To Clarify About the Nuking of the WTC
I think mini-nukes had to be used to completely flatten/pulverize/disintegrate those massive structures... I am primarily unsure about how much steel was actually vaporized. Lots of outer wall sections and core columns just seem to have disappeared... but it's not clear to me how these could have been obliterated without the use of huge blinding bombs. And how did so much of the internal objects including floor slabs, get completely disintegrated?
The only thing, as I pointed out in my last post, is that it's just bloody hard to know how much of the structure was indeed obliterated, given the public information we have. However, the picture we have show there WAS a HUGE AMOUNT of STEEL DEBRIS, contra to Judy Wood/Morgan Reynolds. Joel Meyerowitz's book "Aftermath" shows this very well, but so do many other pics of ground zero from other sources. The big question is what was in the footprint of the towers-- and how far down the debris went. That makes all the difference.
posted by spooked at 8:52 PM
2 Comments:
I saw a paper from 1997 written by J.Deutsche (cia,citibank,raytheon), Phillip Zelikow (neo con, head of the 911 commission)---that said, among many other interesting things: Paraphrasing, parenthesis mine: If (only) small nuclear devices had been used in the basement central columns at the WTC in 1993, then we would be able to institute suspension of civil liberties, etc.
There is so much contradictory imagery in the 9/11 photos and videos, including the aftermath rubble and cleanup work, that much of the photographic record has to be the product of fakery, Spooked. But to what purpose?
To hide? To misdirect? To confuse?
Perhaps all three... and still more.
Because Dr. Wood adamantly refuses to even briefly address this verification problem, her own prodigious work remains under a dark cloud of suspicion too.
Post a Comment
<< Home