Sometimes I See the Headline of an Article and Just Know It Has a "33"
I hit paydirt in the first paragraph of this piece--
The article relates to ridiculously abused practice of "civil asset forfeiture", which I mentioned a few posts back.
Law Lets I.R.S. Seize Accounts on Suspicion, No Crime Required
ARNOLDS PARK, Iowa — For almost 40 years, Carole Hinders has dished out Mexican specialties at her modest cash-only restaurant. For just as long, she deposited the earnings at a small bank branch a block away — until last year, when two tax agents knocked on her door and informed her that they had seized her checking account, almost $33,000.
The Internal Revenue Service agents did not accuse Ms. Hinders of money laundering or cheating on her taxes — in fact, she has not been charged with any crime. Instead, the money was seized solely because she had deposited less than $10,000 at a time, which they viewed as an attempt to avoid triggering a required government report.
“How can this happen?” Ms. Hinders said in a recent interview. “Who takes your money before they prove that you’ve done anything wrong with it?” The federal government does.
The article relates to ridiculously abused practice of "civil asset forfeiture", which I mentioned a few posts back.
posted by spooked at 2:19 PM
1 Comments:
What are you saying?
* PTB actively searched for someone with $33K in the bank...in order to:
* Send a coded message to warn anyone that knows about this story that something bad will happen to them if they have $33K - or approx. that much in a bank account?
What do they hope will happen if only a few people know that 33 is a code?
As a serious, honorable believer in 33 codes, please explain why we should also give serious attention to this?
Why is it that only a tiny number of people profess to believe in it?
It may be something AP believes, but most thinking people don't believe in things they don't know to be actual fact.
An ad hominem response should be beneath you.
Post a Comment
<< Home