Dr. Judy Wood's WTC Evidence
See here and click on "Fire Investigation Report on World Trade Center Buildings-- Request for Correction dated March 16, 2007".
Please take time to look at her presentation.
Only a fool could look at her presentation and not be convinced that the WTC was demolished, most likely by high-tech weaponry.
The shills of course, know what happened-- they just pretend to be dumb, or simply laugh at everything. Derision is an effective tool for psychological control.
But really, LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE.
Now, what exact technology was used to take down the towers, is not clear. Of course, the burden of proof to show what exactly was used on the towers, is not on Dr. Wood. Dr. Wood speculates that "Directed Energy Weapons" (DEW) were used, and there is some reason to think that they were used.
Personally, I think much of what happened at the WTC can be explained by small pure fusion nukes. Small nukes can explain the series of deep explosions that were heard before the towers fell (see "911 Eyewitness"). Nukes can vaporize ("dustify") steel. Unlike DEW, nukes produce massive amounts of energy and do not require an outside energy source. Mini-nukes are obviously powerful, so very few would be required. Pure fusion nukes would leave very little radioactive residue-- just tritium, and that was found at ground zero. Other pieces of evidence that fit nukes are found here. Finally, there is a history of the US using nukes extensively, in different scenarios, and on innocent people.
I can't rule out DEW-- they quite possibly were used in conjunction with nukes. And there is reason to think DEW was used.
Finally, DEW and mini-nuke technologies overlap to some extent, in terms of their effects-- they both release extremely high levels of energy; in the case of DEW, the energy is more focused. It is even conceivable that there are fusion-based DEWs.
Please take time to look at her presentation.
Only a fool could look at her presentation and not be convinced that the WTC was demolished, most likely by high-tech weaponry.
The shills of course, know what happened-- they just pretend to be dumb, or simply laugh at everything. Derision is an effective tool for psychological control.
But really, LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE.
Now, what exact technology was used to take down the towers, is not clear. Of course, the burden of proof to show what exactly was used on the towers, is not on Dr. Wood. Dr. Wood speculates that "Directed Energy Weapons" (DEW) were used, and there is some reason to think that they were used.
Personally, I think much of what happened at the WTC can be explained by small pure fusion nukes. Small nukes can explain the series of deep explosions that were heard before the towers fell (see "911 Eyewitness"). Nukes can vaporize ("dustify") steel. Unlike DEW, nukes produce massive amounts of energy and do not require an outside energy source. Mini-nukes are obviously powerful, so very few would be required. Pure fusion nukes would leave very little radioactive residue-- just tritium, and that was found at ground zero. Other pieces of evidence that fit nukes are found here. Finally, there is a history of the US using nukes extensively, in different scenarios, and on innocent people.
I can't rule out DEW-- they quite possibly were used in conjunction with nukes. And there is reason to think DEW was used.
Finally, DEW and mini-nuke technologies overlap to some extent, in terms of their effects-- they both release extremely high levels of energy; in the case of DEW, the energy is more focused. It is even conceivable that there are fusion-based DEWs.
posted by spooked at 12:35 PM
6 Comments:
DEW. space jew beams. mini nukes. thermites. etc?
destructos of this nature are hard to fathom, ya?
however, when one considers that each tower poofed into a cloud of dust in only 10 seconds and that much of the steel disappeared before it even hit the ground, destructos of this nature are not so inconceivable are they.
fuck you pinch.
FEEL the love!
When you *finally* run out of bullshit, resort to the "Well....Fuck you!" response!
Beautiful!
hoist a cold lager to yourself pinch!
Done, CS! I'll have a couple for you as well.
click my name while you're at it!
CS,
Why should I? I already hoisted one for Edna at your suggestion (and a fine suggestion it was) and hoisted one for you in honor of your foolish ape-like pretending.
Imitation is the most sincere form of flattery, and I'm sure the REAL CS appreciates your efforts to mirror him - again, when you can't get your own point across it takes a real rocket scientist to copy cat someone else.
Post a Comment
<< Home