Why Clinton, Edwards, Romney or Thompson Will Be the Next President, and Why Obama and Giuliani Won't
When push comes to shove, I'm betting the US is still not ready to elect someone president with a clearly "ethnic" name.
McCain is sort of on the edge here, in terms of having an ethnic name. But more importantly, I think McCain is heavily weighed down by allegiance to Bush and the Iraq war to be electable.
And my pick for who will become the 44th president is... Hillary Clinton.
She will make the least mistakes, she will have the novelty factor of being the first woman president going for her, she will have the juicy gossip angle to her, the Democrats clearly have an edge overall -- and she is clearly an establishment choice.
Personally, I can't see voting for her though.
McCain is sort of on the edge here, in terms of having an ethnic name. But more importantly, I think McCain is heavily weighed down by allegiance to Bush and the Iraq war to be electable.
And my pick for who will become the 44th president is... Hillary Clinton.
She will make the least mistakes, she will have the novelty factor of being the first woman president going for her, she will have the juicy gossip angle to her, the Democrats clearly have an edge overall -- and she is clearly an establishment choice.
Personally, I can't see voting for her though.
posted by spooked at 3:44 PM
12 Comments:
Spooked911 and Anonymous Physicist
You are both invited to register with the JREF forums and tell us your points of view.
We have a keen interest in all aspects of 9/11 truth and would enjoy hearing your perspective of what happened on 9/11.
http://forums.randi.org/forumindex.php
sure you do.
Overview of the 9/11 Frame-Up
(PERMANENT TOP POST) of this blog speaks for itself, JREF geniuses, as does your moron representative, sword_of_truth.
We respectfully decline your invitation, as neither AP nor I have the time to spend arguing on a forum about 9/11.
Our views are clearly presented on this site. If you need further clarification about anything, please email me.
JREFER - What Spooked is trying to say is that all of their evidence is totally made up and they can't back their shit up when challenged by real scientists and engineers.
What they want is to be left alone so that they can carry on dredging up old saturday morning cartoon scripts and pretending they are real.
Wow, it's "Baby Low Yeild."
From now on that's your name here, retarded shill. The spelling will be your own way to remind people [and yourself, delusional one] of your intllect, and the "baby" refers to your mental age, and possibly your physical age.
Anonymous Physicist
BTW, folks, this lying Swart, lied again RE Plutonium as I cited in my recent articles here.
Swart claimed I was wrong about the govt studies not including Plutonium, or not revealing the results after finding high amounts.
So here again is the URL for the study:
http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/chem1/WTCchemistrytable.html
And here is the list of elements they "officially" tested for [or released data on]
"Silicon, Calcium, Magnesium, Sulfur, Iron, Aluminum, Carbon, Sodium, Potassium, Titanium, Manganese,Phosphorous, Barium, Strontium, Zinc, Lead, Copper, Cerium, Yttrium, Chromium, Nickel, Lanthanum, Antimony, Vanadium, Molybdenum, Lithium, Thorium, Rubidium, Cobalt, Niobium, Scandium, Uranium, Cadmium, Arsenic, Gallium, Beryllium, Silver, Cesium, Bismuth, Thallium"
Note also they did not either test for, or release data on, isotopes of: Tellurium, Palladium, or Ruthenium, that shill swart also referred to. So he is posting just lies. Saying this or that isotope wasn't found, when--if he checked--he would see that they didn't "officially" test for these.
[Sp. Typo from my last comment: intellect].
Anonymous Physicist
And here is the list of elements they "officially" tested for [or released data on]
"Silicon, Calcium, Magnesium, Sulfur, Iron, Aluminum, Carbon, Sodium, Potassium, Titanium, Manganese,Phosphorous, Barium, Strontium, Zinc, Lead, Copper, Cerium, Yttrium, Chromium, Nickel, Lanthanum, Antimony, Vanadium, Molybdenum, Lithium, Thorium, Rubidium, Cobalt, Niobium, Scandium, Uranium, Cadmium, Arsenic, Gallium, Beryllium, Silver, Cesium, Bismuth, Thallium"
Note also they did not either test for, or release data on, isotopes of: Tellurium, Palladium, or Ruthenium,...
What AP is saying is that he admits that he does not have the evidence that he needs to say that a fission event occurred.
As I said, scientists aren't allowed to make shit up. But AP doesn't seem to care about proper scientific methodology.
No cases of radiation poisoning.
No by products of fission found.
No seismic spikes recorded.
No spikes in thyroid disorders after the event.
No spikes in birth defects.
No nukes, you kook (or conventional explosives).
http://www.npr.org/programs/morning/features/2002/may/freshkills/index.html
The search has been methodical and exhaustive. The rubble is spread out and inspected twice at Ground Zero. Then it’s brought to Fresh Kills by barge and truck, where the clumps of tangled metal and concrete are broken down using heavy machinery and vibrating belts.
Teams of officers and agents watch as the rubble is sifted down to a fine ashy silt that they then rake through by hand.
So here we have dozens of FBI and law enforcement personnel sifting through what you claim is highly radioactive fallout dust by hand and yet none of them suffered from radiation poisoning either.
I can understand why you guys are so angry at me. To see someone so effortlessly demolishing the mythology of your religion and using solid, unassailable science to do it must be extremely frustrating.
To spend so much time telling people how smart you are only to have someone come along and contradict you and you can tell just by reading what they say that they know so much more than you just compounds the anger.
Baby Low Yeild [new name for swart with his own spelling for yield] is still here?
Second grader, I already have quoted the massive amounts of Barium and Strontium found [products of fission of Uranium or Plutonium], and of course, the tritium. The thyroid cancers and rare blood and lymph cancers have also been cited.
Hitler was right, all fascist regimes just put out the Big Lie, their agents--even their retarded ones--just keep repeating lies.
Baby Low Yeild, you are toast.
""and yet none of them suffered from radiation poisoning either.""
over 400 responders have developed rare forms of cancer so far.
and counting.
and yet again you deceptively insert the word fission.
and yet again you claim that there were no seismic spikes yet here is evidence of such.
richters 2.1 & 2.3 as the destruction BEGAN.:
WTC NUCLEAR DEMOLITION
and yet again you ignore the incredible heat that was witnessed by many official responders, and lingered for many months despite constant dousing with water (china syndrome).
and once more you have ignored the fact that it would take very very high energy to render all of the concrete and most of the steel of both towers into powder before it ever hit the ground (more proof that the seismic spikes were recorded when the destruction began, as dust powder would hardly register 2.3 richter), and the fact that the obvious pyroclastic behaviour of said concrete dust cloud could only have been the result of very very great heat.
hmmm, anything else?
oh ya; fully 1/2 of the 3000 victims remains were not recovered.
were they squashed in the "collapse"?
no, they were obliterated.
by explosions.
is it any wonder that we consider sword_of_physics to be deceptive and sword_of_truth to be a moron?
and these dull swords are representative of JREF?
h is for ha, shills.
Well said, h.
Anonymous Physicist
Post a Comment
<< Home