Trump Is Guilty of Treason and Wants to Start Major Wars as a Distraction
Trump is toast. Not because he's an asshole, though he is; not because he's a Republican, which (in fact) he isn't; he's toast because he's one of the biggest traitors in the history of the U.S. and Mueller has *at least* three key witnesses *already* who can testify to that.
Trump knows he's toast, which is why he's preparing for two wars: a war on the rule of law here at home, and a senseless war abroad, in either North Korea or Iran. All of it is to save himself—he thinks—by delaying what at this point is inevitable: his fall from power.
Trump effectively has no lawyers: (1) McGahn is a witness against him. (2) He no longer trusts Cobb and discusses firing him. (3) Dowd resigned. (4) DiGenova and Toensing chose not to join the team. (5) Sekulow is more activist than lawyer. (6) Cohen is mired in scandal.
Meanwhile, Trump is firing all his intelligent advisors—Tillerson, McMaster, perhaps soon Kelly (NB: even Hope Hicks, while young, may on occasion have been a calming and steadying influence)—and bringing in dangerous radicals like John Bolton. Bolton could get us into a war.
The reason Trump not having a real legal team is a major national news story is that the war with North Korea (and possibly Iran) that Bolton wants—has long wanted—would possibly forestall Trump's legal woes slightly, so he might take military advice in lieu of legal advice.
Simple fact: the inability of the most powerful man in the world to secure adequate legal representation as he's facing the gravest downfall of a political figure in American history is a huge national news story—and a national security issue—and must be covered as such.
Analysis from Seth Abramson. I can't argue with his logic. See the twitter threads linked above for additional documentation.
posted by spooked at 4:04 PM
16 Comments:
"trump is toast" not gonna happen. remember when "obama is toast"? never happened.
before that, "bush is toast". still waiting for that one.
go back a little more and the clintons committed blatant treason by selling technology to china. you guessed it; still out and about.
pretty sure the next "POTUS will be toast" - won't happen either.
oh wait, remember who the next POTUS is supposed to be?
the guy who was abducted and had numerous orgys with alien women all disguised as peter gabriel! that man has too much integrity to commit treason.
Exactly. Trump isn't going down -
now or next year.
oh here we go::
DAVID HOGG WAS ACTUALLY AT HOME DURING THE FLORIDA PARKLAND SCHOOL SHOOTING.
what! busted yall son of bitch.
dr. phil ... what!
DR PHIL EXPOSES BOMBS IN THE WTC ON 9/11
@the mighty wak (6:30 PM):
Didn't you get the memo?
The numerous and glaring inconsistencies in Hogg's account don't matter any more than the testimony of survivors do because actually trying to solve the murder of 17 innocents might distract us from gun culture!
Never mind the psychiatric fascism that's going to accompany those gun laws, as well as the ever-increasing militarisation of law enforcement and the transformation of schools into prisons.
I disagree that Trump is the "most powerful man in the world."
There is a permanent government that existed before his ascension and will still be in power afterward. It's comprised of people like John Bolton, Gina Haspell, Erik Prince, and Robert Mueller (all intelligence assets), who headed the criminal investigation into the 9/11 attacks after being appointed director of the FBI only days before "everything changed."
"ever-increasing militarisation of law enforcement"
yalls should see the response (machine-guns) of the 'benign' LAPD to the most minor of traffic infractions.
@11:54 <- i retract that statement, i actually have no idea what the LAPD is or if they do indeed respond with machine-guns. or not.
The lovely students at Marjory Stoneman Douglas want to:
*establish a database filled with the personal information of all gun owners (millions of U.S. citizens), operated not by law enforcement but by "the Department of Defense"!
*"Amend privacy laws" to allow closer cooperation between police and psychiatrists, in other words the destruction of patient / therapist confidentiality and turning psychiatrists into agents of the state.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/commentisfree/2018/mar/23/parkland-students-manifesto-americas-gun-laws
Starting to see the agenda here?
Sorry guys, I'm not a pro-2nd amendment pro-gun person, and not sympathetic to rightwing "gundamentalist" conspiracies and arguments.
""trump is toast" not gonna happen. remember when "obama is toast"? never happened.
before that, "bush is toast". still waiting for that one."
Trump is as obvious of a criminal and traitor as has ever served as president, so I think he is likely toast.
I never believed Obama was toast.
I don't remember saying Bush was toast either. I did a search on the blog here and couldn't find that phrase.
"go back a little more and the clintons committed blatant treason by selling technology to china. you guessed it; still out and about."
Which case is that? Not familiar with it, but I suspect it is rightwing garbage.
"oh wait, remember who the next POTUS is supposed to be?
the guy who was abducted and had numerous orgys with alien women all disguised as peter gabriel! that man has too much integrity to commit treason.""
Who is that?
no S, i wasn't suggesting that you said the previous POTUS' were toast - but that was the general public consensus for each POTUS - that they were toast for being the dick heads that each one of them was. but none of them ever seemed to be toast. not even bush jr who's govt started 2 illegal wars, killing millions of innocents and actually re instituted the almost totally eradicated heroin flow from afghanistan. has trump done anything even remotely on a par with bush jr?
"the guy who was abducted and had numerous orgys with alien women all disguised as peter gabriel"
what do you mean "who is that?" you yourself did a blog post on the guy - the guy who painted portraits of his peter gabriel looking wife and their alien love child.
"Sorry guys, I'm not a pro-2nd amendment pro-gun person, and not sympathetic to rightwing "gundamentalist" conspiracies and arguments."
Wow - that's not even the issue! You're being disingenuous now. I'm to the left of Bernie Sanders, as are a number of others who aren't willing to ignore the *evidence* in this case.
Do you support a Pentagon-operated "database" with files millions of U.S. citizens (as called for by the Parkland students) or not?
Do you support "amending privacy laws" so psychiatrists and police can exchange information on "troubling" individuals (as called for by the Parkland students) or not?
Do you consider the witnesses who have stated on tape that they saw / heard other gunmen credible or not? If not why not? Provide *reasons* - not partisan drivel.
Is Nikolas Cruz *innocent until proven guilty* or not?
Maybe you should change your name to "Spook." You clearly don't care about the truth as much as you care about your political agenda. It's pathetic.
Maybe that was a little harsh.
You're right on *many* issues (including the rampant corruption / militarism of the Trump Administration) and this blog is filled with valuable information (particularly about 9/11).
Your last response was the height of insanity, though. I've been posting *facts* and *witness* statements, and you're only response is: "Sorry, guys - I'm not pro-gun." As if we all have these little "boxes" we need to stay in / conform to, and can't take any position that might conflict with our box-narrative.
This is by design and it's why partisanism is a cancer.
The fact is you wouldn't be ignoring these points (such as witness statements) if it regarded 9/11.
Why should it matter that the political agendas involved are different? That's the height of hypocrisy.
A mirror of the above exchange:
Guy 1: How could a few small fires cause three skyscrapers to collapse? How could four hijacked planes have evaded U.S. air defenses for more than an hour? How could they have hit one of the most well-protected buildings in the world? Isn't it a little too coincidental that plans to invade Afghanistan and Iraq had been drafted well in advance of the "surprise attacks"?
Guy 2: Sorry. I'm not pro-terrorist and I don't have sympathy for leftwing conspiracies and arguments.
Post a Comment
<< Home