Weirdness with Flight 175

I am really not sure what to make of this "Ghost Gun" article, that theorizes that the shots of flight 175 hitting the South tower were either video hoaxes, pictures of a hologram or real pictures of a strange plane that was not flight 175.

They basically are supporting the no plane theory, which I have discussed before.

The no-plane theory at face-value sounds ridiculous, but has three main things going for it:
1) If you go to the Memory Hole, they have police reports from the day of 9/11 (these are really very striking to read, if never have looked at them). But the point is that in the police reports, there were in fact eye-witness reports of missile being fired from the Woolworth building into the south tower. This is direct eye-witness testimony that is hard to refute.

2) No planes hitting the WTC towers or the Pentagon means you don't have to worry about how knife-armed hijackers took over four planes and navigated three of them perfectly to their targets. There is no need to posit planes being flown by remote control either.

3) If you look at videos of the WTC north and south tower hits-- particularly when the plane first enters the south tower-- they have a certain strange, almost fake quality, the way the plane sort of "melts" into the exterior wall.

Basically, however, I need to re-read this "Ghost Gun" article because it is very long and fairly technical. Unfortunately, my time is very limited. But if anyone out there reads it over, please let me know what you think.