right?

The problem then, is that there is simply no debris field outside where the Pentagon was hit that would correspond to the wings of a Boeing 757.

Thus, it still is hard to believe that flight 77 hit the Pentagon.

But I am not going to dwell on this issue, since it is impossible to prove with the data we have currently. And it is contentious!