Engine Trouble
See IMPORTANT UPDATE BELOW!
This is officially one of the engines from flight 93, apparently freshly unearthed.
However, there are a few problems with this scene:
1) why did this engine go in the ground but the other one went flying away?
2) how exactly was it, that this heavy engine impacting the ground at 600 mph, only went ONE FOOT underground-- when the black boxes in the TAIL of the plane went at least 15 feet underground?
3) are they really using an excavator to dig out a hole that is in theory packed with human remains? Shouldn't they be doing this excavation a little more delicately?
4) as best as I can tell, this is the rear half of a crumpled up turbofan engine. Where is the front half?
5) most interestingly, the engine looks as though it went into the ground at a 90 degree angle. How can this be the case, when officially flight 93 hit the ground at a 45 degree angle?
I see someone else has serious doubts about this engine.
UPDATE: Although the engine is clearly not at a 45 degree angle (as the official account would hold), I realized the engine is not at a perfect 90 degree angle.
The engine is actually at about a 70 degree angle, where 90 degrees is straight vertical.
This picture nonetheless deviates drastically from the official story.
You should be able to see in the picture that there are trees in the background. The only foliage near the crash site was straight to the west. This means the picture was taken to the east of the crater looking west. (See here for a high-res version of the photo.)
This means the topmost part of the engine is leaning TOWARDS THE SOUTH.
Officially, the plane came from the north, heading south, and if the plane went into the ground at some angle (most sources say 45 degrees), the engine should be positioned with the topmost part tipping significantly to the north. In other words, the engine debris should be leaning northwards. In this picture, the engine is tilted completely the wrong direction!
It is extremely unlikely the engine was tilted the opposite way during the digging process, since removal of dirt on the northern side if anything should have made the engine tilt more in that direction, which would have supported the official story more. Further, if the engine was moved significantly prior to the picture being taken, it invalidates this official evidence.
I think the engine was moved from its original location before the picture was taken -- and most likely was planted to bolster the case for a 757 crash at this site.
This is officially one of the engines from flight 93, apparently freshly unearthed.
However, there are a few problems with this scene:
1) why did this engine go in the ground but the other one went flying away?
2) how exactly was it, that this heavy engine impacting the ground at 600 mph, only went ONE FOOT underground-- when the black boxes in the TAIL of the plane went at least 15 feet underground?
3) are they really using an excavator to dig out a hole that is in theory packed with human remains? Shouldn't they be doing this excavation a little more delicately?
4) as best as I can tell, this is the rear half of a crumpled up turbofan engine. Where is the front half?
5) most interestingly, the engine looks as though it went into the ground at a 90 degree angle. How can this be the case, when officially flight 93 hit the ground at a 45 degree angle?
I see someone else has serious doubts about this engine.
UPDATE: Although the engine is clearly not at a 45 degree angle (as the official account would hold), I realized the engine is not at a perfect 90 degree angle.
The engine is actually at about a 70 degree angle, where 90 degrees is straight vertical.
This picture nonetheless deviates drastically from the official story.
You should be able to see in the picture that there are trees in the background. The only foliage near the crash site was straight to the west. This means the picture was taken to the east of the crater looking west. (See here for a high-res version of the photo.)
This means the topmost part of the engine is leaning TOWARDS THE SOUTH.
Officially, the plane came from the north, heading south, and if the plane went into the ground at some angle (most sources say 45 degrees), the engine should be positioned with the topmost part tipping significantly to the north. In other words, the engine debris should be leaning northwards. In this picture, the engine is tilted completely the wrong direction!
It is extremely unlikely the engine was tilted the opposite way during the digging process, since removal of dirt on the northern side if anything should have made the engine tilt more in that direction, which would have supported the official story more. Further, if the engine was moved significantly prior to the picture being taken, it invalidates this official evidence.
I think the engine was moved from its original location before the picture was taken -- and most likely was planted to bolster the case for a 757 crash at this site.
posted by spooked at 5:52 PM
11 Comments:
1) why did this engine go in the ground but the other one went flying away?
it didn't really and the other one didn't really
2) how exactly was it, that this heavy engine impacting the ground at 600 mph, only went ONE FOOT underground-- when the black boxes in the TAIL of the plane went at least 15 feet underground?
it didn't really and they didn't really
3) are they really using an excavator to dig out a hole that is in theory packed with human remains? Shouldn't they be doing this excavation a little more delicately?
forensics! ha ha.
4) as best as I can tell, this is the rear half of a crumpled up turbofan engine. Where is the front half?
the other 1/2 of this engine was "recovered" from under a scaffold on church st. near the wtc.
I also notice there does not seem to be any dirt on, or embedding in the engine!
There was a before 9/11 and an after 9/11. You need to understand that everything is different now. Why would God allow dirt to stick to that sacred engine?
Fred
maybe they needed the tractor to dig the hole and place the engine in there before the official photographer got there!
a real 757 engine
There is no plane in that hole. And a government entity telling me there is, is all the more reason to believe I am right.
hey how big is a 757 compared to that stupid campfire that we were told was the official flight93 (a 757!) crash site anyway? it's only this big!
hey we'd better wait until the "fire" (from all of the vaporization!) goes out before we recover all of the debris, right? absolutely!
better get the yellow jackets out #2! look at all the invisible debris we need to clean up!
"hey boss! yellow jacket guy #3 is interfering with my microscope!"
no the tractor was for scooping up all the DNA!
Another day, another desperate ploy of the 9/11 Denial Movement revealed.
Have you interviewed the people responsible for the excavation?
No? What a pity.
You can add those interviews to the list of hundreds of interviews you 9/11 Deniers keep avoiding of the rescue and recovery personnel we asked you to interview 4 years ago. But you were scared to death and refused. Flat out refused.
We know why. No one has ever been able to come up with evidence for your fantasies. Neither can you.
No one has ever been able to come up with evidence for your fantasies. Neither can you
right back atcha in spades skyking@! hey aren't the many photos of the official shanksville "crater" (campfire!) all showing the total lack of 757 debris considered evidence?
hey how did that fine job of beating around the bush instead of explaining how both towers exploded into dust at the astounding rate of 11 floors per second and the third imploded totally into it's own footprint at the equally astounding rate of 7 floors per second work out for you?
s. king--
do you know who excavated the crater and how we can contact them?
If not, you're wasting our time.
Post a Comment
<< Home