Quite Possibly the Single Most Incriminating Photo Relevant to No Plane Hitting the South Tower
From one of the NIST WTC investigation NCSTAR publications
(i.e. NISTNCSTAR1-5A_chap_1-8):
(click to enlarge)
Here's the official story:
(click to enlarge)
Look at this-- there are damaged columns totally blocking where the plane supposedly went in-- both on the left-hand and right-hand side of the main hole! It's insane.
(click to enlarge)
UPDATE: Clearly, a higher resolution version of this hole photo would be wonderful to have. Apparently, "Chris Sorensen" had this photo up on is website, according to this cache-- but the photo isn't even there in the cached version. I tried the Wayback machine, but they had nada. Curious, however, as NIST says this is a frame from a photo, and "Chris Sorensen", who appears to be a professional photographer, talks about a photo. Yeah, I'm, sure there is an "innocent explanation" for all this-- though, this is all too typical of the usual crap I get when I try to track down some 9/11 evidence.
One thing that WOULD be worth doing is to do a FOIA request from NIST for a high resolution version of this image. There is no sane reason they could deny such a request-- unless they know how damning the image is and refuse it on those grounds.
(i.e. NISTNCSTAR1-5A_chap_1-8):
(click to enlarge)
Here's the official story:
(click to enlarge)
Look at this-- there are damaged columns totally blocking where the plane supposedly went in-- both on the left-hand and right-hand side of the main hole! It's insane.
(click to enlarge)
UPDATE: Clearly, a higher resolution version of this hole photo would be wonderful to have. Apparently, "Chris Sorensen" had this photo up on is website, according to this cache-- but the photo isn't even there in the cached version. I tried the Wayback machine, but they had nada. Curious, however, as NIST says this is a frame from a photo, and "Chris Sorensen", who appears to be a professional photographer, talks about a photo. Yeah, I'm, sure there is an "innocent explanation" for all this-- though, this is all too typical of the usual crap I get when I try to track down some 9/11 evidence.
One thing that WOULD be worth doing is to do a FOIA request from NIST for a high resolution version of this image. There is no sane reason they could deny such a request-- unless they know how damning the image is and refuse it on those grounds.
posted by spooked at 6:47 PM
6 Comments:
Maybe those columns were forced into the positions seen as the result of the plane twisting/turning.
The plane must have whipped out a shovel at the last moment and shovelled those columns back into place behind itself after first entering the tower entirely.
Maybe the "plane" flew in, then the pilot put it into reverse & backed the "plane" up to push these heavy steel columns back into place.
Hey...I've heard Al CIA-Duh! pilots are crazy like that!
since it was only a ghostplane that hit the WTC2, we shouldn't be surprised by any strange anomalies such as steel columns that are inconveniently in the wrong place.
What plane?
"Maybe those columns were forced into the positions seen as the result of the plane twisting/turning."
You're joking, right?
Post a Comment
<< Home