An Amazing Picture of Ground Zero
(click to enlarge)
This apparently is part of the west wall of WTC1, although it fell at a truly bizarre angle away from the building.
from here.
The core column stabbed in the street may be one of the ones that peeled away like a banana peel in this video:
This apparently is part of the west wall of WTC1, although it fell at a truly bizarre angle away from the building.
from here.
The core column stabbed in the street may be one of the ones that peeled away like a banana peel in this video:
posted by spooked at 3:48 PM
9 Comments:
so alberta, if the concrete from both towers wasn't turned into powder (at the astounding rate of 11 floors per second) then where is it? it is nowhere in either of those photos.
they washed it all away with a hose.
hey how come that core column (with fried cross-beams) stabbed into the street but the 7 ton section of perimeter columns that was knocked out by a tire (as if!) landed on a 4" thick sidewalk without so much as cracking it after falling from a height of 1000 ft.?
Figure 02. The destruction of WTC2 envelops lower Manhattan in a blizzard of ultra-fine dust.
Figure 50. Ground-level view of the enormous quantity of dust wafting skyward. Conventional demolition dust does not do this.
translation into anonymese:
the towers were turned into powder.
^ha.
It's rather funny how the trolls always ignore threads and issues like this.
For all the complaints that we don't understand 9/11, they never seem to have any explanations themselves.
No, Spooky. We don't comment on certain things because we're smart enough to know what we don't know -and smart enough to not make shit up when faced with something we don't know.
I have no idea on the dynamics of what the destruction of a 110 story sky scraper should be like - and unlike you and your faithful slavish followers here, I don't pretend to. I don't know all the dynamics of what a section of perimeter column should/could/would/is capable of doing when dislodged from a building, and I don't pretend to.
I've seen some pretty wild and wacky and weird things in my life, the least of which might be you and your mindless moronic minions choosing to make total and utter fools of yourself (anonymously, of course) on the internet, and as a result of that experience I know not to be surprised by anything.
----
""we're smart enough to know what we don't know -and smart enough to not make shit up when faced with something we don't know.""
the mighty pinch has spoken!
here's just a little of what we do know:
both of the twin towers including much of the steel were somehow turned into dust at the rate of 11 floors per second each and at the same time 1400 cars some of which were a good mile away were oddly burned, scorched and melted.
the 3rd tower collapsed into it's own footprint at the rate of 7 floors per second and silverstein the wtc lease-holder admitted that they "made the decision to pull it".
an honest investigation would have addressed these issues instead of ignoring, distracting and even falsifying them.
so. pinch, if you actually expect people to believe your claim that spooked has "made shit up" then you need to point out exactly what shit he has made up.
until you actually say something of substance then it is obvious that in reality you know nothing about 9/11 and are not qualified to even venture an opinion much less make any sweeping pronouncements about "making shit up".
nice try though.
^ha.
I have no idea on the dynamics of what the destruction of a 110 story sky scraper should be like - and unlike you and your faithful slavish followers here, I don't pretend to. I don't know all the dynamics of what a section of perimeter column should/could/would/is capable of doing when dislodged from a building, and I don't pretend to.
I've seen some pretty wild and wacky and weird things in my life, the least of which might be you and your mindless moronic minions choosing to make total and utter fools of yourself (anonymously, of course) on the internet, and as a result of that experience I know not to be surprised by anything.
All I have done is asked questions, looked at the evidence carefully and then drawn mostly reasonable conclusions.
Yet every day here, I get called a fool, idiot, crazy, etc. Why? For trying to understand?
You say you don't understand this either Pinch, yet you have the gall to make fun of me when I try to actually understand this stuff?
The official story is full of problems. I have shown the official story is flawed over and over and over and I have PROVEN the official flight 93 crash story is very wrong. No one has successfully refuted my flight 93 crash proof.
Yet still I get called a fool or an idiot or crazy.
What gives?
It amazes me, Pinch, that a military man, sworn to uphold the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic, and apparently intelligent enough to fly a plane onto an aircraft carrier, would have so few questions about an attack on American soil.
I know that, but Pinch is still morally and intellectually accountable for his words and actions.
Post a Comment
<< Home