Getting Planes Out of the Sky on 9/11
To some extent, it makes sense that all aircraft were ordered to land at about 9:30 on 9/11.
The logic would seem to be to shoot down all the ones that didn't land, as they were the hijacked ones.
Except-- there are problems with this logic.
First, it was a huge job to land so many planes, it would take some time, and the "terrorists" had struck quickly before-- it doesn't seem like other hijackers would wait too long to strike. By the official parameters of the story, it seems quite possible that any new hijacked planes would have hit their target, easily, by the time all the planes were landed.
Second, the Air Force had clearly been ineffective in responding to ANY hijacked flight up to that time, so why would they able to get other hijacked planes in time? (Within the official parameters of the story, of course)
Third, at the time the order was given to land, there weren't even official shoot-down orders!
All in all, the order to land all the planes seems well-intentioned perhaps, but rather DUBIOUS in terms of practicality.
For instance, why didn't the FAA let the Air Force do it's normal job of intercepting rogue flights?
Even more strange was the fact that-- military, and law enforcement flights were ordered TO LAND FROM 9:26 a.m. TO 10:31am!
Getting military flights out of the sky makes little sense. Surely, the Air Force can track their own planes!!!!
Gee, why would ALL flights be ordered out of the sky at the same time the WTC was being demolished????
Hmmmmm......
The logic would seem to be to shoot down all the ones that didn't land, as they were the hijacked ones.
Except-- there are problems with this logic.
First, it was a huge job to land so many planes, it would take some time, and the "terrorists" had struck quickly before-- it doesn't seem like other hijackers would wait too long to strike. By the official parameters of the story, it seems quite possible that any new hijacked planes would have hit their target, easily, by the time all the planes were landed.
Second, the Air Force had clearly been ineffective in responding to ANY hijacked flight up to that time, so why would they able to get other hijacked planes in time? (Within the official parameters of the story, of course)
Third, at the time the order was given to land, there weren't even official shoot-down orders!
All in all, the order to land all the planes seems well-intentioned perhaps, but rather DUBIOUS in terms of practicality.
For instance, why didn't the FAA let the Air Force do it's normal job of intercepting rogue flights?
Even more strange was the fact that-- military, and law enforcement flights were ordered TO LAND FROM 9:26 a.m. TO 10:31am!
Getting military flights out of the sky makes little sense. Surely, the Air Force can track their own planes!!!!
Gee, why would ALL flights be ordered out of the sky at the same time the WTC was being demolished????
Hmmmmm......
posted by spooked at 11:19 PM
4 Comments:
""why didn't the FAA let the Air Force do it's normal job of intercepting rogue flights?""
is that part of the official fairytale? that 3 of the 4 "planes" hit their targets because the airforce' hands were tied by the FAA?
----
look how phony flight 175 was
if the airforce' hands were indeed tied by the FAA does that mean that the airforce would have stopped what was alleged to have been AA11, UA175 and AA77 from striking their respective targets if only they had been allowed to?
if this is part of the official 9/11 fairytale then doesn't this imply that the FAA is responsible for every death that occurred when these alleged planes allegedly struck the wtc1, wtc2 and pentagon?
why have the alleged families of the alleged deceased victims on these 3 alleged planes not sued the FAA for it's (ir)responsibility?
why do only a very small handful of these alleged deceased show up on the social security death index?
and why did a search of the BTS data base for the day of 9/11/01 reveal that neither AA11 nor AA77 were listed as having even left the ground that day? this might explain why the supposed image of AA11, filmed by a professional filmmaker with a professional camera set-up, was only a blurry invisible blob that was the wrong shape and size for a 767, and might account for the fact that all of the security cameras at the pentagon failed to capture AA77 when it allegedly struck the pentagon and disappeared entirely without a trace.
why has analyses of every image of what was alleged to have been UA175 revealed that this "plane" was nothing more than foolish looking cartoon silhouettes inserted onto obviously set-up footage of the explosion at wtc2?
the airforce failed to stop these 9/11 planes simply because there were no real 9/11 planes.
----
CNN fake hit comparisons
Cartoon News Network
What about DU's war on Truth Seekers?
Here's "lithos" on why he deleted a thread:
DU does not wish to appear to legitimatize or condone the Whatreallyhappened due to its editorial policy of referencing and promoting the material of known hate sites and groups.
Lithos
DU Moderator
=========
Oh, really, "lithos"? It's okay to
post hateful messages about speculation that President Bush had a male prostitute spending the night with him at the WH but it's not okay to post a message that includes a link to a 9/11 research site?
One tiny example of many that proves DU and its disgusting "lithos" are stealth right-wingers.
Post a Comment
<< Home