Why the Initial CNN Footage of the Second Hit is Suspicious
First, I HIGHLY recommend that everyone view the CNN footage from the morning of 9/11 captured here. No matter what you think of 9/11, it is quite interesting.
Okay, now here is why their coverage of the second hit is HIGHLY suspicious:
1) the first clip of the second plane is from a helicopter view. The helicopter is to the west of the WTC, and the pilot and/or cameraman should have seen the second plane coming from MILES away. Yet the plane just pops into the camera view (which was showing the burning north tower) as if it took them by surprise. The camera doesn't even budge to try to get more of the plane, it is as if the camera is robotically fixed on the tower. This makes no sense.
2) This first video is worst possible angle to see the plane hit the tower, one can't even see the south tower, and overall this kind of imagery could be very easy to fake-- they don't have to worry about HOW the plane hits the building.
3) This first video clip is from another network, so two networks relied on this one clip for the "live" shot of the second hit. Only one fake was needed.
4) Later on, around 9:10 am, a reporter on the street says that people are telling him that missiles hit the tower. But he is cut off and over-ridden by studio host who says, 'we saw the plane on the video'.
5) when the second hit is finally shown from a new camera angle, around 9:09 am -- no plane is visible, only the fireballs! Yet the studio host kindly tells us, 'there goes the plane right through the building...'
6) the third clip of the second hit, from a third angle, shows only the second view of the plane. In this clip, the plane is approaching the tower from a steep southwest diagonal. The problem with this video is that the plane is coming in at a completely different angle from what any other video shows.
And then they work with the two videos showing the second plane for a while, then something happens at the Pentagon/DC area, then the South tower collapses, back to the Pentagon/DC, then the north tower collapses, and no other clips of the second hit are shown for an hour, from 9:40am to 10:40am.
Okay, now here is why their coverage of the second hit is HIGHLY suspicious:
1) the first clip of the second plane is from a helicopter view. The helicopter is to the west of the WTC, and the pilot and/or cameraman should have seen the second plane coming from MILES away. Yet the plane just pops into the camera view (which was showing the burning north tower) as if it took them by surprise. The camera doesn't even budge to try to get more of the plane, it is as if the camera is robotically fixed on the tower. This makes no sense.
2) This first video is worst possible angle to see the plane hit the tower, one can't even see the south tower, and overall this kind of imagery could be very easy to fake-- they don't have to worry about HOW the plane hits the building.
3) This first video clip is from another network, so two networks relied on this one clip for the "live" shot of the second hit. Only one fake was needed.
4) Later on, around 9:10 am, a reporter on the street says that people are telling him that missiles hit the tower. But he is cut off and over-ridden by studio host who says, 'we saw the plane on the video'.
5) when the second hit is finally shown from a new camera angle, around 9:09 am -- no plane is visible, only the fireballs! Yet the studio host kindly tells us, 'there goes the plane right through the building...'
6) the third clip of the second hit, from a third angle, shows only the second view of the plane. In this clip, the plane is approaching the tower from a steep southwest diagonal. The problem with this video is that the plane is coming in at a completely different angle from what any other video shows.
And then they work with the two videos showing the second plane for a while, then something happens at the Pentagon/DC area, then the South tower collapses, back to the Pentagon/DC, then the north tower collapses, and no other clips of the second hit are shown for an hour, from 9:40am to 10:40am.
posted by spooked at 11:15 AM
2 Comments:
The videos are in the CNN footage I linked to at the top of the post.
The Loose change video (Google video) really opens up a can of kick arse to the perps. We can all see the explosions as the planes enter the buildings. I believe that this evidence is irrefutable, and that the official story is crap. We were never told about explosives onboard those planes, yet even the Naudet brothers film shows the blast immediately prior to the plane hitting the building.
Post a Comment
<< Home