Use of Nuclear Weapons Against Human Beings
The point of the post about Japan offering to surrender well before Hiroshima and Nagasaki was to point out that the US had no apparent compunction about using the most horrible weapons known to man against innocent civilians when they didn't even need to do it.
In fact, the US went OUT OF ITS WAY to use nuclear weapons against Japan-- an outrageous fact that has been completely suppressed by mainstream historians.
And if the US military command showed no compunction about using nukes against civilians in 1945, it is likely the US would have little compunction about doing this again -- that is, using nukes or related weaponry against civilians.
They might even do it against their own civilians-- in order to spark a new war and a new political order.
In fact, the US went OUT OF ITS WAY to use nuclear weapons against Japan-- an outrageous fact that has been completely suppressed by mainstream historians.
And if the US military command showed no compunction about using nukes against civilians in 1945, it is likely the US would have little compunction about doing this again -- that is, using nukes or related weaponry against civilians.
They might even do it against their own civilians-- in order to spark a new war and a new political order.
posted by spooked at 8:42 AM
3 Comments:
have heard about port chicago?
The local news accounts of the blast on July 17, 1944, all focus on a flashing bright light and a mushroom cloud - all written before the general public or the news media were even aware of the dawn of the nuclear age. One of the critical points of contention in the theory that Port Chicago's explosion may have been nuclear, is the radiation factor. The purported bomb would have been a low-yield weapon detonated in shallow water. One of the key authorities on the effect of nuclear weapons is a publication prepared by the United States Department of Defense and published by the United States Atomic Energy Commission in April 1962. Entitled, "The Effects of Nuclear Weapons", the publication states on page 60, "There may well be some fallout or rainout onto the surface of the water (or a ship or shore station) from the radioactive base surge, but in many cases it is expected to pass over without depositing any debris. Thus, according to circumstances, there may or may not be radioactive contamination on the surfaces of objects in the vicinity of a shallow underwater nuclear burst." The theory advanced by Peter Vogel - who is a journalist and who also studied physics with nuclear physicist Edward Teller - is that a nuclear weapon was in the hold of a Liberty Ship.
use of the television against human beings
"In fact, the US went OUT OF ITS WAY to use nuclear weapons against Japan-- an outrageous fact that has been completely suppressed by mainstream historians.
And if the US military command showed no compunction about using nukes against civilians in 1945, it is likely the US would have little compunction about doing this again -- that is, using nukes or related weaponry against civilians."
Stupidest thing said on the Internet this week...
Post a Comment
<< Home