The Big Picture: Conspiracies, Clandestine Operations and Covert Operations Are Scams-- Meant to Enrich the Powerful Few at the Expense of the Many
Clandestine, conspiratorial crimes are the way of the world.
By definition, they are carried out in secret.
And it is natural that the powerful elites are going to use the government-- including the military and military technology-- as part of their conspiracies.
Uncovering conspiracies is therefore a POPULIST ISSUE, relating to basic democratic principles-- something that EVERYONE should be concerned about (unless you're one of the powerful elite, that is).
It's foolish to think that 9/11 wasn't another scam.
In fact, the idea that 9/11 WAS a scam should be the basic assumption, the basic starting principle, about what happened-- NOT the official story.
By definition, they are carried out in secret.
And it is natural that the powerful elites are going to use the government-- including the military and military technology-- as part of their conspiracies.
Uncovering conspiracies is therefore a POPULIST ISSUE, relating to basic democratic principles-- something that EVERYONE should be concerned about (unless you're one of the powerful elite, that is).
It's foolish to think that 9/11 wasn't another scam.
In fact, the idea that 9/11 WAS a scam should be the basic assumption, the basic starting principle, about what happened-- NOT the official story.
posted by spooked at 7:56 AM
16 Comments:
No...!
The basic assumption, the basic starting principle is that you are a freak and an idiot and a complete lunatic.
How else can someone approach this web site?
ya right anonymouse.
go get your anonydad...!
^h
when the economic resources of civil society are diverted toward global corporatization, war, and the furtherance of a national security state... who wins and who loses?
The basic assumption, the basic starting principle is that you are a freak and an idiot and a complete lunatic.
Except what I wrote is perfectly logical and you have written nothing to back up your claim.
How else can someone approach this web site? How about rationally, with an open mind, unencumbered by demagoguery?
"How else can someone approach this web site?"
There are lots of websites out there for you to approach. What brings you here? And what makes you think it is appropriate to a
Whoops.
And what makes you think it is appropriate to act so rude?
Polite answer, please.
you guys have probably seen this before, but Fred's video rocks!
9/11 Octopus 8 - Unmasking the Media Perps
i think this video is fantastic and shows three different camera shots of 2nd event from similar angles and positions, but not all cameras catch the plane? furthermore, the video shows how quickly TV anchors started spitting out the OGCT-- in under a minute practically!
shit like this drives me nuts. not the poster but the fact that he'd include a picture of 'harley' guy who has been previously featured in a media perp mashup but not clue in to media involvement? here we've got an 'eyewitness' who knows the entire OCGT minutes after the north tower 'collapse' and the blogger babies cannot admit to or see through media involvement? why?! oh yea, because they wish to use the mainstream media to spread their message of 'truth' ;-) silly me.
i am hereby re-branding the 9/11 truth movement as the 9/11 accountability movement. since they've clearly shown they aren't interested in the truth and are only seeking someone who can be held accountable for 9/11, we should call them what they are. furthermore, why let 'em usurp the meaning of 'truth' and use it for something which is so far from the truth? we should call 'em what they are: the 9/11 accountability movement
the 9/11 half-truth movement.
"even papier mache can punch thru steel if it's going fast enough!"
"anti-semitic space-beams!"
"ow my movement hurts!"
...911blogger.com/tard
Without truth, its mis-accountability, even dis-accountability. Which could lead to discountability. Great point, though.
Not exactly on-topic, but this blog piece is an excellent response to the Cockburns, Hayes, Monbiots, etc:
http://blog.uwinnipeg.ca/ius/archives/002639.html
Has anyone here read the Counterpunch Newsletter article on the "dancing art students/spies"?
The reason I ask is that I'm wondering if a very prolific shill at DU might be one of them.
A 9/11 researcher has found that the shill in question is listed on the web site of a graphics art design firm as being the "design director". That same person (shill) is also allegedly associated with a co. that does work for various Gov't agencies.
Is it possible that one of the dancing art students is actually posting/DISRUPTING at DU?
THAT would be very, very interesting, eh what?
not surprising in the least.
you should post the name/handle of this individual in a comment right here - don't be shy about things like that.
After YOU, anonymous said!
"After YOU, anonymous said!"
touche :-)
anonymous @ 6:19 was me.
^h.
Post a Comment
<< Home