Shorter Pinch
I am outraged that Spooked would allude very indirectly to the use of a neutron bomb against Iraqis at the Baghdad airport, but it doesn't really bother me when Spooked says that small fusion bombs were used to blow up the World Trade Center.
Further, I really know nothing about the types of radioactive fallout that is left by a neutron bomb.
Further, I really know nothing about the types of radioactive fallout that is left by a neutron bomb.
posted by spooked at 5:00 PM
6 Comments:
ha! pinch pretends as if he talks a good 9/11 game but as one who has observed his comments since day one, i will once again state for the record that pinch has not ever once claimed that 9/11 was anything other than an obvious inside job - rather, he has resorted to elementary school ridicule type tactics such as claiming that "spooked is a kook!" etc.
he and the rest of the sword of conspiracy pinch gang do not have a leg to stand on re: 9/11, as their very next comment will no doubt prove.
Perhaps you haven't seen my latest post on Khalid Sheikh Mohammed?
http://911conspiracysmasher.blogspot.com/2007/03/khalid-sheikh-mohammed-before-he-was.html
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed? as if.
just as i said about your very next comment! what a shock.
and perhaps you still haven't explained why you still haven't acknowledged that neither the NIST nor 9/11 commission reports have addressed the issue of each tower turning completely to dust at the rate of gravity free-fall?
(11 floors per second)
The first confession released by the Bush regime’s Military Tribunals – that of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed – has discredited the entire process. Writing in Jurist, Northwestern University law professor Anthony D’Amato likens Mohammed’s confession to those that emerged in Stalin’s show trials of Bolshevik leaders in the 1930s.
----------
In his confession, KSM claims:
"I was responsible for planning, training, surveying, and financing for the New (or Second) Wave of attacks against the following skyscrapers after 9/11: ...Plaza Bank, Washington state"
The Plaza Bank was not founded until 2006
I commented on the neutron bomb scenario because it was simply too stupid to pass up - sort like the (latest - you have so many of them) apex of lunacy. I could care less about your claims that small nukes took down the WTC. That is dumb enough in and of itself and is just another feather in your stupid hat.
As far as radiation is concerned from a neutron bomb, half-life decay of the elements that primarily make up the radiation resulting from a neutron bomb can extend up to 10-12 years. To argue that radiation from a neutron bomb is not present 4 years after a supposed detonation that nobody saw and nobody heard and nobody detected and nobody can prove and nobody believes does make one smile a bit, though.
Further, ANY nuclear detonation at BIAP would have been seen by thousands - unless, of course, you claim that those "thousands" were hoodwinked and brainwahsed by the same magic that hoodwinked and brainwashed the thousands who watched airplanes hit the WTC. You woudl have to include, however, in those hoodwinked in Iraq the French, the Russians and other nations that have heat-registering and thermal/infra red spectral satellites in orbit since they have detected a nuke detonation and as of today have not come forth and told the world of a nuke at BIAP.
But then again I remember, this is Spook's Place and here the laws of reason and logic are suspended.
One last point. Any one, especially a "scientist" as you so happily like to refer to yourself, who cites Wikipedia as the sole reference to bolster any argument is a) a loser. Pure and simple. Wikipedia is like a junior varsity reference - nice to read to get a basic understanding of something, but when it comes to serious referencing of a subject or topic, move on to the real stuff.
You just added yet another underline and more italics to the fact that you are really a wacked-out-loser-wanna-be-Dr-Scientist-dude, dude, with a huge, severe elephantitis-sized case of Bush Derangement Syndrome.
I wonder who posted under the "pinch" name THIS time!?
They must've had to go WAY up the pay grade to get someone this verbose.
Our "regular" 'pinchy' has never put this many words together concurently in his/her life!
;-)
Post a Comment
<< Home