A Mega-Smoking Gun
More here, here and here.
One POSSIBLE explanation is that the timing of the footage was wrong AND that the reporter was standing in front of a blue-screen projecting slightly old footage of WTC7 as she talks about it having collapsed... but, it seems less and less likely this was the case as more people look into this. Certainly the lighting on the reporter, Jane Stanley looks like natural sunlight, not like she's in a studio. So it is probably not bluescreen. Moreover, the link with Stanley dies suddenly at the end of the clip, perhaps the producers saw the goof or saw that Building 7 was about come down.
Remember, many people were told ahead of time WTC7 was coming down, for instance here and here. This BBC footage seems to be a stark example of this foreknowledge-- where they actually jumped the gun and said it collapsed before it was taken down.
(And thanks to "DEMOCRAT" for pointing me to this footage initially.)
posted by spooked at 2:35 PM
4 Comments:
So I suppose the Beeb is in cahoots with W! Whodathunk it! Why aren't they on board with the whole Bush World Domination deal? Damn Brits...can't trust 'em!
"Rocknation" (DU poster) asked a very good question: "if she was mistaken about it being WTC7, then which building WAS she referring to"?
Unfortunately, as is all too often the case, "Rocknation", like 99% of other TruthSeekers just let the ball drop and allowed him/herself to be baited with questions about a British slang phrase used in the same post.
That's a HUGE problem at DU: 99% of the T.Seekers there are woefully inadequate to compete with the paid shills. They don't know what they're doing. Don't understand what's going on. Don't know how to fight. Don't know how to stay FOCUSED. Don't have a clue about what's important and what's trivial. Waste most of their posts on UNproductive responses to the BS posted by the professionals (who are extremely competent in what they do). Are totally outclassed before they even step out on the field.
Maybe worst of all, they (T.Seekers ) only THINK they know what they're doing.
"focus on what can be proven - wtc7 controlled demolition"
~911blogger.com
------
When the South Tower and then the North Tower exploded they each produced vast clouds of dust that first so attenuated the sunlight on the streets below that witnesses described a pitch-black environment. They then settled, covering virtually every surface with fine, penetrating dust. The dust permeated the insides of buildings, and contaminated air conditioning systems, necessitating lengthy decontamination procedures.
The dust was present everywhere around Ground Zero, but settled in thicker accumulations in the downwind directions south and east of the complex. The dust settled to a depth of 3 inches in locations as far as six blocks from the World Trade Center. 1
Apparently the dust contained a significant proportion of the towers' constituents, such as their concrete, glass, and gypsum. Photographs of Ground Zero show piles of shattered steel and aluminum cladding, but show virtually no signs of the tens of thousands of tons of concrete that constituted the 4-inch-thick floor slabs of each of the towers' 110 floors. This observation, combined with the documented extent of the dust, suggests that the vast majority of that concrete was pulverized into fine dust.
~Jim Hoffman
------
total disintegration/pulverization/dustification of the concrete and much of the steel at the astounding rate of 11 floors per second for each tower.
^h.
mixed feelings about this BBC/WT7 issue... Fintan has a nice writeup about this, take it with a grain of salt.
9/11 Campaigners: Beware of BBC-WT7 Sucker Play
i know Dunne distanced himself from alot of 9/11 researchers by releasing his CIA fakes but he still holds alot of credibility in my book, and i think he throughly discredited Alex Jones a few weeks back. And, as far as i know, he was the first to point out Steven Jones' Cold Fusion background.
i'd be interested to hear anything thoughts you guys might have.
Post a Comment
<< Home