Flight 587-- A Real Terrorist Attack
Contrary to what the government says.
This is simply fascinating and I think this story is legitimate. In a Democratic Underground thread, the 9/11 researcher Paul Thompson related that the flight 587 attack was predicted by a Pakistani student in New York who had predicted the 9/11 attacks. Another poster on DU said his brother was a pilot who had heard that flight 587 was a shoe bomb attack. I hadn't heard that Robert Wright comment, but I wam not surprised-- he was one of the few honest FBI agents working (which is why he is a "former agent", I suppose). I think the interpretation at the end (by the Propaganda Matrix writer) is basically correct.
What this shows importantly is that Al Qaeda is a real terrorist threat and they did have a bunch of people lined up to attack the US around 9/11/01. The 9/11 attacks, of course, were a whole different ball game, but this flight 587 story shows that there were at least some real Al Qaeda terrorists trying to inflict damage. There was of course another shoe bomber, Richard Reid, who failed and was caught. The shoe bomb of course is a pretty crude attack and nothing like 9/11. I think the shoe bomb attack is basically what your average Al Qaeda stooge could pull off.
But the most amazing thing is how the government LIED about these other attacks! It seems as though the government, right after 9/11, didn't want to freak people out too much by having too many attacks on airplanes. Most likely the government didn't want to have the airline industry completely collapse by people scared of flying. The powers that be wanted just the right kind and right amount of fear-- such as was propagated by the anthrax attacks, which were clearly an inside government job.
I am curious what attacks happened before 9/11 that were "real" terrorist attacks?
...an ex-firefighter, named as Tom Lynch, relates his eyewitness account of the final moments of American Airlines Airbus A300 Flight 587, which crashed and burned just two minutes and 24 seconds after take off from JFK International Airport in New York City.
The incident occured on November 12, 2001.
The most recent federal investigation blamed the pilot of the aicraft and the designers for the 'accident'.
The official explanation of the crash is that turbulence caused the tailfin of the plane to snap off.
This eyewitness account along with many others completely contradicts that.
Lynch states that parts only dropped off the plane AFTER a small explosion and that the plane was engulfed by flames no more than two seconds after the first explosion.
The (sic) strongly indicates a small bomb was detonated which then ignited the jet fuel.
Furthermore, in August of last year a supposed Al-Qaeda operative told Canadian intelligence that a Montreal man who trained in Afghanistan alongside the 9/11 hijackers was responsible for the crash.
The source told CSIS that Abderraouf Jdey had downed the plane using a small shoe bomb.
Why would the government cover up a terrorist attack when from all the past examples, they are the only ones to benefit?
Former FBI agent Robert Wright went public in claiming that the intelligence agencies knew of numerous incidents both before and after 9/11 that were real terrorist attacks but covered them up as 'accidents'.
One argument would be that the Globalists don't want ayone or anything to interfere with their carefully constructed script for the controlled advancement of the New World Order and so they simply ignore any real terrorist attacks and tell the public they were unfortunate accidents.
This is simply fascinating and I think this story is legitimate. In a Democratic Underground thread, the 9/11 researcher Paul Thompson related that the flight 587 attack was predicted by a Pakistani student in New York who had predicted the 9/11 attacks. Another poster on DU said his brother was a pilot who had heard that flight 587 was a shoe bomb attack. I hadn't heard that Robert Wright comment, but I wam not surprised-- he was one of the few honest FBI agents working (which is why he is a "former agent", I suppose). I think the interpretation at the end (by the Propaganda Matrix writer) is basically correct.
What this shows importantly is that Al Qaeda is a real terrorist threat and they did have a bunch of people lined up to attack the US around 9/11/01. The 9/11 attacks, of course, were a whole different ball game, but this flight 587 story shows that there were at least some real Al Qaeda terrorists trying to inflict damage. There was of course another shoe bomber, Richard Reid, who failed and was caught. The shoe bomb of course is a pretty crude attack and nothing like 9/11. I think the shoe bomb attack is basically what your average Al Qaeda stooge could pull off.
But the most amazing thing is how the government LIED about these other attacks! It seems as though the government, right after 9/11, didn't want to freak people out too much by having too many attacks on airplanes. Most likely the government didn't want to have the airline industry completely collapse by people scared of flying. The powers that be wanted just the right kind and right amount of fear-- such as was propagated by the anthrax attacks, which were clearly an inside government job.
I am curious what attacks happened before 9/11 that were "real" terrorist attacks?
1 Comments:
I swear. The more I delve into and actually research these so-called "terrorist" attacks, or attempted "terrorist" attacks the angrier I get. On the topic of Richard Reid aka "The Shoe Bomber", there are soooo many problems with that incident I don't even know where to begin!
First off, as ex-military myself (Ranger) ANYONE with even the most cursory aquaintence with C4 (which is what Reid's shoes were packed with) KNOWS it can't be triggered with a fucking flame! Remember?...news reports claimed he was trying to light his shoe(s). WTF!?? You can LITERALLY THROW C4 against a brick wall and it wont go off. THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT! It's designed to be HIGHLY stable! TOTAL BS story. And..the part of the report where fellow passengers became alarmed because he was bending over to access his shoes. I do that SEVERAL times on my flights (I like to air out my feet ;-) ) and NO ONE EVER give it a second glance. And many times I'm down there fiddling for a few minutes, 'cos the seats are so damn cramped. I could light a mini bonfire if I wanted to! LOL So...the whole "We saw him bending down over there so we all got suspicious and decided to tackle him" story sounds like TOTAL BS to me. Another thing...you can't see what the person 2 seats in front of you is doing on crowded airliners is doing..much less across the whole cabin. Look back into those reports and you'll see with the benefit of a few years in between then & now how uttery ridiculous the whole story is.
keep up the great blogging. BTW, from reading a lot of your writing...I feel we have very similar approaches, and thinking processes toward the 9/11 scam. ;)
Post a Comment
<< Home