Good Analysis of the Passenger Lists on Flight AA11
...by Gerard Holmgren. He's done a hell of a lot of work.
Why on earth can't AA release the full passenger manifest by now???? Is there something sinister they are hiding?
Of course, part of the reason for the confusion may be that flight 11 was really two different airplanes,that took off from two different gates.
The other oddity is that flight 11 was never listed in the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) database.
I can only surmise that one of the flight 11's was a "terror drill flight", and perhaps some real passengers got put on the flight by mistake. I really don't have any good ideas for why there was a second flight 11.
The fact is - that in nearly three years - the media has tried to give the impression that they have published valid passenger lists, when all that has been provided is the contradictory rubbish exposed in this investigation. We are left with no choice but to conclude that these AA11 lists are fabrications. Personal stories of those allegedly involved have been built on the basis of these fabricated lists. As qualified earlier, some or all of them may be real people who are really missing, and may have friends or families who genuinely believe that they got on to a flight called AA11. We don't know at this stage. But the passenger lists as complete entities are lies.
Why on earth can't AA release the full passenger manifest by now???? Is there something sinister they are hiding?
Of course, part of the reason for the confusion may be that flight 11 was really two different airplanes,that took off from two different gates.
The other oddity is that flight 11 was never listed in the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) database.
I can only surmise that one of the flight 11's was a "terror drill flight", and perhaps some real passengers got put on the flight by mistake. I really don't have any good ideas for why there was a second flight 11.
posted by spooked at 10:21 PM
2 Comments:
The internet persona calling himself Gerard Holmgren also claims the World Trade Center wasn't hit by a plane ...
Even if the AA11 lists were not released with 100% completeness, so what?
And if a database of COMPLETED flights doesn't include the plane that hit the WTC (ie. it didn't complete its flight), so what?
This sort of speculation is the type of thing that gives "conspiracy theory" a bad name for most people.
If you read the so-called "two gates" story, you won't find any actual authentic evidence to it. There may be truth to its claims, but it's not contained in that article.
One problem of internet sites is that anyone can make up claims and post them without having to do even the slightest effort to do fact checking.
Gerard Holmgren's "analysis" was shown to be illogical and silly 2 years ago when he was laughed off sf.indymedia.org. Buffoons like him don't actually believe in evidence or logic; Holmgren is only advancing his political agenda.
Since he was exposed, he has not let up with his nonsense, every subsequent writing of his becoming more bizarre and laughable.
Sky King
Post a Comment
<< Home