The Fort Hood Conspiracy
Fort Hood: 'This story stinks to high heaven.' SFC, who spent ten years at Fort Hood, comments on Ft. Hood events 09 Nov 2009 I spent 10 years at Ft Hood. There is no way this 'official' story is legitimate. No way would a room full of combat vets allow this one shooter to get off over 100 rounds! And, it is not normal for the outside security guards to be there. They are at the MP station, and at the main gates. This means the room full of soldiers processing must have been pinned down; multiple shooters is the only plausible scenario. this sounds like MAJ Hasan has been used, and perhaps is a patsy. --SFC Donald Buswell (Retired)Lots more at the CLG link. Also, Major Nidal drank alcohol and frequented a strip club, reminiscent of the 9/11 patsies. Further, the feds had been monitoring Hasan for over a year, supporting the idea that he was being set up.
Good overview of the incident here.
posted by spooked at 7:42 AM
8 Comments:
Corporate media is framing the
issue as though the major question
is: did the Army do enough to protect Ft. Hood soldiers against
the possibility of the kind of
incident which took place there?
Ft. Hood is the newest Pearl Harbor.
The incident raises many questions,
such as:
1. Did Obama have anything to do with it? He probably wasn't surprised it happened, but it's unlikely that he had direct knowledge that it was going to happen.
2. Does the fact that it is being reported today that Obama is ordering "tens of thousands" more troops to be sent to Afghanistan
appear to be linked to the attack?
Don't be silly. What are you, some kind of conspiracy theorist nut?
3.Will future investigations into
the event uncover the truth about
what really happened? No. It was a military/intelligence services
operation. Hasan has already been
framed as a "lone nut" and the issue being framed by the media has to do with whether the Army did enough to protect Ft. Hood
soldiers against the possibility of such an attack, thus ensuring that the issue of a conspiracy to set up Hasan, control, handle, and manipulate him to accomplish the
desired goal...will not be asked, much less investigated.
4. Did Israel have anything to do with what happened? Don't be shocked if it turns out that some of the alleged terrorists and extremist Muslim clerics he is said to have been in contact with
turn out to have been Mossad agents.
5. Will the public-at-large ever learn the truth about Ft. Hood?
No. At least not the AMERICAN
public.
I haven't bothered to go to the DU forum to see if the Shills there
have swung into action, but I'd bet money that at least some of them, particularly the Daisy chain
is already hard at work making sure that legitimate questions
aren't raised and explored without
insults and the other usual disinfo
tactics being deployed on behalf
of the perps.
Speaking of Afghanistan - those
who talk about the U.S. "winning"
don't know, or in the case of
the media and politicians, pretend
to not know that "winning" isn't
the goal there. The goal is to
make sure that the military and
security industries are "well fed"
so that there's no interruption
in campaign contributions to
politicians of both parties.
re: the new health care bill.
sections 7203 and 7201. The less evil of these sections, 7203, calls for $25,000 in fines and up to a year imprisonment for “defying” the federal mandate for getting insurance. That's the misdemeanor. The felony? A quarter of a million dollars in fines and up to five years in prison.
"Ft. Hood is the newest Pearl Harbor."
Great line.
Th other points are excellent too.
"re: the new health care bill.
sections 7203 and 7201. The less evil of these sections, 7203, calls for $25,000 in fines and up to a year imprisonment for “defying” the federal mandate for getting insurance. That's the misdemeanor. The felony? A quarter of a million dollars in fines and up to five years in prison."
Yeah, that seems to be pure rightwing disinfo bullshit.
Check the bill here:
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h3962/text
There are no sections 7201 and 7203.
In fatc, in the whole bill, the only thing about mandates is "‘(2) REPORTS AND FINDINGS- None of the reports submitted under this section or research findings disseminated by the Center or Commission shall be construed as mandates, for payment, coverage, or treatment." and "‘(1) COVERAGE- Nothing in this section shall be construed--‘(A) to permit the Center or Commission to mandate coverage, reimbursement, or other policies for any public or private payer;
Yeah, that seems to be pure rightwing disinfo bullshit.
Check the bill here:
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h3962/text
There are no sections 7201 and 7203.
i enter that url and it makes my computer freeze up so unfortunately i have to take your word for it that it is pure rightwing disinfo bullshit.
hopefully you are correct.
sorry your computer froze up-- the link is for the complete text of the bill, which is large and takes a while to load. You can also try downloading the PDF of te bill which is easily found by googling.
the thing is that conservatives have spreading tons of disinfo on the bill, so it's best not to take anything you read about it on face value.
Post a Comment
<< Home